The emerging role of the advanced practice epilepsy nurse: A comparative study between two countries.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare advanced practice in epilepsy nurses in Spain and United Kingdom, identifying differences in the domains of standard advanced practice. BACKGROUND: Europe has recently faced the challenge of providing high-quality care for patients with epilepsy, a disease that generates many health demands. In some countries, such as the United Kingdom, advanced practice nursing is well established and could serve as a guide for implantation in countries where it is still in development, as is the case of Spain. DESIGN: A multicentre cross-sectional descriptive cohort study compared differences in the roles of advanced practice nurses in Spain and the United Kingdom. METHODS: The Advanced Practice Role Delineation Tool and its validated Spanish version were administered using an online questionnaire in a cohort of advanced practice epilepsy nurses in both countries. A convenience sample was recruited between January to December 2019. The study complied with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. RESULTS: Most United Kingdom nurses in our sample came from community environments, in contrast to Spanish nurses who worked in hospital. All domains analysed in the survey had significantly higher scores in the United Kingdom than in the Spanish cohort, especially in the research and leadership domains. CONCLUSIONS: The advanced practice role in Spain is underdeveloped compared with the United Kingdom. Differences in the settings of advanced roles in epilepsy nurses may be explained by greater community practice in the United Kingdom and differences in organisational and health systems. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our study showed the need to implement specific policies to develop advance practice nurse roles in Spain to improve the quality of care of patients with epilepsy.

Spanish version of the Satisfaction with Epilepsy Care questionnaire: Adaptation and psychometric properties.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaption and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the Satisfaction with Epilepsy Care (SEC) questionnaire and analyze patient satisfaction with epilepsy care. METHODS: Transcultural adaptation and validation of the SEC were carried out using translation and back-translation with pilot testing and an expert panel. The SEC-E (Spanish) was analyzed in 213 patients with epilepsy to examine construct and criterion validity and internal consistency. RESULTS: The SEC-E achieved conceptual, semantic, and content equivalence with the original version. For content validity, one question was eliminated from the original questionnaire as it has little relevance in our cultural setting. Positive correlations for criterion validity were obtained using the gold standard measure (Satisfaction in Hospitalized Patients scale). Construct validity replicated the three dimensions of the original questionnaire. The scale showed adequate reliability through internal consistency (Cronbach's α of 0.94) and temporal stability on retest (n = 85). Patients scored (0 to 100) 77.5 [standard deviation (SD): 19.9] for satisfaction with communication, 76.9 (SD: 17) for organization, and 67.2 (SD: 22.1) for information. SIGNIFICANCE: The SEC-E is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of educational interventions aiming to improve the quality of care in patients with epilepsy in Spanish clinical practice. The results showed a good level of patient satisfaction with epilepsy care.

Protocol for the management of psychiatric patients with psychomotor agitation.

BACKGROUND: Psychomotor agitation (PMA) is a state of motor restlessness and mental tension that requires prompt recognition, appropriate assessment and management to minimize anxiety for the patient and reduce the risk for escalation to aggression and violence. Standardized and applicable protocols and algorithms can assist healthcare providers to identify patients at risk of PMA, achieve timely diagnosis and implement minimally invasive management strategies to ensure patient and staff safety and resolution of the episode. METHODS: Spanish experts in PMA from different disciplines (psychiatrists, psychologists and nurses) convened in Barcelona for a meeting in April 2016. Based on recently issued international consensus guidelines on the standard of care for psychiatric patients with PMA, the meeting provided the opportunity to address the complexities in the assessment and management of PMA from different perspectives. The attendees worked towards producing a consensus for a unified approach to PMA according to the local standards of care and current local legislations. The draft protocol developed was reviewed and ratified by all members of the panel prior to its presentation to the Catalan Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health, the Spanish Society of Biological Psychiatry (SEPB) and the Spanish Network Centre for Research in Mental Health (CIBERSAM) for input. The final protocol and algorithms were then submitted to these organizations for endorsement. RESULTS: The protocol presented here provides guidance on the appropriate selection and use of pharmacological agents (inhaled/oral/IM), seclusion, and physical restraint for psychiatric patients suspected of or presenting with PMA. The protocol is applicable within the Spanish healthcare system. Implementation of the protocol and the constituent algorithms described here should ensure the best standard of care of patients at risk of PMA. Episodes of PMA could be identified earlier in their clinical course and patients could be managed in the least invasive and coercive manner, ensuring their own safety and that of others around them. CONCLUSION: Establishing specialized teams in agitation and providing them with continued training on the identification of agitation, patient management and therapeutic alternatives might reduce the burden of PMA for both the patient and the healthcare system.

