Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(3)2024 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38541110

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Vaccination is one means of SARS-CoV-2 prevention and control. However, despite the effectiveness of vaccination, adverse reactions continue to require vigilance and monitoring. The researchers emphasize the possibility that some of the reported side effects may be psychological in origin. Based on this hypothesis, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the emotional dispositions of healthcare workers who experienced emotions before vaccination and adverse reactions after vaccination. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted between February and May 2021 in the Kaunas Clinics of the University of Health Sciences. A total of 2117 employees of the clinic departments who were vaccinated with two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine participated in this study. Statistical analysis was performed on the data using IBM SPSS Statistics®. Results: Most participants (74.5%) experienced systemic (including local) adverse events; 16.5% experienced only local adverse events, and 9.1% experienced no adverse events. The frequency of systemic (including local) adverse events reduced with increasing age (p < 0.05). The main emotions that participants experienced before vaccination were anxiety (37.88%) and happiness (39.02%). Systemic (including local) adverse events occurred 1.26 times more frequently in women than men (77.44% vs. 61.6%, p < 0.05), while local adverse events occurred 1.4 times more often in male participants than in female participants (21.39% vs. 15.27%, p < 0.05). Among the respondents who did not experience adverse events, the most common emotion felt was happiness (25.5%), and most of the participants who experienced systemic (including local) adverse events felt anxiety (42.6%). Conclusions: The information about vaccination and potential adverse events should be targeted at younger persons. It is recommended that women, more than men, should receive professional counseling from psychologists or psychotherapists. The public dissemination of positive messages about the benefits and safety of vaccines prior to a vaccination campaign may alleviate the tension or anxiety felt regarding potential adverse events. Healthcare specialists-both those who work directly with vaccines and those who do not-should maintain a positive psychological attitude towards vaccination, as this can increase patient satisfaction with the benefits of vaccines.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , Emotions , Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Male , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects
2.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 29(1): 2284257, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of multimorbidity among older people in Lithuania and other Central-Eastern European countries leads to a greater patient treatment burden and puts additional pressure on healthcare services. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate the Lithuanian version of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ). METHODS: The Lithuanian version of the MTBQ was tested (2021-2022) with 789 patients from seven Lithuanian primary care centres who had two or more long-term conditions. The questionnaire translation's reliability, validity and dimensionality of the were assessed with Spearman's rank correlation, Cronbach's alpha, and factor reduction analysis. Treatment burden and its associations with sociodemographic and other indicators were analysed. RESULTS: Lithuanian version of MTBQ had good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.711), validity, factor reduction applicability, and interpretability. The MTBQ scores of the questionnaire had a negative association with the quality-of-life scale (r=-0.327, 95% CI [-0.389, -0.264]) and positive associations with the self-rated health scores (r = 0.230, 95% CI [0.163, 0.297]) and with the number of comorbidities (r = 0.164, 95% CI [0.097, 0.233]). Distribution of treatment burden was identified (none (19,4%), low (46,6%), medium (25%), high (9%)). High treatment burden was found to be associated with having five or more long-term diseases, taking five or more medications, having anxiety or depression and living in a rural area. CONCLUSION: The study's findings show that the MTBQ is applicable in assessing the treatment burden of multimorbid patients in Lithuania. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that Lithuanian patients with multimorbidity have average treatment burden scores similar to or higher than participants in previous MTBQ validation studies.


• The Lithuanian version of MTBQ features good content validity, internal reliability, and construct validity, and is suitable for assessing treatment burden of patients with multimorbidity in Lithuania.• The study demonstrated that Lithuanian patients with multimorbidity had average treatment burden scores similar to or higher than participants in previous MTBQ validation studies.


