Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Int Med Res ; 45(2): 781-791, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28415928

ABSTRACT

Objective This study was performed to investigate the incidence of and potential risk factors for rectal pain after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 300 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. We assessed the presence of rectal pain and categorized patients into Group N (no rectal pain) or Group P (rectal pain). Results In total, 288 patients were included. Of these patients, 39 (13.5%) reported rectal pain and 14 (4.9%) had rectal pain that persisted for >3 months. Univariate analysis revealed that patients in Group P had more preoperative chemoradiotherapy, more ileostomies, longer operation times, more anastomotic margins of <2 cm from the anal verge, more anastomotic leakage, and longer hospital stays. Multivariate analysis identified an anastomotic margin of <2 cm from the anal verge and a long operation time as risk factors. The presence of diabetes mellitus was a negative predictor of rectal pain. Conclusions In this study, the incidence of rectal pain after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery was 13.5%. An anastomotic margin of <2 cm from the anal verge and a long operation time were risk factors for rectal pain. The presence of diabetes mellitus was a negative predictor of rectal pain. Thus, the possibility of postoperative rectal pain should be discussed preoperatively with patients with these risk factors.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Pain/diagnosis , Proctoscopy/adverse effects , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anal Canal/pathology , Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/pathology , Diabetes Complications , Diabetes Mellitus/pathology , Female , Humans , Ileostomy/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Pain/etiology , Pain/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Pain Physician ; 19(3): 131-8, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27008286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidural block failures can occur due to a misleading loss of resistance (LOR) signal. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the false LOR rate and to determine whether the Epidrum, which is an LOR device for identifying the epidural space, improves the ability to find the epidural space during cervical epidural injection compared the LOR technique. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind trial. SETTING: Single academic medical center. METHODS: A total of 150 patients undergoing cervical interlaminar epidural injections at C7-T1 were randomized to receive either the LOR technique with a syringe (group C) or the Epidrum guidance (group E). Fluoroscopic images were used to confirm the accuracy of the needle placement within the epidural space. The rate of misleading epidural signals and adverse effects were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The false LOR rate was 74.7% for group C, 62.7% for group E, and 68.7% overall. The incidence of false LOR was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Also, the success rate and the rate of true epidural signals were similar between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: The Epidrum cannot be used to confirm whether the needle has entered the vascular space without fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we did not find any difference in accuracy between the Epidrum and the LOR technique with a syringe for detecting the cervical epidural space. The overall higher false LOR rate suggests that the combined use of fluoroscopy and LOR technique with a syringe or the Epidrum is necessary to increase the rate of finding the true cervical epidural space. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: KCT0001333.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Epidural Space/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Injections, Epidural/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Needles , Single-Blind Method
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(2): e273, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25590836

ABSTRACT

Perioperative risk factors were identified for acute kidney injury (AKI) defined by the RIFLE criteria (RIFLE = risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage) after surgery on the thoracic aorta with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in this case-control study. A retrospective review was completed for 702 patients who underwent surgery on the thoracic aorta with CPB. A total of 183 patients with AKI were matched 1:1 with patients without AKI by a propensity score. Matched variables included age, gender, body-mass index, preoperative creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate, a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, smoking history, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to exclude the influence of patient demographics, preoperative medical status, and baseline renal function. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate for independent risk factors in the matched sample of 366 patients. The incidence of AKI was 28.6% and 5.9% of patients from the entire sample required renal replacement therapy. AKI was associated with a prolonged postoperative hospital stay and a higher one-month and one-year mortality both in the entire and matched sample set. Independent risk factors for AKI were a left ventricular ejection fraction <55%, preoperative hemoglobin level <10 g/dL, albumin <4.0 g/dL, diagnosis of dissection, operation time >7 hours, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) time >30 min, pRBC transfusion >1000 mL, and FFP transfusion >500 mL. Although the incidence of poor glucose control (blood glucose >180 mg/dL) was higher in patients with AKI in matched sample, it was not an independent risk factor.AKI was still associated with a poor clinical outcome in the matched sample. Potentially modifiable risk factors included preoperative anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Efforts to minimize operation time and DHCA time along with transfusion amount may protect patients undergoing aortic surgery against AKI.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Case-Control Studies , Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Function Tests/methods , Kidney Function Tests/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Propensity Score , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL