Clinical Practice Experiences Using a Professional Diabetes Management Ecosystem During COVID.

BACKGROUND: Challenges of patient care in diabetes were exacerbated by COVID, undermining the ability of patients to engage in-person with health care professionals (HCPs). To combat this, there has been accelerated adoption of telemedicine to support patient and provider connectivity. METHODS: We collated survey information regarding telemedicine from 21 European clinical institutions. Health care professionals joined virtual meetings focusing on the OneTouch Reveal (OTR) ecosystem and its utility for conducting telemedicine. Selected HCPs provided clinical case studies to explain how the OTR ecosystem supported patient care. RESULTS: Remote consultations increased by nearly 50% in 21 European clinics during the pandemic (Belgium [24%], Iberia [65%], Germany [34%], Italy [54%]). In all, 52% of people with diabetes using OTR app to connect remotely with HCPs had type 1 diabetes and 48% had type 2 diabetes. Remote connection methods included telephone (60%), email (19%), video chat (10%), text only (3%), or a mix of these methods (8%). Health care professionals usually reviewed patient data during consultations (45%) rather than before consultations (25%). Fifty-five percent of HCPs indicated digital ecosystems like OTR ecosystem would become their standard of care for diabetes management. In-depth conversations with HCPs provided a deeper understanding of how a digital ecosystem integrated into clinical practice and population management. In addition, five patient case studies using OTR ecosystem were provided by a selection of our HCPs. CONCLUSION: Diabetes management solutions, such as OTR ecosystem, supported telemedicine during the pandemic and will continue to play a valuable role in patient care beyond the pandemic.

Population-Based National Prevalence of Thyroid Dysfunction in Spain and Associated Factors: Di@bet.es Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the national prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in Spain and its association with various clinical, environmental, and demographic variables. METHODS: The study included 4554 subjects (42.4% men) with a mean age of 50 years (range 18-93 years), who were participants in a national, cross-sectional, population-based survey conducted in 2009-2010. Data gathered included clinical and demographic characteristics, physical examination, and blood sampling. Thyrotropin, free thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, and thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) concentrations were analyzed by electrochemiluminescence. Urinary iodine (UI) levels were measured in an isolated urine sample. RESULTS: The prevalence of treated hypothyroidism, untreated subclinical hypothyroidism, and untreated clinical hypothyroidism was 4.2% [confidence interval (CI) 3.6-4.9%], 4.6% [CI 4.0-5.2%], and 0.3% [CI 0.1-0.5%], respectively. The prevalence of total hypothyroidism (including all fractions) was 9.1% [CI 8.2-10.0%]. The prevalence of total hyperthyroidism was 0.8% [CI 0.6-1.1]. A total of 7.5% [CI 6.7-8.3%] of the population tested positive for TPOAbs (≥50 IU/mL). In multivariate logistic regression models, TPOAbs were strongly associated with both hypothyroidism (p < 0.001) and hyperthyroidism (p = 0.005), whereas high UI levels (>200 µg/g creatinine) were associated with hypothyroidism (p < 0.001). The positive association between UI and hypothyroidism remained for both treated (p < 0.001) and untreated (p < 0.05) hypothyroidism, whereas it was especially significant for non-autoimmune (TPOAbs negative) forms (p < 0.001). At UI levels ≥200 µg/g, there was a positive correlation between UI and thyrotropin levels (ß = 0.152, p < 0.001) and a negative correlation between UI and free triiodothyronine levels (ß = -0.134, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to the data, a large proportion (10%) of the Spanish population has some evidence of thyroid dysfunction. High TPOAb concentrations were associated with both hypo- and hyperthyroidism, whereas high UI concentrations were associated with hypothyroidism.

Low Physical Activity and Its Association with Diabetes and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study.

Low physical activity (PA), or sedentary lifestyle, is associated with the development of several chronic diseases. We aimed to investigate current prevalence of sedentariness and its association with diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors. PA was evaluated in a population-based, cross-sectional, randomly sampled study conducted in 2009-2010 in Spain. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (SF-IPAQ) was used to assess PA. 4991 individuals (median age 50 years, 57% women) were studied. Prevalence of sedentariness was 32.3% for men and 39% for women (p < 0.0001). Sex differences were particularly notable (age*sex interaction, p = 0.0024) at early and older ages. Sedentary individuals had higher BMI (28 vs. 27 kg/m2) and obesity prevalence (37 vs. 26%). Low PA was present in 44, 43, and 38% of individuals with known diabetes (KDM), prediabetes/unknown-diabetes (PREDM/UKDM), and normal glucose regulation (p = 0.0014), respectively. No difference between KDM and PREDM/UKDM (p = 0.72) was found. Variables independently associated (p < 0.05) with sedentariness were age, sex, BMI, central obesity, Mediterranean diet adherence, smoking habit, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and dyslipidemia. Low PA is on the rise in Spain, especially among women. Sedentariness is associated with several cardiovascular risk factors and may be responsible for the increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes in this country.