Subject(s)
Multimorbidity , Primary Health Care , Humans , Aged , Lithuania , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Psychometrics
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(2)2023 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36837477

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Although multimorbidity poses many challenges for both individuals and healthcare systems, information on how these patients assess the quality of their healthcare is lacking. This study assessed the multimorbid patients' satisfaction with their healthcare. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was a part of a project Joint Action-Chronic Diseases and Promoting Healthy Ageing across the Life Cycle and its implementation. The study included 400 patients with arterial hypertension and at least one concomitant chronic disease. Patients completed The Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions Plus (PACIC+) questionnaire, EuroQol Five-Dimensions-Three-Level Quality of Life questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Results: The mean age of the participants was 65.38 years; there were 52.5% women. The mean PACIC+ 5As summary score was 3.60. With increasing age, participants rated worse on most PACIC+ subscales. Participants who assessed their quality of life as worse were also less satisfied with their healthcare. The presence of three or more concomitant diseases negatively affected PACIC+ scores. Patients with ischemic heart disease and heart failure had lower PACIC+ scores on most subscales, whereas patients with atrial fibrillation had lower scores only on the Agree subscale. The presence of diabetes was not associated with worse PACIC+ scores; moreover, the scores in Assist and Arrange subscales were even better in diabetic patients (3.36 vs. 2.80, p = 0.000 and 3.69 vs. 3.13, p = 0.008, respectively). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and musculoskeletal disorders showed lower PACIC+ scores. Conclusions: Older age, worse self-assessed health state, presence of three or more diseases, and certain chronic diseases were associated with lower patients' satisfaction with their healthcare. Personalized healthcare, increasing competencies of primary healthcare teams, healthcare services accessibility, and financial motivation of healthcare providers may increase multimorbid patients' satisfaction with their healthcare.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Multimorbidity , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires , Chronic Disease , Personal Satisfaction
4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(3)2022 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35334616

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: The safety and effectiveness of vaccines are among the key priorities in COVID-19 pandemic management. Moreover, evidence-based data regarding vaccine safety and immunogenicity can play an important role in building the trust of the community regarding vaccination. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine among healthcare workers in one hospital, 21 days after first dose. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences between February and March 2021. Hospital employees who arrived to receive the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine 21 days after the first one were invited to participate in the study: they were asked to complete an anonymous adverse events questionnaire and were offered a SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM rapid test. The study was performed at a single point, 21 days after the first dose of the vaccine. Results: Data of 4181 vaccine recipients were analysed. The first vaccine dose was associated with a 53.6% incidence of adverse events, mainly local reactions. Adverse events occurred more frequently in younger participants and women. Moderate adverse events were experienced by 1.4% of the vaccine recipients; 6.2% were incapacitated. Of the 3439 participants who performed a rapid IgG test, 94.5% were positive for IgG antibodies after the first vaccine dose. Seroconversion rates were lower in participants older than 47 years. Conclusions: Despite 1.4% moderate adverse events, no safety concerns or anaphylaxis were identified. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine induced an immune response in the overwhelming majority of recipients after a single dose. Younger participants experienced adverse events and were positive for IgG antibodies more frequently than older counterparts. It is important to mention that this study specifically considered short-term safety and reactions following vaccination and that long-term adverse effects were not investigated in the study. Thus, future research into both long-term adverse reactions and immune system programming is essential.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Pandemics , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Inquiry ; 58: 469580211011933, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33890509

ABSTRACT

Dementia is considered to be a significant cause of disability and dependency for older people worldwide and it raises difficulties in providing adequate formal and informal assistance. Research on the experience of long-term care (LTC)services for older people with dementia is scarce in Eastern European countries. This study aimed to understand the system of care for older people with dementia from the perspective of health and social care workers providing LTC services in Lithuania. A total of 72 primary health care and social care professionals from public and private institutions in Kaunas city participated in this study. One-to-one interviews were conducted with family physicians, community nurses, psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and social workers. A vignette situation of 2 fictitious patients with dementia and their informal caregiver was discussed during the interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis by induction approach. The data revealed 2 main themes: LTC provision trajectory, and three-dimensional relationship perception in realization of LTC activities. LTC provision trajectory reflected activities performed as a response to the described situation embracing formal procedures for the endorsement of LTC needs as well as the range of LTC services. The three-dimensional perception of relationships in LTC services' implementation reflected the participants' personal approach toward LTC, relationship with different specialists, and the informal caregiver. Our study revealed the potential of complex measures that could be instrumental for the refinement of the caregiving process. First, a change in the additional care requirements endorsement logic is needed, shifting focus from medical diagnosis to functional abilities assessment. Second, to establish clear procedures for formal cooperation between the health and social care sectors in the trajectory of LTC service provision. Finally, to find an adequate balance between LTC and institutional care by creating a more comprehensive range of LTC services. A more consistent and coordinated delivery of services by both health and social care sectors seems to be an untapped resource for the improvement of the LTC potential.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Long-Term Care , Aged , Caregivers , Humans , Social Support , Social Work
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707791

