Feasibility and Challenges with Measuring Adverse Childhood Experiences in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Purpose: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) screening tool captures some experiences of childhood adversity, ranging from abuse to parental separation. Research has shown a correlation between ACEs and both adult and childhood disease. This study evaluated the feasibility of conducting ACE screening in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and investigated associations with markers for severity of illness and utilization of resources. Methods: This was a cross sectional study screening for ACEs among children admitted to a single quaternary medical-surgical PICU. Children age 0-18 years old admitted to the PICU over a one-year period were considered for enrollment. A 10-question ACE screen was used to evaluate children for exposure to ACEs. Chart review was used to collect demographic and clinical data. Results: Of the 432 parents approached for enrollment, 400 (92.6%) agreed to participate. Most parents reported an ACE score of zero (68.9%) while 31% of participants experienced at least 1 ACE, of whom 14.8% experienced ≥ 2 ACEs. There was not a statistically significant association between ACE score and length of stay (p-value = 0.26) or level of respiratory support in patients with asthma (p-value = 0.15) or bronchiolitis (p-value = 0.83). The primary reasons for not approaching families were parent availability, non-English speaking parents, and social work concerns. Conclusions: This study demonstrates feasibility to collect sensitive psychosocial data in the PICU and highlights challenges to enrollment. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40653-023-00555-9.

"You Have Made All the Loving Choices": Good Parent Praise in Pediatric Critical Care Conferences.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Parents' ideas about what it means to be a "good parent" to their seriously ill child influence parental decision-making. Little is known about when, why, and how clinicians offer good-parent praise or how parents react. Our objective was to describe clinicians' spontaneous use of good-parent praise statements to parents during PICU care conferences and how parents respond. METHODS: Single-center, cross-sectional review of 72 transcripts of audio-recorded PICU care conferences in a quaternary medical center. Qualitative analysis was conducted to code triggers for clinician good-parent statements and parent responses. RESULTS: Clinicians made at least one statement of good-parent praise in 32% of family conferences. Triggers for clinician statements of good-parent praise were categorized into 6 themes: decision making, gratitude to the clinical team, defense of parenting, parental body language, parental guilt, and intention to close the meeting. Parental responses to clinician statements of good-parent praise fell into 6 themes: acknowledgment, medical talk, deepening of feelings expressed in conversation, focusing on a decision, redirecting on the patient, and gratitude. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians spontaneously praised parents for their role in being a good parent in less than one-third of family conferences. Clinician statements were triggered by verbal and nonverbal parental behaviors, a critical decision-making point in the conversation, and an intention to close the meeting. In response, parents frequently responded positively to the praise and often returned the gratitude or reflected on their feelings about caregiving for their child.