Prevalencia, diagnóstico, tratamiento y control de la hipertensión arterial en España. Resultados del estudio Di@bet.es / Prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and control of hypertension in Spain. Results of the Di@bet.es Study

Introducción y objetivos: El Di@bet.es es un estudio nacional diseñado con el objetivo de estimar la prevalencia de diabetes mellitus y otros factores de riesgo cardiovascular en la población adulta española. Se presenta la prevalencia de hipertensión arterial y en qué grado se reconoce, se trata y se controla. Métodos: Se incluye una muestra de la población española con 5.048 adultos de edad ≥ 18 años. Se realizó un interrogatorio clínico y una exploración que incluyó 3 lecturas de presión arterial en reposo y sedestación para calcular la media de las 3 lecturas. Se definió hipertensión como presión arterial sistólica ≥ 140 mmHg y/o presión arterial diastólica ≥ 90 mmHg y/o en tratamiento farmacológico antihipertensivo. Resultados: El 42,6% de la población adulta española de edad ≥ 18 años es hipertensa, más los varones (49,9%) que las mujeres (37,1%). La prevalencia fue superior entre los prediabéticos (67,9%) y diabéticos (79,4%). El 37,4% de los hipertensos están sin diagnosticar, más los varones (43,3%) que las mujeres (31,5%). Toman tratamiento farmacológico el 88,3% de los hipertensos conocidos y solo el 30% tiene la presión arterial controlada, más las mujeres (24,9%) que los varones (16%). Conclusiones: La prevalencia de hipertensión en España es alta y un importante porcentaje de pacientes hipertensos aún están sin diagnosticar. La hipertensión se asoció con diabetes y prediabetes, y aunque el tratamiento farmacológico es cada vez más frecuente, no logra mejorar el grado de control, que continúa siendo bajo. Es importante desarrollar y promocionar campañas poblacionales de prevención, detección y tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Di@bet.es is a national study designed to estimate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk factors in the Spanish adult population. The prevalence of hypertension and the degree to which it is recognized, treated, and controlled are described. Methods: The study included a sample of the Spanish population with 5048 adults aged ≥ 18 years. Patients were questioned and examined, with 3 blood pressure readings while seated and at rest to calculate the mean of the 3 readings. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or prescription for antihypertensive drug therapy. Results: Hypertension was found in 42.6% of the Spanish adult population aged ≥ 18 years and was more common among men (49.9%) than women (37.1%). The prevalence was higher among prediabetics (67.9%) and diabetics (79.4%). Undiagnosed hypertension was identified in 37.4% of patients and was more common in men (43.3%) than in women (31.5%). Among patients with known hypertension, 88.3% were receiving drug therapy. Well-controlled blood pressure was found in only 30% and was more common among women (24.9%) than men (16%). Conclusions: The prevalence of hypertension in Spain is high, and a considerable percentage of hypertensive patients have still not been diagnosed. Hypertension is associated with diabetes and prediabetes, and although drug therapy is increasingly common, the degree of control has not improved and remains low. Population campaigns should be developed and promoted for hypertension prevention, detection, and treatment (AU)

Prevalence, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in Spain. Results of the Di@bet.es Study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Di@bet.es is a national study designed to estimate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk factors in the Spanish adult population. The prevalence of hypertension and the degree to which it is recognized, treated, and controlled are described. METHODS: The study included a sample of the Spanish population with 5048 adults aged ≥ 18 years. Patients were questioned and examined, with 3 blood pressure readings while seated and at rest to calculate the mean of the 3 readings. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or prescription for antihypertensive drug therapy. RESULTS: Hypertension was found in 42.6% of the Spanish adult population aged ≥ 18 years and was more common among men (49.9%) than women (37.1%). The prevalence was higher among prediabetics (67.9%) and diabetics (79.4%). Undiagnosed hypertension was identified in 37.4% of patients and was more common in men (43.3%) than in women (31.5%). Among patients with known hypertension, 88.3% were receiving drug therapy. Well-controlled blood pressure was found in only 30% and was more common among women (24.9%) than men (16%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hypertension in Spain is high, and a considerable percentage of hypertensive patients have still not been diagnosed. Hypertension is associated with diabetes and prediabetes, and although drug therapy is increasingly common, the degree of control has not improved and remains low. Population campaigns should be developed and promoted for hypertension prevention, detection, and treatment.

Ambient temperature and prevalence of obesity in the Spanish population: The Di@bet.es study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine possible associations between ambient temperature and obesity in the Spanish population using an ecological focus. METHODS: The Di@bet.es study is a national, cross-sectional, population-based survey of cardiometabolic risk factors and their association with lifestyle. SAMPLE: 5,061 subjects in 100 clusters. VARIABLES: Clinical, demographic and lifestyle survey, physical examination, and blood sampling. The mean annual temperature (°C) for each study site was collected from the Spanish National Meteorology Agency (1971-2000). RESULTS: The prevalence rates of obesity in the different geographical areas divided according to mean annual temperature quartiles were 26.9% in quartile 1 (10.4-14.5°C), 30.5% in quartile 2 (14.5-15.5°C), 32% in quartile 3 (15.5-17.8°C), and 33.6% in quartile 4 (17.8-21.3°C) (P = 0.003). Logistic regression analyses including multiple socio-demographic (age, gender, educational level, marital status) and lifestyle (physical activity, Mediterranean diet score, smoking) variables showed that, as compared with quartile 1, the odd ratios for obesity were 1.20 (1.01-1.42), 1.35 (1.12-1.61), and 1.38 (1.14-1.67) in quartiles 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P = 0.001 for difference, P < 0.001 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports an association between ambient temperature and obesity in the Spanish population controlled for known confounders.

Variable patterns of obesity and cardiometabolic phenotypes and their association with lifestyle factors in the Di@bet.es study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prevalence rates of "metabolically healthy obese" (MHO) subjects vary depending on the criteria used. This study examined the prevalence and characteristics of MHO subjects and metabolically abnormal normal-weight subjects and compared the findings with the NHANES 1999-2004 study. The aims of the present study were, first, to determine the prevalence rates of MHO and MNHNO subjects using the same criteria as those of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (1999-2004) study, and second to compare the prevalence and correlates of obese subjects who are resistant to the development of adiposity-associated cardiometabolic abnormalities (CA) and normal-weight individuals who display cardiometabolic risk factor clustering between the Spanish and the US populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Di@bet.es study is a national, cross-sectional population-based survey of 5728 adults conducted in 2009-2010. Clinical, metabolic, sociodemographic, and anthropometric data and information about lifestyle habits, such as physical activity, smoking habit, alcohol intake and food consumption, were collected. Subjects were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) (normal-weight, <25 kg/m(2); overweight, 25-29.9 kg/m(2); and obese, >30 kg/m(2)). CA included elevated blood pressure; elevated levels of triglycerides, fasting glucose, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and elevated homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) value and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) level. Two phenotypes were defined: metabolically healthy phenotype (0-1 CA) and metabolically abnormal phenotype (≥2 CA). The prevalence of metabolically abnormal normal-weight phenotype was slightly lower in the Spanish population (6.5% vs. 8.1%). The prevalence of metabolically healthy overweight and MHO subjects was 20.9% and 7.0%, respectively, while in NHANES study it was 17.9% and 9.7%, respectively. Cigarette smoking was associated with CA in each phenotype, while moderate physical activity and moderate alcohol intake were associated with being metabolically healthy. Olive oil intake was negatively associated with the prevalence of CA. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, physical activity level, and alcohol intake contribute to the explanation of the prevalence of CA in the Spanish population, as in the US population. However in Spain, olive oil intake contributes significantly to the explanation of the variance in the prevalence of CA.

Prevalence of plasma lipid abnormalities and its association with glucose metabolism in Spain: The di@bet. es study

Introduction: Dyslipidemia is a significant contributor to the elevated CVD risk observed in type 2 diabetes mellitus. We assessed the prevalence of dyslipidemia and its association with glucose metabolism status in a representative sample of the adult population in Spain and the percentage of subjects at guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Material and methods: The di@bet.es study is a national, cross-sectional population-based survey of 5728 adults. Results: A total of 4776 subjects were studied. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed in 56.8% of subjects; only 13.2% of subjects were treated with lipid lowering drugs. Lipid abnormalities were found in 56.8% of Spanish adults: 23.3% with high LDL-C, 21.5% high TG, 35.8% high non-HDL-C, and 17.2% low HDL-C. Most normal subjects showed an LDL-C ≤ 3.36 mmol/l. Pre-diabetics presented similar proportion when considering a goal of 3.36 mmol/l, but only 35% of them reached an LDL-C goal ≤ 2.6 mmol/l. Finally, 45.3% of diabetics had an LDL-C ≤ 2.6 mmol/l, and only 11.3% achieved an LDL-C ≤ 1.8 mmol/l. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a high prevalence of dyslipidemia in the adult Spanish population, and a low use of lipid-lowering drugs. Moreover, the number of subjects achieving their corresponding LDL-C goal is small, particularly in subjects at high cardiovascular risk, such as diabetics

Introducción: La dislipidemia es uno de los factores más importantes implicados en el riesgo de desarrollar enfermedad cardiovascular en la diabetes tipo 2. En el presente estudio evaluamos la prevalencia de dislipidemia y su asociación con el metabolismo hidrocarbonado en una muestra representativa de población adulta española y el porcentaje de sujetos que alcanzaron el objetivo de cLDL. Material y métodos: El estudio Di@bet.es está basado en los datos obtenidos de una encuesta nacional transversal en 5.728 adultos. Resultados: Se estudiaron 4.776 sujetos. La dislipidemia fue diagnosticada en el 56,8% de los sujetos; solo el 13,2% de los individuos estaban en tratamiento con fármacos hipolipemiantes. Las alteraciones lipídicas se distribuyeron del siguiente modo: 23,3% tenían cLDL elevado, el 21,5% TG elevados, el 35,8% elevación de colesterol no HDL, y el 17,2% cHDL bajo. La mayor parte de los sujetos sanos tenían cLDL ≤ 3,36 mmol/l. Los individuos prediabéticos presentaron una proporción similar si consideramos como objetivo cLDL ≤ 3,36 mmol/l, pero solo el 35% de ellos alcanzaron un objetivo de cLDL≤ 2,6 mmol/l. Finalmente, el 45,3% de los diabéticos tenían cLDL≤ 2,6 mmol/l, y solo el 11,3% alcanzaron cLDL-C ≤ 1,8 mmol/l. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio demuestra una elevada prevalencia de dislipidemia en población adulta española, y un escaso uso de fármacos hipolipemiantes. Además, el número de sujetos que alcanzaron el objetivo de cLDL fue muy pequeño, especialmente en sujetos con elevado riesgo cardiovascular como los diabéticos

I Workshop ibérico sobre la asociación entre diabetes y enfermedades periodontales. Documento de consenso / 1st Iberian Workshop on the relationship between diabetes and periodontal diseases. Consensus Document

Este consenso se ha realizado por expertos de las Fundaciones de las Sociedades Españolas de Diabetes y de Periodoncia. La evidencia revisada presenta datos relevantes que avalan la importancia tanto de la diabetes como de las enfermedades periodontales, así como de la relación bidireccional entre las mismas:- La diabetes tiene una alta prevalencia en las poblaciones de España y Portugal con elevada prevalencia de diabetes no conocida y con cifras en continuo incremento. Además, es muy relevante la importancia, frecuencia y severidad de sus complicaciones.- Las enfermedades periodontales tienen una alta prevalencia, cercana al 90% de la población adulta. La capacidad destructiva de la periodontitis conduce a la pérdida de dientes, lo que provoca importantes alteraciones para el paciente. También la periodontitis se ha asociado a un incremento en el riesgo de enfermedades cardiovasculares, de resultados adversos del embarazo, y de enfermedades pulmonares, entre otras.- Numerosos estudios han señalado que la diabetes es un importante factor de riesgo para sufrir periodontitis, especialmente si el control de la glucemia no es adecuado.- Las enfermedades periodontales han demostrado un efecto negativo sobre el control de la glucemia, tanto en pacientes con diabetes como en sujetos sanos, y se ha demostrado que las complicaciones de la diabetes son más frecuentes en pacientes con periodontitis.- El tratamiento periodontal es capaz de mejorar el control de la glucemia, con un valor de reducción de la hemoglobina glucosilada de 0.4%.Basados en estas evidencias, se proponen distintas implicaciones para los profesionales sanitarios involucrados en el cuidado de estos pacientes

This consensus report has been prepared by a group of experts from the Spanish Foundations of Diabetes and of Periodontology. The reviewed evidence shows relevant data that strongly support the importance of diabetes and periodontal diseases, as well as their bi-directional relationship: - Diabetes has a high prevalence in Spain and Portugal, with a high prevalence of un-diagnosed diabetes, and with continuously increasing rates. In addition, the frequency and severity of their complications is also very important. - Periodontal diseases have high prevalence, close to 90% in adult populations. The destructive capacity of periodontitis leads to tooth loss, which is associated with a profound impact on the patients. Periodontitis have also been related to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and pulmonary infections, as well as other conditions. - Numerous studies have concluded that diabetes is a significant risk factor for periodontitis, especially in subjects with poor glycemic control. - Periodontal diseases have been shown to have a deleterious effect on glycemic control, both in diabetic patients and healthy subjects, and it has been demonstrated that diabetes complications are more frequent in diabetic patients with periodontitis. - Periodontal treatment has been associated with improvements in glycemic control, with a mean reduction in glycosylated haemoglobin of 0.4%. Based on the above evidence, different challenges are proposed for health professionals involved in diabetic and periodontitis patient care

Prevalence of plasma lipid abnormalities and its association with glucose metabolism in Spain: the di@bet.es study.

INTRODUCTION: Dyslipidemia is a significant contributor to the elevated CVD risk observed in type 2 diabetes mellitus. We assessed the prevalence of dyslipidemia and its association with glucose metabolism status in a representative sample of the adult population in Spain and the percentage of subjects at guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The di@bet.es study is a national, cross-sectional population-based survey of 5728 adults. RESULTS: A total of 4776 subjects were studied. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed in 56.8% of subjects; only 13.2% of subjects were treated with lipid lowering drugs. Lipid abnormalities were found in 56.8% of Spanish adults: 23.3% with high LDL-C, 21.5% high TG, 35.8% high non-HDL-C, and 17.2% low HDL-C. Most normal subjects showed an LDL-C ≤ 3.36 mmol/l. Pre-diabetics presented similar proportion when considering a goal of 3.36 mmol/l, but only 35% of them reached an LDL-C goal ≤ 2.6 mmol/l. Finally, 45.3% of diabetics had an LDL-C ≤ 2.6 mmol/l, and only 11.3% achieved an LDL-C ≤ 1.8 mmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a high prevalence of dyslipidemia in the adult Spanish population, and a low use of lipid-lowering drugs. Moreover, the number of subjects achieving their corresponding LDL-C goal is small, particularly in subjects at high cardiovascular risk, such as diabetics.

Costes directos de la diabetes mellitus y de sus complicaciones en España (Estudio SECCAID: Spain estimated cost Ciberdem-Cabimer in Diabetes) / Direct cost of diabetes mellitus and its complications in Spain (SECCAID Study: Spain estimated cost Ciberdem-Cabimer in Diabetes)

OBJETIVO: Estimar los costes directos generados por la diabetes mellitus (DM), tanto tipo 1 como tipo 2, desde la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio del coste de la enfermedad mediante un enfoque de prevalencia, a través del análisis y la revisión de las bases de datos y de la literatura relacionada con el uso de recursos en la DM. Las categorías de costes directos anuales considerados fueron: hospitalarios (incluyendo la atención ambulatoria), atención primaria (incluyendo pruebas complementarias y tiras reactivas de automonitorización de glucemia capilar) y, fármacos. Para los costes no relacionados, solo se incorporó el sobrecoste. Adicionalmente, se analizó el coste de las complicaciones independientemente de la categoría de costes donde se hubieran originado. Todos los costes fueron actualizados a euros de 2012. RESULTADOS: El coste directo total anual de la DM ascendió a 5.809 millones de euros, que representó el 8,2% del gasto sanitario total. Los costes farmacológicos fueron la categoría con mayor peso sobre el coste directo total (38%), seguido por los costes hospitalarios (33%). El coste farmacológico fue de 2.232 millones de euros, donde los fármacos antidiabéticos aportaron 861 millones de euros (15%). Las tiras reactivas de automonitorización de glucemia capilar contribuyeron en 118 millones de euros (2%). El coste total de complicaciones en general fue de 2.143 millones de euros. CONCLUSIONES: Los costes de la DM representan una proporción muy elevada del total del gasto sanitario español, siendo imprescindible introducir estrategias y medidas para mejorar la eficiencia en el control y el tratamiento de la DM para reducir así sus complicaciones y los enormes costes humanos y económicos asociados a la enfermedad

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to estimate the direct costs associated with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus in Spain taking into account a National Health Service perspective. METHOD: A costs of illness study was conducted using the prevalence approach and data from existing databases and bibliographic references related to the use of resources in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The costs categories analysed were: hospital costs (including outpatient care), primary care costs (including additional tests cost and self monitoring blood glucose strips cost) and drug costs. In calculating the non-related cost, only the extra cost was taken into account. Additionally, we analysed the complications cost independently of where costs were originated. Costs were updated to 2012 euros. RESULTS: The total direct annual cost of diabetes mellitus was 5,809 million euros, representing 8.2% of the total Spanish health expenditure. Drug costs was the major component of total cost (38%), followed by hospital costs (33%). Drug costs accounted for 2,232 million euros, with antidiabetic drugs costs being 861 million euros (15%). Self monitoring blood glucose strips only contributed 118 million euros (2%) to the total cost. The cost of complications cost was 2,143 million euros, around 37% of the total. CONCLUSIONS: Total direct costs associated with diabetes mellitus represent a high proportion of total Spanish health expenditure. It is crucial to introduce measures and strategies to improve efficiency in the control and treatment of diabetes mellitus, with the final purpose of reducing its complications and the considerable economic impact generated

Efectos de las enfermedades periodontales sobre la diabetes / Effects of periodontal diseases on diabetes

Se ha evidenciado en los últimos años no solo que la diabetes es un factor de riesgo para las enfermedades periodontales, sino que estas a su vez podrían afectar al control de la glucemia y las consecuencias de ello derivadas. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar la evidencia existente sobre la influencia de las enfermedades periodontales en la diabetes, su control metabólico y sus complicaciones, así como tratar de analizar las implicaciones de esos hallazgos. Las enfermedades periodontales son infecciones que inducen una respuesta inmunoinflamatoria en los tejidos periodontales, responsable en gran parte de la destrucción tisular asociada. Su prevalencia es alta en todo el mundo, lo que es confirmado por datos recientes tanto en España como en Portugal. Su importancia radica no solo en los efectos locales como la pérdida de dientes, sino también en sus efectos sistémicos. Entre ellos, las enfermedades periodontales pueden afectar a la diabetes y a su control glucémico, debido a los efectos a nivel de la inflamación sistémica. Diferentes estudios han señalado que la periodontitis se asocia a un nivel de hemoglobina glucosilada más elevado, tanto en pacientes con y sin diabetes. Incluso, se ha sugerido que la periodontitis puede asociarse a un riesgo aumentado de sufrir diabetes, además de un riesgo aumentado de sufrir ciertas complicaciones en pacientes diabéticos. Por otra parte, el tratamiento periodontal puede mejorar el control de la glucemia y, eventualmente, reducir la frecuencia de complicaciones. Las implicaciones de estas evidencias son múltiples y afectan a dentistas, personal médico y a pacientes, entre otros

In the last few years, various studies have shown that diabetes is not only a risk factor for periodontal diseases, but also that periodontal diseases may affect glycaemic control, with the well known consequences in terms of diabetes complications. The aim of the present paper was to review the existing evidence on the impact of periodontal diseases on diabetes, its metabolic control, and its complications, as well as the implications of these findings. Periodontal diseases are infections, which trigger an immune inflammatory response in the periodontal tissues, responsible for a major proportion of the associated tissue destruction. The prevalence of periodontal diseases is high all over the world, which is confirmed in recent studies, both in Spain and Portugal. The importance of these diseases is based, not only on the local effects, such as tooth loss, but also on their systemic consequences. Among them, periodontal diseases have been shown to affect diabetes and its glycaemic control, due to (among other factors) the associated systemic inflammation. Different studies have shown that periodontitis is associated with a higher level of glycosylated haemoglobin, both in subjects with and without diabetes. Moreover, it has been suggested that periodontitis may increase the risk of diabetes onset, as well as a higher risk of diabetic complications for diabetes patients. Conversely, periodontal therapy may improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients and, eventually, decrease diabetes complications. The implications of these findings are numerous, affecting dentists, other health professionals and patients, among others

Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Spain using regional cutoff points for waist circumference: the di@bet.es study.

