Treatment effects on residual cognitive symptoms among partially or fully remitted patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blinded, exploratory study with vortioxetine.

BACKGROUND: Residual cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) are common, yet poorly investigated. We explored the effectiveness of vortioxetine as adjunctive treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and as monotherapy versus continued SSRI, in patients with MDD who achieved full or partial remission with SSRI, but report residual cognitive symptoms. METHODS: Patients (18-65 years old, N =151) diagnosed with MDD, with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items total score ≤10 and a Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression total score >25, were randomized 1:1:1 to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with current SSRI + placebo, SSRI + vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day), or vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) + placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. Secondary outcomes comprised cognitive functioning, subjectively-rated cognitive symptoms, patient functioning, and mood symptoms. RESULTS: From baseline to week 8, all treatment groups improved DSST performance, with statistically nonsignificant treatment differences. Similar results were seen for secondary endpoints. Improvement in cognitive performance tended to be numerically larger with vortioxetine monotherapy than with SSRI monotherapy, while vortioxetine as adjunctive treatment tended to perform numerically better in further improving depressive symptoms. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Nausea was the most common adverse event for vortioxetine. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes limited statistical power. CONCLUSION: In this explorative study, remitted patients with MDD improved their cognitive performance with no treatment differences. Secondary results indicate numerical benefits for cognitive performance with vortioxetine monotherapy, and for depressive symptoms with vortioxetine augmentation.

The Effects of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Function in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Management of cognitive deficits in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) remains an important unmet need. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of vortioxetine on cognition in patients with MDD. METHODS: Random effects meta-analysis was applied to three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week trials of vortioxetine (5-20mg/day) in MDD, and separately to two duloxetine-referenced trials. The primary outcome measure was change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) score. Standardized effect sizes (SES) versus placebo (Cohen's d ) were used as input. Path analysis was employed to determine the extent to which changes in DSST were mediated independently of a change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Meta-analysis was applied to MADRS-adjusted and -unadjusted SES values. Changes on additional cognitive tests were evaluated (source studies only). RESULTS: Before adjustment for MADRS, vortioxetine separated from placebo on DSST score (SES 0.25-0.48; nominal p < 0.05) in all individual trials, and statistically improved DSST performance versus placebo in meta-analyses of the three trials (SES = 0.35; p < 0.0001) and two duloxetine-referenced trials (SES = 0.26; p = 0.001). After adjustment for MADRS, vortioxetine maintained DSST improvement in one individual trial ( p = 0.001) and separation from placebo was maintained in meta-analyses of all three trials (SES = 0.24; p < 0.0001) and both duloxetine-referenced trials (SES 0.19; p = 0.01). Change in DSST with duloxetine failed to separate from placebo in individual trials and both meta-analyses. Change in DSST statistically favored vortioxetine versus duloxetine after MADRS adjustment (SES = 0.16; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine, but not duloxetine, significantly improved cognition, independent of depressive symptoms. Vortioxetine represents an important treatment for MDD-related cognitive dysfunction.

Memantine treatment in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month study.

Memantine is a moderate affinity, uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist currently approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study (Study 99679) conducted in Europe evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 20 mg/day memantine in patients with mild to moderate AD. Patients were randomised to either memantine or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Efficacy was primarily assessed as change from baseline in ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus score. Of 470 patients randomised and treated (memantine, n=318; placebo, n=152), 85% and 91% completed the study. Memantine-treated patients showed statistically significant improvement relative to placebo at weeks 12 and 18, and numerical superiority at week 24 on both efficacy scales. The lack of significance at week 24 was attributed to an unexpectedly high placebo response. Memantine was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to placebo. The data presented support the efficacy of memantine in mild to moderate AD.

Improvement in behavioural symptoms in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease by memantine: a pooled data analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Behavioural disturbances are a common and distressing aspect of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This pooled analysis evaluated the specific benefits of memantine on behavioural disturbances in patients with moderate to severe AD. METHODS: Data were pooled from six 24/28-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies. Of the 2,311 patients included in these studies, 1,826 patients with moderate to severe AD (MMSE <20) were included in this analysis, corresponding to the extended indication for memantine in Europe. In this subgroup, 959 patients received memantine 20 mg/day and 867 received placebo. Behavioural symptoms were rated using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) total and single-item scores at weeks 12 and 24/28. RESULTS: At weeks 12 and 24/28, ITT analysis demonstrated that memantine treatment produced statistically significant benefits over placebo treatment in NPI total score (p=0.001 and p=0.008), and in NPI single items: delusions (p=0.007 week 12, p=0.001 week 24/28), hallucinations (p=0.037 week 12), agitation/aggression (p=0.001 week 12, p=0.001 week 24/28), and irritability/lability (p=0.005 week 24/28), LOCF population. Analysis of the patients without symptoms at baseline indicated reduced emergence of agitation/aggression (p=0.002), delusions (p=0.047), and disinhibition (p=0.011), at week 12, and of agitation/aggression (p=0.002), irritability/lability (p=0.004), and night-time behaviour (p=0.050) at week 24/28 in those receiving memantine. OC analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that memantine is effective in treating and preventing the behavioural symptoms of moderate to severe AD. Specific persistent benefits were observed on the symptoms of delusions and agitation/aggression, which are known to be associated with rapid disease progression, increased caregiver burden, early institutionalisation, and increased costs of care.

Short-term treatment with gaboxadol improves sleep maintenance and enhances slow wave sleep in adult patients with primary insomnia.

RATIONALE: Gaboxadol is a selective extrasynaptic GABA(A) agonist, previously in development for the treatment of insomniac patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acute efficacy and safety of gaboxadol in primary insomnia (PI). METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, four-way crossover, polysomnograph study comparing gaboxadol 10 and 20 mg (GBX20) to placebo in 40 adults with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, criteria for PI. Zolpidem 10 mg was used as an active reference. Treatment was administered on two consecutive nights in each treatment session. Next-day residual effects were evaluated 2 and 9 h after lights on. RESULTS: Efficacy analysis included the per-protocol population (n = 38) from night 2. GBX20 reduced wake after sleep onset (p < 0.01). Both doses of gaboxadol, but not zolpidem, reduced the number of night awakenings (p < 0.001). GBX20 and zolpidem increased total sleep time (p < 0.05). Neither dose of gaboxadol nor zolpidem significantly reduced sleep onset latency, although a trend was seen for zolpidem. Gaboxadol enhanced slow wave sleep (SWS) dose-dependently (gaboxadol 10 mg: p < 0.01, GBX20: p < 0.001). Patients reported improved sleep quality following GBX20 (p < 0.05). Both doses of gaboxadol were generally well tolerated with almost exclusively mild to moderately severe adverse events (AEs). More frequent and severe AEs followed GBX20. No serious AEs were reported. No drug treatment was associated with next-day residual effects. CONCLUSION: Acute administration of gaboxadol improves sleep maintenance and enhances SWS in a dose-dependent manner in adult patients with PI. Gaboxadol was not associated with next-day residual effects. Gaboxadol was generally well tolerated, although gaboxadol showed a dose-dependent increase in incidence and severity of AEs.

Memantine treatment in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month study.

Memantine is a moderate affinity, uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist currently approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study (Study 99679) conducted in Europe evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 20mg/day memantine in patients with mild to moderate AD. Patients were randomised to either memantine or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Efficacy was primarily assessed as change from baseline in ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus score. Of 470 patients randomised and treated (memantine, n=318; placebo, n=152), 85% and 91% completed the study. Memantine-treated patients showed statistically significant improvement relative to placebo at weeks 12 and 18, and numerical superiority at week 24 on both efficacy scales. The lack of significance at week 24 was attributed to an unexpectedly high placebo response. Memantine was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to placebo. The data presented support the efficacy of memantine in mild to moderate AD.

Escitalopram (S-enantiomer of citalopram): clinical efficacy and onset of action predicted from a rat model.