Health-related quality of life in patients with urostomies.

PURPOSE: To assess health-related quality of life in patients with urothelial (bladder) cancer 6 months following radical cystectomy with construction of a urostomy. SUBJECTS: The target sample was 54 patients with urothelial cancer who underwent radical cystectomy with Bricker-type incontinent urinary diversion between December 2008 and December 2009; 37 out of 54 (68%) of potential respondents agreed to participate. Seven potential subjects died within the 6-month period and we were unable to locate 10 potential respondents. INSTRUMENT: The Stoma-Quality of Life was developed to be valid for measurement of 20 items that query the impact of the ostomy on the health-related quality of life and its impact on daily life. Scores were categorized as 70% to 100% (indicating good quality of life), 30% to 69% (indicating moderate quality of life), and 0 to 29% (indicating poor quality of life). METHODS: Subjects responded to the Stoma-Quality of Life questionnaire by telephone 6 months after urostomy surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-five were ranked as having a good quality of life. The remaining 2 subjects had scores indicating moderate quality of life; no respondent was ranked as having a poor quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related quality of life was ranked as good in 95% of a group of patients managed by radical cystectomy and Bricker ileal conduit construction and moderate in 5%. Based on these findings, we conclude that the Bricker-type incontinent urinary diversion remains a viable treatment option for bladder cancer that allows an acceptable health-related quality of life.

Impact of a nurse-run clinic on prevalence of urinary incontinence and everyday life in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in patients undergoing prostatectomy and to evaluate the impact of UI on the everyday life in order to select the patients eligible to enter a pelvic floor rehabilitation program. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: The sample comprised 114 consecutive men undergoing laparoscopic or open radical prostatectomy between April 2007 and April 2008. Participants' mean age was 59 years (range, 46-67 years). The research setting was a hospital-based clinic in Barcelona, Spain. Patients who required an indwelling urinary catheter due to other factors were excluded from the trial. During admission, nursing staff explained the study and obtained informed consent from patients willing to participate in the trial. METHODS: The impact of UI on daily living was evaluated via administration of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. Impact of UI was evaluated before surgery, and after 1 and 12 months following indwelling catheter removal. RESULTS: A total of 95.5% patients developed UI 1 month following bladder catheter removal. Slightly less than 1 in 4 patients (24.8%) indicated that UI had no effect on activities of daily living. In contrast, 27.5% indicated that UI had a moderate impact and 47.7% indicated a severe impact. Ninety-one patients reported performing pelvic floor muscle exercises to improve UI, but only 45% were found to be performing them correctly. When evaluated at 1 year following catheter removal, 52.64% of the patients continued to experience UI. The majority (79.8%) indicated that UI did not impact their daily lives, 8.8% indicated a moderate impact, and 20.4% reported that UI had a severe impact on daily life. Seventy patients (61.4%) continued to perform pelvic floor muscle exercises; after 1 year, 93% were deemed to be correctly identifying, contracting, and relaxing their pelvic floor muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary incontinence remains prevalent as long as 12 months following catheter removal. Incontinence exerts a moderate to severe impact on daily life in 27.5% to 20.4% of respondents. In order to minimize the negative impact as much as possible, we advocate a pelvic floor muscle training program overseen by RNs.

Nursing care program for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

The prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in 114 patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy was examined to determine the efficacy of an ED care program in which nurse-provided education plays a fundamental role in the detection and follow-up of ED as well as in treatment compliance. The nursing program consists of four visits during which specific treatment-related information, education and support, active listening, and selection of the treatment best suited to each patient (in consultation with the healthcare team) are provided. One month following bladder catheter removal, 77 of the 114 patients (69%) in the study had ED, with a majority suffering from severe ED. A nursing care program could help minimize ED and enable patients to adapt to their new situation.