ABSTRACT

Multimorbidity, the coexistence of several chronic conditions in a patient, represents a great challenge for healthcare systems and society. The Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model (IMCM) was recently designed within the Joint Action on chronic diseases and promoting healthy ageing across the life cycle (CHRODIS) to ensure the continuity of care for patients with multimorbidity. The IMCM was implemented in five European pilot sites in Spain, Italy, and Lithuania, within the Joint Action CHRODIS-PLUS. The effect of these pilot interventions was assessed pre- and post-implementation by 17 healthcare managers, using the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) measure, and by 226 patients with the Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC+) survey. The ACIC total score significantly increased (5.23 to 6.71, p = 0.022) after the intervention, with differences across sites. A significant increase in the PACIC+ summary score was found ranging from 3.25 at baseline to 4.03 after the intervention (p < 0.001), and 58% of the sample perceived an improvement in care. Higher PACIC+ scores after the intervention were associated to lower baseline values in the respective PACIC+ dimension and to greater changes in ACIC Part 1 (delivery system organization). The IMCM implementation can help improve the quality of care for patients with multimorbidity.


Subject(s)
Multimorbidity , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Lithuania , Male , Spain
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31835691

ABSTRACT

Patients with multimorbidity (defined as the co-occurrence of multiple chronic diseases) frequently experience fragmented care, which increases the risk of negative outcomes. A recently proposed Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model aims to overcome many issues related to fragmented care. In the context of Joint Action CHRODIS-PLUS, an implementation methodology was developed for the care model, which is being piloted in five sites. We aim to (1) explain the methodology used to implement the care model and (2) describe how the pilot sites have adapted and applied the proposed methodology. The model is being implemented in Spain (Andalusia and Aragon), Lithuania (Vilnius and Kaunas), and Italy (Rome). Local implementation working groups at each site adapted the model to local needs, goals, and resources using the same methodological steps: (1) Scope analysis; (2) situation analysis-"strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats" (SWOT) analysis; (3) development and improvement of implementation methodology; and (4) final development of an action plan. This common implementation strategy shows how care models can be adapted according to local and regional specificities. Analysis of the common key outcome indicators at the post-implementation phase will help to demonstrate the clinical effectiveness, as well as highlight any difficulties in adapting a common Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model in different countries and clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Multimorbidity , Patient Care Planning , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Lithuania , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Pilot Projects , Program Development , Rome , Spain
8.
Int J Ment Health Syst ; 13: 55, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31417610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Changes in the demographics and respective growth of life expectancy and social needs make informal caregiving crucial component of comprehensive health and social care network, which substantially contributes to the health and well-being of the elderly. The purpose of this paper is to understand the system of care of elderly patients with mental disorders from the perspective of informal caregivers in Lithuania. METHODS: We conducted five semi-structured focus group discussions with 31 informal caregivers attending to elderly patients with mental disorders. The data were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was subsequently performed. RESULTS: Five thematic categories were established: (1) the current state of care-receivers: representation of the complexity of patients' physical and mental condition. (2) The current state of caregivers: lack of formal caregivers' integration as a team; inadequate formal involvement of informal caregivers. (3) Basic care needs: the reflection of the group needs relating directly to the patient, care organisation and the caretaker. (4) The (non-) Readiness of the existing system to respond to the needs for care: long-term care reliance on institutional services, lack of distinction between acute/immediate care and nursing, lack of integration between the medical sector and the social care sector. (5) Potential trends for further improvement of long-term care for the elderly with mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening of the care network for elderly patients with mental disorders should cover more than a personalised and comprehensive assessment of the needs of patients and their caregivers. Comprehensive approaches, such as formalization of informal caregivers' role in the patient care management and planning, a more extensive range of available services and programs supported by diverse sources of funding, systemic developments and better integration of health and social care systems are essential for making the system of care more balanced.

