Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 19(4): 584-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24994702

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report the mid-term results of aortic root replacement using a self-assembled biological composite graft, consisting of a vascular tube graft and a stented tissue valve. METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2011, 201 consecutive patients [median age 66 (interquartile range, IQR, 55-77) years, 31 female patients (15.4%), median logistic EuroSCORE 10 (IQR 6.8-23.2)] underwent aortic root replacement using a stented tissue valve for the following indications: annulo-aortic ectasia or ascending aortic aneurysm with aortic valve disease in 162 (76.8%) patients, active infective endocarditis in 18 (9.0%) and acute aortic dissection Stanford type A in 21 (10.4%). All patients underwent clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. We analysed survival and valve-related events. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.5%. One- and 5-year cardiac-related mortality rates were 3 and 6%, and overall survival was 95 ± 1.5 and 75 ± 3.6%, respectively. The rate of freedom from structural valve failure was 99% and 97 ± 0.4% at the 1- and 5-year follow-up, respectively. The incidence rates of prosthetic valve endocarditis were 3 and 4%, respectively. During a median follow-up of 28 (IQR 14-51) months, only 2 (1%) patients required valve-related redo surgery due to prosthetic valvular endocarditis and none suffered from thromboembolic events. One percent of patients showed structural valve deterioration without any clinical symptoms; none of the patients suffered greater than mild aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement using a self-assembled biological composite graft is an interesting option. Haemodynamic results are excellent, with freedom from structured valve failure. Need for reoperation is extremely low, but long-term results are necessary to prove the durability of this concept.


Subject(s)
Aorta/surgery , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Bioprosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Aged , Aorta/physiopathology , Aortic Diseases/diagnosis , Aortic Diseases/mortality , Aortic Diseases/physiopathology , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Heart Valve Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Hemodynamics , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Switzerland , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL