Growth in Newborn Circumcisions Performed by Pediatric Urologists and Advanced Practice Providers Between 2010 and 2021 in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize changes in the proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists and advanced practiced providers (APPs) in the United States over the last decade. METHODS: The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database was queried for newborn circumcision private health insurance claims (Common Procedural Terminology 54150) between 2010 and 2021. Setting (inpatient/outpatient), US Census Bureau region, clinician specialty, and patient age (days) were determined for the full study time period, and by study year. Simple linear regression assessed growth in proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists and APPs (nurse practitioner/physician assistant/midwife), over time. RESULTS: In total, 1,006,748 newborn circumcisions (59% inpatient) were identified; while most were performed by obstetricians (45%) or pediatricians (33%); APPs performed 0.9%, and pediatric urologists performed 0.7%. From 2010-2021, the proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists increased from 0.3% to 2.0% and by APPs in from 0.5% to 2.9% (P < .001 for both). Growth for both pediatric urologists and APPs occurred APPs predominantly from 2016 to 2021. Trends in proportion of newborn circumcision performed by pediatricians was stable [31.5% (2010) and 32.5% (2021)], but decreased for obstetricians [48.8% (2014) and 38.1% (2021)]. CONCLUSION: The proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists and APPs increased more than 6-fold between 2010 and 2021, though both specialties still perform a minority of newborn circumcisions. These data provide important baseline information for newborn circumcision workforce planning, including evaluating collaborative care models where pediatric urologists train APPs to perform circumcision.

Streamlining surgical trays for common pediatric urology Procedures: A quality improvement initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Procedures involving the external genitalia are the most common pediatric urologic operations. Our group identified excess instrumentation for these cases to be a potential cause of operating room (OR) inefficiency at our large, freestanding pediatric hospital. This quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to streamline surgical instrumentation for the most-performed pediatric urologic procedures at our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six Sigma DMAIC methodology (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) guided this multidisciplinary, iterative QI effort. A stakeholder team utilized data review, direct observations, and multiple in-person discussions to create a new "Groin-Penis Tray" (GPT) to replace a larger tray for the 90 most common pediatric urologic procedures. Suture preference cards and expectations about which sutures would be opened for each case were updated. The primary outcome was estimated yearly cost-avoidance due to reduced sterile processing. Additional outcomes included: instruments opened/case, % cases with complete trays, Mayo stand set-up time, and % cases with unused sutures. Balancing measures included: total median OR time and tray weights. Baseline and post-implementation measures were characterized and compared. RESULTS: A QI professional, 10 pediatric urologists, 2 pediatric urology fellows, and multiple OR and sterile processing staff members participated. The Summary Figure compares baseline and post-implementation measurements. The number of instruments opened/case decreased from 146 to 65. Annual sterile reprocessing costs decreased by >$51,000. Median Mayo stand set-up time decreased from 7.3 to 3.5 min (p < 0.001). The number of cases with complete trays increased from 7/20 (35%) to 11/20 (55%, p = 0.34). The new GPT is 2.7 kg lighter than the prior tray. Median OR time remained stable (baseline: 91 min; post-implementation: 102 min, p = 0.44). The number of cases with suture waste decreased from 78% to 0% immediately post-implementation but increased to 40% one year later. DISCUSSION: This systematic, iterative QI process spanned the course of ∼2 years, including planning, building, and updating new trays, then assessing longer-term success via the control phase. The new GPT is used for most pediatric urologic procedures at our hospital, and benefits include sterile reprocessing cost savings and ergonomics. Our team gained valuable experience related to assessing QI project scope, determining key stakeholders and roles, and strategies for sustainability that we will apply to future initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: Streamlining surgical trays for common pediatric urologic procedures at a large freestanding children's hospital using established QI methodology reduced OR cost by >$51,000/year and Mayo stand set-up times without compromising balancing measures.

Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics vs. placebo after midshaft-to-distal hypospadias repair: the PROPHY Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of prophylactic antibiotics after stented hypospadias repair is very common, but most research has not identified any clinical benefits of this practice. Only one study has found that postoperative prophylaxis reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Data from the same trial suggested that prophylaxis may also reduce urethroplasty complications. No studies on this subject have been placebo-controlled. OBJECTIVE: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics on the incidence of infection or urethroplasty complications after stented repair of midshaft-to-distal hypospadias. STUDY DESIGN: Boys were eligible for this multicenter trial if they had a primary, single-stage repair of mid-to-distal hypospadias with placement of an open-drainage urethral stent for an intended duration of 5-10 days. Participants were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or placebo twice daily for 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was a composite of symptomatic UTI, surgical site infection (SSI), and urethroplasty complications, including urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, and dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and C. difficile colitis. RESULTS: Infection or urethroplasty complications occurred in 10 of 45 boys (22%) assigned to receive antibiotic prophylaxis as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) who received placebo (relative risk [RR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 5.8; p = 0.16). There were no significant differences between groups in symptomatic UTIs, SSIs, or any urethroplasty complications. Mild ADRs occurred in 3 of 45 boys (7%) assigned to antibiotics as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) given placebo (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.5; p = 0.72). There were no moderate-to-severe ADRs, and no patients developed C. difficile colitis. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial of 93 patients, prophylactic antibiotics were not found to reduce infection or urethroplasty complications after stented mid-to-distal hypospadias repair. The study did not reach its desired sample size and was therefore underpowered to independently support a conclusion that prophylaxis is not beneficial. However, the result is consistent with most prior research on this subject. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02096159.

Assessment of distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction visualization on contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CEVUS) uses intravesically administered microbubble contrast to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urethral anomalies with ultrasound. Multiple studies have suggested CEVUS can replace voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) as a radiation-free alternative. Analysis of the ureterovesical junction and ureters on VCUG documenting the ureterovesical junction position, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles is important as anatomical variations may affect management and surgical approach. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction region visualization in children with VUR detected on CEVUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEVUS studies performed between June 2018 and March 2019 with reported VUR were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric radiologists to confirm VUR and to qualitatively assess the ureterovesical junction region for each renal moiety using a 3-point scale for clear, limited or absent visualization of the distal ureter, ureterovesical junction, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with VUR on CEVUS were identified. Sixty-seven renal moieties were evaluated including a solitary kidney in one child. VUR was detected in 52 moieties by reader 1 and in 53 by reader 2. A single moiety with discrepancy between readers regarding VUR was excluded from statistical analysis. No diverticula were detected by either reader and one ureterocele was detected by both readers. Visualization of the ureterovesical junction was described as clear in 5/52, limited in 14/52 and absent in 33/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 12/52, limited in 20/52 and absent in 20/52 by reader 2. The ureterovesical junction was clearly visualized in 5/52 (9.6%) by reader 1 and 12/52 (23.1%) by reader 2. The Kappa value of -0.29 (confidence interval [CI] -0.25, 0.21) reveals a lack of agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent ureterovesical junction visualization. Distal ureteral visualization was described as clear in 14/52, limited in 16/52 and absent in 22/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 27/52, limited in 7/52 and absent in 18/52 by reader 2. The distal ureter was clearly visualized in 14/52 (26.9%) by reader 1 and 27/52 (51.9%) by reader 2. The Kappa of 0.43 (CI 0.22, 0.64) reveals moderate agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent distal ureteral visualization. Duplication of the renal collecting system was identified in 13/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 1 and 11/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 2. Visualization of ureteral duplication was described as clear in 9, limited in 4 and absent in 39 of 52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 9, limited in 2 and absent in 41 by reader 2. Ureteral duplication was clearly visualized in 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 1 and 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 2. Kappa of 0.87 (CI 0.68, 1) reveals high agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent identification of ureteral duplication. CONCLUSION: The distal ureter and ureterovesical junction region frequently are not clearly visualized in refluxing renal moieties on CEVUS. Awareness of this limitation is important as there may be implications when evaluating patients for surgical management of VUR.

