Presynaptic and postsynaptic mesolimbic dopamine D3 receptors play distinct roles in cocaine versus opioid reward in mice.

BACKGROUND: Past research illuminated pivotal roles of dopamine D3 receptors (D3Rs) in the rewarding effects of cocaine and opioids. However, the cellular and neural circuit mechanisms underlying these actions remain unclear. METHODS: We employed Cre-LoxP techniques to selectively delete D3R from presynaptic dopamine neurons or postsynaptic dopamine D1R-expressing neurons in male and female mice. We utilized RNAscope in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, voltammetry, optogenetics, microdialysis, and behavioral assays (n≥8) to functionally characterize the roles of presynaptic versus postsynaptic D3Rs in cocaine and opioid actions. RESULTS: Our results revealed D3R expression in ∼20% of midbrain dopamine neurons and ∼70% of D1R-expressing neurons in the nucleus accumbens. While D2R was expressed in ∼80% dopamine neurons, we found no D2R and D3R colocalization among these cells. Selective deletion of D3Rs from dopamine neurons increased exploratory behavior in novel environments and enhanced pulse-evoked NAc dopamine release. Conversely, D3R deletion from D1R-expressing neurons attenuated locomotor responses to D1-like and D2-like agonists. Strikingly, D3R deletion from either cell type reduced oxycodone self-administration and oxycodone-enhanced brain-stimulation reward. In contrast, neither of these D3R deletions impacted cocaine self-administration, cocaine-enhanced brain-stimulation reward, or cocaine-induced hyperlocomotion. Furthermore, D3R knockout in dopamine neurons reduced oxycodone-induced hyperactivity and analgesia, while deletion from D1R-expressing neurons potentiated opioid-induced hyperactivity without affecting analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: We dissected presynaptic versus postsynaptic D3R function in the mesolimbic dopamine system. D2R and D3R are expressed in different populations of midbrain dopamine neurons, regulating dopamine release. The mesolimbic D3Rs are critically involved in the actions of opioids but not cocaine.

AM6527, a neutral CB1 receptor antagonist, suppresses opioid taking and seeking, as well as cocaine seeking in rodents without aversive effects.

Preclinical research has demonstrated the efficacy of CB1 receptor (CB1R) antagonists in reducing drug-taking behavior. However, clinical trials with rimonabant, a CB1R antagonist with inverse agonist profile, failed due to severe adverse effects, such as depression and suicidality. As a result, efforts have shifted towards developing novel neutral CB1R antagonists without an inverse agonist profile for treating substance use disorders. Here, we assessed AM6527, a CB1R neutral antagonist, in addiction animal models. Our findings revealed that AM6527 did not affect cocaine self-administration under fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules but dose-dependently inhibited it under progressive-ratio reinforcement schedules. Additionally, AM6527 dose-dependently inhibited heroin self-administration under both fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio reinforcement schedules and oral sucrose self-administration under a fixed-ratio reinforcement schedule, as well as cocaine- or heroin-triggered reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in rats. However, chronic AM6527 administration for five consecutive days significantly inhibited heroin self-administration only during the initial two days, indicating tolerance development. Notably, AM6527 did not produce rewarding or aversive effects by itself in classical electrical intracranial self-stimulation and conditioned place preference tests. However, in optical intracranial self-stimulation (oICSS) maintained by optogenetic stimulation of midbrain dopamine neurons in DAT-cre mice, both AM6527 and rimonabant dose-dependently inhibited dopamine-dependent oICSS behavior. Together, these findings suggest that AM6527 effectively reduces drug-taking and seeking behaviors without rimonabant-like adverse effects. Thus, AM6527 warrants further investigation as a potential pharmacotherapy for opioid and cocaine use disorders.

Efficacy of Lacosamide and Rufinamide as Adjuncts to Midazolam-Ketamine Treatment Against Cholinergic-Induced Status Epilepticus in Rats.

Benzodiazepine pharmacoresistance develops when treatment of status epilepticus (SE) is delayed. This response may result from gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors (GABAAR) internalization that follows prolonged SE; this receptor trafficking results in fewer GABAAR in the synapse to restore inhibition. Increase in synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) also occurs in rodent models of SE. Lacosamide, a third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM), acts on the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Another ASM, rufinamide, similarly acts on sodium channels by extending the duration of time spent in the inactivation stage. Combination therapy of the benzodiazepine midazolam, NMDAR antagonist ketamine, and ASMs lacosamide (or rufinamide) was investigated for efficacy against soman (GD)-induced SE and neuropathology. Adult male rats implanted with telemetry transmitters for monitoring electroencephalographic (EEG) activity were exposed to a seizure-inducing dose of GD and treated with an admix of atropine sulfate and HI-6 1 minute later and with midazolam monotherapy or combination therapy 40 minutes after EEG seizure onset. Rats were monitored continuously for seizure activity for two weeks, after which brains were processed for assessment of neurodegeneration, neuronal loss, and neuroinflammatory responses. Simultaneous administration of midazolam, ketamine, and lacosamide (or rufinamide) was more protective against GD-induced SE compared with midazolam monotherapy. In general, lacosamide triple therapy had more positive outcomes on measures of epileptogenesis, EEG power integral, and the number of brain regions protected from neuropathology compared with rats treated with rufinamide triple therapy. Overall, both drugs were well tolerated in these combination models. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We currently report on improved efficacy of antiseizure medications lacosamide and rufinamide, each administered in combination with ketamine (NMDAR antagonist) and midazolam (benzodiazepine), in combatting soman (GD)-induced seizure, epileptogenesis, and brain pathology over that provided by midazolam monotherapy, or dual therapy of midazolam and lacosamide (or rufinamide) in rats. Administration of lacosamide as adjunct to midazolam and ketamine was particularly effective against GD-induced toxicity. However, protection was incomplete, suggesting the need for further study.