ABSTRACT
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health issue, and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) plays an important role in the cardiovascular system. Previous studies have examined one important exon polymorphism, Pro12Ala, in PPARG with respect to mortality of CKD patients, but the results were inconsistent and current evidence is insufficient to support a strong conclusion. This study aimed to examine the correlation between Pro12Ala gene polymorphism and mortality among Asians with CKD by trial sequential analysis (TSA). Methods: The research was divided into observational research and meta-analysis. For the cohort study, 767 subjects from dialysis centers in Taipei were selected as samples, and tracked from December 2015 to February 2017. For the meta-analysis, relevant literature from "PubMed" and "Embase" databases (until December 2016), was searched and TSA was used to verify the results. In order to achieve the best evidence hierarchies, our retrospective cohort study was added to the meta-analysis and the TSA. Results: The combined sample size for Asian was 1,685 after adding our cohort study, and there was no significant correlation between PPARG Pro12Ala and mortality by the allele model (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.39-1.83, I2 = 79.3%). Under the parameter setting with the RR value of 1.5, TSA estimation presented that the cumulative sample size entered into the futility area, and it confirmed the conclusion in this study. Conclusion: We found that PPARG Pro12Ala gene polymorphism was not related to mortality in CKD Asians patients, and validated our conclusion using TSA after adding our sample.
ABSTRACT
For patients with acute myocardial infarction scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary stent implantation, in most cases a drug-eluting stent is recommended as the first choice for treatment. However, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents on patients with different types of myocardial infarction. Our objective was to explore the effects of bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents on patients with different types of myocardial infarction in terms of major cardiovascular incidents. This retrospective cohort study included 934 patients with myocardial infarction undergoing coronary artery stent implantation for the first time at the cardiac catheter room of the Tri-Service General Hospital in the Neihu District between 2014 and 2018. Patients' information, including demographic data, laboratory data, cardiac echocardiography results, and angiocardiography results, was collected by reviewing medical records. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust the potential confounding factors, and the adjusted data were then used to compare the correlation between different types of stents and major cardiovascular incidents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. After the confounding factors were adjusted, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving a drug-eluting stent compared with those receiving a bare-metal stent, it was found that the mortality risk was lower in terms of all causes of death (Adj-HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.14-0.48, p < 0.001) and cardiogenic death (Adj-HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.08-0.55, p = 0.002), the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction was lower (Adj-HR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.04-0.73, p = 0.017), and there was no difference in the risk of revascularization at the lesion site (Adj-HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.24-1.43, p = 0.243). It terms of the findings in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, those receiving a drug-eluting stent had a lower risk of revascularization at the lesion site (Adj-HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.24-0.97, p = 0.04); however, there was no difference in the mortality risk in terms of all causes of death (Adj-HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.37-1.35, p = 0.296) or cardiogenic death (Adj-HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.18-1.90, p = 0.379),or in the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (Adj-HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.06-1.25, p = 0.093). Compared with bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents provide better protection against death to receivers with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; however, this protection is decreased in receivers with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. It is recommended that for patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction who are indicated to receive a drug-eluting stent, the clinical effectiveness of the treatment must be considered.