9.
J Interprof Care ; 33(6): 670-679, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30999774

ABSTRACT

During past decades the science of collaboration in health care has progressed significantly worldwide, although in some regions (e.g.: Central and Eastern Europe) these processes are slower. The aim of this study was to develop a new, multidimensional measurement tool of the developing collaboration in primary health care (PHC). This study included both qualitative (thematic analysis of the data from focus group discussions) and quantitative (a 36-item cross-sectional questionnaire) methods in order to develop and test a new measurement scale. The collaboration scale between community nurses (CNs) and general practitioners (GPs) in primary health-care teams (COPAN scale) was created. It initially revealed five determining factors: "Goal Oriented Team Synergy", "Team Structure and Leadership", "Organizational Background for Teamwork", "Competence" and "Diffusion of Functions." Two and three-factor scales (COPAN-2 and COPAN-3) were developed after confirmatory factor analysis with sufficient psychometric characteristics to be applied in practice. This study reports the reliability of a novel tool that can be used to measure collaboration of CNs and GPs in PHC. The newly developed scale has the potential to become an easy-to-use tool in the monitoring of teamwork situations within PHC settings of low integration or newly evolving teams.


Subject(s)
Community Health Nursing , Cooperative Behavior , General Practitioners , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Clinical Competence , Female , Focus Groups , Goals , Humans , Leadership , Lithuania , Male , Psychometrics , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 23(1): 114-120, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28394192

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the importance of primary care to healthcare systems and population health, it seems crucial to identify factors that contribute to the quality of primary care. Professional satisfaction has been linked with quality of primary care. Physician dissatisfaction is considered a risk factor for burnout and leaving medicine. OBJECTIVES: This study explored factors associated with professional satisfaction in seven European countries. METHODS: A survey was conducted among primary care physicians. Estonia, Finland, Germany and Hungary used a web-based survey, Italy and Lithuania a telephone survey, and Spain face to face interviews. Sociodemographic information (age, sex), professional experience and qualifications (years since graduation, years of experience in general practice), organizational variables related to primary care systems and satisfaction were included in the final version of the questionnaire. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors associated with satisfaction among physicians. RESULTS: A total of 1331 primary care physicians working in primary care services responded to the survey. More than half of the participants were satisfied with their work in primary care services (68.6%). We found significant associations between satisfaction and years of experience (OR = 1.01), integrated network of primary care centres (OR = 2.8), patients having direct access to specialists (OR = 1.3) and professionals having access to data on patient satisfaction (OR = 1.3). Public practice, rather than private practice, was associated with lower primary care professional satisfaction (OR = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Elements related to the structure of primary care are associated with professional satisfaction. At the individual level, years of experience seems to be associated with higher professional satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Job Satisfaction , Physicians, Primary Care/psychology , Primary Health Care , Specialization , Access to Information , Adult , Europe , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Fam Pract ; 32(1): 69-74, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25411423