Challenging proximal hypospadias repairs: An evolution of technique for two stage repairs.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal hypospadias repair remains challenging. Our approach to the first stage of two-stage proximal hypospadias repairs has evolved from using Byars' flaps to preputial inlay grafts in anatomically suitable cases and pedicled preputial flaps in more complex repairs. We reviewed our outcomes, hypothesizing that inlay grafts and pedicled preputial flaps were associated with lower complication risks than Byars' flaps. STUDY DESIGN: A single institution, retrospective, cohort study of consecutive two-stage, primary, proximal hypospadias repairs performed from 2007 to 2017 was conducted. Patients with <6 months follow-up and incomplete operative reports were excluded. Risk of complications (fistula, dehiscence, diverticulum, meatal stenosis, stricture) were evaluated following urethroplasty and stratified by first-stage repair technique. As technique refinements have been made since 2012, comparisons between two temporal subgroups (those who underwent repair in 2007-2012 and in 2013-2017) were made. RESULTS: 78 of 127 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall complication rate was 47% (Summary Table). Median follow-up was 25.4 months (range 6.4-128.5 months) after urethroplasty. Pedicled preputial flaps (hazards ratio [HR] 0.30; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.14-0.65) and inlay grafts (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.11-0.95) were associated with lower complication risks compared to Byars' flaps (Summary Table). Median time to complication was significantly shorter for Byars' flaps (5.7 months) than for inlay grafts (40.6 months) and pedicled preputial flaps (79.2 months) by Kaplan Meier analysis. Temporal subgroup comparisons showed that overall complication rates decreased from 70% to 31% (p = 0.001), but differences in complication rates by first-stage technique were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: In our cohort, repairs with Byars' flaps had the highest complication rate, which is consistent with our observations that urethras tubularized from Byars' flaps lack appropriate backing and are hypermobile and irregular. To overcome these shortcomings, modifications were made to our approach to two-stage proximal hypospadias repairs with the use of inlay grafts and pedicled preputial flaps quilted to the underlying corporal bodies to optimize the stability of the urethral plate. Our preliminary results are promising. CONCLUSION: Approach to the first stage of two-stage repairs affects outcomes. Pedicled preputial flaps and inlay grafts were associated with lower complication risks than Byars' flaps. Refinement of technique and patient selection may have resulted in fewer complications in the short term. However, long-term follow-up is needed.

Association between intra-operative meatal mismatch and urethrocutaneous fistula development in hypospadias repair.

INTRODUCTION: The Glans-Meatus-Shaft (GMS) Score is a pre-operative phenotypic scoring system used to assess hypospadias severity and risk for post-operative complications. The 'M' component is based on pre-operative meatal location, but meatal location sometimes changes after penile degloving, resulting in 'meatal mismatch.' OBJECTIVE: To identify: 1) the incidence and clinical predictors of meatal mismatch, and 2) the association of meatal mismatch with post-operative urethrocutaneous fistula development. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent primary hypospadias repair at a single center from 2011 to 2018. Meatal mismatch was defined as: upstaging (meatus moving more proximally after degloving), downstaging (moving more distally after degloving), or none. Covariates included: pre-degloving meatal location, chordee severity, penoscrotal anatomy, pre-operative testosterone, and number of stages for repair. To test the association between meatal mismatch and fistula development, we constructed two, nested, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models with and without meatal mismatch and compared them with the likelihood ratio test. A sensitivity analysis excluded patients with <6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 485 patients, 99 (20%) exhibited meatal mismatch, including 75 (15%) with upstaging and 24 (5%) patients with downstaging (Figure). Meatal mismatch was significantly associated with penoscrotal webbing, number of stages for repair, and pre-degloving meatal location, with downstaging being associated with more proximal meatal location. Over a median follow-up of 7.3 months (interquartile range 2.0-20.9), fistulae developed in 56 (12%) patients. On multivariable analysis, meatal upstaging was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of fistula development (Hazards Ratio [HR]: 3.04, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.44-6.45) compared to no mismatch. Meatal downstaging had similar risk of fistula development compared to no mismatch (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.29-3.35). Multi-stage compared to single-stage repair was associated with reduced risk of fistula development (HR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.09-0.66). The likelihood ratio test favored the model that included meatal mismatch. The sensitivity analysis showed similar findings. DISCUSSION: Our short-term results suggest that meatal mismatch may be an important additional consideration to the GMS score as a tool to assess hypospadias severity, counsel families, and predict outcomes. Longer-term studies are needed to enhance the precision of risk stratification in hypospadias. CONCLUSIONS: Meatal mismatch occurred in 20% of patients undergoing hypospadias repair. Among this cohort, meatal upstaging was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of post-operative urethrocutaneous fistula development.

