Phase 3 immunogenicity and safety study of a tick-borne encephalitis vaccine in healthy Japanese participants 1 year of age and older.

BACKGROUND: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus infects the central nervous system and may lead to severe neurological complications or death. This study assessed immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of TBE vaccine in Japanese participants 1 year of age and older. METHODS: This phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study was conducted in Japanese adult (≥ 16 years) and pediatric (1-< 16 years) populations. Participants received a single 0.5-mL (adult) or 0.25-mL (pediatric) dose of TBE vaccine at each of 3 visits. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who were seropositive (neutralization test [NT] titer ≥ 1:10) 4 weeks after Dose 3. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included NT seropositivity rates 4 weeks after Dose 2, immunoglobulin G (IgG) seropositivity 4 weeks after Doses 2 and 3, NT geometric mean titers (GMTs), IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and geometric mean fold rises. Primary safety endpoints were frequencies of local reactions, systemic events, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs. RESULTS: Among 100 adult and 65 pediatric participants, 99.0 % and 100.0 % completed the study, respectively. NT seropositivity was achieved in 98.0 % adult and 100.0 % pediatric participants after Dose 3; seropositivity after Dose 2 was 93.0 % and 92.3 %, respectively. In both age groups, IgG seropositivity was ≥ 90.0 % and ≥ 96.0 % after Doses 2 and 3, respectively; GMTs and GMCs were highest 4 weeks after Dose 3. Reactogenicity events were generally mild to moderate in severity and short-lived. AEs were reported by 15.0 % (adult) and 43.1 % (pediatric) of participants. No life-threatening AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, immediate AEs, related AEs, or deaths were reported. No serious AEs were considered related to TBE vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: TBE vaccine elicited robust immune responses in Japanese participants 1 year of age and older. The 3-dose regimen was safe and well tolerated, and findings were consistent with the known safety profile of this TBE vaccine. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT04648241.

A Phase 2 Extension Study Evaluating the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of 3 or 4 Doses of a Clostridioides difficile Vaccine in Healthy US Adults Aged 65 to 85 Years.

BACKGROUND: This phase 2 extension explored the long-term antibody persistence of an investigational Clostridioides difficile vaccine and the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dose 4 approximately 12 months post-dose 3. METHODS: One year post-dose 3, healthy US 65- to 85-year-olds (N = 300) were randomized to dose 4 of vaccine at previously received antigen levels (100 or 200 µg) or placebo. Assessments included safety and percentages of participants achieving neutralizing antibody titers above prespecified thresholds (≥219 and ≥2586 neutralization units/mL for toxins A and B, respectively). RESULTS: In participants previously given three 200-µg doses and placebo in the extension, toxin A and B neutralizing antibodies were above prevaccination levels 48 months post-dose 3 (36 months after placebo); 24.0% and 26.0% had toxin A and B antibodies at or above prespecified thresholds, respectively. Neutralizing antibodies increased post-dose 4 (12 months post-dose 3) and persisted to 36 months post-dose 4. Thirty days post-dose 4, all participants had toxin A and 86.5% to 100% had toxin B titers at or above prespecified thresholds. Local reactions were more frequent in vaccine recipients. Systemic and adverse event frequencies were similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: C difficile vaccine immune responses persisted 48 months post-dose 3. Dose 4 was immunogenic and well tolerated, supporting continued development. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02561195.

A phase 3 study evaluating the lot consistency, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of a Clostridioides difficile vaccine in healthy adults 65 to 85 years of age.

BACKGROUND: A toxoid-based Clostridioides difficile vaccine is currently in development. Here, we report lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of 3 C difficile vaccine doses in healthy older adults. METHODS: This phase 3, placebo-controlled study randomized (1:1:1:1) healthy adults 65 to 85 years of age to 1 of 3 C difficile vaccine lots or placebo. Participants received C difficile vaccine (200 µg total toxoid) or placebo (Months 0, 1, 6). The primary immunogenicity objective was lot-to-lot consistency (2-sided 95 % CIs within 0.5 and 2 for comparisons of geometric mean concentration [GMC] ratios) for toxins A- and B-specific neutralizing antibody levels 1 month after Dose 3. Safety outcomes included local reactions and systemic events ≤7 days after vaccination, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). RESULTS: Of 1317 enrolled participants, 1218 completed the study. C difficile vaccine immunogenicity was consistent across lots, with neutralizing antibody responses 1 month after Dose 3 for both toxin A (GMC [95 % CI]: lot 1, 878.8 [786.3, 982.2]; lot 2, 873.0 [779.2, 978.1]; lot 3, 872.9 [782.6, 973.5]) and toxin B (lot 1, 5823.9 [5041.0, 6728.4]; lot 2, 5462.8 [4733.4, 6304.7]; lot 3, 5426.0 [4724.4, 6231.8]). Two-sided 95 % CIs for GMC ratios were within 0.5 and 2 for toxins A and B, indicating lot-to-lot consistency was achieved. C difficile vaccine was well tolerated, with similar rates of local reactions and systemic events among vaccine lots. AE and SAE rates were similar across C difficile vaccine (36.5 % and 4.5 %, respectively) and placebo (35.3 % and 6 %). CONCLUSIONS: Three doses (Months 0,1,6) of toxoid-based C difficile vaccine induced robust neutralizing antibody responses and were well tolerated in healthy participants 65 to 85 years of age. Lot-to-lot consistency was excellent, indicating the manufacturing process for this C difficile vaccine formulation was well controlled. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03579459.

