Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Patient Relat Outcome Meas ; 10: 335-343, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31754316

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis of patient-reported outcomes from the ELECT (Evaluation of Lanreotide Depot/Autogel Efficacy and Safety as a Carcinoid Syndrome Treatment) trial (NCT00774930) was to explore the effect of lanreotide on symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Specifically, this post hoc analysis was designed to identify the most important patient-reported outcomes for patients in ELECT. METHODS: The post hoc analysis of ELECT, a placebo-controlled study of lanreotide in patients with neuroendocrine tumors, evaluated patient-reported outcomes during the double-blind phase of the trial, specifically daily diarrhea and flushing symptoms, octreotide rescue use, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-GINET21 questionnaires at baseline and week 12. Principal component (PC) analysis was applied on baseline data to identify independent variable clusters and clinically meaningful summary measures that highly correlated to these PCs. From those, the minimum clinical important differences were derived so to perform a responder analysis. RESULTS: The three largest PCs captured 42.9% of the variation among baseline variables. The C30 summary score (C30-SS), diarrhea burden, and flushing burden were highly correlated with PC1, PC2, and PC3, respectively. Lanreotide patients were more likely to experience an improvement on the C30-SS (risk ratio [RR] 2.42; P=0.023), diarrhea burden (RR 2.85; P=0.005), and flushing burden (RR 1.39; P=0.31) compared to placebo patients. Lanreotide-treated patients have a higher probability of being a responder on at least one of the three domains of C30-SS, diarrhea burden, or flushing burden compared to placebo patients (RR 1.48; P=0.06). CONCLUSION: The higher response rates in the diarrhea burden are consistent with the previously reported effects of lanreotide on octreotide rescue medication use, while the findings of a greater efficacy of lanreotide vs placebo in the quality-of-life domains represent a novel aspect in the benefits of lanreotide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00774930.

2.
Oncologist ; 24(4): 463-474, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30355775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) is an established biomarker in neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome; however, its role in nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors is not defined. We present post hoc data on urinary 5-HIAA and plasma chromogranin A (CgA) from the CLARINET study. METHODS: Patients with well- or moderately differentiated, nonfunctioning, locally advanced or metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were randomized to deep subcutaneous lanreotide depot/autogel 120 mg or placebo once every 28 days for 96 weeks. Tumor response, evaluated centrally (RECIST 1.0), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by treatment and biochemical response, defined as (a) baseline >upper limit of normal (ULN, 41.6 µmol per day 5-HIAA; 98.1 µg/L CgA) and (b) ≥50% decrease from baseline and to ≤ULN value on study. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (82 of 171; lanreotide, n = 45; placebo, n = 37) and 66% (129 of 195; lanreotide, n = 65; placebo, n = 64) of randomized patients had 5-HIAA and CgA > ULN at baseline. Among patients with >ULN baseline values who did not progress after 96 weeks of treatment, significantly greater reductions in 5-HIAA and CgA were observed in lanreotide-treated versus placebo-treated patients throughout the study (all p < .05). PFS was significantly prolonged among 5-HIAA responders versus nonresponders (median not reached vs. 16.2 months, p < .0001; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.48) and CgA responders versus nonresponders (median not reached vs. 16.2 months, p = .0070; HR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.12-0.76), regardless of treatment arm. PFS was also significantly prolonged among lanreotide-treated 5-HIAA responders versus nonresponders (p = .0071) but was not significantly different among placebo-treated 5-HIAA responders versus nonresponders. There were no significant differences in PFS between lanreotide-treated CgA responders versus nonresponders or between placebo-treated CgA responders versus nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-HIAA findings are noteworthy because they occurred in patients with nonfunctioning enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Monitoring 5-HIAA and CgA may be useful when treating patients with nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Current guidelines focus only on the monitoring of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the diagnosis and management of functional neuroendocrine tumors with carcinoid syndrome. The current post hoc analysis of patients with nonfunctional enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the CLARINET study demonstrated that measuring and following both 5-HIAA and chromogranin A as biomarkers of disease progression may be useful in the management of patients with nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Chromogranin A/blood , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/secondary , Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid/urine , Neuroendocrine Tumors/secondary , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Peptides, Cyclic/therapeutic use , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/blood , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/urine , Humans , International Agencies , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/blood , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/urine , Pancreatic Neoplasms/blood , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/urine , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Survival Rate
3.
Endocr Pract ; 2018 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30084687