Are pressure pop-offs beneficial to the bladder in boys with posterior urethral valves?

BACKGROUND: Pressure pop-offs, such as high-grade vesicoureteral reflux with renal dysplasia, have historically been considered beneficial for renal and bladder outcomes in boys with posterior urethral valves (PUV). Recent longer-term studies have called into question the beneficial effects of pop-offs on renal function. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how pop-offs affect bladder outcomes in boys with PUV. STUDY DESIGN: At a single-center, the electronic medical records of boys with PUV who underwent valve ablation from 2000 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed for bladder and continence outcomes. Patients were excluded due to presentation after one year of age, age at last follow-up <1 year, lack of urodynamic study (UDS), lack of voiding cystourethrogram, or concomitant prune belly syndrome. Between patients with and without pop-offs, the following outcomes were compared: prevalence of significant hydronephrosis (Society for Fetal Urology grade 3 or 4) prior to valve ablation and at last follow-up, nadir creatinine level, classification of initial UDS, type of medical and/or surgical interventions, dryness during the day and toilet-training status at last follow-up (among patients ≥4 years), and age at toilet-training. For patients with multiple UDS, initial and latest UDS were compared. RESULTS: 48 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 31 (65%) had pop-offs and 17 (35%) did not. Median age at last follow-up was 5.9 years (range: 1.0-12.2 years). Patients with pop-offs were more likely to have unsafe initial UDS (26% vs. 12%, p = 0.15) but less likely to have high voiding pressures at their latest UDS (15% vs. 50%, p = 0.03). Patients with pop-offs were more likely to have used clean intermittent catheterization (26% vs. 0%, p = 0.04) and were less likely to be toilet-trained by age 4 (76% vs. 100%, p = 0.15) or dry during the day at last follow-up (56% vs. 92%, p = 0.06). Toilet-trained patients with pop-offs were toilet-trained by an earlier age than patients without pop-offs (3 vs 4 years, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: The results of the present retrospective study show that patients with pop-offs required more extensive interventions to achieve continence, and achieved continence and toilet-training less frequently than patients without pop-offs. Additionally, our results demonstrated that patients with pop-offs had worse bladder dynamics initially, which may suggest that pop-offs are a manifestation of more excessive pressure build-up prior to valve ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Among boys with posterior urethral valves who present in the first year of life, pop-offs do not appear to impart significant benefit to bladder outcomes and may indicate more severe bladder dysfunction.

Caregiver Reported Reasons for Delay of Neonatal Circumcision.

OBJECTIVES: To determine caregiver-reported reasons for delay of desired neonatal circumcision. METHODS: Caregivers requesting elective outpatient circumcision at two urban tertiary care hospitals were surveyed from 1/2017 to 12/2018. Boys >3 years and those with abnormal penile anatomy were excluded. Patient/parent demographics, insurance status, comorbidities, birth history, family history, reasons circumcision was desired, and reasons for circumcision delay were obtained. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 206/229 caregivers (90% response rate). Respondents were primarily mothers (74%) who identified as African-American (62%). Eligible boys presented at a median 7.5 months [0.3-35.6] and were predominantly African-American (63%), publicly-insured at birth (83%), and publicly-insured at present (86%). 80% were full-term. 83% had no comorbidities. Most caregivers (84%) requested inpatient circumcision, primarily for penile cleanliness (75%) and infection prevention (72%). Common reasons for delay included neonatal circumcision not being performed by the birth physician/hospital (26%) and prematurity (16%). Publicly-insured boys were more likely to encounter delays related birth physician/hospital not performing circumcisions (P = .02). Non-Caucasian/mixed race boys were less likely to be eligible for circumcision without general anesthesia (P = .004). In 108 cases (52%), circumcision was requested for full-term boys without comorbidities. Of these, 72 (35% of the cohort) now require general anesthesia to undergo circumcision. CONCLUSION: Among 206 boys experiencing circumcision delay, most were full-term, African-American, and publicly-insured. Common reasons for delay included neonatal circumcision not being performed by the birth hospital/physician and prematurity. General anesthesia could have been avoided in >35% of boys if circumcision was performed at birth.

