The cost implications of Wilson disease among hospitalized patients: analysis of USA hospitals.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In this study, we used a national cohort of patients with Wilson's disease (WD) to investigate the admissions, mortality rates, and costs over the captured period to assess specific subpopulations at higher burden. METHODS: Patients with WD were selected using 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The weighted estimates and patient data were stratified using demographics and medical characteristics. Regression curves were graphed to derive goodness-of-fit for each trend from which R2 and P values were calculated. RESULTS: Annual total admissions per 100 000 hospitalizations due to WD were 1075, 1180, 1140, and 1330 (R2 = 0.75; P = 0.13) from 2016 to 2019. Within the demographics, there was an increase in admissions among patients greater than 65 years of age (R2 = 0.90; P = 0.05) and White patients (R2 = 0.97; P = 0.02). Assessing WD-related mortality rates, there was an increase in the mortality rate among those in the first quartile of income (R2 = 1.00; P < 0.001). The total cost for WD-related hospitalizations was $20.90, $27.23, $24.20, and $27.25 million US dollars for the years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively (R2 = 0.47; P = 0.32). There was an increasing total cost trend for Asian or Pacific Islander patients (R2 = 0.90; P = 0.05). Interestingly, patients with cirrhosis demonstrated a decreased trend in the total costs (R2 = 0.97; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that certain ethnicity groups, income classes and comorbidities had increased admissions or costs among patients admitted with WD.

Inpatient Cost Burdens of Treating Chronic Hepatitis B in US Hospitals: A Weighted Analysis of a National Database.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study evaluates the cost burdens of inpatient care for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to stratify the patients based on the presence of cirrhosis and conduct subgroup analyses on patient demographics and medical characteristics. METHODS: The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was used to select individuals diagnosed with CHB. The weighted charge estimates were derived and converted to admission costs, adjusting for inflation to the year 2016, and presented in United States Dollars. These adjusted values were stratified using select patient variables. To assess the goodness-of-fit for each trend, we graphed the data across the respective years, expressed in a chronological sequence with format (R2, p-value). Analysis of CHB patients was carried out in three groups: the composite CHB population, the subset of patients with cirrhosis, and the subset of patients without cirrhosis. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, the total costs of hospitalizations in CHB patients were $603.82, $737.92, $758.29, and $809.01 million dollars from 2016 to 2019, respectively. We did not observe significant cost trends in the composite CHB population or in the cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis cohorts. However, we did find rising costs associated with age older than 65 (0.97, 0.02), white race (0.98, 0.01), Hispanic ethnicity (1.00, 0.001), and Medicare coverage (0.95, 0.02), the significance of which persisted regardless of the presence of cirrhosis. Additionally, inpatients without cirrhosis who had comorbid metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) were also observed to have rising costs (0.96, 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a significant increase in overall costs with CHB inpatients, regardless of the presence of cirrhosis. However, certain groups are more susceptible to escalating costs. Therefore, increased screening and nuanced vaccination planning must be optimized in order to prevent and mitigate these growing cost burdens on vulnerable populations.

Trends of Costs and Admission Rates Among Patients Admitted With Autoimmune Hepatitis: Analysis of US Hospitals Using the NIS Database.

Background and aim: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prominent cause of chronic liver disease in the United States. This study aims to characterize the incidence, mortality, and cost implications of this condition using a national database. Method: The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was used to select patients with AIH. After adjusting for inflation, weighted charge data were used to calculate the admission costs using charge-to-cost ratios. Demographic, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity values were used to build strata to characterize admission incidence, mortality data and aggregate and per-capita cost values. Furthermore, additional sensitivity analysis was performed using a stratified set of patients with AIH as one of the top 10 diagnosis (AIH-specific subsample). Multinomial regression curves were graphed and assessed to derive goodness-of-fit for each trend. R2 and P-values were calculated. Results: From 2016 to 2019, the total admissions related to AIH were approximately 20,984, 21,905, 22,055, and 22,680 cases, respectively (R2: 0.93, P-value: 0.03). AIH-related hospitalization aggregate costs came to $338.18, $369.17, $355.98, and $387.25 million dollars (R2: 0.75, P-value: 0.17). Significant admission growth was seen in the Southern region (R2: 0.91, P-value: 0.05). Most notably, increasing trends in total admissions were found across older age, those of White and Hispanic descent, and those with comorbidities. On the other hand, the AIH-specific subsample illustrated decreasing trends in admissions across demographics (i.e., age, gender, and race) and comorbidities; however, those with hepatic complications saw a rise in the admission trends (cirrhosis - R2: 0.98, P-value: 0.009; multiple liver complications - R2: 0.95, P-value: 0.03). Conclusion: Among AIH-specific admissions, there was a decreasing trend overall; however, there was an exceptional increase in the admissions among those with hepatic complications.

