Enhanced mechanic properties of calcium phosphate cements via mussel-inspired adhesive as bone substitute: Highlights of their interactions.

BACKGROUND: Inspired by natural bones, many organic components were added to Calcium Phosphate Cements (CPCs) to improve their mechanical strength. However, the strength of these composite CPCs is limited by the low strength of organic components itself and the weak interaction between organic components and CPCs. OBJECTIVE: Firstly, a composite CPC containing mussel-inspired adhesive, Poly-(Dopamine Methacrylamide-co-2-methoxy Ethylacrylate) (pDM) was developed. Secondly, the interactions between pDM and CPC and their effect on mechanical properties were investigated. METHODS: The interactions between pDM and CPC were performed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Laser Raman, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy and X-ray Diffraction Analysis. RESULTS: The toughness and compressive strength of pDM-CPC scaffold were both significantly enhanced, because of the enhanced interface binding strength among CPC and pDM due to their interaction and the improved mechanical strength of pDM owing to its self-oxidation cross-linking. The toughness of pDM-CPC scaffolds increased with the increased contents of pDM, while pDM-CPC scaffold containing 35 wt.% pDM had the highest compressive strength of all, which the latter was more than five times compared to that of CPC. CONCLUSION: The mechanically strong pDM-CPC scaffolds has potential application in bone regeneration as well as in craniofacial and orthopedic repair.

Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study.

Purpose Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) was effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase II Japanese trial. This regional trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in Asian patients with mCRC with or without exposure to biologic therapy. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial was conducted at 30 sites in China, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand. Patients ≥ 18 years old with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and known KRAS status who were refractory or intolerant to two or more prior chemotherapy regimens were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio; minimization method) to receive trifluridine/tipiracil (twice per day orally; 5 days on and 2 days off for 2 weeks, followed by 14 days off per cycle) or placebo. The primary end point was overall survival (intent-to-treat population). Results Between October 16, 2013, and June 15, 2015, 406 patients were randomly assigned to receive trifluridine/tipiracil (n = 271) or placebo (n = 135). Risk of death was significantly lower in the trifluridine/tipiracil arm than in the placebo arm (hazard ratio for death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; log-rank P = .035). Median overall survival was significantly longer in the trifluridine/tipiracil than in the placebo arm (7.8 months [95% CI, 7.1 to 8.8 months] v 7.1 months [95% CI, 5.9 to 8.2 months], respectively), for a median survival follow-up time of 13.8 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 15.3 months) compared with 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 17.3 months), respectively. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between the arms (trifluridine/tipiracil, n = 63 [23.2%]; placebo, n = 32 [23.7%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion Trifluridine/tipiracil has a statistically significant survival benefit compared with placebo in Asian patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies, regardless of exposure to biologic therapy. The safety profile is similar to previous reports.

Phase 1 study of oral TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety of TAS-102 administered twice daily (bid) on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 4-week cycle, confirm feasibility of the Japanese recommended dose (RD), 35 mg/m(2), in Western patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard chemotherapies, and describe preliminary antitumor activity. METHODS: This open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 study was conducted at four US centers. Patients were enrolled into two sequential cohorts [30 (cohort 1) or 35 mg/m(2)/dose bid (cohort 2)]; dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were evaluated during cycle 1 in dose-escalation cohorts. At RD, 15 additional patients were enrolled in an expansion cohort. RESULTS: Patients (N = 27) with refractory mCRC received TAS-102; 74 % had received ≥4 prior regimens. DLT was not observed in three patients in cohort 1, and was in one out of nine patients in cohort 2 (grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Therefore, RD was identified as 35 mg/m(2) bid. At RD, fatigue (63 %), gastrointestinal disturbances and nausea (46 %), vomiting (46 %), and diarrhea (42 %) were common but rarely grade 3/4. Grade 3/4 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea occurred at 4 % each. Grade 3/4 toxicity was predominantly hematologic [neutropenia (71 %), anemia (25 %)]; febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients. Stable disease lasting ≥6 weeks was achieved by 16 evaluable patients (70 %); median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3 and 7.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TAS-102 has an acceptable safety profile and preliminary evidence of disease stabilization in Western patients with refractory mCRC. Results from a randomized phase 3 study have shown survival benefit with disease stabilization evidence in this population.