Application and internal validation of lung ultrasound score in COVID-19 setting: The ECOVITA observational study.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronarovirus-2 associated still causes a significant number of deaths and hospitalizations mainly by the development of respiratory failure. We aim to validate lung ultrasound score in order to predict mortality and the severity of the clinical course related to the need of respiratory support. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter hospital-based cohort study, all adult patients with diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, performed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were included. Upon admission, all patients underwent blood gas analysis and lung ultrasound by expert operators. The acquisition of ultrasound scan was performed on 12 peculiar anatomic landmarks of the chest. Lung ultrasound findings were classified according to a scoring method, ranging 0 to 3: Score 0: normal A-lines. Score 1: multiple separated B-lines. Score 2: coalescent B-lines, alteration of pleural line. Score 3: consolidation area. RESULTS: One thousand and seven patients were included in statistical analysis (male 62.4 %, mean age 66.3). Oxygen support was needed in 811 (80.5 %) patients. The median ultrasound score was 24 and the risk of having more invasive respiratory support increased in relation to higher values score computed. Lung ultrasound score showed negative strong correlation (rho: -0.71) with the P/F ratio and a significant association with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.11, 95 %CI 1.07-1.14; p < 0.001), even after adjustment with the following variables (age, sex, P/F ratio, SpO2, lactate, hypertension, chronic renal failure, diabetes, and obesity). CONCLUSIONS: The novelty of this research corroborates and validates the 12-field lung ultrasound score as tool for predicting mortality and severity clinical course in COVID-19 patients. Baseline lung ultrasound score was associated with in-hospital mortality and requirement of intensive respiratory support and predict the risk of IOT among COVID-19 patients.

[Coexistence of renovascular hypertension and pheochromocytoma. Description of 2 clinical cases]. / Coesistenza di ipertensione nefrovascolare e feocromocitoma. Descrizione di due casi clinici.

The two unusual clinical cases described here illustrate the importance of correct application of clinical methodology. Two patients, a 55-year-old man and a 50-year-old woman, presented with severe hypertension due to the coexistence of renal artery stenosis and pheochromocytoma. Their symptoms were indicative of renovascular hypertension which was verified by the finding of extremely elevated plasma renin activity and angiographic detection of critical renal artery stenosis. Further consideration of specific clinical findings led to the suspicion of coexisting pathologies: the detection of elevated plasma catecholamine levels and abdominal computed tomography and iodobenzylguanidine imaging confirmed the presence of pheochromocytoma. The first patient repeatedly refused surgical treatment and died after 9 months; the second patient recovered after undergoing combined nephrectomy and tumor removal. These cases underscore the importance of a carefully planned sequence of studies in patients presenting with uncommon or equivocal clinical manifestations, particularly when conclusive diagnosis is essential to successful treatment.

[Prospective evaluation of the captopril test in diagnosing renal artery stenosis in hypertensive patients]. / Valutazione prospettica del test al captopril nella diagnosi di stenosi di arteria renale in soggetti ipertesi.

In order to verify the utility of the captopril test (CT) in diagnosing renal artery stenosis we performed a prospective study in 94 consecutive patients (40 females, 54 males, mean age 52.4 +/- 12.3 years) suspected of having renovascular hypertension and with a serum level of creatinine < 2 mg/dl. Antihypertensive drugs were withdrawn one week before the CT or, if this was considered unsafe, patients were treated with nifedipine or diltiazem (53 subjects; 56.4%). We used renal angiography and the Muller criteria to interpret the CT. Our results were as follows: sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 96%; positive predictive value, 88%; and negative predictive value, 97%. In our study a simplified criterion for positive CT-postcaptopril plasma renin activity > 10 ng/mL/h-provided a similar diagnostic value. We conclude that the captopril test is a useful screening test for the detection of renal artery stenosis in selected hypertensive patients and that it can also be reliably performed in patients who are taking calcium antagonists.

[Comparison of the efficacy of monotherapy with a beta-blocker, a diuretic, and ACE inhibitors in the control of blood pressure during stress]. / Confronto dell'efficacia delle monoterapie con beta-bloccante, diuretico, ACE-inibitore nel controllo dei valori pressori durante stress.

In order to compare the efficacy of beta-blocking, diuretics and ACE-inhibiting monotherapy in controlling the blood pressure increase to stress, a study was conducted on 30 subjects (10 treated with atenolol, 10 with hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride combination, 10 with enalapril) with mild or moderate essential hypertension whose resting blood pressures were normalised by therapy. In the 3 groups of subjects blood pressure values at rest, during mental stress, static and dynamic exercise did not significantly differ before antihypertensive therapy. Atenolol and enalapril significantly reduced systolic and diastolic pressure below pretreatment values throughout and immediately after each test, differing from diuretic therapy which did not show any significant reduction in diastolic rises at the peak of hand-grip or in both systolic and diastolic pressures at the highest work-loads during dynamic exercise. In the recovery period of the exercise cycle test diuretics also produced a later normalisation of diastolic pressure. In conclusion, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors seem to be more effective than diuretics in the control of the blood pressure response to stress in hypertensive patients, suggesting that these drugs are the first choice treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.