Risk Factors for Unplanned Early Implantable Port Catheter Removal in Adult Hematology Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Purpose: Implantable port catheter is a reliable vascular access for chemotherapy infusion in cancer patients. However, patients with hematology malignancies usually present with a myriad of blood cell abnormalities that put them at risk of infection and mechanical problems requiring catheter removal. This study aims to determine the risk factors associated with unplanned (catheter removal other than completion of treatment plan) early (within 90 days of catheter implantation) implantable port catheter removal. Patients and Methods: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study of 386 patients with hematology malignancies who received implantable venous access ports between January 2015 and December 2022. We conducted a univariate analysis to select the variables for propensity score matching. Patients with unplanned early implantable port catheter removal (early group) were matched 1:1 to patients without unplanned early removal (non-early group). Results: Univariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference between early and non-early groups for age (p = 0.048), hemoglobin level (p = 0.028), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.025), and PG-SGA (p < 0.001). Thrombocytopenia was the only independent risk factor with a statistically significant difference in Cox proportional hazard analysis, HR 2.823, 95 CI 1.050-7.589, p = 0.040. The median catheter survival for patients with thrombocytopenia was 61 days (95% CI 28.58-93.42) compared to 150 days (95% CI 9.81-290.19) for patients without thrombocytopenia, p = 0.015. Patient survival is not affected by early catheter removal. The median survival for patients in the early group was 28.28 months (95% CI 27.43-29.15) compared to 32.39 months (95% CI 24.11-40.68), for the non-early group, p = 0.709. Conclusion: Hematology malignancy patients with thrombocytopenia are at high risk for unplanned early port catheter removal without survival difference.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections Are Associated with Infection Recurrence in Arteriovenous Grafts Treated with Revision.

Background and Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate whether Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) recur more frequently than other bacterial infections following treatment with revision. Materials and Methods: Operative procedures, including total excision, subtotal excision, and revision, were performed on 60 patients to treat 65 AVG infections. Final outcomes were classified as no infection recurrence, infection recurrence, and death without prior recurrence. In the competing risk setting, the cumulative incidence was estimated using the cumulative incidence function and Gray's test, and the associations between outcomes and different variables were estimated using a subdistribution hazard (SDH) model. Results: Comparing AVG infections with and without recurrence, PA infection was not associated with a higher risk of infection recurrence (p = 0.13); however, the first operative procedure type was associated with infection recurrence (p = 0.04). AVGs with PA infection were associated with a higher total number of surgical interventions (p < 0.05) than AVGs without PA infection. Regarding the cumulative incidences of outcomes, for AVGs treated with subtotal excision or revision, the cumulative incidence of recurrent infection was 3.3-fold higher for those with PA infection than without one year after the first surgery. However, when AVGs were treated with revision alone, the cumulative incidence was 4.1-fold. After excluding AVGs treated with total excision, the SDH model was applied, obtaining a hazard ratio for infection recurrence of 16.05 (p = 0.02) for AVGs with PA infection compared with AVGs without PA infection. No other variables were significantly associated with infection recurrence. Conclusions: For subtotal resection and revision, AVGs infected with PA had a higher recurrence rate than those infected with other species. However, revision surgery may aggravate the recurrence rate.

Insight into the Clonal Lineage and Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from Vascular Access Infections before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Patients receiving hemodialysis are at risk of vascular access infections (VAIs) and are particularly vulnerable to the opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Hemodialysis patients were also at increased risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study determined the change in the molecular and antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates from VAIs during the pandemic compared with before. A total of 102 S. aureus isolates were collected from VAIs between November 2013 and December 2021. Before the pandemic, 69 isolates were collected, 58%, 39.1%, and 2.9% from arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs), and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), respectively. The prevalence of AVG and TCC isolates changed to 39.4% and 60.6%, respectively, of the 33 isolates during the pandemic. Sequence type (ST)59 was the predominant clone in TCC methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and AVG-MRSA before the pandemic, whereas the predominant clone was ST8 in AVG-MRSA during the pandemic. ST59 carrying the ermB gene was resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin. By contrast, ST8 carrying the msrA gene was exclusively resistant to erythromycin. The ST distribution for different VAIs changed from before to during the pandemic. The change in antibiotic resistance rate for different VAIs was closely related to the distribution of specific STs.

Appraisal of lung cancer survival in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Introduction: The survival outcome of lung cancer patients with end-stage renal disease has been poorly studied in the literature. In this study, we evaluated the effect of end-stage renal disease on lung cancer survival. Material and methods: A retrospective, multicenter, matched-cohort study of lung cancer patients with end-stage renal disease under renal replacement therapy (WITH-ESRD) and without end-stage renal disease (WITHOUT-ESRD) was performed. One WITH-ESRD patient was matched to four WITHOUT-ESRD patients. Results: Baseline clinical characteristics did not differ statistically significantly after matching between the WITH-ESRD and WITHOUT-ESRD groups. WITH-ESRD included 133 patients and WITHOUT-ESRD included 532 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in median overall survival between WITH-ESRD patients and WITHOUT-ESRD patients (7.36 months versus 12.25 months, respectively, p = 0.133). Lung cancer WITH-ESRD patients receiving medical treatment had a median overall survival of 5.98 months (95% CI: 4.34-11.76) compared to 14.13 months (95% CI: 11.30-16.43) for WITHOUT-ESRD patients, p = 0.019. Although patients receiving surgical treatment compared to those receiving medical treatment had an improvement of survival by 46% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.19-1.53, p = 0.243), the difference did not reach statistical significance. Cox regression analysis revealed that male gender and stage IIIA-IV were independent factors associated with poor outcome for WITH-ESRD patients. Conclusions: In our limited experience, the survival for lung cancer with ESRD is not inferior to lung cancer patients without ESRD. The reasons for poor survival for the WITH-ESRD medical treatment group and late diagnosis despite frequent medical visits merit further investigation.

The role of venous pressure variability during hemodialysis in the prediction of impending arteriovenous graft occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Elevated venous pressure during hemodialysis (VPHD) is associated with arteriovenous graft (AVG) stenosis. This study investigated the role of VPHD variations in the prediction of impending AVG occlusion. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 118 operations to treat AVG occlusion (occlusion group) and 149 operations to treat significant AVG stenosis (stenosis group). In addition to analyzing the VPHD values for the three hemodialysis (HD) sessions prior to the intervention, VPHD values were normalized to mean blood pressure (MBP), blood flow rate (BFR), BFR × MBP, and BFR2 × MBP to yield ratios for analysis. The coefficient of variation (CV) was used to measure relative variations. RESULTS: The within-group comparisons for both groups revealed no significant differences in the VPHD mean and CV values among the three HD sessions prior to intervention. However, the CVs for VPHD/MBP, VPHD/(BFR × MBP), and VPHD/(BFR2 × MBP) exhibited significant elevation in the occlusion group during the last HD session prior to intervention compared with both the penultimate and antepenultimate within-group HD data (p < 0.05). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the CV for VPHD/(BFR2 × MBP) was the only parameter able to discriminate between the last and the penultimate HD outcomes (p < 0.001). According to a multivariate analysis, after controlling for covariates, CV for VPHD/(BFR2 × MBP) >8.76% was associated with a higher risk of AVG thrombosis (odds ratio: 3.17, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the variation in VPHD/(BFR2 × MBP) may increase the probability of AVG occlusion.

Aortic dissection assessment by 4D phase-contrast MRI with hemodynamic parameters: the impact of stent type.