[Quality of care in diabetic patients receiving pharmacologic treatment]. / Calidad de atención en pacientes diabéticos bajo tratamiento farmacológico.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease with an increasing prevalence. Appropriate treatment of the disease and prevention of chronic complications reduce morbidity and mortality in a cost-effective manner. These actions should be measured through the use of validated indicators for quality of care. The goal of this study was to assess the quality of care in diabetic patients under pharmacologic treatment in a private university hospital. A retrospective study was conducted in adult patients who bought insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents during a 3 month period; demographic and clinical data were obtained for 12 consecutive months following the buying period. The study included 305 adult patients; most were males (60%), with type 2 diabetes (95%), and using oral hipoglycemic agents (86%). Control of blood pressure was registered in 80%, foot exam in 5%, eye exam in 27%, HbA1C blood level in 85%, complete lipid profile in 82%, microalbuminuria in 27% and creatinine clearance in 22% of patients, respectively. Mean values were HbA1C 7.1(+/- 1.6)%, and < or = 7% in 66%, LDL 113 (+/- 33.6) mg/dl and <100 mg/dl in 30%, BP 136-79 mm Hg and < 130-80 mm Hg in 46% of patients, respectively. This study emphasizes the need for quality of care assessment through validated indicators and points out the aspects that should be improved within a health care system.

Calidad de atención en pacientes diabéticos bajo tratamiento farmacológico / Quality of care in diabetic patients receiving pharmacologic treatment

La diabetes mellitus es una enfermedad crónica de prevalencia creciente. El tratamiento adecuado de la enfermedad y la prevención de complicaciones crónicas reducen la morbimortalidad de manera costo-efectiva. Dichas acciones deben ser medidas a través de indicadores validados de calidad de atención. El objetivo del presente estudio fue medir la calidad de atención en pacientes diabéticos bajo tratamiento farmacológico en una institución universitaria privada. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en pacientes adultos que compraron insulina o hipoglucemiantes orales durante un período de 3 meses; la información clínico demográfica fue obtenida durante un lapso de 12 meses consecutivos posteriores al período de compra. Se incluyeron 305 pacientes, en su mayoría hombres (60%), diabéticos tipo 2 (95%) y con predominio de uso de hipoglucemiantes orales (86%). Se documentaron controles de presión arterial en el 80%, examen del pie en el 5%, oftalmológico en el 27%, HbA1C en el 85%, perfil lipídico completo en el 82%, microalbuminuria en el 27% y clearance de creatinina en el 22% de los pacientes, respectivamente. Los valores medios obtenidos fueron HbA1C 7.1 (más o menos 1.6)%, y en el 66% fue menor o igual a 7%, LDL 113 (más o menos 33.6) mg/dl y en el 30% menor que 100 mg/dl, PA 136-79 mm Hg y en un 46% de los pacientes menor que 130-80 mm Hg. Este estudio enfatiza la necesidad de realizar controles de calidad con indicadores validados y resalta los aspectos que deben ser mejorados dentro de un sistema de salud.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease with an increasing prevalence. Appropriate treatment of the disease and prevention of chronic complications reduce morbidity and mortality in a cost-effective manner. These actions should be measured through the use of validated indicators for quality of care. The goal of this study was to assess the quality of care in diabetic patients under pharmacologic treatment in a private university hospital. A retrospective study was conducted in adult patients who bought insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents during a 3 month period; demographic and clinical data were obtained for 12 consecutive months following the buying period. The study included 305 adult patients; most were males (60%), with type 2 diabetes (95%), and using oral hipoglycemic agents (86%). Control of blood pressure was registered in 80%, foot exam in 5%, eye exam in 27%, HbA1C blood level in 85%, complete lipid profile in 82%, microalbuminuria in 27% and creatinine clearance in 22% of patients, respectively. Mean values were HbA1C 7.1(more or less than 1.6)%, and less than or equal to 7% in 66%, LDL 113 (more or less than 33.6) mg/dl and less than 100 mg/dl in 30%, BP 136-79 mm Hg and less than 130-80 mm Hg in 46% of patients, respectively. This study emphasizes the need for quality of care assessment through validated indicators and points out the aspects that should be improved within a health care system.