Escitalopram is the active S-enantiomer of citalopram. In a chronic mild stress model of depression in rats, treatments with both escitalopram and citalopram were effective; however, a faster time to onset of efficacy compared to vehicle treatment was observed for escitalopram-treated (5 mg/kg/day) than for citalopram-treated (10 mg/kg/day) rats at Week 1. To study the predictability of this observation in the clinic, we analysed 4-week data from an 8-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study that compared escitalopram and citalopram to placebo in primary care patients with major depressive disorder (baseline Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores > or =22 and < or =40). Since the flexible dosing started after Week 4, analysis of 4-week data ensured that the patients received fixed doses of 10 mg/day escitalopram (155 patients), 20 mg/day citalopram (160 patients), or placebo (154 patients). The efficacy analysis showed a significantly superior therapeutic effect for escitalopram versus placebo from Week 1 onwards (observed cases) with an adjusted mean change in MADRS at Week 4 (last observation carried forward) of 2.7 points (P=0.002). By comparison, 20 mg/day citalopram did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect compared to placebo. Escitalopram was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of citalopram. The preclinical observation that escitalopram possesses a faster time to onset of efficacy than citalopram was also seen in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Thus, escitalopram is efficacious in depression and the effect occurs earlier than for citalopram.

Efficacy of intravenous citalopram compared with oral citalopram for severe depression. Safety and efficacy data from a double-blind, double-dummy trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration is often beneficial in the treatment of severely depressed patients. It is mainly the tri- and tetracyclic antidepressant drugs that can be administered intravenously. However, these drugs have a less favourable safety profile than newer antidepressants, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Citalopram is the only SSRI that is available in a formulation for infusion. This double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of citalopram infusion (40 mg per day) and citalopram tablet (40 mg per day). METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive either placebo tablet plus citalopram infusion (the infusion group; n=135) or citalopram tablet plus placebo infusion (the tablet group; n=119). After receiving randomised treatment for eight days, all patients entered an open treatment phase, during which they received oral citalopram 40 mg per day for five weeks. RESULTS: Although there was no difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores at the end of the randomised treatment period, by the end of the open treatment phase the reduction in MADRS scores was significantly greater in the infusion group than in the tablet group (p=0.015). The infusion group also showed superior efficacy in Clinical Global Impressions assessments. Citalopram was equally well tolerated in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirmed the efficacy of citalopram 40 mg per day, and clearly supports the use of citalopram infusion in the treatment of severely depressed, hospitalised patients.

Lu 25-109, a muscarinic agonist, fails to improve cognition in Alzheimer's disease. Lu25-109 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of the selective muscarinic receptor m1 partial agonist, m2 antagonist, Lu25-109-a compound that directly stimulates muscarinic cholinergic receptors-in patients with probable AD. METHODS: A 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial comparing three doses of Lu25-109 with placebo was carried out. A total of 496 patients with probable AD with a Mini-Mental State Examination score between 10 and 26 were enrolled at 29 centers and randomized to placebo or Lu25-109 25, 50, or 100 mg tid. The primary efficacy measures were the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale and the AD Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change. Secondary efficacy variables included the AD Cooperative Study Inventory of Activities of Daily Living and the Behavioral Symptoms in AD Scale. RESULTS: In both an intent-to-treat and a completer's analysis there were no significant differences for either the two primary or the secondary variables. There was a trend for patients on the highest drug dose to worsen in the completer's analysis. Adverse events included dizziness, nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, increased sweating, and anorexia, all of which increased with increasing drug dose. CONCLUSION: Lu25-109, a selective partial ml agonist and an m2/m3 antagonist, failed to improve cognition in patients with mild to moderate AD.

