The CryoPop study: Screening for high-grade cervical dysplasia in Karnataka, India.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience of screening with visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and colposcopy to identify women with high-grade precancerous cervical lesions who were candidates for cryotherapy. Women were screened to determine eligibility for a clinical trial testing the safety and efficacy of a new, simple and inexpensive cryotherapy device (CryoPop®) targeted for use in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Primary and urban health centres in Belagavi, Hubballi and Vijayapur, India. POPULATION: Women in the age-group 30-49 years, premenopausal, with no prior hysterectomy and no known HIV infection were eligible for screening. METHODS: Visual inspection with acetic acid was performed on eligible women following informed consent. VIA-positive women were referred for colposcopy and biopsy. Biopsies were read by two pathologists independently, with a third pathologist acting as tie-breaker if needed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the number/proportion of women screening positive by VIA and the number/proportion of those women screening VIA-positive found to have high-grade cervical lesions on biopsy (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 [CIN 2/3]). Demographic variables were compared between women who screened VIA-positive and those who screened VIA-negative; a separate comparison of demographic and limited reproductive variables was performed between women who had CIN 2/3 on biopsy and those without CIN 2/3 on biopsy. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data and t-tests or analysis of variance for numeric data were used with all tests two-sided and performed at an alpha 0.05 level of statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 9130 women were screened with VIA between 4 July 2020 and 31 March 2021. The mean age of all women screened was 37 years (standard deviation = 5.6 years) with 6073 of the women (66.5%) in the 30-39 year range. Only 1% of women reported prior cervical cancer screening. A total of 501 women (5.5%) were VIA-positive; of these, 401 women underwent colposcopy. Of those who had colposcopy, 17 (4.2%) had high-grade lesions on biopsy, an additional 164 (40.9%) had low-grade cervical lesions on biopsy or endocervical curettage and one woman (0.2%) was found to have invasive cancer. VIA-positive women were younger and had higher levels of education and income; however, women who were VIA-positive and found to have CIN 2/3 were older, were more likely to be housewives and had higher household income than those without CIN 2/3. CONCLUSION: Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, over 9100 women were screened with VIA for precancerous lesions. However, only 17 (4.2%) were found to have biopsy-proven high-grade cervical lesions, underscoring the subjective performance of VIA as a screening method. Given that this is significantly lower than rates reported in the literature, it is possible that the prevalence of high-grade lesions in this population was impacted by screening a younger and more rural population. This study demonstrates that screening is feasible in an organised fashion and can be scaled up rapidly. However, while inexpensive and allowing for same-day treatment, VIA may be too subjective and have insufficient accuracy clearly to identify lesions requiring treatment, particularly in low-prevalence and low-risk populations, calling into question its overall cost-effectiveness.

Planned delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia in low-income and middle-income countries (CRADLE-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality. Evidence regarding interventions in a low-income or middle-income setting is scarce. We aimed to evaluate whether planned delivery between 34+ 0 and 36+ 6 weeks' gestation can reduce maternal mortality and morbidity without increasing perinatal complications in India and Zambia. METHODS: In this parallel-group, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we compared planned delivery versus expectant management in women with pre-eclampsia from 34+ 0 to 36+ 6 weeks' gestation. Participants were recruited from nine hospitals and referral facilities in India and Zambia and randomly assigned to planned delivery or expectant management in a 1:1 ratio by a secure web-based randomisation facility hosted by MedSciNet. Randomisation was stratified by centre and minimised by parity, single-fetus pregnancy or multi-fetal pregnancy, and gestational age. The primary maternal outcome was a composite of maternal mortality or morbidity with a superiority hypothesis. The primary perinatal outcome was a composite of one or more of: stillbirth, neonatal death, or neonatal unit admission of more than 48 h with a non-inferiority hypothesis (margin of 10% difference). Analyses were by intention to treat, with an additional per-protocol analysis for the perinatal outcome. The trial was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, 10672137. The trial is closed to recruitment and all follow-up has been completed. FINDINGS: Between Dec 19, 2019, and March 31, 2022, 565 women were enrolled. 284 women (282 women and 301 babies analysed) were allocated to planned delivery and 281 women (280 women and 300 babies analysed) were allocated to expectant management. The incidence of the primary maternal outcome was not significantly different in the planned delivery group (154 [55%]) compared with the expectant management group (168 [60%]; adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·79 to 1·05). The incidence of the primary perinatal outcome by intention to treat was non-inferior in the planned delivery group (58 [19%]) compared with the expectant management group (67 [22%]; adjusted risk difference -3·39%, 90% CI -8·67 to 1·90; non-inferiority p<0·0001). The results from the per-protocol analysis were similar. There was a significant reduction in severe maternal hypertension (adjusted RR 0·83, 95% CI 0·70 to 0·99) and stillbirth (0·25, 0·07 to 0·87) associated with planned delivery. There were 12 serious adverse events in the planned delivery group and 21 in the expectant management group. INTERPRETATION: Clinicians can safely offer planned delivery to women with late preterm pre-eclampsia, in a low-income or middle-income country. Planned delivery reduces stillbirth, with no increase in neonatal unit admissions or neonatal morbidity and reduces the risk of severe maternal hypertension. Planned delivery from 34 weeks' gestation should therefore be considered as an intervention to reduce pre-eclampsia associated mortality and morbidity in these settings. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council and Indian Department of Biotechnology.

Safety and efficacy of the new CryoPop® cryotherapy device for cervical dysplasia in low- and middle-income countries: study protocol for a multicenter open-label non-inferiority clinical trial with historical controls.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the world, affecting mainly women residing in low- and middle-income countries. Progression from a pre-invasive phase to that of an invasive phase generally takes years and provides a window of opportunity to screen for and treat precancerous lesions. METHODS: This study is being conducted at four sites in north Karnataka, India. Community sensitization activities have been organized in the study areas to create awareness among stakeholders, including elected representatives, physicians, health care workers, and potential participants. Organized community based as well as hospital-based screening is being conducted using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Screen positive women are referred to respective study hospitals for colposcopy and directed biopsy. Participants with confirmed high-grade cervical dysplasia (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or HSIL) who fit all other eligibility criteria will be recruited to the study and will receive cryotherapy using CryoPop®, an innovative new cryotherapy device. DISCUSSION: There is a need to develop an inexpensive, simple, and effective cryotherapy device for use by frontline health care providers at locations where screening and timely treatment can be given, accelerating access to cervical cancer prevention services and minimizing loss to follow-up of women with precancerous lesions who need treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry - India CTRI/2019/01/017289 ClinicalTrials.Gov number NCT04154644 . Registered on November 6, 2019.

Current views and practice of faculty members and consultants regarding 'Publications in India': A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an increasing enthusiasm and pressure to submit scientific articles to journals for publication due to official policies. This has led to increased stress on authors and editors and in issues like plagiarism. We planned a cross-sectional study with an aim to explore the current publication related views and practice of faculty members and consultants. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire based prospective survey with 22 questions divided into parts. Print and electronic versions were sent to around 18,270 members in total, a majority of whom were anaesthesiologists and 600 members responded to our questionnaire. A database was created and analysed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: About 80% felt that online journals were better read than print journals. Eighty eight percent agreed that publications improve academic skills. The Medical Council of India requirements to publish in reputed journals were cited as the main reasons for plagiarism. The publication rule had become a burden for 46% respondents. Review articles were most likely to be read though clinical investigations were considered to be of maximum academic significance. Review/publishing time followed by author requirements and journal indexing were the points our respondents liked to see most when choosing a journal for article submission. CONCLUSION: Our survey results depict the current author related views and trends in publication practice which may guide in evidence-based policy making.