Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of the Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey to the Mediterranean Spanish Context (NEMS-P-MED).

Individuals' perceptions of their food environments are a mediator between exposure to the environment and people's interaction with it. The Nutrition Environment Measures Surveys (NEMS) are valid and reliable measures to assess food environments. In Spain, there is no adapted instrument to measure the perceived obesogenic environment. This article aims to adapt and evaluate the Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey for a Spanish context (NEMS-P-MED). The Spanish version has 32 questions to measure the perception about availability, accessibility and marketing of 3 types of environment: home, shops and restaurants. We assess feasibility, construct validity and internal consistency reliability through a sample of 95 individuals. The internal consistency was acceptable for most items (Cronbach's alpha coefficients range from 0.6 to 0.9), similar to that of the original scale. The NEMS-P-MED has been shown to be valid and, on certain items reliable, and was useful to assess the population's perceptions of the food environment in the home, restaurants and food stores in a Spanish context. Adapting standardized measurement tools to specific contexts to assess the perceived and observed characteristics of food environments may facilitate the development of effective policy interventions to reduce excess weight.

Low adherence to the western and high adherence to the mediterranean dietary patterns could prevent colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess if the associations found between three previously identified dietary patterns with breast, prostate and gastric cancer are also observed for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: MCC-Spain is a multicase-control study that collected information of 1629 incident cases of CRC and 3509 population-based controls from 11 Spanish provinces. Western, Prudent and Mediterranean data-driven dietary patterns-derived in another Spanish case-control study-were reconstructed in MCC-Spain. Their association with CRC was assessed using mixed multivariable logistic regression models considering a possible interaction with sex. Risk by tumor site (proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum) was evaluated using multinomial regression models. RESULTS: While no effect of the Prudent pattern on CRC risk was observed, a high adherence to the Western dietary pattern was associated with increased CRC risk for both males [ORfourth(Q4) vs. first(Q1)quartile (95% CI): 1.45 (1.11;1.91)] and females [ORQ4 vs. Q1 (95% CI): 1.50 (1.07;2.09)] but seem to be confined to distal colon [ORfourth(Q4) vs. first(Q1)quartile (95% CI): 2.02 (1.44;2.84)] and rectal [ORQ4 vs. Q1 (95% CI): 1.46 (1.05;2.01)] tumors. The protective effect of the Mediterranean dietary pattern against CRC was observed for both sexes [males: ORQ4 vs. Q1 (95% CI): 0.71 (0.55;0.92); females: ORQ4 vs. Q1 (95% CI): 0.56 (0.40;0.77)] and for all cancer sites: proximal colon [ORQ4 vs. Q1 (95% CI): 0.70 (0.51;0.97)], distal colon [ORQ4 vs. Q1 (95% CI): 0.65 (0.48;0.89)], and rectum (ORQ4 vs. Q1 (95% CI): 0.60 (0.45;0.81)]. CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with most of the associations previously found between these patterns and breast, prostate and gastric cancer risk and indicate that consuming whole fruits, vegetables, legumes, olive oil, nuts, and fish and avoiding red and processed meat, refined grains, sweets, caloric drinks, juices, convenience food, and sauces might reduce CRC risk.

Evaluación del equilibrio alimentario de los menús escolares de la Comunidad Valenciana (España) mediante un cuestionario / Evaluation of school menu food balance in the Autonomous Community of Valencia (Spain) by means of a questionnaire

Objetivo: Evaluar el equilibrio alimentario de los menús escolares de la Comunidad Valenciana (España) mediante un cuestionario. Método: Estudio observacional transversal. Muestra por conveniencia de 255 menús escolares mensuales (20 días cada uno). Variables independientes: tamaño de la ciudad del colegio, provincia, ubicación (costa vs. interior), titularidad (público vs. privado), diseño del menú (empresa vs. colegio) y mes (mayo vs. octubre). Se usó como instrumento el cuestionario EQ-MEs con 17 ítems, que mide el equilibrio. Se compararon las diferencias en el equilibrio de los menús y la media de raciones mensuales considerando los diferentes niveles de las variables independientes. Resultados: La media del índice de equilibrio obtenida fue de 9,19 puntos (rango: 0-17). El 78,4% de los menús fueron diseñados por empresas. El 60,4% fueron clasificados como adecuados y el 0,8% como equilibrados. Los menús de empresas obtuvieron mayor puntuación (9,49) que los diseñados por los colegios (8,13). Obtuvieron mayor puntuación los ubicados en Castellón (10,35) que los de Alicante (9,43) y Valencia (8,86). Solo un 3,1% de los menús estudiados se adecuaban a las recomendaciones de raciones de carne, el 37,6% a las de legumbres, el 49,4% a las de pescado y el 37% a las de fruta. Conclusión: Con el cuestionario EQ-Mes, la mayoría de los menús ofertados en la Comunidad Valenciana son adecuados para la población infantil. Para mejorarlos deberían reducirse las raciones de patatas fritas, arroz, pasta, carne, fritos y lácteos, e incrementar las de legumbres, pescado, pescado azul y fruta

Objective: To evaluate school menu food balance in the Autonomous Community of Valencia (Spain) by means of a questionnaire. Method: Observational cross-section study. For convenience it shows of 255 monthly school menus (20 days each). Independent variables: size of the city the school is in, province, location (coast vs. inland), ownership (public vs. private), design of the menu (company vs. school) and month (May vs. October). The 17-item EQ-MEs questionnaire was used as a tool to measure balance. Differences in the balance of the menus and the average of monthly servings were compared, taking into account the different levels of the independent variables. Results: The average of the balance index obtained was 9.19 points (range: 0-17). Approximately 78.4% of menus were designed by companies. Approximately 60.4% were classified as suitable and 0.8% as balanced. The menus designed by companies obtained a higher score (9.49) than those designed by schools (8.13). Menus in Castellón (10.35) achieved a higher score than those in Alicante (9.43) and Valencia (8.86). Only 3.1% of the studied menus met serving recommendations in terms of meat, 37.6% met pulses serving recommendations, 49.4% met fish serving recommendations and 37% met fruit serving recommendations. Conclusion: With the EQ-MEs questionnaire, most of the menus offered in the Autonomous Community of Valencia are suitable for children. To improve them, they should reduce fried potato, rice, pasta, meat, fried food and dairy product servings, while increasing pulses, fish, oily fish and fruit servings

Meat intake, cooking methods and doneness and risk of colorectal tumours in the Spanish multicase-control study (MCC-Spain).

PURPOSE: Although there is convincing evidence that red and processed meat intake increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), the potential role of meat cooking practices has not been established yet and could partly explain the current heterogeneity of results among studies. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between meat consumption and cooking practices and the risk of CRC in a population-based case-control study. METHODS: A total of 1671 CRC cases and 3095 controls recruited in Spain between September 2008 and December 2013 completing a food frequency questionnaire with a meat-specific module were included in the analyses. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression models adjusted for known confounders. RESULTS: Total meat intake was associated with increased risk of CRC (OR T3-T1 1.41; 95% CI 1.19-1.67; p trend < 0.001), and similar associations were found for white, red and processed/cured/organ meat. Rare-cooked meat preference was associated with low risk of CRC in red meat (ORrare vs. medium 0.66; 95% CI 0.51-0.85) and total meat (ORrare vs. medium 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.86) consumers, these associations being stronger in women than in men. Griddle-grilled/barbecued meat was associated with an increased CRC risk (total meat: OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.13-1.87). Stewing (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.04-1.51) and oven-baking (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.40) were associated with increased CRC risk of white, but not red, meat. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports an association of white, red, processed/cured/organ and total meat intake with an increased risk of CRC. Moreover, our study showed that cooking practices can modulate such risk.

[Evaluation of school menu food balance in the Autonomous Community of Valencia (Spain) by means of a questionnaire]. / Evaluación del equilibrio alimentario de los menús escolares de la Comunidad Valenciana (España) mediante un cuestionario.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate school menu food balance in the Autonomous Community of Valencia (Spain) by means of a questionnaire. METHOD: Observational cross-section study. For convenience it shows of 255 monthly school menus (20 days each). INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: size of the city the school is in, province, location (coast vs. inland), ownership (public vs. private), design of the menu (company vs. school) and month (May vs. October). The 17-item EQ-MEs questionnaire was used as a tool to measure balance. Differences in the balance of the menus and the average of monthly servings were compared, taking into account the different levels of the independent variables. RESULTS: The average of the balance index obtained was 9.19 points (range: 0-17). Approximately 78.4% of menus were designed by companies. Approximately 60.4% were classified as suitable and 0.8% as balanced. The menus designed by companies obtained a higher score (9.49) than those designed by schools (8.13). Menus in Castellón (10.35) achieved a higher score than those in Alicante (9.43) and Valencia (8.86). Only 3.1% of the studied menus met serving recommendations in terms of meat, 37.6% met pulses serving recommendations, 49.4% met fish serving recommendations and 37% met fruit serving recommendations. CONCLUSION: With the EQ-MEs questionnaire, most of the menus offered in the Autonomous Community of Valencia are suitable for children. To improve them, they should reduce fried potato, rice, pasta, meat, fried food and dairy product servings, while increasing pulses, fish, oily fish and fruit servings.

Fiabilidad de un cuestionario para evaluar el equilibrio alimentario de menús escolares / Reliability of a questionnaire to evaluate the food balance of school menus

Una adecuada planificación del menú escolar puede servir como estrategia en la prevención de la obesidad infantil y las enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles. El objetivo del estudio fue aportar evidencias de fiabilidad de un cuestionario capaz de evaluar el equilibrio alimentario (cualitativo) de menús escolares. El cuestionario estudiado constaba de 17 ítems referidos a grupos de alimentos, técnicas culinarias y la combinación de los platos para su uso en la evaluación de la oferta alimentaria en comedores escolares (cuestionario EQ-MEs). Para la fiabilidad se analizó la reproducibilidad (coeficiente de correlación intraclase y de Pearson), tanto el grado de acuerdo intraobservador como entre dos observadores, de una muestra de 255 planificaciones mensuales de menús para 20 días ofrecidos en la Comunitat Valenciana (España). Se completó el estudio con el análisis gráfico de Bland-Altman. La asociación intraobservador mostró un coeficiente de correlación intraclase entre 0,940 y 1, y de Pearson entre 0,900 y 0,990. La comparativa interobservadores reflejó una asociación con valores entre 0,771 y 0,980 para el coeficiente de correlación intraclase (excepto para el ítem combinación de platos con 0,516), y entre 0,895 y 0,845 para el de Pearson (excepto para el ítem combinación de platos con 0,350). El análisis gráfico de Bland-Altman mostró también las altas asociaciones encontradas. En conclusión, el cuestionario EQ-MEs es un instrumento fiable para evaluar el equilibrio de menús escolares, de fácil utilización y que permite clasificarlos(AU)

Proper school menu planning can serve as a strategy in the prevention of childhood obesity and chronic noncommunicable diseases. The aim of the study was to provide reliable evidence of a questionnaire that allows to evaluate the food balance of school menus. There was studied the reliability of a questionnaire of 17 articles referred to groups of food, culinary technologies and the combination of the plates for his use in the evaluation of the food offer in school dining rooms (questionnaire EQ-MEs). For the reliability there was analyzed the reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient and of Pearson), so much degree of agreement intra-observer as between two observers, of a sample of 255 monthly plannings of menus for 20 days offered in the Valencian Community (Spain). The study was completed with the Bland-Altman graphical analysis. The association test-retest showed an intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.940 and 1, and of Pearson between 0.900 and 0.990. Comparative inter-observers it reflected an association with values between 0.771 and 0.980 for the intraclass correlation coefficient (except for the article combination of plates with 0.516), and between 0.895 and 0.845 for that of Pearson (except for the article combination of plates with 0.350). Bland-Altman's graphical analysis showed also the high opposing associations. In conclusion, the EQ-MEs questionnaire is a reliable instrument to evaluate the balance of school menus, easy to use and classifying them(AU)

Adherence to the Western, Prudent and Mediterranean dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: MCC-Spain study.

