Penicillin and amikacin mixture has bactericidal activity equivalent to gentamicin, tylosin, lincomycin and spectinomycin mixture in equine frozen semen.

Neat stallion semen can contain a variety of microorganisms, some of which may impair sperm quality and/or cause infection of the mares' reproductive tract. For this reason, antibiotics are commonly added to semen extenders. A combination of gentamicin, tylosin, lincomycin and spectinomycin (GTLS) has been recommended for use, but there are no reports on the use of this mixture in equine semen extender. Penicillin and amikacin (PA) are safe for preserving sperm quality while effectively controlling bacterial growth in equine cooled stored semen, but data on frozen semen are scarce. Therefore, a bioequivalence study was performed to assess the bactericidal activity of GTLS and PA in equine frozen semen. Nine mature, healthy stallions were used in the study. Split ejaculates were processed using media without antibiotics (Control) or with different antibiotics. For the GTLS group, centrifugation medium and freezing extender were prepared with gentamicin 250 µg/ml, tylosin 50 µg/ml, lincomycin 150 µg/ml and spectinomycin 300 µg/ml. For the PA group, the centrifugation medium was prepared with potassium penicillin G (PPG) 1200 units/ml and the freezing extender was prepared with PPG 1200 units/ml and amikacin 500 µg/ml. Semen processed in extenders without antibiotics had higher (p < .005) bacterial loads throughout all cryopreservation processing steps than semen samples processed using antibiotics. There were no differences in semen bacterial load after centrifugation, 15 and 30 min after final extension, and after thawing between GTLS and PA groups, but PA had faster (p < .05) kill-time kinetics than GTLS. Only minor differences in sperm kinetic parameters were observed among groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrated bioequivalence between GTLS and PA in mitigating end-point bacterial loads. Prudent concentrations of the antibiotic mixtures evaluated in this study can be considered both effective and sperm-safe for equine frozen semen.

Advanced methods for handling and preparation of stallion semen.

Clinical reproduction in the horse more closely parallels human clinical reproduction than in other domestic farm animals. Horse breeders rarely include fertility as a selection criterion when making mating decisions; in most breeds, there is no licensing or approval of stallions. This has led to a significant number of stallions in the breeding pool that possess desirable performance traits but are subfertile for a variety of reasons, some of them genetically transmitted between generations. Therefore, semen characteristics can vary greatly among stallions within the breeding population. A champion stallion is not gelded or culled for poor semen quality or the inability of his spermatozoa to withstand semen preservation techniques. Rather, equine theriogenologists go to great lengths to maximize reproductive performance using any and all means available. Therefore, advanced methods for processing and selecting stallion semen provide the clinician with valuable tools for handling poor-quality semen or for obtaining spermatozoa for assisted reproduction procedures.

Frozen semen management in equine breeding programs.

Success with frozen semen requires attention to detail and a basic understanding of the techniques for properly handling and thawing and inseminating frozen semen. Practitioners should also be familiar with strategies used for managing mares for insemination with thawed semen. This manuscript will review those techniques and also present fertility data collected in a commercial setting. Factors that affect pregnancy rates for mares inseminated with frozen-thawed semen such as timing and frequency of insemination were examined for two separate data sets consisting of 332 and 536 mare cycles collected during the 2002 and 2003 breeding seasons. There were no differences observed in pregnancy rates for mares inseminated once or multiple times in a given cycle (51.5% versus 51.7% for data set 1 and 47.1% versus 46.1% for data set 2). Mares inseminated twice on a cycle, once before and once after ovulation, became pregnant at a rate similar to mares inseminated once within 6h post-ovulation (48.1% versus 47.3%).