Oral clodronate in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of the bisphosphonate clodronate on the occurrence of skeletal events (hypercalcaemia, fractures and radiotherapy) in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. SETTING: A department of oncology in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: One hundred patients who received firstline systemic antineoplastic treatment for metastatic breast cancer with bone involvement were randomized to receive clodronate as two 400 mg capsules twice a day for 2 years or no additional therapy. RESULTS: In the clodronate group the number of skeletal events was reduced to 14 events in 48 evaluable patients as compared with 21 events in 51 evaluable control patients. The time to the first skeletal event was significantly longer in the clodronate group than in the control group (P = 0.015) and the most distinct difference was a lower occurrence of fractures in the clodronate group (P = 0.023). After 15 months the effect of clodronate tended to decline as the need for radiotherapy increased in the clodronate group compared with the control group (P = 0.069). Significant improvements in several quality-of-life aspects were seen in both groups during the first 6 months, but there was no significant difference between the groups. No effect was observed on time to radiologically evaluated disease progression in bone or on survival. The most frequent side-effects resulting in discontinuation of clodronate were nausea and diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: Oral clodronate is associated with a temporary reduction of morbidity related to bone metastases in breast cancer patients.

Survival in breast cancer patients after the first episode of hypercalcaemia.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate hypercalcaemia (serum ionized calcium (S-Ca2+) > 1.35 mmol L(-1)) in breast cancer patients before and after the introduction of bisphosphonates and the effect of disease- and treatment-related factors on survival. DESIGN: Prospective and retrospective registration of covariates. SETTING: A department of oncology in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: A consecutive cohort of 212 hypercalcaemic patients never treated with bisphosphonate was identified prospectively (period 1) and 193 patients with metastases were classified into three groups: mild (S-Ca2+ < 1.48: n=102). moderate (1.48 < or = S-Ca2+ < or = 1.60; n=41). and severe hypercalcaemia (S-Ca2+ > 1.60 mmol L(-1); n=50). Fifty-one patients with severe hypercalcaemia all treated with bisphosphonate except one were identified retrospectively (period 2). RESULTS: For period 1 median survival was 6.7 months. Survival was significantly decreased in the two groups with the highest initial S-Ca2+ (P < 0.0001). Median survival times in severely hypercalcaemic patients from periods 1 and 2 were 1.4 (9 5(% confidence interval 0.8-2.1) and 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.3-3.1) months, respectively. In a Cox model for period 1 significant covariates were: WHO performance, extent of metastases, whether systemic anticancer treatment could be given, and haemoglobin, but not S-Ca2+. CONCLUSION: Prognosis is poor in hypercalcaemic breast cancer patients with WHO performance 3-4 and advanced metastatic disease when effective systemic treatment can no longer be offered. Bisphosphonate treatment does not seem to improve survival in severe hypercalcaemia. Antihypercalcaemic treatment of mild malignancy-associated hypercalcaemia appears not to be vital. Therapeutic efforts should be aiming at patients with moderate hypercalcaemia.

Stimulation of histamine synthesis from tumour cells by concanavalin A and A23187.

In the present study the amount of histamine synthesized by two experimental tumour cell lines, the Yoshida ascites sarcoma cells and SEWA cells, was measured after stimulation in vitro with the calcium ionophore A23187 and the plant lectin Concanavalin A (Con A). After 7 hrs of incubation with the two stimulators, histamine could be measured and the amount was still increasing up to 15 hrs of incubation with a maximal net histamine production of approximately 1.0 ng histamine per 10(6) tumour cells per ml sample. In addition, the tumour promoter 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) was found to enhance the synthesis of histamine in the presence of Con A or A23187, except in high concentrations, i.e. 50 ng/ml TPA, where an inhibitory effect was seen. TPA alone could not induce detectable histamine synthesis. In order to measure the histamine, the tumour cells were incubated in glass microfibre-based microtiter plates, which have been shown to bind histamine with high affinity and selectivity. The aim has been to develop a functional in vitro tumour assay which can detect histamine from tumour cells and which can be used to measure pharmacological interaction of the tumour cell function as well as histamine production from different tumour cell types.

Studies on the mechanism of cytotoxicity of 3'-deoxyadenosine N1-oxide in different strains of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells.