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the previously identified effect on breast cancer risk of the Western, Prudent and Mediterranean dietary patterns. STUDY DESIGN: MCC-Spain is a multicase-control study that collected epidemiological information on 1181 incident cases of female breast cancer and 1682 healthy controls from 10 Spanish provinces. Three dietary patterns derived in another Spanish case-control study were analysed in the MCC-Spain study. These patterns were termed Western (high intakes of fatty and sugary products and red and processed meat), Prudent (high intakes of low-fat dairy products, vegetables, fruits, whole grains and juices) and Mediterranean (high intake of fish, vegetables, legumes, boiled potatoes, fruits, olives, and vegetable oil, and a low intake of juices). Their association with breast cancer was assessed using logistic regression models with random province-specific intercepts considering an interaction with menopausal status. Risk according to tumour subtypes - based on oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptors (ER+/PR+ & HER2-; HER2+; ER-/PR- & HER2-) - was evaluated with multinomial regression models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breast cancer and histological subtype. RESULTS: Our results confirm most of the associations found in the previous case-control study. A high adherence to the Western dietary pattern seems to increase breast cancer risk in both premenopausal women (OR4thvs.1stquartile (95% CI):1.68 (1.02;2.79); OR1SD-increase (95% CI):1.19 (1.02;1.40)) and postmenopausal women (OR4thvs.1stquartile(95% CI):1.48(1.07;2.05); OR1SD-increase(95% CI): 1.14 (1.01;1.29)). While high adherence to the Prudent pattern did not show any effect on breast cancer, the Mediterranean dietary pattern seemed to be protective, but only among postmenopausal women (OR4thvs.1stquartile (95% CI): 0.72 (95% CI 0.53;0.98); p-int=0.075). There were no significant differences by tumour subtype. CONCLUSION: Dietary recommendations based on a departure from the Western dietary pattern in favour of the Mediterranean diet could reduce breast cancer risk in the general population.

Adherence to nutrition-based cancer prevention guidelines and breast, prostate and colorectal cancer risk in the MCC-Spain case-control study.

Prostate, breast and colorectal cancer are the most common tumours in Spain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between adherence to nutrition-based guidelines for cancer prevention and prostate, breast and colorectal cancer, in the MCC-Spain case-control study. A total of 1,718 colorectal, 1,343 breast and 864 prostate cancer cases and 3,431 population-based controls recruited between 2007 and 2012, were included in the present study. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRC/AICR) score based on six recommendations for cancer prevention (on body fatness, physical activity, foods and drinks that promote weight gain, plant foods, animal foods and alcoholic drinks; score range 0-6) was constructed. We used unconditional logistic regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders. One-point increment in the WCRF/AICR score was associated with 25% (95% CI 19-30%) lower risk of colorectal, and 15% (95% CI 7-22%) lower risk of breast cancer; no association with prostate cancer was detected, except for cases with a Gleason score ≥7 (poorly differentiated/undifferentiated tumours) (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99). These results add to the wealth of evidence indicating that a great proportion of common cancer cases could be avoided by adopting healthy lifestyle habits.

[Programme of screening for colorrectal cancer in the Valencia community, Spain: results of the first round (2005-2008)]. / Programa de cribado de cáncer colorrectal de la comunidad valenciana: Resultados de la primera ronda: 2005-2008.

BACKGROUND: Several studies evaluating colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) have reported a significant reduction in mortality from this tumor. The study aims to describe the results of the first round of the CRC screening program in medium-risk population of Valencia and assessing their feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Colorectal cancer screening pilot study using biennial FOBT. All residents (106,000 Inhabitants) between 50 and 69 years old (a subgroup of 70-74 years), from 3 selected health departments (04, 07 and 13) were invited by mail to participate. The individuals with FOBT positive were referred to hospital for colonoscopy. The following rates were calculated as indicators of program quality: the participation rate, positive FOBT rate, acceptance rate of colonoscopy, and detection rate of low and high-risk adenomas and invasive cancers, and positive predictive value of FOBT. RESULTS: The participation was 35,231 individuals (35.70%). The number of FOBT positive was 579 (1.64% of total analyzed test), 548 people agreed colonoscopy (acceptance rate: 94.69%). 61 CRC were detected, 61 and 153 High-Risk and Low-Risk Adenomas (rates of 1.77, 1.77 and 4.46% per 1,000 participants). The positive predictive values for cancer, low-risk and high risk adenomas were 10.95%, 10.95%, and 27.46% respectively. CONCLUSION: The program indicators suggest that a population program of colorectal cancer is feasible in our community as the process indicators obtained are similar to those given in other programs in Spain and Europe.