Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 14(8): 5891-5901, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144009

ABSTRACT

Background: The musculoskeletal system participates in the pathology of metabolic disorders. Several studies have focused on body composition changes; however, the adipose tissue between muscle bundles with different metabolic statuses has rarely been studied. This study sought to explore the association between body compositions and metabolic disorders in Asians, and identify whether these body compositions can be used to detect metabolic disorders with different waist circumferences (WCs) by computed tomography (CT). Methods: A total of 116 subjects were included in the study and categorized into the following four groups according to WC and metabolic syndrome (MS): (I) the healthy control group; (II) the normal WC with metabolic disorder group; (III) the normal WC with MS group; and (IV) the larger WC with MS group. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria based on WC, laboratory tests, body mass index (BMI), and medical history was used to diagnose MS. Body composition parameters, such as muscle attenuation, the cross-sectional area of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), muscle, extramyocellular lipid (EMCL), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and the ratios between different compositions [e.g., the SMR (SAT/muscle), EMR (EMCL/muscle), and VMR (VAT/muscle)] were calculated for the thigh and abdomen. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves adjusted for multiple comparisons were used to discriminate among metabolic disorders. Results: The groups with metabolic disorders had more SAT (P=0.001) and EMCL (P=0.040) in the thigh, and more VAT (P=0.001) and a higher SMR (P<0.001) in the abdomen. EMCL and muscle attenuation in the thigh (AUCs =0.790 and 0.791), and the VMR and SMR in the abdomen were better able to diagnose metabolic disorders (AUCs =0.752 and 0.746) than other body composition parameters. While SAT and EMCL in the thigh (AUCs =0.768 and 0.760), and VAT and the VMR in the abdomen (AUCs =0.788 and 0.775) were better able to diagnose MS than other parameters. Conclusions: Body composition parameters for the thigh and abdomen could assist in detecting patients with an increased risk of MS.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL