Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 937: 173504, 2024 Aug 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797411

ABSTRACT

Studying the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality (the ability of ecosystems to provide multiple ecosystem functions) (BEMF) is a current hotspot in ecology research. Previous studies on BEMF emphasized the role of plant and microbial diversity but rarely mention stand spatial structure. To investigate the effect of stand spatial structure on BEMF, this study established 30 forest dynamic plots in three natural restoration stages (shrubbery, secondary growth forest, and old-growth forest) in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou province, China. A positive response in soil multifunctionality (SMF), plant species diversity, stand spatial structure, and fungal ß diversity (p < 0.05) followed natural restoration. However, bacterial ß diversity showed a negative response (p < 0.05), while microbial α diversity remained unchanged (p > 0.05). These results based on a structural equation model showed that plant species diversity had no direct or indirect effect on SMF, soil microbial diversity was the only direct driver of SMF, and stand spatial structure indirectly affected SMF through soil microbial diversity. The random forest model showed that soil microbial ß diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index of the diameter at breast height for woody plant species were the optimal variables to characterize SMF and soil microbial diversity, respectively. These results suggested that natural restoration promoted SMF, and microbial diversity had a direct positive effect on SMF. In the meantime, stand spatial structure had a significant indirect effect on SMF, while plant species diversity did not. Future work on degraded karst forest restoration should direct more attention to the role of the stand spatial structure and emphasize the importance of biodiversity.


Subject(s)
Biodiversity , Forests , Soil Microbiology , Soil , China , Soil/chemistry , Microbiota , Ecosystem , Fungi , Environmental Monitoring , Conservation of Natural Resources
2.
Front Plant Sci ; 15: 1338596, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38455729

ABSTRACT

The various vegetation types in the karst landscape have been considered the results of heterogeneous habitats. However, the lack of a comprehensive understanding of regional biodiversity patterns and the underlying ecological processes limits further research on ecological management. This study established forest dynamic plots (FDPs) of the dominant vegetation types (shrubland, SL; mixed tree and shrub forest, MTSF; coniferous forest, CF; coniferous broadleaf mixed forest, CBMF; and broadleaf forest, BF) in the karst landscape and quantified the species diversity patterns and potential ecological processes. The results showed that in terms of diversity patterns, the evenness and species richness of the CF community were significantly lower than other vegetation types, while the BF community had the highest species richness. The other three vegetation types showed no significant variation in species richness and evenness. However, when controlling the number of individuals of FDPs, the rarefied species richness showed significant differences and ranked as BF > SL > MTSF > CBMF > CF, highlighting the importance of considering the impacts of abundance. Additionally, the community assembly of climax communities (CF or BF) was dominated by stochastic processes such as species dispersal or species formation, whereas deterministic processes (habitat filtering) dominated the secondary forests (SL, MTSF, and CBMF). These findings proved that community assembly differs mainly between the climax community and other communities. Hence, it is crucial to consider the biodiversity and of the potential underlying ecological processes together when studying regional ecology and management, particularly in heterogeneous ecosystems.

3.
J Environ Manage ; 354: 120379, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368806

ABSTRACT

Understanding factors driving soil multifunctionality can help with terrestrial ecosystem restoration. Soil microbial diversity and network complexity are two important factors influencing ecosystem multifunctionality. However, their effects on soil multifunctionality are still unclear. Based on high-throughput sequencing, we analyzed soil microbial alpha diversity and network complexity and their relative impacts on soil multifunctionality during the aerial seeding restoration process from 1983 to 2017 in Mu Us sandy land, China, a region threatened by desertification. Our results showed soil bacterial and fungal alpha diversity and multifunctionality increased with aerial seeding restoration. We found the community composition of soil bacteria and fungi changed with restoration periods. The keystone species of the soil bacterial network changed during restoration, while those of the soil fungal network remained unchanged. Soil bacterial and fungal species mainly maintained positive associations throughout the restoration periods. Soil bacterial network complexity initially decreased before increasing with restoration, while soil fungal network complexity increased continuously. Soil multifunctionality was found to have significantly positive correlations with soil fungal network complexity and soil bacterial alpha diversity. Compared with soil fungal alpha diversity and soil microbial network complexity, soil bacterial alpha diversity significantly promoted soil multifunctionality. Our research highlights the critical impact that soil bacterial alpha diversity plays in soil multifunctionality in restored ecosystems threatened by desertification.


Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Soil , Bacteria/genetics , China , Soil Microbiology
4.
J Environ Manage ; 354: 120265, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382441

ABSTRACT

Giant habitat heterogeneity is an important factor contributing to the high species richness (SR) in karst forests. Yet, the driving factor behind the alterations in SR patterns during natural restoration remains unclear. In this study, we established the forest dynamics plots along the natural restoration sequence (including shrub-tree mixed forest stage (SC), secondary forest stage (SG) and old-growth forest sage (OG)) in degraded karst forests to compare the SR and the dependence on its components (including total community abundance, species abundance distribution (SAD), and conspecific spatial aggregation (CSA)) among stages of natural restoration. By evaluating the degree of contribution of the components to local SR and rarefied SR, we found that the SG exhibited the highest local SR, while the rarefied SR remained increasing along the restoration sequence after controlling the sample size. At SC-SG stage, SAD and CSA contributed negatively to the differences in SR, while abundance made a positive contribution to SR differences. At SG-OG, abundance contributed positively to the difference in SR at all scales, while SAD contributed negatively at small scales. No significant contribution of CSA was found at observed scales. In addition, local SR varied more significantly with PIE than with abundance. Our research emphasizes the importance of eliminating the influence of abundance on species richness in forest ecology and management, as well as the significance of separately evaluating the components that shape the diversity patterns.


Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Forests , Trees , Ecology , Biodiversity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL