Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Neurología sobre el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple y manejo holístico del paciente 2023 / Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and holistic patient management in 2023

El último documento de consenso del Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes de la Sociedad Española de Neurología sobre el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) data del año 2016. Aunque muchas consideraciones continúan todavía vigentes, desde entonces se han producido cambios significativos en el manejo y tratamiento de esta enfermedad, motivados no solo por la aprobación de nuevos fármacos con diferentes mecanismos de acción, sino también por la evolución de conceptos otrora consolidados. Esto ha permitido abordar situaciones especiales como el embarazo y la vacunación desde otra perspectiva, e incluir nuevas variables en la toma de decisiones en práctica clínica, como plantear tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad (TME) de alta eficacia en fases tempranas, considerar la perspectiva del paciente y utilizar nuevas tecnologías como monitorización remota. Estos cambios han motivado la presente actualización del consenso mediante metodología Delphi, con el objetivo de reflejar el nuevo paradigma de manejo del paciente con EM basándose en la evidencia científica y la experiencia clínica de los participantes. Entre las principales conclusiones destacan como recomendaciones: iniciar TME inmunomodulador en el síndrome radiológico aislado con actividad radiológica persistente, evaluar la perspectiva del paciente y abandonar la terminología «líneas de tratamiento» en la clasificación de los TME (consenso mayor del 90%). Tras el diagnóstico de EM la elección del primer TME debería considerar la presencia/ausencia de factores de mal pronóstico (epidemiológicos, clínicos, radiológicos y biomarcadores) para la aparición de nuevos brotes o progresión de discapacidad, pudiendo plantear desde el inicio TME de alta eficacia. (AU)

The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient's perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring. In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants. The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term “lines of therapy” no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset. (AU)

Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and holistic patient management in 2023.

The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient's perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring. In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants. The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term "lines of therapy" no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset.

[15th Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: a review of the latest developments presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress (Part II)]. / XV Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2022 (II).

INTRODUCTION: On 4 and 5 November 2022, Madrid hosted the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, where neurologists specialised in multiple sclerosis outlined the latest developments presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress, held in Amsterdam from 26 to 28 October. AIM: To synthesise the content presented at the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, in an article broken down into two parts. DEVELOPMENT: This second part describes the new developments in terms of therapeutic strategies for escalation and de-escalation of disease-modifying therapies (DMT), when and in whom to initiate or switch to highly effective DMT, the definition of therapeutic failure, the possibility of treating radiologically isolated syndrome and the future of personalised treatment and precision medicine. It also considers the efficacy and safety of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, different approaches in clinical trial design and outcome measures to assess DMT in progressive stages, challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment, and treatment in special situations (pregnancy, comorbidity and the elderly). In addition, results from some of the latest studies with oral cladribine and evobrutinib presented at ECTRIMS 2022 are shown.

TITLE: XV Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2022 (II).Introducción. El 4 y el 5 de noviembre se celebró en Madrid la Reunión Post-ECTRIMS, en la que neurólogos expertos en esclerosis múltiple resumieron las principales novedades presentadas en el congreso de ECTRIMS 2022, celebrado entre el 26 y el 28 de octubre en Ámsterdam. Objetivo. Sintetizar las ponencias que tuvieron lugar en la Reunión Post-ECTRIMS, en un artículo desglosado en dos partes. Desarrollo. En esta segunda parte, se presentan las novedades sobre las estrategias terapéuticas de escalado y desescalado de los tratamientos modificadores de la enfermedad (TME), cuándo y a quién iniciar o cambiar a TME de alta eficacia, la definición de fracaso terapéutico, la posibilidad de tratar el síndrome radiológico asilado, el futuro del tratamiento personalizado y la medicina de precisión, la eficacia y seguridad del autotrasplante de células madre hematopoyéticas, diferentes aproximaciones en el diseño de ensayos clínicos y en las medidas de resultados para evaluar TME en fases progresivas, retos en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del deterioro cognitivo, y tratamiento en situaciones especiales (embarazo, comorbilidad y personas mayores). Además, se muestran los resultados de algunos de los últimos estudios realizados con cladribina oral y evobrutinib presentados en el ECTRIMS 2022.

[15th Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: a review of the latest developments presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress (Part I)]. / XV Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2022 (I).

INTRODUCTION: On 4 and 5 November 2022, Madrid hosted the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, where neurologists specialised in multiple sclerosis (MS) outlined the most relevant novelties presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress, held in Amsterdam from 26 to 28 October. AIM: To synthesise the content presented at the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, in an article broken down into two parts. DEVELOPMENT: In this first part, the initial events involved in the onset of MS, the role played by lymphocytes and the migration of immune system cells into the central nervous system are presented. It describes emerging biomarkers in body fluids and imaging findings that are predictive of disease progression and useful in the differential diagnosis of MS. It also discusses advances in imaging techniques which, together with a better understanding of the agents involved in demyelination and remyelination processes, provide a basis for dealing with remyelination in the clinical setting. Finally, the mechanisms triggering the inflammatory reaction and neurodegeneration involved in MS pathology are reviewed.

TITLE: XV Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2022 (I).Introducción. El 4 y el 5 de noviembre se celebró en Madrid la XV edición de la Reunión Post-ECTRIMS, donde neurólogos expertos en esclerosis múltiple (EM) resumieron las principales novedades presentadas en el congreso de ECTRIMS 2022, celebrado en Ámsterdam entre el 26 y el 28 de octubre. Objetivo. Sintetizar las ponencias que tuvieron lugar en la Reunión Post-ECTRIMS, en un artículo desglosado en dos partes. Desarrollo. En esta primera parte se presentan los primeros eventos involucrados en el inicio de la EM, la implicación de los linfocitos y la migración de células del sistema inmunitario hacia el sistema nervioso central. Se describen los biomarcadores emergentes en fluidos corporales y los hallazgos de imagen que permiten predecir la evolución de la enfermedad, y que resultan útiles en el diagnóstico diferencial de la EM. También se exponen los avances en las técnicas de imagen que, junto con un mayor conocimiento de los agentes involucrados en los procesos de desmielinización y remielinización, proporcionan una base para abordar la remielinización en el entorno clínico. Por último, se repasan los mecanismos desencadenantes de la reacción inflamatoria y la neurodegeneración implicados en la patología de la EM.

Alemtuzumab treatment in real clinical practice: Experience in a multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but in recent years safety-related concerns had emerged due to description of novel serious side effects not registered in CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II phase 3 studies, nor in TOPAZ extension study. Data about alemtuzumab use in real clinical practice are limited and based mainly on retrospective studies with small sample sizes. Therefore, more information about effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab in this context is needed. METHODS: A multicenter observational prospective study to investigate effectivity and safety of alemtuzumab in a real-world setting was performed. Primary endpoints were the change in annualized relapse rate (ARR), and in disability measured by EDSS score. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative probability of confirmed 6-month disability improvement and worsening. Disability worsening and disability improvement were considered when the EDSS score was increased or decreased, respectively, in 1 point if baseline EDSS score was <5.0, or in 0.5 point if baseline EDSS score was ≥5.5, confirmed over 6 months. Other secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved NEDA-3 status (absence of clinical relapses, disability EDSS progression, and MRI disease activity as depicted by new/enlarging T2 lesions or Gadolinium enhancing T1 lesions). Adverse events also were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 195 RRMS patients (70% female) who started alemtuzumab treatment were included. Mean of follow-up was 2.38 years. Alemtuzumab significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate from baseline with risk reductions of 86%, 83.5%, and 84%, at 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up respectively (Friedman test, p-value < 0.05 for all comparisons). Alemtuzumab also significantly reduced EDSS score over one and two years after starting alemtuzumab treatment (Friedman test, p-value<0.001 for both comparisons). A high proportion of patients presented confirmed 6-month stability or disability improvement (92%, 82%, and 79%, over 1, 2 and 3 years of follow-up respectively). The proportion of patients who retained NEDA-3 status at 12, 24 and 36 months were 61%, 49%, and 42%, respectively. Baseline characteristics associated with a lower probability of achieving NEDA-3 were younger age, sex female, high ARR, elevated number of previous treatments, and switch from a second line therapy. Infusion related reactions were the most frequent adverse event observed. The most common infections were urinary tract infections (50%), and upper respiratory tract infections (19%) over the 3 years of follow- up. Secondary thyroid autoimmunity was developed in 18.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab has demonstrated in real clinical practice high effectiveness in controlling multiple sclerosis activity, and no unexpected adverse events were observed.

Determinación plasmática de neurofilamentos como biomarcador en la esclerosis múltiple: conclusiones del foro EMotion / Plasma determination of neurofilaments as biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: conclusions of the EMotion Forum

Introducción: La identificación de biomarcadores de progresión de la enfermedad y de actividad clínica y subclínica continúa siendo una necesidad en el abordaje de la esclerosis múltiple (EM). Entre ellos, la determinación plasmática de niveles de los neurofilamentos de cadena ligera (NfL-PM) ha mostrado una posible correlación con la evolución clínica y la evaluación de la respuesta terapéutica en los pacientes con EM. Sin embargo, la determinación de NfL-PM afronta diversos obstáculos que dificultan su integración en la práctica asistencial, como la ausencia de valores normalizados y protocolos estandarizados. Objetivo: Este trabajo tiene un doble objetivo: a) revisar la evidencia sobre la utilidad en la práctica clínica de los NfL como biomarcadores de neurodegeneración e inflamación en la EM y b) recoger las conclusiones de un foro de expertos en EM reunidos para debatir sobre la utilidad y aplicabilidad de la determinación de NfL-PM en España (Foro EMotion 2020). Desarrollo: Los NfL-PM parecen particularmente útiles a la hora de determinar la actividad subclínica en la EM y ofrecen la posibilidad de identificar poblaciones con riesgo de desarrollo de EM, como los casos de síndrome radiológico aislado. Se deben considerar aspectos como la monitorización de fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad de inducción o la valoración de respuestas subóptimas para retirar fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad poco eficaces. Conclusiones: Los especialistas coincidieron en el potencial diagnóstico y pronóstico de la determinación de NfL-PM y en que su utilidad en la EM puede contribuir al desarrollo general de la técnica.(AU)

Introduction: In the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) there is still a need to identify biomarkers of disease progression, and clinical and subclinical activity. Among them, determination of neurofilament light chain plasma levels (NfL-PM) has shown a possible correlation with clinical course and assessment of therapeutic response in MS patients. However, the determination of NfL-PM has to overcome several obstacles that hinder its integration into healthcare practice, such as the absence of normalised values and standardised protocols. Aim: This article has two main aims: a) to review the evidence on the usefulness of NfL in clinical practice as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation in MS, and b) to pool the conclusions from a forum of MS experts gathered to discuss the usefulness and applicability of NfL-PM determination in Spain (EMotion Forum 2020). Development: NfL-PM seems particularly useful in determining subclinical activity in MS and offers the possibility of identifying populations at risk of developing MS, such as cases of radiologically isolated syndrome. Issues such as the monitoring of induction disease-modifying drugs or the assessment of suboptimal responses for the withdrawal of ineffective disease-modifying drugs should be considered. Conclusions: The experts agreed on the diagnostic and prognostic potential of NfL-PM determination and that its usefulness in MS can contribute to the general development of the technique.(AU)

[Plasma determination of neurofilaments as biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: conclusions of the EMotion Forum]. / Determinación plasmática de neurofilamentos como biomarcador en la esclerosis múltiple: conclusiones del foro EMotion.

INTRODUCTION: In the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) there is still a need to identify biomarkers of disease progression, and clinical and subclinical activity. Among them, determination of neurofilament light chain plasma levels (NfL-PM) has shown a possible correlation with clinical course and assessment of therapeutic response in MS patients. However, the determination of NfL-PM has to overcome several obstacles that hinder its integration into healthcare practice, such as the absence of normalised values and standardised protocols. AIM: This article has two main aims: a) to review the evidence on the usefulness of NfL in clinical practice as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation in MS, and b) to pool the conclusions from a forum of MS experts gathered to discuss the usefulness and applicability of NfL-PM determination in Spain (EMotion Forum 2020). DEVELOPMENT: NfL-PM seems particularly useful in determining subclinical activity in MS and offers the possibility of identifying populations at risk of developing MS, such as cases of radiologically isolated syndrome. Issues such as the monitoring of induction disease-modifying drugs or the assessment of suboptimal responses for the withdrawal of ineffective disease-modifying drugs should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: The experts agreed on the diagnostic and prognostic potential of NfL-PM determination and that its usefulness in MS can contribute to the general development of the technique.

TITLE: Determinación plasmática de neurofilamentos como biomarcador en la esclerosis múltiple: conclusiones del foro EMotion.Introducción. La identificación de biomarcadores de progresión de la enfermedad y de actividad clínica y subclínica continúa siendo una necesidad en el abordaje de la esclerosis múltiple (EM). Entre ellos, la determinación plasmática de niveles de los neurofilamentos de cadena ligera (NfL-PM) ha mostrado una posible correlación con la evolución clínica y la evaluación de la respuesta terapéutica en los pacientes con EM. Sin embargo, la determinación de NfL-PM afronta diversos obstáculos que dificultan su integración en la práctica asistencial, como la ausencia de valores normalizados y protocolos estandarizados. Objetivo. Este trabajo tiene un doble objetivo: a) revisar la evidencia sobre la utilidad en la práctica clínica de los NfL como biomarcadores de neurodegeneración e inflamación en la EM y b) recoger las conclusiones de un foro de expertos en EM reunidos para debatir sobre la utilidad y aplicabilidad de la determinación de NfL-PM en España (Foro EMotion 2020). Desarrollo. Los NfL-PM parecen particularmente útiles a la hora de determinar la actividad subclínica en la EM y ofrecen la posibilidad de identificar poblaciones con riesgo de desarrollo de EM, como los casos de síndrome radiológico aislado. Se deben considerar aspectos como la monitorización de fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad de inducción o la valoración de respuestas subóptimas para retirar fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad poco eficaces. Conclusiones. Los especialistas coincidieron en el potencial diagnóstico y pronóstico de la determinación de NfL-PM y en que su utilidad en la EM puede contribuir al desarrollo general de la técnica.

13th Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: review of the new developments presented at the 2020 ECTRIMS Congress (II). / XIII Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2020 (II).

INTRODUCTION: For more than a decade, after the ECTRIMS Congress, Spain has hosted the Post-ECTRIMS meeting, where neurologists with expertise in multiple sclerosis (MS) meet to review the new developments presented at the ECTRIMS. AIM: This article, published in two parts, summarises the presentations of the post-ECTRIMS meeting, held online on 16 and 17 October 2020. DEVELOPMENT: This second part highlights the importance of gender and age in understanding the pathology of the disease and optimising its management. The advances made in paediatric MS, from a neuropsychological and neuroimaging point of view, are presented. In turn, special attention is paid to the findings that contribute to a more personalised approach to therapy and to choosing the best treatment strategy (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for each patient. Similarly, results related to possible strategies to promote remyelination are addressed. Although there are no major advances in the treatment of progressive forms, some quantitative methods for the classification of these patients are highlighted. In addition, the study also includes results on potential tools for assessment and treatment of cognitive deficits, and some relevant aspects observed in the spectrum of neuromyelitis optica disorders. Finally, the results of the papers considered as breaking news at the ECTRIMS-ACTRIMS are detailed. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the advances presented were related to the knowledge of paediatric MS, remyelination strategies and cognitive assessment in MS.

TITLE: XIII Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2020 (II).Introducción. Desde hace más de una década, tras el Congreso ECTRIMS, se celebra en España la reunión post-ECTRIMS, donde neurólogos expertos en esclerosis múltiple (EM) se reúnen para revisar las novedades presentadas en el ECTRIMS. Objetivo. En el presente artículo, publicado en dos partes, se resumen las ponencias de la reunión post-ECTRIMS, celebrada los días 16 y 17 de octubre de 2020 virtualmente. Desarrollo. En esta segunda parte se destaca la importancia del género y la edad en la compresión de la patología de la enfermedad y la optimización de su manejo. Se exponen los avances realizados en la EM pediátrica desde un punto de vista neuropsicológico y de neuroimagen. Por su parte, cobran especial protagonismo los hallazgos que contribuyen a realizar un enfoque del tratamiento más personalizado y a elegir la mejor estrategia de tratamiento (farmacológica y no farmacológica) para cada paciente. De igual forma, se abordan los resultados relacionados con las estrategias posibles que promuevan la remielinización. Aunque no hay grandes avances en el tratamiento de formas progresivas, se destacan algunos métodos cuantitativos para la clasificación de estos pacientes. Además, se incluyen los resultados sobre herramientas potenciales de evaluación y tratamiento de los déficits cognitivos, y algunos aspectos relevantes observados en el espectro de los trastornos de la neuromielitis óptica. Por último, se detallan los resultados de las ponencias consideradas como noticias de última hora en el ECTRIMS-ACTRIMS. Conclusiones. Se presentaron avances principalmente sobre el conocimiento de la EM pediátrica, las estrategias de remielinización y la evaluación cognitiva en la EM.

13th Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: review of the new developments presented at the 2020 ECTRIMS Congress (I). / XIII Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2020 (I).

INTRODUCTION: For more than a decade, following the ECTRIMS Congress, the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting has been held in Spain, where neurologists with expertise in multiple sclerosis (MS) from all over the country meet to review the most relevant latest developments presented at the ECTRIMS congress (on this occasion held together with ACTRIMS). AIM: This article, published in two parts, summarises the presentations that took place at the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, held online on 16 and 17 October 2020. DEVELOPMENT: This first part includes the latest results regarding the impact of the environment and lifestyle on risk of MS and its clinical course, and the role of epigenetics and genetic factors on these processes. Findings from preclinical and clinical research on the lymphocyte subtypes identified and the involvement of lymphoid follicles and meningeal involvement in the disease are discussed. Changes in brain structure are addressed at the microscopic and macroscopic levels, including results from high-resolution imaging techniques. The latest advances on biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of MS, and on the involvement of the microbiome in these patients are also reported. Finally, results from patient registries on the impact of COVID-19 in MS patients are outlined. CONCLUSIONS: There have been new data on MS risk factors, the impact of MS at the cellular and structural level, the role of the microbiome in the disease, biomarkers, and the relationship between COVID-19 and MS.

TITLE: XIII Reunión Post-ECTRIMS: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso ECTRIMS 2020 (I).Introducción. Desde hace más de una década, tras el congreso ECTRIMS, se celebra en España la reunión Post-ECTRIMS, donde neurólogos expertos en esclerosis múltiple (EM) de toda España se reúnen para revisar las principales novedades presentadas en el ECTRIMS (en esta ocasión, celebrado junto con el ACTRIMS). Objetivo. En el presente artículo, publicado en dos partes, se resumen las ponencias que tuvieron lugar en la reunión Post-ECTRIMS, celebrada los días 16 y 17 de octubre de 2020 de forma virtual. Desarrollo. En esta primera parte se incluyen los últimos resultados acerca del impacto del ambiente y el estilo de vida sobre el riesgo de EM y su curso clínico, y el papel de la epigenética y los factores genéticos sobre estos procesos. Se discuten los hallazgos en investigación preclínica y clínica sobre los subtipos de linfocitos identificados, y la implicación de los folículos linfoides y la afectación meníngea en la enfermedad. Los cambios en la estructura cerebral se abordan a nivel microscópico y macroscópico, incluyendo resultados de técnicas de imagen de alta resolución. También se presentan los últimos avances sobre biomarcadores para el diagnóstico y el pronóstico de la EM, y sobre la afectación del microbioma en estos pacientes. Por último, se esbozan los resultados de registros de pacientes sobre el impacto de la COVID-19 en los pacientes con EM. Conclusiones. Ha habido nuevos datos sobre factores de riesgo de la EM, impacto de la EM a nivel celular y estructural, papel del microbioma en la enfermedad, biomarcadores y la relación entre COVID-19 y EM.

Recomendaciones para la vacunación en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple candidatos a terapias inmunosupresoras: documento de consenso español / Recommendations for vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis who are eligible for immunosuppressive therapies: Spanish consensus statement

ANTECEDENTES: La reciente aparición de terapias de alta efectividad para el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple (EM), con potencial riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas, obliga plantear estrategias de prevención y minimización de riesgos. La vacunación constituye una parte esencial del manejo de estos pacientes. Este consenso recoge una serie de pautas y escenarios prácticos de vacunación en pacientes adultos con EM candidatos a tratamiento inmunosupresor. METODOLOGÍA: Se llevó a cabo un consenso de tipo formal. Tras definir el alcance del documento, se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de vacunación en pacientes con EM, así como guías de vacunación específicas de pacientes inmunosuprimidos y en tratamiento biológico con otras enfermedades. Para la formulación de las recomendaciones se empleó la metodología de Modified Nominal Group Technique. DESARROLLO: La vacunación en pacientes candidatos a tratamiento inmunosupresor se debe plantear antes de iniciar un tratamiento inmunosupresor siempre que la situación clínica del paciente lo permita. Se recomendarán tanto aquellas indicadas en el calendario vacunal del adulto, como algunas específicas, en función de la inmunidad previa. Si ya está instaurado el tratamiento inmunosupresor las vacunas vivas atenuadas estarán contraindicadas. Para aquellas vacunas que dispongan de un correlato de protección se recomienda monitorizar la respuesta serológica transcurridos de uno a 2 meses de la última dosis

BACKGROUND: The recent development of highly effective treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) and the potential risk of infectious complications require the development of prevention and risk minimisation strategies. Vaccination is an essential element of the management of these patients. This consensus statement includes a series of recommendations and practical scenarios for the vaccination of adult patients with MS who are eligible for highly effective immunosuppressive treatments. METHODOLOGY: A formal consensus procedure was followed. Having defined the scope of the statement, we conducted a literature search on recommendations for the vaccination of patients with MS and specific vaccination guidelines for immunosuppressed patients receiving biological therapy for other conditions. The modified nominal group technique methodology was used to formulate the recommendations. DEVELOPMENT: Vaccination in patients who are candidates for immunosuppressive therapy should be considered before starting immunosuppressive treatment providing the patient's clinical situation allows. Vaccines included in the routine adult vaccination schedule, as well as some specific ones, are recommended depending on the pre-existing immunity status. If immunosuppressive treatment is already established, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. For vaccines with a correlate of protection, it is recommended to monitor the serological response in an optimal interval of 1-2 months from the last dose

Recommendations for vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis who are eligible for immunosuppressive therapies: Spanish consensus statement. / Recomendaciones para la vacunación en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple candidatos a terapias inmunosupresoras: documento de consenso español.

BACKGROUND: The recent development of highly effective treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) and the potential risk of infectious complications require the development of prevention and risk minimisation strategies. Vaccination is an essential element of the management of these patients. This consensus statement includes a series of recommendations and practical scenarios for the vaccination of adult patients with MS who are eligible for highly effective immunosuppressive treatments. METHODOLOGY: A formal consensus procedure was followed. Having defined the scope of the statement, we conducted a literature search on recommendations for the vaccination of patients with MS and specific vaccination guidelines for immunosuppressed patients receiving biological therapy for other conditions. The modified nominal group technique methodology was used to formulate the recommendations. DEVELOPMENT: Vaccination in patients who are candidates for immunosuppressive therapy should be considered before starting immunosuppressive treatment providing the patient's clinical situation allows. Vaccines included in the routine adult vaccination schedule, as well as some specific ones, are recommended depending on the pre-existing immunity status. If immunosuppressive treatment is already established, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. For vaccines with a correlate of protection, it is recommended to monitor the serological response in an optimal interval of 1-2 months from the last dose.

Neuroimagen funcional en el diagnóstico de pacientes con síndrome parkinsoniano: actualización y recomendaciones para el uso clínico / Functional neuroimaging in the diagnosis of patients with Parkinsonism: Update and recommendations for clinical use

Las técnicas de neuroimagen funcional se han utilizado tradicionalmente en la investigación de los pacientes que presentan un síndrome parkinsoniano. Sin embargo, la aparición de radiofármacos comerciales junto a la disponibilidad de equipos de tomografía por emisión de fotón único (SPECT) y más recientemente de la tomografía por emisión de positrones (PET), han permitido su empleo rutinario en la práctica clínica. Precisamente el desarrollo y grado de evidencia clínica alcanzado por los biomarcadores de neuroimagen durante las 2 últimas décadas ha conllevado que progresivamente se estén incluyendo en los criterios clínicos de diagnóstico de enfermedades neurodegenerativas que cursan con un síndrome parkinsoniano. No obstante, la diversidad de radiofármacos que permiten evaluar la funcionalidad de las vías anatómicas involucradas en la neurodegeneración presente en los diferentes síndromes parkinsonianos (vía nigroestriatal dopaminérgica, actividad neuronal de los ganglios basales y la corteza, inervación simpática miocárdica), junto a las técnicas de neuroimagen (gammagrafía, SPECT y PET) han originado cierta controversia con respecto a la indicación de las pruebas de neuroimagen como exploración complementaria. En esta revisión realizada por un panel de expertos en medicina nuclear y neurología se analizan las técnicas de neuroimagen funcional disponibles haciendo especial énfasis en las consideraciones prácticas del diagnóstico de pacientes con un síndrome parkinsoniano de origen incierto y la valoración de la progresión de la enfermedad de Parkinson (AU)

Functional Neuroimaging has been traditionally used in research for patients with different Parkinsonian syndromes. However, the emergence of commercial radiotracers together with the availability of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and, more recently, positron emission tomography (PET) have made them available for clinical practice. Particularly, the development of clinical evidence achieved by functional neuroimaging techniques over the past two decades have motivated a progressive inclusion of several biomarkers in the clinical diagnostic criteria for neurodegenerative diseases that occur with Parkinsonism. However, the wide range of radiotracers designed to assess the involvement of different pathways in the neurodegenerative process underlying Parkinsonian syndromes (dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway integrity, basal ganglia and cortical neuronal activity, myocardial sympathetic innervation), and the different neuroimaging techniques currently available (scintigraphy, SPECT and PET), have generated some controversy concerning the best neuroimaging test that should be indicated for the differential diagnosis of Parkinsonism. In this article, a panel of nuclear medicine and neurology experts has evaluated the functional neuroimaging techniques emphazising practical considerations related to the diagnosis of patients with uncertain origin parkinsonism and the assessment Parkinson’s disease progression (AU)

[Functional neuroimaging in the diagnosis of patients with Parkinsonism: Update and recommendations for clinical use]. / Neuroimagen funcional en el diagnóstico de pacientes con síndrome parkinsoniano: actualización y recomendaciones para el uso clínico.

Functional Neuroimaging has been traditionally used in research for patients with different Parkinsonian syndromes. However, the emergence of commercial radiotracers together with the availability of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and, more recently, positron emission tomography (PET) have made them available for clinical practice. Particularly, the development of clinical evidence achieved by functional neuroimaging techniques over the past two decades have motivated a progressive inclusion of several biomarkers in the clinical diagnostic criteria for neurodegenerative diseases that occur with Parkinsonism. However, the wide range of radiotracers designed to assess the involvement of different pathways in the neurodegenerative process underlying Parkinsonian syndromes (dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway integrity, basal ganglia and cortical neuronal activity, myocardial sympathetic innervation), and the different neuroimaging techniques currently available (scintigraphy, SPECT and PET), have generated some controversy concerning the best neuroimaging test that should be indicated for the differential diagnosis of Parkinsonism. In this article, a panel of nuclear medicine and neurology experts has evaluated the functional neuroimaging techniques emphazising practical considerations related to the diagnosis of patients with uncertain origin parkinsonism and the assessment Parkinson's disease progression.

Long-term exposure to duodenal levodopa/carbidopa infusion therapy improves quality of life in relation especially to mobility, activities of daily living, and emotional well-being.

BACKGROUND: Continuous duodenal levodopa infusion (DLI) is an effective therapy that improves quality of life (QoL) in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, in which aspects improve the patients their QoL has been poorly documented. METHODS: We evaluated 39-item Parkinson's disease Quality of Life Questionnaire Summary Index score (PDQ-39SI) changes analyzing its different domains in nine patients with advanced PD treated with DLI. RESULTS: All the patients (64.7 ± 11.1 years, 55.5% men) improved PDQ-39SI 6 months after beginning with DLI (29.7 ± 8.6, P = 0.008) and after median duration infusion of 25.3 ± 8.8 months (34.8 ± 11.2, P = 0.008) compared with baseline (55.6 ± 11.5). All domains except social support improved significantly at 6 months. Mobility (P = 0.012), activities of daily living (P = 0.015), and emotional well-being (P = 0.008) improved significantly at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: DLI improves QoL in patients with advanced PD after short- and long-term exposure. Whereas all domains except social support improve after 6 months under DLI, only mobility, activities of daily living and emotional well-being improve significantly after long-term exposure to DLI.

Experiencia con la infusión continua de levodopa intraduodenal (Duodopa®) en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada en un hospital de segundo nivel asistencial / Experience with continuous levodopa enteral infusion (Duodopa®) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease in a secondary level hospital

Introducción: La infusión continua de levodopa intraduodenal (Duodopa®) constituye una alternativa a la infusión subcutánea de apomorfina y a la cirugía en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) avanzada. Describimos nuestra experiencia con Duodopa® en pacientes con EP avanzada.Métodos: Realizamos un estudio epidemiológico, observacional, no intervencionista, poblacional, descriptivo, y retrospectivo, en el que se incluyen todos aquellos pacientes con EP avanzada tratados con Duodopa® por parte de la Sección de Neurología del Hospital A. Marcide de Ferrol hasta abril de 2010. Resultados: Once de un total de 12 pacientes seleccionados fueron tratados con Duodopa® [63,6% varones; edad media 62,7±10,6 (44-74) años]. En el momento de ser seleccionados para recibir Duodopa® presentaban: tiempo medio de evolución de enfermedad de 14,5±8,9 (3-34) años, dosis media de levodopa oral de 918,2±277,7 (450-1300) mg/día, y un estadio de Hoehn y Yahr de 3,7±0,5 (3-4). Nueve pacientes mantienen el tratamiento con Duodopa®. Hubo mejoría en las fluctuaciones motoras (72,7% gran mejoría) y discinesias (55,5% gran mejoría) con reducción del tiempo off/día (90,9%) y tiempo con discinesias/día (66,6%) después de un tiempo total de seguimiento con Duodopa® de 170,5 (3-31) meses. La mejoría en las escalas PDQ-39 y Schwab&England fue de 38,5±19,8 y 24±12,5 puntos respectivamente (p<0,05). La dosis media equivalente oral de levodopa (abril 2010) fue de 1683,4±295,8 (1234-2216) mg/día.Conclusiones: Duodopa® pudiera ser un tratamiento efectivo, seguro, y bien tolerado alternativo a la cirugía y apomorfina subcutánea en pacientes con EP avanzada adecuadamente seleccionados (AU)

Introduction: Continuous levodopa delivery by enteral infusion (Duodopa®) is an alternative to deep brain stimulation and subcutaneous apomorphine to control motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). We report our experience with Duodopa® therapy in 11 patients with advanced PD.Methods: We retrospectively assessed clinical and quality of life changes in all patients with PD with severe motor fluctuations and dyskinesias who started continuous daily levodopa duodenal infusion through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy from September 2006 (Duodopa® was approved for advanced PD treatment in Spain at that date) until April 2010 at the A. Marcide Hospital of Spain.Results: Nine patients received Duodopa® [62.7±10.6 (44-74) years, 63.6% male)]. Pre-Duodopa® clinical characteristics of patients were: disease duration 14.5±8.9 (3-34) years, oral levodopa dose 918.2±277.7 (450-1300) mg/day, and Hoehn and Yahr staging 3.7±0.5 (3-4). Nine patients are still receiving Duodopa®. Patients improved motor fluctuations (72.7% significant improvement), dyskinesia (55.5% significant improvement), daily off-time (90.9%) and daily duration dyskinesia (66.6%) after total infusion time of 170.5 months (3-31). The improvement in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and Schwab&England Capacity for Daily Living Scale were 38.5±19.8 and 24±12.5 respectively (P<0.05). Equivalent daily dose of levodopa (April 2010) was 1683.4±295.8 (1234-2216) mg/day.Conclusions: Intraduodenal infusion of levodopa offers an important alternative in treating patients with advanced Parkinson disease (AU)

[Experience with continuous levodopa enteral infusion (Duodopa(®)) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease in a secondary level hospital]. / Experiencia con la infusión continua de levodopa intraduodenal (Duodopa(®)) en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada en un hospital de segundo nivel asistencial.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous levodopa delivery by enteral infusion (Duodopa(®)) is an alternative to deep brain stimulation and subcutaneous apomorphine to control motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). We report our experience with Duodopa(®) therapy in 11 patients with advanced PD. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed clinical and quality of life changes in all patients with PD with severe motor fluctuations and dyskinesias who started continuous daily levodopa duodenal infusion through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy from September 2006 (Duodopa(®) was approved for advanced PD treatment in Spain at that date) until April 2010 at the A. Marcide Hospital of Spain. RESULTS: Nine patients received Duodopa(®) [62.7±10.6 (44-74) years, 63.6% male)]. Pre-Duodopa(®) clinical characteristics of patients were: disease duration 14.5±8.9 (3-34) years, oral levodopa dose 918.2±277.7 (450-1300) mg/day, and Hoehn and Yahr staging 3.7±0.5 (3-4). Nine patients are still receiving Duodopa(®). Patients improved motor fluctuations (72.7% significant improvement), dyskinesia (55.5% significant improvement), daily off-time (90.9%) and daily duration dyskinesia (66.6%) after total infusion time of 170.5 months (3-31). The improvement in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and Schwab&England Capacity for Daily Living Scale were 38.5±19.8 and 24±12.5 respectively (P<0.05). Equivalent daily dose of levodopa (April 2010) was 1683.4±295.8 (1234-2216) mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Intraduodenal infusion of levodopa offers an important alternative in treating patients with advanced Parkinson disease.

[Descriptive analysis of the use of atypical antipsychotics under compassionate-use in a health area in Ferrol (La Coruña, Spain)]. / Análisis descriptivo de la prescripción de antipsicóticos atípicos de uso compasivo en el área sanitaria de Ferrol.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although atypical antipsychotics (AA) provoke fewer extra-pyramidal symptoms (ES) than classic antipsychotics, their use in patients greater than or equal to 75 years old with dementia must be under compassionate-use. This is an important limitation. We performed a descriptive analysis of the use of atypical antipsychotics under compassionate-use (AACU) in the Ferrol health area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed all the patients who were receiving an AACU from March, 2004 (that is the date when prescription under compassionate-use of AA came into force in Spain) to November 30, 2008. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three of 164 patients (63.6% women; median ages, 81.9 ± 4.95 years) were included. Diagnostic aetiologies were: 42.9% Alzheimer's disease, 30.8% Parkinson-dementia/Lewy body disease, and 15.8% vascular/mixed dementia. A total of 68.4% of patients had received other anti-psychotic drugs previously and 32.3% had ES due to antipsychotics. The AACU received were: quetiapine (76.7%), ziprasidone (18.8%), and olanzapine (4.5%). Median follow-up time was 20.25 ± 20.38 months. Side effects were observed in 19.7% of patients. Improvement of NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory) was 33.3 ± 24.75 points. Agitation/aggressiveness (5.6 ± 4.55), delirious ideas (4.94 ± 5.07), irritability (4.38 ± 4.94), and anxiety (4.32 ± 4.83) were the symptoms that most improved. Although there were no differences between AACU, quetiapine was associated with significant maintenance in monotherapy (94.1% vs 72% for ziprasidone and 83.3% for olanzapine; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: AACU are effective and well tolerated drugs. Quetiapine was the most frequently used AACU. An excessive percentage of patients previously received other antipsychotics and present with ES.

Análisis descriptivo de la prescripción de antipsicóticos atípicos de uso compasivo en el área sanitaria de Ferrol / Descriptive analysis of the use of atypical antipsychotics under compassionate-use in a health area in Ferrol (La Coruña, Spain)

Objetivos: Aunque quetiapina y ziprasidona producen menos síntomas extrapiramidales (SEP) que otros antipsicóticos, su uso en pacientes mayores de 75 años con demencia se ve condicionado por la obligatoriedad de prescribirlos “por uso compasivo”. Realizamos un análisis descriptivo del uso de antipsicóticos atípicos de uso compasivo (AAUC) en el área sanitaria de Ferrol. Pacientes y métodos: Incluimos a todos los pacientes que recibieran un AAUC desde marzo de 2004 (fecha en que entró en vigor la dispensación de AAUC) hasta el 30-11-2008. Resultados: Se incluyó a 133 de un total de 164 pacientes (el 63,6%, mujeres; media±desviación estándar de edad, 81,9±4,95 años). El 94,1% presentaba demencia (el 42,9%, enfermedad de Alzheimer; el 30,8%, demencia-enfermedad de Parkinson, y el 15,8%, demencia vascular/mixta). El 68,4% había recibido algún otro antipsicótico previo y el 32,3% presentaba SEP secundarios. Los AAUC prescritos fueron: quetiapina (76,7%), ziprasidona (18,8%) y olanzapina (4,5%). La media de tiempo de seguimiento fue 20,25±20,38 meses. El cumplimiento terapéutico fue del 95,5%. El 19,7% presentó efectos secundarios. La media de mejora en la escala NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory) fue 33,3±24,75 puntos. La agitación/agresividad (5,6±4,55), las ideas delirantes (4,94±5,07), la irritabilidad (4,38±4,94) y la ansiedad (4,32±4,83) fueron los síntomas que más mejoraron. Aunque no hubo diferencias entre los 3 AAUC, quetiapina conllevó un mayor mantenimiento en monoterapia (el 94,1 frente al 72% de ziprasidona y el 83,3% de olanzapina; p<0,0001). Conclusiones: Los AAUC son fármacos efectivos y bien tolerados. Quetiapina es el AAUC más utilizado. Un porcentaje excesivo de pacientes reciben antes otros antipsicóticos y presentan SEP (AU)

Background and objective: Although atypical antipsychotics (AA) provoke fewer extra-pyramidal symptoms (ES) than classic antipsychotics, their use in patients greater than or equal to 75 years old with dementia must be under compassionate-use. This is an important limitation. We performed a descriptive analysis of the use of atypical antipsychotics under compassionate-use (AACU) in the Ferrol health area.Patients and methods: We retrospectively assessed all the patients who were receiving an AACU from March, 2004 (that is the date when prescription under compassionate-use of AA came into force in Spain) to November 30, 2008. Results: One hundred and thirty-three of 164 patients (63.6% women; median ages, 81.9 ± 4.95 years) were included. Diagnostic aetiologies were: 42.9% Alzheimer's disease, 30.8% Parkinson-dementia/Lewy body disease, and 15.8% vascular/mixed dementia. A total of 68.4% of patients had received other anti-psychotic drugs previously and 32.3% had ES due to antipsychotics. The AACU received were: quetiapine (76.7%), ziprasidone (18.8%), and olanzapine (4.5%). Median follow-up time was 20.25 ± 20.38 months. Side effects were observed in 19.7% of patients. Improvement of NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory) was 33.3 ± 24.75 points. Agitation/aggressiveness (5.6 ± 4.55), delirious ideas (4.94 ± 5.07), irritability (4.38 ± 4.94), and anxiety (4.32 ± 4.83) were the symptoms that most improved. Although there were no differences between AACU, quetiapine was associated with significant maintenance in monotherapy (94.1% vs 72% for ziprasidone and 83.3% for olanzapine; p < 0.0001).Conclusions: AACU are effective and well tolerated drugs. Quetiapine was the most frequently used AACU. An excessive percentage of patients previously received other antipsychotics and present with ES (AU)

Multiple cranial neuropathy associated with herpes simplex virus infection and anti-GM2 immunoglobulin M antibodies.

Antiganglioside antibodies can appear after several acute infections and are often associated with various clinical patterns of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Thus, for example, cytomegalovirus infection has been associated with anti-GM2 antibodies and Guillain-Barré syndrome variants with severe sensory loss and cranial nerve involvement. We report on a patient who developed multiple cranial neuropathy associated with herpes simplex virus infection and anti-GM2 immunoglobulin M antibodies.

Salmonella enteríca portadora de betalactamasas de espectro extendido (blee) aisladas en Zaragoza durante los años 2001-2005 / No disponible

No disponible