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are associated with elevated 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and chromogranin A (CgA) levels. This study aimed to analyze relationships between urinary 5-HIAA and plasma CgA levels and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Centrally assessed biomarker levels and correlations with progression-free survival (PFS) and carcinoid syndrome (CS) symptom control were evaluated in a pooled analysis of CLARINET (96-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled) and ELECT (16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 32-week initial open label and ≥2 year long-term extension open label) studies of adults with NETs, with (ELECT) or without (CLARINET) CS at 97 institutions. Patients were treated with subcutaneous lanreotide depot 120 mg monthly. RESULTS: Of 319 pooled patients, 86% and 95% had baseline 5-HIAA and CgA data, respectively, with 47% and 74% having levels greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN). PFS was longer among patients who experienced a decrease in biomarker levels at week 12, with statistical significance reached in the CgA cohort (not reached vs. 14.4 months; P<.0001). A large proportion (87%) of patients without symptoms of CS in the CLARINET study had detectable levels of 5-HIAA (48% >ULN). In ELECT, patients with CS who received lanreotide and experienced a biochemical response (≥50% decrease from baseline) achieved greater symptom control. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that 5-HIAA and CgA are secreted as biochemical biomarkers in many patients with NETs, regardless of clinical syndromes. Significant biochemical response was associated with improved clinical outcomes, as measured by improved PFS or improved CS symptom control. ABBREVIATIONS: 5-HIAA = 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid; CgA = chromogranin A; CI = confidence interval; CLARINET = Controlled Study of Lanreotide Antiproliferative Response in Neuroendocrine Tumors; CS = carcinoid syndrome; ELECT = Evaluation of Lanreotide Depot/Autogel Efficacy and Safety as a Carcinoid Syndrome Treatment; HR = hazard ratio; ITT = intention-to-treat; NET = neuroendocrine tumor; PanNET = pancreatic NET; PFS = progression-free survival; PPI = proton pump inhibitor; SSA = somatostatin analogue; ULN = upper limit of normal.

4.
Endocr Pract ; 24(3): 243-255, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547049

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This ELECT prospective analysis examined lanreotide depot/autogel for carcinoid syndrome (CS) symptom control in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who were responsive to prior octreotide (prior octreotide group) compared with patients who were naïve to prior somatostatin analogue treatment (de novo group). METHODS: Adults with histopathologically confirmed NET and stable CS (diarrhea and/or flushing) were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) lanreotide 120 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Patients reported diarrhea and/or flushing symptom severity and frequency and short-acting SC octreotide rescue therapy daily using an Interactive Voice/Web Response System. To evaluate the efficacy of lanreotide compared with placebo, the novel primary endpoint of patient-determined use of SC octreotide rescue therapy for breakthrough symptoms was used as a surrogate for symptom control. Clinically meaningful patient-reported treatment benefit was examined using daily patient-reported symptoms of diarrhea and flushing. RESULTS: Of the 115 randomized patients, 51 (n = 26 lanreotide, n = 25 placebo) were octreotide-naïve (de novo) and 64 (n = 33 lanreotide; n = 31 placebo) received prior octreotide. Lanreotide versus placebo patients had a lower mean percentage of days of SC octreotide rescue therapy in de novo and prior octreotide groups (least squares [LS] mean difference -19.1, P = .0477 and -6.9, P = .4332, respectively). The mean percentage of days with moderate/severe diarrhea and/or flushing was lower in lanreotide versus placebo patients in de novo and prior octreotide groups (LS mean difference -14.6, P = .0140 and -10.9, P = .0746, respectively). The transition from octreotide to lanreotide was generally well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Improvement in CS symptoms occurred with lanreotide treatment, regardless of prior octreotide use. ABBREVIATIONS: CI = confidence interval CS = carcinoid syndrome DB = double blind ELECT = Evaluation of Lanreotide depot/autogel Efficacy and safety as a Carcinoid-syndrome Treatment IOL = initial open-label IVRS/IWRS = interactive voice/web response system LS = least square NET = neuroendocrine tumor OR = odds ratio SC = subcutaneous SSA = somatostatin analogue SSTR = somatostatin receptor TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event.


Subject(s)
Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome/drug therapy , Peptides, Cyclic/therapeutic use , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Carcinoid Tumor/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Octreotide/therapeutic use , Self Report , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
5.
Oncologist ; 23(1): 16-24, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29038234

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the double-blind (DB) ELECT study, lanreotide depot/autogel significantly reduced versus placebo the need for short-acting octreotide for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome (CS) control in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients. Here we present patient-reported symptom data during DB and initial open-label (IOL) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with NETs and CS history, with/without prior somatostatin analog use, were randomized to 16 weeks' DB lanreotide 120 mg subcutaneous or placebo every 4 weeks, followed by 32 weeks' IOL lanreotide. Patients recorded diarrhea and/or flushing frequency and severity daily by Interactive Voice (Web) Response System for 1 month prior to randomization and throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 115 patients randomized (n = 59 lanreotide, n = 56 placebo), 56 lanreotide and 45 placebo patients enrolled in the IOL phase. During DB treatment, least square (LS) mean percentages of days with moderate/severe diarrhea and/or flushing were significantly lower for lanreotide (23.4%) versus placebo (35.8%; LS mean difference [95% confidence interval]: -12.4 [-20.73 to -4.07]; p = .004). For DB lanreotide patients, average daily composite (frequency × severity) diarrhea scores improved significantly between DB and IOL treatment (mean difference: -0.71 [-1.20 to -0.22]; p = .005), and remained stable for diarrhea and/or flushing. For DB placebo patients, composite scores for diarrhea, flushing, and diarrhea and/or flushing improved significantly between DB and IOL treatment (mean differences: -1.07 [-1.65 to -0.49]; -1.06 [-1.93 to -0.19]; and -2.13 [-3.35 to -0.91]; all p ≤ .018). CONCLUSION: Improved diarrhea and flushing control in CS patients during 16-week lanreotide treatment was sustained during maintenance of lanreotide treatment for the 32-week IOL phase (48 weeks total). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study prospectively collected daily patient-reported data on diarrhea and flushing from the ELECT trial to evaluate the direct impact of lanreotide depot on patients' relief of carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Treatment with lanreotide depot was associated with significant reductions in the percentages of days patients reported symptoms of diarrhea and flushing, as well as reductions in the frequency and severity of daily symptoms compared with placebo during 16 weeks of double-blind treatment. These improvements were sustained for 32 additional weeks of open-label lanreotide treatment (i.e., through week 48 of treatment), resulting in clinically meaningful, long-term symptom reduction.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Flushing/prevention & control , Gels/therapeutic use , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Peptides, Cyclic/therapeutic use , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Double-Blind Method , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Somatostatin/therapeutic use
6.
Horm Res Paediatr ; 86(3): 188-195, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27603324

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a triptorelin pamoate (11.25 mg) 3-month formulation in the management of central precocious puberty (CPP) (TP Study) and to retrospectively compare it with a triptorelin acetate (11.25 mg) 3-month formulation (TA Study). METHODS: We conducted two phase III, multicentre, single-stage, non-comparative, open-label studies. In the TP Study, patients with CPP received an intramuscular injection of triptorelin pamoate 11.25 mg at baseline and 3 months after baseline. Hormonal changes as well as safety and efficacy endpoints were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the 37 patients in the TP Study were similar to those of the TA Study population. A suppressed luteinising hormone (LH) response (LH peak ≤3 IU/l) to the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone test at 3 months (primary endpoint) occurred in 83.8 and 82.8% of the cases in the TP and the TA Study, respectively. At 6 months, a suppressed LH response occurred in 86.5 and 96.8% of the cases in the TP and the TA Study, respectively. Pubertal development was slowed in both studies. Adverse events were mild to moderate and resolved without sequelae in the TP Study. CONCLUSION: Triptorelin pamoate 11.25 mg administered at 3-month intervals is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with CPP. The efficacy and safety profiles appear similar to those reported in the literature for triptorelin acetate 11.25 mg. © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.


Subject(s)
Puberty, Precocious/drug therapy , Triptorelin Pamoate/administration & dosage , Child , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/blood , Humans , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Male , Puberty, Precocious/blood , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Triptorelin Pamoate/adverse effects
7.
Endocr Pract ; 22(9): 1068-80, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27214300

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lanreotide depot/autogel 120 mg for the control of carcinoid syndrome (CS) symptoms in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: This was a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00774930). Patients with/without prior somatostatin analog (SSA) use were randomized to lanreotide depot/autogel 120 mg or placebo every 4 weeks, with access to short-acting octreotide as rescue medication. The primary endpoint was the percentage of days in which short-acting octreotide was used, which was assessed from daily diaries using an analysis of covariance including the stratification variables baseline short-acting octreotide use and frequency of diarrhea/flushing. The proportions of patients experiencing treatment success was a supportive analysis. Adverse events were recorded at all visits. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were enrolled (lanreotide, n = 59; placebo, n = 56). The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) percentage of days with rescue octreotide use (primary endpoint) was significantly lower in the lanreotide (33.7%; 95% CI, 25.0%-42.4%) versus the placebo group (48.5%; 95% CI, 39.6%-57.4%), representing an absolute difference of -14.8% (95% CI, -26.8% to -2.8%; P = .017). The odds ratio of full/partial treatment success (≤3 days short-acting octreotide use weeks 12 to 15) was significantly greater with lanreotide than placebo (2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3; P = .036). No new safety concerns were identified, and lanreotide was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Lanreotide depot/autogel is effective for the control of CS symptoms in patients (SSA-naïve or experienced) with NETs. ABBREVIATIONS: AE = adverse event BMI = body mass index CS = carcinoid syndrome ELECT = Evaluating Lanreotide Efficacy and safety as a Carcinoid-syndrome Treatment HRQoL = health-related quality of life LTOLE = long-term open-label extension NET = neuroendocrine tumor OL = open label SSA = somatostatin analog.


Subject(s)
Carcinoid Tumor/drug therapy , Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Peptides, Cyclic/administration & dosage , Peptides, Cyclic/adverse effects , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoid Tumor/complications , Double-Blind Method , Drug Compounding , Female , Gels , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/complications , Octreotide/administration & dosage , Octreotide/adverse effects , Placebos , Somatostatin/administration & dosage , Somatostatin/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...