BACKGROUND: To explore the diagnostic performance of 4-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D PC-MRI) in evaluating aortic dissection in different clinical scenarios. METHODS: The study group comprised 32 patients with a known aortic dissection who each underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA), and then 4D PC-MRI with a 1.5-T MR scanner. The 4D PC-MRI images were compared with the CTA images to evaluate the aortic size, branch identification, and iliac and femoral arterial access. RESULTS: The patients were divided into three groups: (I) patients diagnosed with Type B aortic dissection but did not undergo intervention (n=8); (II) patients with residual aortic dissection after open repair of Type A dissection (n=7); (III) patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair with or without open surgery (n=17). Without radiation or contrast media injection, 4D PC-MRI provided similar aortic images for patients in Group 1 and most of those in Group 2. In Group 3, stainless steel stents affected image quality in three patients. High-quality 4D PC-MRI images were obtained for the remaining 14 patients in Group 3, who had non-stainless steel stents, and provided major aortic information comparable to that provided by CTA with contrast media. The hemodynamic parameters of true and false lumens were evaluated between three patients with Type B aortic dissections and three patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for their aortic dissection. The stroke volume was higher in the true lumen of the patients with stent-grafts than in the patients with Type B aortic dissection without intervention. The regurgitant fraction, an indicator of nonlaminar flow, was higher in the false lumens than in the true lumens. All 32 patients in this study tolerated 4D PC-MRI without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: 4D PC-MRI is radiation- and contrast media-free option for imaging aortic dissection. It not only provided images comparable in quality to those obtained with CTA but also provided information on hemodynamic parameters, including endoleak detection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. 4D PC-MRI was safe and accurate in evaluating chronic Type B aortic dissection and residual aortic dissection after surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection. Therefore, it could be a potential tool in treating pathology in aortic dissection, especially for patients with malperfusion syndrome of visceral vessels and in young patients with renal function impairment. However, certain endograft materials, especially stainless steel, may prevent the further application of 4D PC-MRI and should be avoided.

Do the Paths of Sequential Vein Grafts Influence the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgeries?

BACKGROUND: The use of a sequential vein graft (SVG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in multi-vessel coronary disease is common. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the paths of SVGs on the outcomes of CABG. METHODS: From January 2011 to June 2017, 126 patients underwent elective isolated CABG. If the path of the SVG was from the aorta to the right coronary artery (RCA)/ posterior descending artery (PDA) to the left circumflex artery (LCX)/obtuse marginal artery (OM), the patients were included in Group R. If the path was from the aorta to the LCX/OM to the RCA/PDA, the patients were included in Group L. The in-hospital and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Group R had 69 patients, and Group L had 57 patients. Univariate analysis showed that Group L had a higher number of grafts (P < .001) and less aortic cross-clamping time (P < .001) and total bypass time (P = .001). Otherwise, Group L had 14 patients (19.3%), who received first diagonal branch (D1) bypass grafting, while Group R had none (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, in- hospital mortality from heart failure, postoperative acute kidney injury, medium-term mortality, and readmission for cardiac incidents were not associated with the SVG path. CONCLUSION: The SVG path from the aorta to the LCX/OM to the RCA/PDA facilitated the additional D1 bypass grafting, but the outcomes for this approach were not significantly different from those for the other path.

Does Interhospital Transfer Influence the Outcomes of Patients Receiving Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection? Type A Aortic Dissection: Is Transfer Hazardous or Beneficial?

INTRODUCTION: The progression of acute type A aortic dissection may cause immediate death, such that, in the event of its diagnosis, emergency surgery is indicated. Relatedly, an interhospital transfer may prolong the time from diagnosis to surgery. This study therefore investigated how interhospital transfers impact surgical outcomes for acute type A aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After excluding those patients who received deferred surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, 112 patients who received emergency surgery for the condition at our hospital from January 2011 to January 2018 were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups, one consisting of the patients who were sent directly to our emergency department (group 1) and the other consisting of the patients who were transferred from another hospital after first being diagnosed with type A aortic dissection (group 2). The collected data included the patient demographics, clinical characteristics, operative findings and methods, postoperative outcomes, latest follow-up time, and most recent status. RESULTS: There were 59 patients in group 1 and 53 patients in group 2. Univariate analysis revealed that group 1 had significantly more patients with a previous stroke (p = 0.007). Moreover, the average length of time from receiving a computed tomography (CT) scan to entering the operating room (OR) was shorter for the group 1 patients (p < 0.001). However, except for the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (14.5% versus 33.3%, p = 0.024), there was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of the operative findings and outcomes, such as hypotension before cardiopulmonary bypass, hemopericardium, other complications, and survival rate. Multivariate analysis showed that the independent predictors of hospital mortality included age > 61.5 years (p = 0.017), respiratory rate upon admission > 18.5 breaths/minute (p = 0.046), and total bypass time > 265.6 minutes (p = 0.015). For the patients who survived to discharge, log-rank analysis demonstrated similar cumulative survival rates for the two groups (p = 0.62). Further multivariate analysis showed that the risk of death after discharge was associated with the interval between the CT scan and OR entry (hazard ratio = 0.97 per minute; 95% confidence interval, 0.950-0.998; p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: In this study, it was found that interhospital transfer did not influence the surgical outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection. As such, it can be concluded that the transfer of the patients with type A aortic dissection to tertiary hospitals with experienced cardiac surgical teams may not increase the surgical risk.

Lung cancer outcome in the setting of chronic kidney disease: Does the glomerular filtration estimation formula matter?

BACKGROUND: The survival outcomes of lung cancer patients with coexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD) reported in the literature have been conflicting. We evaluate whether the survival of lung cancer patients with and without CKD differ significantly using two different formulas. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, propensity-matched study of lung cancer patients with and without CKD was conducted. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/minute. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine survival differences between CKD and non-CKD patients using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CKD-CG) compared to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Formula (CKD-EPI). RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics did not differ statistically significantly between the groups. The CKD-CG formula demonstrated median survival of 10.61 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.33-11.89) for the non-CKD group compared to 10.58 months (95% CI 9.03-12.13) for the CKD group (P = 0.76). The CKD-EPI formula demonstrated median survival of 9.10 months (95% CI 8.01-10.20) for the non-CKD group compared to 7.59 months (95% CI 6.50-8.68) for the CKD group (P = 0.19). Cox regression analysis using both models revealed that CKD is not an independent risk factor for mortality in lung cancer patients. Although the CKD-EPI formula revealed an increased risk of mortality and the CKD-CG formula revealed decreased survival, these results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Lung cancer survival did not differ significantly between CKD and non-CKD patients using either formula.

Is chronic kidney disease an adverse factor in lung cancer clinical outcome? A propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidity has a great impact on lung cancer survival. Renal function status may affect treatment decisions and drug toxicity. The survival outcome in lung cancer patients with coexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been fully evaluated. We hypothesized that CKD is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: A retrospective, propensity-matched study of 434 patients diagnosed between June 2004 and May 2012 was conducted. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/minute. Lung cancer and coexisting CKD patients were matched 1:1 to patients with lung cancer without CKD. RESULTS: Age, gender, smoking status, histology, and lung cancer stage were not statistically significantly different between the CKD and non-CKD groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a median survival of 7.26 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.06-8.46) in the CKD group compared with 7.82 months (95% CI 6.33-9.30) in the non-CKD group (P = 0.41). Lung cancer stage-specific survival is not affected by CKD. Although lung cancer patients with CKD presented with an increased risk of death of 6%, this result was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.93-1.22; P = 0.41). CONCLUSION: According to our limited experience, CKD is not an independent risk factor for survival in lung cancer patients. Clinicians should not be discouraged to treat lung cancer patients with CKD.

Blunt aortic injury: risk factors and impact of surgical approaches.

PURPOSE: This study reviews our 17-year experience of managing blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). METHODS: We analyzed information collected retrospectively from a tertiary trauma center. RESULTS: Between October 1995 and June 2012, 88 patients (74 male and 14 female) with a mean age of 39.9 ± 17.9 years (range 15-79 years) with proven BTAI were enrolled in this study. Their GCS, ISS, and RTS scores were 12.9 ± 3.7, 29.2 ± 9.8, and 6.9 ± 1.4, respectively. Twenty-one (23.8 %) patients were managed non-operatively, 49 (55.7 %) with open surgical repair, and 18 (20.5 %) with endovascular repair. The in-hospital mortality rate was 17.1 % (15/81) and there were no deaths in the endovascular repair group. The mean follow-up period was 39.9 ± 44.2 months. The survivors of blunt aortic injury had lower ISS, RTS, TRISS, and serum creatinine level and lower rate of massive blood transfusion, shock, and intubation than the patients who died, despite higher rates of endovascular repair, hemoglobin, and GCS on presentation. The degree of aortic injury, different therapeutic options, GCS, shock presentation, and intubation on arrival all had significant impacts on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Shock, aortic injury severity, coexisting trauma severity, and different surgical approaches impact survival. Endovascular repair achieves a superior mid-term result and is a reasonable option for treating BTAI.

