ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reproducibility of the high frequency tympanometry (HFT) test measured in healthy infants. A total of 273 newborn babies (106 males and 147 females) were assessed twice (Test 1 and Test 2) on the same day, followed by two more assessments (Test 3 and Test 4) for 118 babies (48 males and 70 females) who returned six weeks later. Five HFT measures including the peak compensated static admittance and component compensated static admittance were assessed for test-retest reproducibility. The results showed no significant differences in mean values of the HFT results between the test and retest conditions for newborn (Test 1/ Test 2) and six-week-old babies (Test 3/ Test 4). High reproducibility for all HFT measures was found for both age groups, as judged by the high intra-correlation coefficients of between 0.75 and 0.95. Normal variations of the HFT measures were established using the 90% range of absolute test-retest difference. Changes in test-retest findings exceeding the 95th percentile values may be considered significant, indicating possible functional changes.
Subject(s)
Acoustic Impedance Tests/standards , Neonatal Screening/standards , Audiometry, Evoked Response , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare the high frequency (1 kHz) tympanometry (HFT) and acoustic reflex (AR) measures obtained from infants at birth and at 6-7 weeks of age. HFT results and AR thresholds using a 2-kHz tone and broadband noise activators were obtained from 42 healthy full-term neonates (15 boys and 27 girls) at both test sessions, separated by six weeks. The results showed that the mean values of HFT test parameters and AR thresholds obtained at 6-7 weeks were generally greater than those obtained at birth. In particular, the differences in mean values of uncompensated admittance at 200 daPa, uncompensated peak admittance, uncompensated peak susceptance, peak-compensated static admittance, and AR thresholds with a 2 kHz tone and broadband noise were found to be statistically significant. The findings from this study suggest the need to have separate sets of normative HFT and AR data for infants at birth and 6-7 weeks.
Subject(s)
Acoustic Impedance Tests/methods , Neonatal Screening , Reflex, Acoustic/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Ear, Middle/physiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Sound SpectrographyABSTRACT
The present study aimed to compare three measures to estimate middle ear admittance in neonates using 1000 Hz tympanometry. Data were obtained from 36 full-term newborns, aged between 24 and 123 hours, who passed a transient evoked otoacoustic emissions test and assessed using a Madsen Otoflex impedance meter. The results showed that the mean middle ear admittances obtained by compensating for the susceptance and conductance components at a pressure of 200 daPa and -400 daPa (Y(CC200) = 1.00 mmho and Y(CC-400) = 1.24 mmho, respectively) were significantly greater than that using the traditional baseline compensation method (Y(BC) = 0.65 mmho). Although Y(CC-400) has attained the highest mean value, it has the lowest test-retest reliability. Hence, the component compensation approach compensated at 200 daPa holds promise as an alternative method for estimating middle ear admittance in neonates. Further research to evaluate its test performance using clinical decision theory is required to determine its clinical significance.