Frequency and Variability of Advice Given to Parents on Care of the Uncircumcised Penis by Pediatric Residents: A Need to Improve Education.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the extent to which pediatricians are providing advice on care of the uncircumcised penis and the advice they are providing. We hypothesized that pediatric residents lack preparedness to offer parents advice on caring for the uncircumcised penis and as such are unlikely to offer such advice. METHODS: An IRB approved, anonymous survey was administered to 244 pediatric residents in 5 urban training programs (Appendix). Descriptive statistics were used for clinical and demographic data and Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparative analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-three residents completed the survey for a response rate of 34%. Less than half (45%) of the residents surveyed were likely, or extremely likely to voluntarily offer advice to parents on care of the uncircumcised penis. On a scale of 0-100, the median confidence level in offering advice was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 30-52). Forty-nine percent of residents reported never being taught care of the uncircumcised penis. Of those who received education, 72% reported learning informally from a senior resident or attending and only 9% learned from a formal lecture. Pediatric residents varied greatly on advice given to parents in regards to the frequency of retraction and 40% offered no advice. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that pediatric residents currently lack confidence in providing parents advice on preputial care and are unlikely to offer such advice. When offered, the advice given is highly variable. This study emphasizes the need for improved education of pediatric residents.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Reoperative Repair for Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: An Updated Series.

PURPOSE: Reoperative pyeloplasty is commonly used in children with recurrent obstruction after pyeloplasty. We previously reported on reoperative robot-assisted laparoscopic repair for failed pyeloplasty in 16 children and concluded that short-term and intermediate outcomes were comparable to open reoperative repair. In this updated series we describe longer term outcomes from an extended study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of consecutive children with prior failed primary pyeloplasty who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair at a single institution from January 2008 to June 2018. RESULTS: Overall, 36 children 0.6 to 15.2 years old (median 3.7) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair (pyeloplasty in 31, ureterocalicostomy in 5) at a median of 24.3 months (range 3.9 to 136.7) after primary repair. Median reoperative time was 285.0 minutes (range 207 to 556) and median length of stay was 1 day (1 to 8). Crossing vessels were present in 8 of 30 children (26.7%) with prior open repair and in 0 of 6 with prior minimally invasive repair. Clavien-Dindo grade 1 to 2 perioperative complications occurred in 4 children (11.1%) and grade 3 to 5 complications in 2 (5.6%). Median followup was 35.3 months (range 1.4 to 108.3), with 18 children (50.0%) being followed for more than 3 years. Postoperative ultrasound in 34 children revealed improvement in 31 (91.2%), stability in 2 (5.9%) and worsening hydronephrosis in 1 (2.9%). All 11 children undergoing preoperative and postoperative diuretic renography demonstrated stable or improved differential renal function. All children were symptom-free at last followup. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children. Our results indicate the feasibility, efficacy, safety and durability of this procedure.

Advising on the care of the uncircumcised penis: A survey of pediatric urologists in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Parents of uncircumcised boys often report confusion regarding the proper care and hygiene practices for the uncircumcised penis. The lack of guidance from healthcare providers may be due to a lack of consensus on the proper care of the prepuce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether or not there exists consensus among pediatric urologists on the care of the uncircumcised penis and on the advice they provide to parents. METHODS: An electronic survey was delivered to 514 members of the Society for Pediatric Urology (SPU). The survey contained demographical and clinical questions which were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 261 SPU members who opened the e-mail invitation, a total of 204 responses were received for a response rate of 78% (overall response rate 40%). Nine responses were excluded for members practicing outside of the United States or whose locations were not disclosed for a final number of responses of 195. Overall, pediatric urologists reported a high level of confidence in providing advice to parents with a median confidence score of 10 (scale 1-10, IQR 9-10). Only 66% reported providing advice to parents on when to begin retracting the foreskin, with 48% basing their advice on the patient's age and 19% on the patient's toilet training status (Figure). Respondents who based their advice on age, advised beginning retraction at 2-5 years (61%), 6-11 years (17%), less than 2 years (12%), and greater than 12 years (10%). For frequency of retraction before toilet training, 50% recommended no retraction, 25% with cleaning or baths, 10% with each diaper change, and 13% provided no advice. After toilet training, 48% of respondents recommended retracting the foreskin with cleaning or baths, 41% with each void, and 19% recommended no retraction. The majority of respondents agreed that problems with voiding (77%), infection (74%), and hygiene (64%) were indications for treatment of phimosis. In asymptomatic cases, 47% believed that phimosis required treatment if persisting beyond a specific age, the most common being greater than 12 years of age (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Although pediatric urologists reported being highly confident in advising parents on the care of the uncircumcised penis, there is not a clear consensus among these subspecialists on when to begin and how often to retract the foreskin, or when phimosis requires treatment. These findings offer insight into current practice patterns to better inform primary care providers and parents.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic transplant-to-native ureteroureterostomy of an intraperitoneal renal allograft.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to describe our experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic transplant-to-native ureteroureterostomy (UU) in a pediatric patient with an intraperitoneal renal allograft. We have previously demonstrated this technique for an extraperitoneal allograft. METHODS: The patient is a 17-year-old female who had undergone a deceased donor renal transplant at 5 years of age. She developed acute kidney injury and hydronephrosis because of a ureteral stricture that developed after a right ovarian cyst excision. A retrograde pyelogram of her native ureter showed normal morphology. Her options were discussed and she proceeded with a robotic transplant-to-native UU. RESULTS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic transplant-to-native UU was performed via an intraperitoneal approach. The procedure time was 217 min with an estimated blood loss of 10 mL. Her postoperative course was unremarkable. After ureteral stent removal, her serum creatinine remained stable and follow-up imaging showed an improvement in hydronephrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic transplant-to-native UU for an intraperitoneal allograft is a technically feasible approach for the treatment of transplant ureteral strictures that combines the durability of open revision with the minimal invasiveness of endourologic management.

The Correlation between Serial Ultrasound and Diuretic Renography in Children with Severe Unilateral Hydronephrosis.

PURPOSE: While serial renal ultrasound is often used as an alternative to functional renal imaging in children followed for hydronephrosis, it is unclear whether a lack of hydronephrosis progression safeguards against loss of renal function. In this study we characterize the association between findings on serial renal ultrasound and diuretic renography in children with severe unilateral hydronephrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed imaging among patients younger than 18 years old with a history of severe unilateral hydronephrosis, 2 renal ultrasounds and 2 diuretic renograms. Each pair of renal ultrasounds was interpreted by an independent blinded diagnostic radiologist and compared to a contemporaneous diuretic renogram. Change in hydronephrosis was considered as 1) a change in hydronephrosis grade or 2) any change by radiologist interpretation. A 5% or greater change in split differential function was considered significant. Chi-square and Spearman correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 85 children were evaluated. Increased hydronephrosis was noted in 11.8% of children by grade and 32.9% by radiologist interpretation. Split differential renal function worsened by 5% or more in 17.6% of children. Overall, 13.3% of children with stable or decreased hydronephrosis demonstrated worsening split differential function at an average of 11.8 months. When renal ultrasound and diuretic renograms were directly compared, the Spearman correlation was poor (r = 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: The overall correlation between imaging modalities was poor, and 13.3% of children with stable or decreased hydronephrosis had worsening of split differential renal function. These findings are important to consider when counseling nonoperatively managed children followed without diuretic renography.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic megaureter tapering with ureteral reimplantation: Tips and tricks.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to demonstrate surgical techniques used in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic megaureter tapering (RALMT) with ureteral reimplantation. We report on our preliminary experience. METHODS: We reviewed video of patients who underwent RALMT with ureteral reimplantation between August 2012 and November 2015. MT was performed extravesically and ureteral reimplantation was performed by extravesical detrusorrhaphy with ureteral anchoring. All patients had an intraoperatively placed ureteral stent. RESULTS: Between August 2012 and November 2015, 14 patients underwent RALMT with ureteral reimplantation. Highlighted techniques include variations in ureteral stent insertion, method of excisional tapering, and approach to reimplantation. All (10/10) patients with postoperative ultrasounds following ureteral stent removal demonstrated radiographic improvement at a mean follow-up of 9 months. No patients had postoperative febrile urinary tract infections. The only complication was one patient with postoperative ileus. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate variations in surgical techniques which may facilitate the surgical steps of RALMT with ureteral reimplantation. Our preliminary experience suggests the procedure is safe and feasible for pediatric patients with symptomatic megaureter.