Safety and Immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 Vaccine Coadministered with Seasonal Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination is a critical tool for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza illnesses. Coadministration of the COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2, with seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (SIIV) can provide substantial benefits, including streamlining vaccine delivery. METHODS: In this phase 3 study, healthy 18- to 64-year-olds who had received three previous doses of BNT162b2 were randomized (1:1) to the coadministration group (month 0, BNT162b2 + SIIV; month 1, placebo) or the separate-administration group (month 0, placebo + SIIV; month 1, BNT162b2). The primary immunogenicity objective was to demonstrate that the immune responses elicited by BNT162b2 and SIIV [measured by full-length S-binding immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) titers against four influenza strains 1 month post-vaccination, respectively] when coadministered were noninferior to those elicited by either vaccine administered alone, based on a prespecified 1.5-fold noninferiority margin [lower bound 95% CI for geometric mean ratio (GMR) > 0.67]. Reactogenicity and adverse event (AE) rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Randomized participants who received study vaccination (N = 1128; coadministration group, n = 564; separate-administration group, n = 564) had a median age of 39 years. Model-adjusted GMRs for coadministration to separate administration were 0.83 (95% CI 0.77, 0.89) for full-length S-binding IgG levels and 0.89-1.00 (lower bound of all 95% CIs > 0.67) for the four influenza strain-specific HAI titers, with all endpoints achieving the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Reactogenicity events were mostly mild or moderate when BNT162b2 was coadministered with SIIV. Serious AEs were reported in < 1% of participants within 1 month after any vaccination; none were considered vaccine-related. CONCLUSIONS: BNT162b2 coadministered with SIIV elicited immune responses that were noninferior to those elicited by BNT162b2 alone and SIIV alone, and BNT162b2 had an acceptable safety profile when coadministered with SIIV. The results of this study support the coadministration of BNT162b2 and SIIV in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05310084.

Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with an underlying malignancy have high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. In clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious against infection, hospitalization, and death, but most trials excluded participants with cancer. We report results from participants with a history of past or active neoplasm (malignant or benign/unknown) and up to 6 months' follow-up post-dose 2 from the placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of the 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2020-January 2021, 46,429 participants aged ≥ 12 years were randomized at 152 sites in 6 countries. Healthy participants with pre-existing stable neoplasm could participate; those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Data are reported for participants, aged ≥ 16 years for safety and ≥ 12 years for efficacy, who had any history of neoplasm at baseline (data cut-off: March 13, 2021). Adverse-event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 3813 participants had a history of neoplasm; most common malignancies were breast (n = 460), prostate (n = 362), and melanoma (n = 223). Four BNT162b2 and 71 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-dose 2; vaccine efficacy was 94.4% (95% CI: 85.2, 98.5) after up to 6 months' follow-up post-dose 2. This compares favorably with vaccine efficacy of 91.1% in the overall trial population after the same follow-up. AEs were reported at IRs of 95.4(BNT162b2) and 48.3 (placebo) per 100 person-years. Most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain, fatigue, pyrexia). Three BNT162b2 and 1 placebo recipients withdrew because of vaccine-related AEs. No vaccine-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: In participants with past or active neoplasms, BNT162b2 vaccine has a similar efficacy and safety profile as in the overall trial population. These results can inform BNT162b2 use during the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials in participants with cancer. Clinical trial number: NCT04368728.

Safety and immunogenicity of a multidose vial formulation of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered with routine pediatric vaccines in healthy infants in India: A phase 4, randomized, open-label study.

