Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 6849, 2023 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37101001

ABSTRACT

There are significant risks of adverse events following oesophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), such as stricture, delayed bleeding and perforation. Therefore, it is necessary to protect artificial ulcers and promote the healing process. The current study was performed to investigate the protective role of a novel gel against oesophageal ESD-associated wounds. This was a multicentre, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial that recruited participants who underwent oesophageal ESD in four hospitals in China. Participants were randomly assigned to the control or experimental group in a 1:1 ratio and the gel was used after ESD in the latter. Masking of the study group allocations was only attempted for participants. The participants were instructed to report any adverse events on post-ESD days 1, 14, and 30. Moreover, repeat endoscopy was performed at the 2-week follow-up to confirm wound healing. Among the 92 recruited patients, 81 completed the study. In the experimental group, the healing rates were significantly higher than those in the control group (83.89 ± 9.51% vs. 73.28 ± 17.81%, P = 0.0013). Participants reported no severe adverse events during the follow-up period. In conclusion, this novel gel could safely, effectively, and conveniently accelerate wound healing following oesophageal ESD. Therefore, we recommend applying this gel in daily clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Diseases , Stomach Neoplasms , Stomach Ulcer , Humans , Ulcer/etiology , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Stomach Ulcer/etiology , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Single-Blind Method , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology
2.
Mol Med Rep ; 12(5): 7749-55, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26460178

ABSTRACT

Disease biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes are most likely within an extremely low concentration range and are thus masked by the presence of high­abundance proteins. Therefore, removing high­abundance proteins is the main challenge for identifying disease biomarkers. In addition, the solution obtained from high­abundance protein depletion kits contains a rich array of compounds, which interfere with isoelectric focusing (IEF). In the present study, the effect of two commercial kits was evaluated and the downstream IEF protocol was optimized. High­resolution results could be obtained according to the following conditions: The ProteoPrep Blue Albumin and IgG Depletion kit depleted albumin and IgG; immobilized pH gradient strips (typically 18 cm) were rehydrated with sample buffer containing 250 µg serum proteins at 30 v for 6 h, 60 v for 6 h, 200 v for 2 h, 500 v for 2 h, 1,000 v for 2 h, 5,000 v for 2 h, 10,000 v for 2 h and then focusing at 10,000 v up to 110 k vhs. In addition, the protein spots identified by matrix­assisted laser desorption ionization time­of­flight mass spectrometry demonstrated that all proteins had a low abundance. The present study not only provides a definite and effective method for removing high­abundance proteins, but also provides a proper protocol (protocol C) for downstream IEF. The present study includes a comprehensive investigation of serum proteomics, which paves the way for serum protein research.


Subject(s)
Blood Proteins/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/isolation & purification , Isoelectric Focusing/methods , Proteomics/methods , Serum Albumin/isolation & purification , Adult , Colonic Neoplasms/blood , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...