Proton beam stereotactic body radiotherapy and hypofractionated therapy with pencil beam scanning is safe and effective for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A single center experience.

Background: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a non-surgical treatment that spares adjacent tissues compared to photon radiation and useful for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). We present a single center experience in HCC and iCCA treated with Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) PBT. Methods: Forty-four consecutive patients (22 patients in each group) receiving PBT were included and reviewed. PBT was delivered with hypofractionated or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using PBS. Tumor size was approximated by clinical target volume (CTV). Outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and liver toxicity was determined by MELD-Na and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade. Results: Median follow up was 38.7 months, fourteen (35%) had multifocal disease and median CTV was 232.5cc. Four (9%) and 40 (91%) patients received SBRT and hypofractionated radiation, respectively. Two year overall survival was statistically higher for HCC (entire group: 68.9% months [95% CI: 61.3 - 76.3%]; iCCA: 49.8% [95% CI: 38.5% - 61.1%]; HCC: 89.4% [95% CI: 82.3 - 96.5%]; P <0.005). There was no statistical difference in progression-free survival or freedom from local failure. Biologically Equivalent Dose (BED) was greater than or equal to 80.5Gy in 37 (84%) patients. All iCCA patients had stable or improved ALBI grade following treatment. ALBI grade was stable in 83% of HCC patients and average MELD-Na score remained stable. Tumor size, pretreatment liver function, and total radiation dose were not associated with liver toxicity. Conclusions: PBT for unresectable HCC and iCCA is safe and effective, even for large and multifocal tumors. Liver function was preserved even in those with baseline cirrhosis in this advanced population with large tumors.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Genetic Classification.

ABSTRACT: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global burden, with management complicated by its heterogeneity, varying presentation, and relative resistance to therapy. Recent advances in the understanding of the genetic, molecular, and immunological underpinnings of HCC have allowed a detailed classification of these tumors, with resultant implications for diagnosis, prognostication, and selection of appropriate treatments. Through the correlation of genomic features with histopathology and clinical outcomes, we are moving toward a comprehensive and unifying framework to guide our diagnostic and therapeutic approach to HCC.

The impact of race and gender on the outcomes of patients with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: propensity score-matched analysis of the NIS database.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen overdose is one of the leading causes of acute liver failure in the USA. In this study, we investigated the impact of race and gender on the hospital outcomes of patients admitted with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. METHODS: From the National Inpatient Sample between the years 2016 and 2019, patients with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure were selected and stratified based on gender (Male and Female) and race (White, Black and Hispanic). The cases were propensity score-matched to controls (male and Whites) and were compared along the following endpoints: mortality, length of stay, hospitalization costs, and hepatic complications. RESULTS: Among patients with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure, females experienced higher rates of mortality (16.60% vs. 11.70%, P = 0.004) and clinical illness, including hypotension (11.80% vs. 7.15%, P = 0.002) and ventilator use (40.80% vs. 30.00%, P < 0.001). When stratified by race, Black patients had longer hospital stays (Black vs. White, 8.76 days vs. 7.46 days, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in outcomes between Hispanic and White patients. No significant differences in mortality were shown between races. CONCLUSION: We found that females had a higher rate of mortality and incidence of hepatic encephalopathy compared to males. When stratified by race, Blacks were shown to have longer hospital stay. Females and racial minorities were also affected by special healthcare needs after discharge compared to their male and White cohorts, respectively.

The causes of death in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis following liver transplantation stratified using pre-liver transplant BMI.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Determining the effects of pre-liver transplant (LT) BMI independent of underlying ascites on the post-LT outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is needed to clarify the paradoxical and protective effects of obesity on post-LT endpoints. In order to accomplish this, we used graded severities of ascites to stratify the NASH-LT population and to perform an ascites-specific strata analysis with differing pre-LT BMI levels. METHODS: 2005-2019 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) database was queried to select patients with NASH, who were categorized into specific sets of ascites severity: no ascites (n = 1188), mild ascites (n = 4463), and moderate ascites (n = 3525). Then, BMI classification (underweight: < 18.5, normal: 18.5-25, overweight: 25-30, obese: ≥ 30 kg/m2) was used to stratify each ascites-specific group and to compare to the post-LT mortality endpoints. Those under 18 years old and those who received living/multi-organ transplants were excluded. RESULTS: Among each ascites category, there were the following numbers of normal, underweight, overweight, and obese BMI patients respectively; no ascites: 161, 4, 359, 664; mild ascites: 643, 28, 1311, 2481; and moderate ascites: 529, 25, 1030, 1941. The obese BMI cohort was at a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to recipients with normal BMI with mild ascites (aHR: 0.79, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.65-0.94, p-value = 0.010; case-incidence 47.10 vs 56.81 deaths per 1000 person-years) and moderate ascites (aHR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, p-value = 0.009; case-incidence 53.71 vs 66.17 deaths per 1000 person-years). In addition, the overweight BMI cohort with mild ascites demonstrated a lower hazard of all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.97, p-value = 0.03; case-incidence 49.09 vs 56.81 deaths per 1000 person-years). There was no difference in graft failure for the three BMI groups (underweight, overweight, and obese) in comparison to normal BMI. Furthermore, the overweight BMI group with mild ascites cohort demonstrated a lower hazard of death due to general infectious causes (aHR: 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.83, p = 0.006; case-incidence 6.12 vs 11.91 deaths per 1000 person-years) and sepsis (aHR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.86, p = 0.01; case-incidence 4.31 vs 8.50 deaths per 1000 person-years). CONCLUSION: The paradoxical effects of obesity in reducing the risks of all-cause death appears to be in part modulated by ascites. The current study emphasizes the need to evaluate BMI with concomitant ascites severity pre-LT to accurately prognosticate post-LT outcomes when evaluating NASH patients with advanced liver disease.

The trends in cost associated with liver transplantation in the US: Analysis of weighted hospital data.

This study aims to evaluate recent annualized trends in the cost-burden of inpatient hospitalizations associated with liver transplantation (LT) in the US as stratified by patient demographics and medical characteristics. From 2016 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample was used to select patients who underwent LT, from which the weighted charge estimates were derived and converted to admission costs using inflation-adjusted charge-to-cost ratios. The adjusted values were stratified using select patient variables and graphed across the respective years to derive goodness-of-fit for each trend (expressed with R2 and p -values). From 2016 to 2019, the estimated total number of LT-related hospitalizations in the US were 6685, 7075, 7260, and 7815 cases respectively. There was a general increase in the total cost of LT-related hospitalizations over the years: $945.75, $1010.23, $1052.46, and $1143.84 in millions of dollars (0.98, 0.01). Furthermore, positive trends in total cost were observed in the following strata: patients aged 35-49 (0.92, 0.04) and above 65 (0.91, 0.05), Whites (0.99, 0.01), those with congestive heart failure (0.98, 0.01), ≥2 comorbidities (0.97, 0.02), hepatic encephalopathy (0.93, 0.04), and those with private insurance (0.93, 0.04), as well as LT performed in the Northeast (0.94, 0.03), Midwest (0.92, 0.04), and South (0.91, 0.04). Total cost associated with hepatitis C declined significantly (0.94, 0.03). With respect to mean costs, positive trends were observed in the following strata: those with other or cryptogenic liver disease (0.93, 0.03), ≥2 comorbidities (0.96, 0.02), and LT performed in the Northeast region (0.93, 0.04). The number of liver transplants performed in the US, as well as the associated costs, are rising. Given the apparent rising costs in specific patient populations, economic and public health policies must focus on cost containment within these groups to ensure appropriate usage of resources.

Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Setting of Liver Transplantation: A Review.

The emerging field of immuno-oncology has brought exciting developments in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It has also raised urgent questions about the role of immunotherapy in the setting of liver transplantation, both before and after transplant. A growing body of evidence points to the safety and efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents as potential adjuncts for successful down-staging of advanced HCCs to allow successful transplant in carefully selected patients. For patients with recurrent HCC post-transplant, immunotherapy has a limited, yet growing role. In this review, we describe optimal regimens in the setting of liver transplantation.

Clinical Practice Issues for Liver Transplantation in COVID-19 Recovered Recipients.

The ongoing burden of COVID-19 in persons with end stage liver failure necessitates the development of sound and rational policies for organ transplantation in this population. Following our initial experience with two COVID-19 recovered recipients who died shortly after transplant, we adjusted our center policies, re-evaluated outcomes, and retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of the subsequent seven COVID-19 recovered recipients. There were two early deaths and 5 successful outcomes. Both deceased patients shared common characteristics in that they had positive SARS-CoV2 PCR tests proximal to transplant (7-17 days), had acute on chronic liver failure, and suffered thromboembolic phenomena. After a careful review of clinical and virological outcome predictors, we instituted policy changes to avoid transplantation in these circumstances. We believe that our series offers useful insights into the unique challenges that confront transplant centers in the COVID-19 era and could guide future discussions regarding this important area.

Sump syndrome of the remnant common bile duct following a living donor liver transplant.

Sump syndrome - a collection of digested food, debris, stones, bile, and bacteria in a poorly drained, bile duct reservoir - occurs most commonly after a side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy. As choledochoduodenostomies are now less common, sump syndrome is more often characterized as a complication of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies; however, most cases occur at the hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis. We report a rare case of sump syndrome in the intra-pancreatic remnant common bile duct in a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis following living donor liver transplant via Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Our patient had a history of end-stage liver disease secondary to primary sclerosing cholangitis but presented with recurrent bacteremia and symptoms of acute cholangitis following her transplant. While this complication has not been reported in this population, we know that those with primary sclerosing cholangitis and those undergoing liver transplantation are at very high risk for biliary complications and strictures. Liver transplant is currently our only treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis, and more than any other group, they are referred for living donor liver transplantation, preferably via Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Thus, our patient's clinical scenario is not uncommon and demonstrates a source of serious infection of which providers must be aware.

Provider Attitudes and Practices for Alcohol Screening, Treatment, and Education in Patients With Liver Disease: A Survey From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease Special Interest Group.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: While abstinence-promoting behavioral and pharmacotherapies are part of the therapeutic foundation for alcohol use disorder (AUD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), these therapies, along with alcohol screening and education, are often underutilized. Our aim was to examine provider attitudes and practices for alcohol screening, treatment and education in patients with liver disease. METHODS: We conducted a survey of primarily (89%) hepatology and gastroenterology providers within (80%) and outside the United States (20%). Surveys were sent to 921 providers with 408 complete responses (44%), of whom 343 (80%) work in a tertiary liver transplant center. RESULTS: While alcohol screening rates in liver disease patients was nearly universal, less than half of providers reported practicing with integrated addiction providers, using alcohol biomarkers and screening tools. Safe alcohol use by liver disease patients was felt to exist by 40% of providers. While 60% of providers reported referring AUD patients for behavioral therapy, 71% never prescribed AUD pharmacotherapy due to low comfort (84%). Most providers (77%) reported low addiction education and 90% desired more during GI/hepatology fellowship training. Amongst prescribers, baclofen was preferred, but with gaps in pharmacotherapy knowledge. Overall, there was low adherence to the 2019 AASLD practice guidance for ALD, although higher in hepatologists and experienced providers. CONCLUSIONS: While our survey of hepatology and gastroenterology providers demonstrated higher rates of alcohol screening and referrals for behavioral therapy, we found low rates of prescribing AUD pharmacotherapy due to knowledge gaps from insufficient education. Further studies are needed to assess interventions to improve provider alignment with best practices for treating patients with AUD and ALD.