PURPOSE: This phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter study in healthy Indian infants and toddlers evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) formulated in a multidose vial (MDV) or single prefilled syringe (PFS). METHODS: Healthy Indian infants (6 weeks of age) were randomized 1:1 to receive either PCV13-MDV or PCV13-PFS concomitant with routine pediatric vaccines. Subjects received a single dose of either PCV13-MDV or PCV13-PFS as a 4-dose schedule (infant series: 1 dose at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age; toddler dose: 12 months of age). Safety was assessed, including local reactions, systemic events, and adverse events (AEs). Immunogenicity 1 month after both the infant series and toddler dose was measured by concentrations of serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies and opsonophagocytic activity titers. RESULTS: Rates and severities of local reactions and systemic events up to 7 days after each dose of either PCV13-MDV or PCV13-PFS were generally similar, with the majority being of mild or moderate severity. PCV13-MDV had a safety profile comparable with PCV13-PFS; both groups experienced a similar frequency of AEs. PCV13-MDV elicited immune responses comparable with those induced by PCV13-PFS. Clear boosting of immune responses after the PCV13-MDV toddler dose was observed; ≥96% of subjects showed serotype-specific IgG concentrations at or above the defined thresholds 1 month after the PCV13-MDV toddler dose. CONCLUSIONS: PCV13-MDV was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in healthy Indian infants and toddlers when coadministered with routine pediatric vaccinations. Safety and immunogenicity of PCV13-MDV was comparable with PCV13-PFS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03548337.

Epidemiology of Invasive Escherichia coli Infection and Antibiotic Resistance Status Among Patients Treated in US Hospitals: 2009-2016.

BACKGROUND: Published data is limited on the prevalence and risk of recurrence of extraintestinal invasive Escherichia coli infections (IEIs) in the United States. METHODS: The analysis included all inpatient and hospital-based outpatient visits occurring between 2009 and 2016 at hospitals with continuous microbiology data submission to the Premier Healthcare Database for 90 days before and 12 months after the admission or visit. IEI was defined as having positive E. coli culture from a normally sterile site (eg, blood, cerebrospinal fluid). The prevalence of IEI, 12-month risk of recurrent IEI, and antibiotic resistance were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 144 944 725 hospital visits among 37 207 510 patients were analyzed, and 71 909 IEI events occurred in 67 583 patients, corresponding to an IEI prevalence of 0.50 events per 1000 visits and 1.82 events per 1000 patients. Recurrence was common: 26.9 per 1000 patients had a recurrent IEI in the 12 months after their infection. Most infections were community acquired (66.4%), and urosepsis was most common clinical syndrome (66.0%). The 30-day risk of IEI among patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy was high: 5.03 events per 1000 patients. Among all IEI cases with antibiotic susceptibility testing, 9.18% were resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, 28.22% to fluoroquinolones, and 0.14% to carbapenems. Resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins increased from 5.46% to 12.97% during the 8-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study indicates a substantial burden of IEI and recurrent IEI exists in the United States, as well as increasing resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Future research should explore risk factors of recurrent IEI aiming to effectively prevent such infections.

Phase 1 trial of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in healthy adults.

In a Phase 1 study, 15 healthy subjects were randomized to receive a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 15 to receive a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (23vPS). Antibody responses were measured immediately before and approximately one month after vaccination. Serotype-specific antibodies were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and an opsonophagocytic assay (OPA) for functional antibodies. PCV13 was as immunogenic or more immunogenic than 23vPS and was well tolerated.

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: emerging clinical information and its implications.

Since 2000, when the first pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was introduced into routine use in the USA, it has had a substantial impact on invasive pneumococcal disease both in the immunized and nonimmunized population. It has also been shown to reduce pneumonia and otitis in young children and has reduced antibiotic nonsusceptible pneumococcal infections. In the USA, three primary doses and a booster dose are recommended (a so-called '3 + 1 schedule'). Some countries have or will soon introduce routine immunization with fewer doses, with either two primary doses and a booster dose ('2 + 1 schedule') or no booster dose ('3 + 0 schedule'). Some serotypes produce less antibody in a two-dose compared with a three-dose primary series. The booster dose may also be important in reducing nasopharyngeal carriage, hence absence of a booster dose may reduce indirect protection. It remains to be seen whether these schedule changes will reduce vaccine effectiveness within the population. Important future developments include extending the number of serotypes included in the vaccine and the possible extension of use into adults in whom indirect protection has been useful, but not as extensive as might be possible with direct immunization.