Dysgeusia and COVID-19: the Importance of the Dentist in the Diagnostic

ABSTRACT: Dysgeusia is understood as changes in the perception of taste in patients infected with COVID-19 and has been frequently observed in the early stages of the disease. Along with the causes of dysgeusia, we can mention the correlation with infectious conditions, being of importance for the differential diagnosis. Dysgeusia can be considered one of the first manifestations of COVID-19, being an important contribution in the search for solutions regarding early diagnosis and treatment, in addition to its hospital and laboratory application.

RESUMEN: La disgeusia se entiende como cambios en la percepción del gusto en pacientes infectados por COVID-19 y se ha observado con frecuencia en las primeras etapas de la enfermedad. Junto a las causas de la disgeusia, podemos mencionar la correlación con patologías infecciosas, siendo de importancia para el diagnóstico diferencial. La disgeusia se puede considerar como una de las primeras manifestaciones del COVID-19, siendo un aporte importante en la búsqueda de soluciones en cuanto al diagnóstico y tratamiento precoces, además de su aplicación hospitalaria y de laboratorio.

Influence of the file format and transmission app on the radiographic diagnosis of caries lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of the radiographic image file format and the transmission application (app) on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty bitewing radiographs of 40 posterior human teeth placed in phantoms were acquired using the Digora Toto digital sensor. All images were exported as TIFF (Tagged Image File Format), BMP (Windows Bitmap), PNG (Portable Network Graphics), and JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) and transmitted online via WhatsApp and Messenger. Five examiners evaluated the radiographs with no online transmission and as transmitted through the 2 apps for the presence of proximal caries lesions using a 5-point scale. The reference standard for caries lesions was established using micro-computed tomography. Two-way analysis of variance compared values of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (α = .05). The kappa test was used to assess intra- and interexaminer agreement. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values showed no significant differences in the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions between the different image file formats (P ≥ .773) and transmission apps (P ≥ .608). Intraexaminer agreement was substantial (κ = 0.742) and interexaminer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.475). CONCLUSION: The digital file format and transmission app did not influence the radiographic diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.

Is the digital radiographic detection of approximal caries lesions influenced by viewing conditions?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of different viewing conditions (combinations of computer display, horizontal viewing angle, and ambient lighting) on the detection of approximal caries lesions on digital radiographic images. STUDY DESIGN: Forty posterior teeth were mounted in a plaster block and radiographed by using a CMOS sensor-based system. Three oral radiologists assessed the radiographic images under different conditions of computer display (iMac 5K 27", Barco MDRC-2124, and Dell P2314H), horizontal viewing angles (90 degrees, 67.5 degrees, and 45 degrees), and ambient lighting (low, medium, and high) and were asked to detect the presence of approximal caries lesions, which were confirmed by means of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared by analysis of variance testing (α = 0.05). Intra- and interobserver agreements were assessed with the Kappa test. RESULTS: Computer display, horizontal viewing angle, and ambient lighting did not significantly influence the diagnosis of approximal caries lesions. In general, moderate values of accuracy, low sensitivity, and high specificity were found for all viewing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The viewing conditions assessed in this study did not influence the detection of approximal caries lesions on digital radiographic images. Dental practitioners are encouraged to find their most comfortable viewing condition for this diagnostic task.

Influence of interpretation conditions on the subjective differentiation of radiographic contrast of images obtained with a digital intraoral system.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate interpretation conditions in the subjective in vitro assessment of dental tissue-equivalent radiographic contrast. STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic images with the density of dental structures were randomized and arranged in 20 sequences with images juxtaposed and separated. Twelve observers interpreted the sequence among the most radiolucent and radiopaque images with 3 displays, 3 horizontal viewing angles, and 3 ambient light conditions. The evaluation time was recorded. The hit percentage was calculated for each evaluation. Three-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test was used to compare the conditions of interpretation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess agreement (α = 0.05). RESULTS: No differences in hit percentages were found among the 3 displays or among the juxtaposed and separated images. Increased hit percentages were recorded for images assessed at 90° compared with 45° for all displays and in high ambient light vs intermediate and low light at 90°. Increased evaluation time was recorded for the consumer-grade display under high ambient light and for the separated images. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective in vitro assessment of dental tissue-equivalent radiographic contrast is not influenced by computer display, which should be viewed at a horizontal viewing angle of 90° and under high ambient light. Longer evaluation times may be expected with consumer-grade displays.

Can a high-density dental material affect the automatic exposure compensation of digital radiographic images?

OBJECTIVES:: To investigate the influence of high-density dental material on the automatic exposure compensation of digital radiographic imaging systems. METHODS:: Two radiographic phantoms were custom made to reproduce radiographic densities of the dental tissues: enamel, dentin and pulp chamber. The phantoms were X-rayed using the Digora Toto, Digora Optime and VistaScan systems for 0.063, 0.1 and 0.16 s. Radiographic acquisitions were repeated in the presence of a high-density material equivalent to a titanium implant, in the small and large sizes. Mean grey values of the dental tissue-equivalent regions were obtained with the Image J software, averaged and compared between the absence and presence of the high-density material using ANOVA for multiple comparisons and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS:: The presence of a high-density material significantly (p ≤ 0.05) decreased grey values of the dental tissue-equivalent images in the Digora Toto and VistaScan, regardless of the exposure time. For the Digora Optime, the high-density material decreased the pulp-equivalent grey values at all exposure times, the dentin-equivalent grey values significantly increased at exposure time of the 0.1 and 0.16 s, and the enamel-equivalent grey values significantly increased at the exposure time of 0.16 s (p ≤ 0.05). In general, the size of the high-density material did not affect the grey values significantly (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:: In general, the presence of a high-density dental material in digital radiographic systems influences the AEC by adjusting dental tissue-equivalent grey values.