A phase III study of late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (LCAF) with conventionally fractionated (CF) radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Between March 1998 and November 2002, 200 eligible patients with NPC were randomized to receive either LCAF (48 Gy in 40 fractions, 2 fractions per day, 1.2 Gy/fraction, with an interval of ≥6 h, 5 d/wk, followed by 30 Gy in 20 fractions using 2 fractions per day, 1.5 Gy/fraction, 5 d/wk) or CF (35 fractions, 2.0 Gy/fraction/d, 5 d/wk, to a total dose of 70 Gy). RESULTS: All patients completed the treatment. Overall baseline characteristics of the study population of the 2 arms were well balanced. With a median follow-up of 6.9 years, the 5-year local control rate was higher in the LCAF arm (87.6% vs. 75.9%, P=0.044). The 5-year overall survival rates were 74.1% vs. 58.0% (P=0.024) for the LCAF arm and the CF arm, respectively. LCAF patients had a higher occurrence of acute mucositis and a more evident weight loss than CF patients, whereas incidence rates of radiation-induced damage to the central nervous system were similar in the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS: LCAF achieved higher local control and overall survival rates than CF radiotherapy, without increasing radiation-related late complications such as cranial nerve palsy.

Paclitaxel with cisplatin in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients in concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and to see whether such a regime would be better tolerated than high dose cisplatin plus fluoracil in Chinese patients. Thirty-one patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were enrolled. Patients were scheduled to receive two courses of concomitant chemotherapy, starting on day 1 and then day 28 during radiotherapy (70-76 Gy in 35-38 fractions in 7-7.5 weeks). Chemotherapy was given by intravenous infusion, paclitaxel 120 mg/m(2) in 3 h, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (25 mg/m(2) days 1-3). Adjuvant therapy was paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) in 3 h, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (25 mg/m(2) days 1-3) on weeks 3, 6, 9 after radiotherapy. All patients completed radiotherapy, but for concomitant chemoradiotherapy, 20 of the 31 patients completed the 2 cycles of chemotherapy, while the other 11 could only receive 1 cycle due to various reasons. The median follow-up was 40 months, 2 patients developed locoregional recurrences, one of whom in the cervical lymph nodes, the other in the nasopharynx. The 3-year overall survival rate was 83.9% and the distant metastasis rate at 3 years was 13.6%. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia 12.9%, anaemia 6.45%, thrombocytopenia 3.22%, severe arrhythmia 3.2%, and hypersensitivity reaction 3.2%. In conclusion, paclitaxel with cisplatin as concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is feasible, safe, and might improve regional control and survival rates in Chinese patients.

Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LCAF).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of late course accelerated fractionated (LCAF) radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The end-points were local control, radiation-induced complications, and factors influencing survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1995 and April 1998, 178 consecutive NPC patients were admitted for radiation treatment. The radiation beam used was (60)Co gamma or 6 MV X rays. For the first two-thirds of the treatment, two daily fractions of 1.2 Gy were given to the primary lesion, with an interval of > or =6h, 5 days per week to a total dose of 48 Gy/40 fractions, over a period of 4 weeks. For the last third of the treatment, i.e., beginning the 5th week of treatment, an accelerated hyperfractionated schedule was carried out. The dose per fraction was increased to 1.5 Gy, 2 fractions per day with an interval of > or =6h, the total dose for this part of the protocol was 30 Gy/20 fractions over 2 weeks. Thus the total dose was 78 Gy in 60 fractions in 6 weeks. RESULTS: All patients completed the treatment. Acute mucositis: none in 2 cases, Grade 1 in 43 cases, Grade 2 in 78 cases, Grade 3 in 52 cases, and Grade 4 in 3 cases. Local control rate: the 5 year nasopharyngeal local control rate was 87.7%, and the cervical lymph nodes local control rate was 85.7%. The 5-year distant metastasis rate was 26.1%, and 5 year survivals were 67.9%, 16 (9%) patients had radiation-induced cranial nerve palsy, 7(4%) patients had temporal lobe or brainstem damage. CONCLUSIONS: With this treatment schedule, patients' tolerance was good, local control and 5 year survivals were better than conventional fractionation schedules, and radiation-related late complications did not increase, as 5-year survival rates of conventional fractionation radiotherapy were only 58%. Randomized clinical trials are being carried out to further confirm the efficacy of LCAF for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Comparison between continuous accelerated hyperfractionated and late-course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment results and toxicity of continuous accelerated hyperfractionated (CAHF) and late-course accelerated hyperfractionated (LCAF) radiotherapy (RT) for esophageal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1996 and March 1999, 101 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were randomized into two groups: 49 to the CAHF group and 52 to the LCAF group. Patients in the CAHF group received RT at 1.5 Gy/fraction b.i.d. (6-h interval), 5 d/wk, to a total dose 66 Gy in 44 fractions during 4.4 weeks. The patients in the LCAF group received conventional fractionation RT, 1.8 Gy/fraction, to a dose of 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions during 4.6 weeks, followed by accelerated fractionation RT using reduced fields, b.i.d., at 1.5 Gy/fraction, with a minimal interval of 6 h between fractions. The total dose was 68.4 Gy in 41 fraction during 6.4 weeks. Patient age, gender, performance score, diet, lesion location, lesion length, stage, and fractionation (CAHF or LCAF) were entered into the univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: All patients finished the treatment course, except for 1 patient in the CAHF group because of severe acute esophagitis. The rate of Grade I, II, and III acute bronchitis was 18.4% (9 of 49), 30.6% (15 of 49), and 8.2% (4 of 49) in the CAHF group and 13.5% (7 of 52), 21.2% (11 of 52), and 3.8% (2 of 52) in the LCAF group, respectively. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). The rate of Grade I, II, III, and IV acute esophagitis was 6.1% (3 of 49), 32.7% (16 of 49), 46.9% (23 of 49), and 14.3% (7 of 49) in the CAHF group and 26.9% (14 of 52), 32.7% (17 of 52), 7.7% (4 of 52), and 1.9% (1 of 52) in the LCAF group, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The local control rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 88.7%, 83.9%, and 55.9% in the CAHF group and 80.7%, 71.4%, and 57.1% in the LCAF group, respectively (p = 0.1251). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rate was 79.6%, 51.6%, and 37.6% in the CAHF group and 80.0%, 57.6%, and 41.2% in the LCAF group, respectively (p = 0.5757). Multivariate analysis showed that age and lesion length were independent significant prognostic factors for local control rate, and age was for the overall survival rate. The fractionation schedule had no significant prognostic effect. CONCLUSION: CAHF and LCAF result in similar 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control and survival rates. CAHF resulted in more severe acute esophagitis and may be less well tolerated than LCAF. The treatment results after the CAHF and LCAF regimens were better than those of historical conventional RT.

Prognostic factors for local control in non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy.

Radiotherapy plays an important role as a treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but local failure still occurs in 70% to 80% of the patients. A retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate the local control predictors for non-SCLC. From January 1990 to December 1996, 256 patients with stages I-IIIb NSCLC entered this analysis. All patients received definitive radiotherapy. The significance of prognostic variables on local control was evaluated using univariate analysis and Cox stepwise regression model. The prognostic index was calculated according to the value of each prognostic factor on local control. Median local progression-free survival time of the whole group was 9.7 months, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial local progression-free survival were 54%, 24%, and 19%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed patients with smaller tumor volume, earlier clinical staging, and treated with higher total dose in shortened overall treatment time had better local control. Tumor volume, clinical staging, and radiotherapy methods were independent prognostic factors on local control. The prognostic index model could predict the local control condition of NSCLC treated with radiation therapy more effectively than a single variable such as TNM staging.