Early vs. late-presenting urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair: A retrospective analysis of patient follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Complications after primary hypospadias repair often present late, that is, more than 1 year postoperatively. This has important implications for clinical practice and prospective research protocols. Follow-up regimen-or lack thereof-may contribute to delayed diagnosis of complications. OBJECTIVE: To characterize and compare the follow-up regimens of patients with early and late-presenting urethroplasty complications after primary hypospadias repair, specifically noting the length of time between encounters during which complications emerged. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Boys who underwent repair of urethroplasty complications after hypospadias surgery were identified, and retrospective chart reviews were performed. Late complications were defined by presentation more than 1 year after primary repair; all others were designated as early. We recorded the encounter at which each patient was first noted to have a complication, as well as the last encounter prior to this. Follow-up intervals during which complications emerged were determined. Comparisons of the type of primary repairs, complications, and follow-up regimens (prescribed as well as actual) were performed between patients with early and late complications. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients underwent repair of 57 hypospadias complications. Eighteen patients (35%) had complications that presented late. Complications after a midshaft/distal hypospadias repair were more likely to present late than complications following a one- or two-stage proximal repair (59% vs. 31% vs. 6%, respectively; p = 0.003). The median interval between encounters during which late complications emerged was 24 months (IQR 16-43), compared with 1.2 (0.7-2.2) months for early-presenting complications (p < 0.001). Eleven of the 18 patients with late complications (61%) had not had an encounter beyond 3 months postoperatively prior to presentation of their complications; only four patients (8%) had a late complication that was unrecognized at a follow-up visit more than 6 months postoperatively (Figure). Patients with late complications had a greater discrepancy between prescribed and actual follow-up intervals, averaging 11 months (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Late presentation of urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair is relatively common. There is typically a lengthy follow-up interval during which late complications emerge. Many patients who presented with late complications had not previously been examined beyond the early postoperative period. Adherence to a more structured follow-up regimen that includes a visit outside of the early postoperative period (e.g. routine encounters at 6 months postoperatively) may facilitate earlier detection and reduce late presentation of complications, especially among patients with midshaft or distal primary repairs. Earlier diagnosis would allow secondary procedures to be completed sooner.

Use of Pediatric Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012.

PURPOSE: We characterize the use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States from 2000 to 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Kids' Inpatient Database to identify patients who underwent ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux. Before 2009 laparoscopic ureteral reimplantion and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation were referred to together as minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation. A detailed analysis of open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation was performed for 2009 and 2012. RESULTS: A total of 14,581 ureteral reimplantations were performed. The number of ureteral reimplantations yearly decreased by 14.3%. However, the proportion of minimally invasive ureteral reimplantations increased from 0.3% to 6.3%. A total of 125 robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantations were performed in 2012 (81.2% of minimally invasive ureteral reimplantations), representing 5.1% of all ureteral reimplantations, compared to 3.8% in 2009. In 2009 and 2012 mean ± SD patient age was 5.7 ± 3.6 years for robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and 4.3 ± 3.3 years for open reimplantation (p <0.0001). Mean ± SD length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.3 days for robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and 2.4 ± 2.6 for open reimplantation (p <0.0001). Median charges were $22,703 for open and $32,409 for robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (p <0.0001). These relationships maintained significance on multivariate analyses. On multivariate analysis robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation use was associated with public insurance status (p = 0.04) and geographic region outside of the southern United States (p = 0.02). Only 50 of 456 hospitals used both approaches (open and robotic), and only 6 hospitals reported 5 or more robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantations during 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux with ureteral reimplantation is decreasing. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is becoming more prevalent but remains relatively uncommon. Length of stay is shorter for the robotic approach but the costs are higher. Nationally robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation appears to still be in the early phase of adoption and is clustered at a small number of hospitals.