Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dev Biol ; 502: 63-67, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433390

ABSTRACT

Genome manipulation methods in C. elegans require microinjecting DNA or ribonucleoprotein complexes into the microscopic core of the gonadal syncytium. These microinjections are technically demanding and represent a key bottleneck for all genome engineering and transgenic approaches in C. elegans. While there have been steady improvements in the ease and efficiency of genetic methods for C. elegans genome manipulation, there have not been comparable advances in the physical process of microinjection. Here, we report a simple and inexpensive method for handling worms using a paintbrush during the injection process that nearly tripled average microinjection rates compared to traditional worm handling methods. We found that the paintbrush increased injection throughput by substantially increasing both injection speeds and post-injection survival rates. In addition to dramatically and universally increasing injection efficiency for experienced personnel, the paintbrush method also significantly improved the abilities of novice investigators to perform key steps in the microinjection process. We expect that this method will benefit the C. elegans community by increasing the speed at which new strains can be generated and will also make microinjection-based approaches less challenging and more accessible to personnel and labs without extensive experience.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans , Germ Cells , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Microinjections/methods , Animals, Genetically Modified , DNA/genetics , CRISPR-Cas Systems
2.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36993165

ABSTRACT

Genome manipulation methods in C. elegans require microinjecting DNA or ribonucleoprotein complexes into the microscopic core of the gonadal syncytium. These microinjections are technically demanding and represent a key bottleneck for all genome engineering and transgenic approaches in C. elegans . While there have been steady improvements in the ease and efficiency of genetic methods for C. elegans genome manipulation, there have not been comparable advances in the physical process of microinjection. Here, we report a simple and inexpensive method for handling worms using a paintbrush during the injection process that nearly tripled average microinjection rates compared to traditional worm handling methods. We found that the paintbrush increased injection throughput by substantially increasing both injection speeds and post-injection survival rates. In addition to dramatically and universally increasing injection efficiency for experienced personnel, the paintbrush method also significantly improved the abilities of novice investigators to perform key steps in the microinjection process. We expect that this method will benefit the C. elegans community by increasing the speed at which new strains can be generated and will also make microinjection-based approaches less challenging and more accessible to personnel and labs without extensive experience.

3.
Annu Rev Neurosci ; 45: 177-198, 2022 07 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35226828

ABSTRACT

Neurodevelopment and efferocytosis have fascinated scientists for decades. How an organism builds a nervous system that is precisely tuned for efficient behaviors and survival and how it simultaneously manages constant somatic cell turnover are complex questions that have resulted in distinct fields of study. Although neurodevelopment requires the overproduction of cells that are subsequently pruned back, very few studies marry these fields to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive nervous system development through the lens of cell clearance. In this review, we discuss these fields to highlight exciting areas of future synergy. We first review neurodevelopment from the perspective of overproduction and subsequent refinement and then discuss who clears this developmental debris and the mechanisms that control these events. We then end with how a more deliberate merger ofneurodevelopment and efferocytosis could reframe our understanding of homeostasis and disease and discuss areas of future study.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis , Phagocytes , Apoptosis/physiology , Cell Death , Homeostasis , Phagocytes/metabolism , Phagocytosis/physiology
4.
J Comp Neurol ; 524(10): 1979-98, 2016 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27073064

ABSTRACT

Anatomical, molecular, and physiological interactions between astrocytes and neuronal synapses regulate information processing in the brain. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has become a valuable experimental system for genetic manipulation of the nervous system and has enormous potential for elucidating mechanisms that mediate neuron-glia interactions. Here, we show the first electrophysiological recordings from Drosophila astrocytes and characterize their spatial and physiological relationship with particular synapses. Astrocyte intrinsic properties were found to be strongly analogous to those of vertebrate astrocytes, including a passive current-voltage relationship, low membrane resistance, high capacitance, and dye-coupling to local astrocytes. Responses to optogenetic stimulation of glutamatergic premotor neurons were correlated directly with anatomy using serial electron microscopy reconstructions of homologous identified neurons and surrounding astrocytic processes. Robust bidirectional communication was present: neuronal activation triggered astrocytic glutamate transport via excitatory amino acid transporter 1 (Eaat1), and blocking Eaat1 extended glutamatergic interneuron-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents in motor neurons. The neuronal synapses were always located within 1 µm of an astrocytic process, but none were ensheathed by those processes. Thus, fly astrocytes can modulate fast synaptic transmission via neurotransmitter transport within these anatomical parameters. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:1979-1998, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Astrocytes/physiology , Central Nervous System/cytology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Neurons/physiology , Synapses/physiology , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Aspartic Acid/pharmacology , Astrocytes/ultrastructure , Cadmium Chloride/pharmacology , Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal/metabolism , Central Nervous System/physiology , Central Nervous System/ultrastructure , Choline O-Acetyltransferase/metabolism , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 1/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials/drug effects , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials/genetics , Larva , Locomotion/genetics , Nerve Net/physiology , Nerve Net/ultrastructure , Neurons/ultrastructure , Sodium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Synapses/genetics , Synapses/ultrastructure , Tetrodotoxin/pharmacology , Transcription Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Transcription Factors/genetics , Vesicular Inhibitory Amino Acid Transport Proteins/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...