Practice patterns in NAFLD and NASH: real life differs from published guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Management guidelines from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/American College of Gastroenterology/American Gastroenterology Association published in 2012 for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) recommend weight loss, vitamin E and pioglitazone as effective therapies for the treatment of biopsy-confirmed NASH. However, little is known about how physicians in the US diagnose NASH or whether published guidelines are being followed. METHODS: We assessed current diagnostic and treatment patterns of the management of NAFLD and NASH among academic gastroenterologists and hepatologists in the US using a standardized survey developed to collect information regarding respondents' practice environments, diagnostic techniques, and medication usage in patients with NAFLD/NASH. RESULTS: We invited 482 gastroenterologists and hepatologists, predominantly from academic centers, of whom 163 completed the survey. Only 24% of providers routinely perform liver biopsy, predominantly among patients with elevated serum aminotransferases. Vitamin E is prescribed regularly by 70% while only 14% routinely prescribe pioglitazone. Despite recommendations to the contrary, ~25% prescribe pioglitazone or vitamin E without biopsy confirmation of NASH. Metformin is used as frequently as pioglitazone despite its proven lack of efficacy in NASH. Overall, 40-73% adhere to published guidelines, depending on the specific question. There was no significant difference seen in adherence to guidelines between gastroenterologists and hepatologists. CONCLUSION: This survey suggests that clinical practice patterns among gastroenterologists and hepatologists for the management of NASH frequently diverge from published practice guidelines. Although liver biopsy remains the gold standard to diagnose NASH, less than 25% of respondents routinely require it to make the diagnosis of NASH. We conclude that NASH is underdiagnosed in gastroenterology and hepatology practices, highlighting the need to refine noninvasive diagnostic tools.

Constrictive Pericarditis as a Cause of Refractory Ascites.

We report a 43-year-old man who presented for evaluation of ascites, varices, and hepatosplenomegaly. Initial labs were notable for normal platelets, mild liver synthetic dysfunction, and disproportionately elevated alkaline phosphatase. He was presumed to have underlying cirrhosis, and diuresis was attempted without success. A transjugular liver biopsy showed marked sinusoidal dilation without cirrhosis. Diagnostic paracentesis revealed fluid studies suggestive of cardiac ascites. Further cardiac evaluation confirmed constrictive pericarditis. The case highlights the importance of considering a broad differential in the evaluation of ascites.

Symptom reports are not reliable during ambulatory reflux monitoring.

OBJECTIVES: Patient reporting of symptom events during ambulatory reflux monitoring is commonly performed with little data regarding its accuracy. We employed a novel time-synchronized ambulatory audio recording of symptom events simultaneously with prolonged pH/impedance monitoring to assess temporal accuracy of patient-reported symptoms. METHODS: An acoustic monitoring system was employed to detect cough events via tracheal and chest wall sounds and it was temporally synchronized with an ambulatory impedance/pH monitoring system. Patients were instructed to record their symptoms in the usual manner. Six separate observers independently listened to the 24-h audio recordings and logged the exact timing of each cough event. Patients were blinded to study design and the audio reviewers were blinded to their own reports and those of patients and other reviewers. Concurrence of audio recordings and patient-reported symptoms were tested for three separate time thresholds: 1, 2, and 5 min. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range (IQR)) number of cough events by audio detection was significantly (P<0.001) higher than those reported by patients: 216 (90-275) and 34 (22-60), respectively. There was significantly (P<0.001) higher agreement among the audio recording listeners (substantial to almost perfect agreement; kappa=0.77-0.82) than between the audio recording and patient-reported symptoms (slight to fair agreement; kappa=0.13-0.27). Patients did not report 91, 82, and 71% of audible cough events based on 1-, 2-, and 5-min concordance time windows, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients do not report the majority of their symptoms during ambulatory reflux monitoring even within a 5-min time window of the true event and advise caution in clinical decision-making based solely on symptom indices.