Peritonitis as presentation of aorto-caval fistula with Salmonella choleraesuis-associated abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: The majority of aorto-caval fistulae occur spontaneously, either as a result of rupture of an existing atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm into the vena cava or secondary to iatrogenic injuries during peripheral angiography or surgery. Aorto-caval fistula from an infected aortic aneurysm is a rare scenario, but potentially lethal. METHODS: Case report and review of the literature. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old female with diabetes mellitus and liver cirrhosis was admitted for intractable abdominal pain with rebound tenderness. A computed tomography scan demonstrated an abdominal aortic aneurysm and ill-defined peri-aortic fluid with air density and evidence of a fistula between the aorta and the inferior vena cava. Salmonella cholerasuis had been isolated from a blood culture at a previous admission. Urgent endovascular exclusion of the aorto-caval fistula was carried out, and the infra-renal abdominal aneurysm was repaired using a Cook Zenith TX2 aortic stent graft. She received parenteral ceftriaxone for four weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This case shows acceptable short-term results after endovascular repair of a Salmonella-infected aorto-caval fistula.

Resuscitation of non-postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest with extracorporeal life support: the role of bridging to intervention.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the predictors of adverse outcomes of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in rescuing adult non-postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest (non-PC CS/CA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 adult patients receiving ECLS for non-PC CS/CA in a single institution between June 2003 and June 2010. The exclusion criteria were (1) pre-ECLS cardiac surgeries in the same admission and (2) age<18 years. Pre-ECLS and ECLS characteristics were compared in patients surviving to hospital discharge and those who did not. Mortalities after hospital discharge were also investigated. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients weaned from ECLS, 32 survived to discharge. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and myocarditis were the most common aetiologies in this study. Forty patients experienced pre-ECLS conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) and 29 required an ECLS-assisted CPR (E-CPR). Thirteen patients who received E-CPR had profound anoxic encephalopathy later. In-hospital mortality was similar in AMI patients who underwent emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after a failed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 43%, 5/11) and those who underwent PCI only (58%, 7/12). Aetiologies other than myocarditis (odds ratio (OR) 11.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-78.5), requirement for E-CPR (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.5-22.0) and profound anoxic encephalopathy (OR 8.9, 95% CI 2.0-40.5) were predictors of in-hospital mortality. No risk factors of mortality after hospital discharge were identified. CONCLUSION: ECLS was effective in bridging adults with non-PC CS/CA to definite treatments. Their prognosis depended on the cause of collapse and the severity of the post-cardiac arrest syndrome.

Prediction of major complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: the CGMH experience.

BACKGROUND: The in-hospital mortality of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is low but can be significant if catastrophic complications occur. To increase the safety of CABG, we aimed to establish a predictive model of major postoperative complications that incorporated patient characteristics and operative strategies. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed which included all consecutive patients receiving isolated CABG from August 2006 to February 2008 (n = 319). Patient characteristics were quantified by the additive EuroSCORE. Operative strategies were classified as cardioplegic arrest, on-pump beating, and off-pump. RESULTS: Four major complications were identified to be connected to the in-hospital mortality: (1) requirement of mechanical circulatory supports > 72 h (odds ratio [OR] 28.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0-139.9), (2) requirement of mechanical ventilator supports > 72 h (OR 9.5., 95%, CI 2.2- 42.7), (3) acute renal failure requiring dialysis (OR 9.2, 95% CI 2.2-38.3), (4) major gastrointestinal complications (OR 5.4., 95% CI 1.1-26.7). An increase of additive EuroSCORE (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4) and the cardioplegic strategy (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.0) were independent risk factors for major complications. The probability of one or more major complication was > 50% for patients receiving cardioplegic CABG with an additive EuroSCORE > 8. CONCLUSION: Dependence on the mechanical ventilator or circulatory supports > 72 h, acute renal failure requiring dialysis, and major gastrointestinal complications were major complications of CABG. The individual risk of having at least one of these complications could be predicted by the patient's preoperative EuroSCORE and operative strategy. A surgical plan tailored by institutional experiences on specific risk factors and aggressive therapeutic plans for major complications are helpful in improving the overall results of CABG.