The correlation between the metabolic processing of 3'-deoxyadenosine N1-oxide (3'-dANO) in vitro and its effect on tumor growth in vivo has been investigated in seven different strains of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. The metabolism of 3'-dANO is initiated by reduction to 3'-deoxyadenosine (3'-dA). This process is the rate-limiting process. The 3'-dA does not accumulate, but is converted to 3'-deoxyadenosine triphosphate (3'-dATP) or 3'-deoxyinosine (3'-dI). The ratio between 3'-dATP and 3'-dI inosine corresponds to the ratio between the activities of adenosine kinase and adenosine deaminase in the cell. Two of the cell lines were markedly inhibited by 3'-dANO in vivo. In these cells the accumulation of 3'-dATP was 1.4-2.2 nmol/h per mg cells, which accounts for the major part of the metabolized 3'-dANO. Five of the cell lines were not inhibited by 3'-dANO and the formation of 3'-dATP was 5-10 times less in these than in the sensitive strains. The low level of 3'-dATP is caused primarily by a low ratio between the activities of adenosine kinase and adenosine deaminase, which is 15 time less than in the sensitive cell lines. The rate of reduction of 3'-dANO seems to be of minor importance. These results indicate a correlation between the inhibition of tumor growth by 3'-dANO and the ability of the cell to accumulate 3'-dATP from 3'-dANO and show that this conversion is determined solely by the rate of reduction of 3'-dANO (3'-dANO reductase activity) and the ratio between the activities of adenosine kinase and adenosine deaminase in the cell. Consequently, the estimation of these enzyme activities in cell lysate of a given tumor can be used to predict whether the tumor is susceptible to inhibition by 3'-dANO.

Combined endocrine treatment of postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. A randomized trial of tamoxifen vs. tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone.

The therapeutic efficacy of combined endocrine therapy with tamoxifen, aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone (T+AG+H) was evaluated against treatment with tamoxifen (T) alone in 210 patients above 65 years of age with metastatic breast cancer. The treatment results have been assessed for the 166 fully evaluable patients and were the following for the T and T+AG+H groups, respectively: PD: 31 and 35%; NC: 35 and 37%; PR: 13 and 16%; and CR: 21 and 12%. The overall treatment results are not statistically different (p = 0.35) and the 95% C.L. of the difference of the response rates are -8% to +20%. The median duration of remission was approximately 24 months in both treatment groups (p = 0.31). The time to treatment failure was comparable with median values of 10 and 8 months in the T and the T+AG+H groups respectively (p = 0.17). Toxicity was more frequent and severe in the combined treatment group and could in most instances be attributed to treatment with AG+H. In conclusion, the simultaneous use of T and AG and H does not seem to improve the therapeutic results in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer.

DNA-binding proteins in Yoshida ascites tumor fluid.

DNA-binding proteins were isolated from Yoshida ascites tumor fluid by chromatography on DNA-cellulose. This fraction represents 1-2% of the total ascites protein. Most of the DNA-binding proteins will bind to phosphocellulose as well. The proteins migrate by agarose gel electrophoresis at pH 8.6 as alpha and beta globulins. Quantitative immunoelectrophoresis revealed the presence of 12-18 proteins. SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis indicated molecular weights ranging from 3-10(4) to 10(6). Seven of the proteins were identified by specific immunoprecipitation as beta1-Eglobulin, beta2-glycoprotein I, fibrinogen split product E (fibrinogen E), coagulation factor XIII (factor XIII), alpha2-macroglobulin, IgG and IgM. Alpha1-antichymotrypsin might also be represented. In nuclear extracts of the tumor cells only factor XIII was present. With the exception of fibrinogen E and P5 all recognized DNA-binding proteins are present in normal rat plasma. With increasing tumor age the concentration of fibrinogen E, factor XIII, P5 and IgM increased both in ascites fluid and in plasma, while the concentration of other DNA-binding-proteins decreased or remained constant. Evidence is presented that the DNA- and phosphocellulose binding ascites protein fraction inhibit tumor cell growth. No inhibition was induced by corresponding protein fractions isolated from normal rat plasma.