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to measure clinical quality by doing an audit of clinical records and to compare the performance based on clinical quality indicators (CQI) for hypertension and type 2 diabetes across seven European countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. METHODS: Two common chronic conditions in primary care (PC), hypertension and type 2 diabetes, were selected for audit. The assessment of CQI started with a literature review of different databases: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization, European Commission European Community Health Indicators, US National Library of Medicine. Data were collected from clinical records. RESULTS: Although it was agreed to obtain the clinical indicators in a similar way from each country, the specific data collection process in every country varied greatly, due to different traditions in collecting and keeping the patients' data, as well as differences in regulation regarding access to clinical information. Also, there was a huge variability across countries in the level of compliance with the indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of clinical performance in PC by audit is methodologically challenging: different databases provide different information, indicators of quality of care have insufficient scientific proof and there are country-specific regulations. There are large differences not only in quality of health care across Europe but also in how it is measured.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Hypertension/therapy , Medical Audit , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Chronic Disease , Databases, Factual , Europe , Humans , Treatment Outcome
12.
BMC Fam Pract ; 14: 118, 2013 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23945286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A team approach in primary care has proven benefits in achieving better outcomes, reducing health care costs, satisfying patient needs, ensuring continuity of care, increasing job satisfaction among health providers and using human health care resources more efficiently. However, some research indicates constraints in collaboration within primary health care (PHC) teams in Lithuania. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the phenomenon of teamwork in Lithuania by exploring the experiences of teamwork by general practitioners (GPs) and community nurses (CNs) involved in PHC. METHODS: Six focus groups were formed with 29 GPs and 27 CNs from the Kaunas Region of Lithuania. Discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis of these data was then performed. RESULTS: The analysis of focus group data identified six thematic categories related to teamwork in PHC: the structure of a PHC team, synergy among PHC team members, descriptions of roles and responsibilities of team members, competencies of PHC team members, communications between PHC team members and the organisational background for teamwork. These findings provide the basis for a discussion of a thematic model of teamwork that embraces formal, individual and organisational factors. CONCLUSIONS: The need for effective teamwork in PHC is an issue receiving broad consensus; however, the process of teambuilding is often taken for granted in the PHC sector in Lithuania. This study suggests that both formal and individual behavioural factors should be targeted when aiming to strengthen PHC teams. Furthermore, this study underscores the need to provide explicit formal descriptions of the roles and responsibilities of PHC team members in Lithuania, which would include establishing clear professional boundaries. The training of team members is an essential component of the teambuilding process, but not sufficient by itself.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Community Health Nursing , General Practitioners , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods , Adult , Cooperative Behavior , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Lithuania , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Innovation , Primary Health Care/economics , Professional Practice Location/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards
13.
Health Policy ; 106(3): 276-83, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22560186

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the organizational changes in Lithuanian Primary Health Care (PHC) in the period from 1994 to 2010, and to highlight the differences with respect to the background of family physicians, the level of urbanization and the type of PHC centers. METHODS: Three cross-sectional, comparative questionnaire surveys were conducted before the start of the PHC reform (in 1994) and in the course of the PHC reform (in 2004 and 2010) in Lithuania. The anonymous questionnaires were sent by mail to district physicians (i.e. internists, who provided health care for adults, and pediatricians, who provided care for children younger than 18 years old) in 1994, and to family physicians (i.e. retrained district physicians and family physicians-graduates from residency in family medicine) in 2004 and 2010. RESULTS: The differences observed in 1994 between former district physicians and those who had completed residency in family medicine, private and public PHC centers and different level of urbanization dissolved in the years of the PHC reform. Physicians' age tended to be higher in the course of the PHC reform. Numbers of patients' consultations were increasing in the period after 1994 till 2010, though numbers of CME hours and home visits were decreasing. CONCLUSIONS: The idea to retrain district physicians into family physicians was a valuable decision. In the years of the PHC reform the workload of family physicians in Lithuania approached the level existing in the EU. The aging of workforce, high workload and reduction of CME hours are the major concerns for future PHC policy.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Care Reform , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Practice/education , Female , Humans , Lithuania , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Innovation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workload/statistics & numerical data
14.
Health Policy ; 83(1): 105-13, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17240474

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed, firstly, to assess changes in the service profile of primary care physicians between 1994, when features of the Soviet health system prevailed, and 2004, when retraining of GPs was completed. Secondly, to compare service profiles among current GPs, taking into account their positions before being retrained. METHODS: A cross-sectional repeated measures study was conducted among district therapists and district pediatricians in 1994 and GPs in 2004. A questionnaire was used containing identical items on the physicians' involvement in curative and preventive services. The response rates in both years were 87% and 73%, respectively. RESULTS: In 2004, physicians had much more office contacts with patients than in 1994. Modest progress was made with the provision of technical procedures. Involvement in disease management was also stronger in 2004 than in 1994, particularly among former pediatricians. Involvement in screening activities remained stable among former therapists and increased among former pediatricians. At present, GPs who used to be therapists provide a broader range of services than ex pediatricians. GPs from the residency programme hold an intermediate position. CONCLUSIONS: Lithuanian GPs have taken up new tasks but variation can be reduced. The health care system is still in the midst of transition.


Subject(s)
Communism , Physicians, Family , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Primary Health Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Lithuania
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...