The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Spain using specific cutoff points for waist circumference (WC) (>94.5 cm for men and >89.5 cm for women) and evaluating the influence of several socio-demographic and economic factors. Data on MetS were obtained from a national study of 4,727 subjects from 18 to 90 years of age, conducted in Spain between 2009 and 2010 (The di@bet.es study). MetS was defined applying the new Harmonized definition (evaluating the use of abdominal obesity (AO) as a obligatory criterion for MetS or not) as well as with other widely used criteria. Results were then compared with data from previous studies. Multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate the influence of different social factors. The age-standardized MetS prevalence was 38.37 % (CI 35.74-40.99) in men and 29.62 % (CI 27.56-31.69) in women, when AO was required as a diagnostic criterion; 42.13 % (CI 39.37-44.89) and 32.31 % (CI 30.15-34.47) in men and women, respectively, if AO was not considered mandatory. Prevalence of MetS increased with age (p < 0.001 for trend). Women with a lower educational level were more likely to have MetS (OR 4.4; 95 % CI: 2.84-6.7) as compared with those with a higher educational level. Subjects with MetS had a worse physical quality of life. The combination of AO, hypertension and carbohydrate alterations was the most common MetS' pattern. A high prevalence of MetS was detected in the Spanish population especially in men, the elderly and women with a low educational level.

Use of drugs related to the treatment of diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk factors in the Spanish population. The Di@bet.es study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the patterns of use of 8 therapeutic drug groups for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk factors, and to identify sociodemographic and health determinants of their use in the overall Spanish population. METHODS: A representative sample of the Spanish population within the Di@bet.es study, a cross-sectional population-based survey, was included. STUDY VARIABLES: sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle data; physical examination, and an oral glucose tolerance test in patients without known diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, patients were systematically queried about current medication use, and 8 pharmacotherapeutic groups were evaluated: lipid-lowering therapy, antihypertensives, oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin, thyroid hormone, uricosurics, psychoactive drugs, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of the Spanish population was taking at least one medication. Therapeutic drug use was associated with age, independently of the higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia in older patients. Sex disparities were found in the use of lipid-lowering agents, allopurinol, levothyroxine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and psychoactive drugs. Use of psychoactive drugs was related to education level, work status, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Almost 30% of patients with diabetes mellitus were taking 6 or more medications daily. Diabetes mellitus was associated with greater use of antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Age and sex are the most important factors determining therapeutic drug use. Lifestyle patterns and sociocultural factors have an impact only on psychoactive drug use. Diabetes mellitus is associated with greater use of antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Factors affecting levels of urinary albumin excretion in the general population of Spain: the Di@bet.es study.

The present study was undertaken to examine the prevalence of urinary ACR (albumin/creatinine ratio) >30 mg/g and the associated clinical and environmental factors in a representative sample of the population of Spain. Di@bet.es study is a national, cross-sectional population-based survey conducted in 2009-2010. Clinical, metabolic, socio-demographic, anthropometric data and information about lifestyle habit were collected. Those subjects without KDM (known diabetes mellitus) were given an OGTT (oral glucose tolerance test). Albumin and creatinine were measured in a urinary sample and ACR was calculated. The population prevalence of ACR >30 mg/g was 7.65% (adjusted for sex and age). The prevalence of ACR >30 mg/g increased with age (P<0.001). Subjects with carbohydrate metabolism disorders had a greater prevalence of ACR >30 mg/g but after being adjusted for age, sex and hypertension, was significant only in those subjects with UKDM (unknown diabetes mellitus) {OR (odd ratio), 2.07 [95% CI (confidence interval), 1.38-3.09]; P<0.001] and KDM [OR, 3.55 (95% CI, 2.63-4.80); P<0.001]. Prevalence of ACR >30 mg/g was associated with hypertension [OR, 1.48 (95% CI, 1.12-1.95); P=0.001], HOMA-IR (homoeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance) [OR, 1.47 (95% CI, 1.13-1.92); P≤0.01], metabolic syndrome [OR, 2.17 (95% CI, 1.72-2.72); P<0.001], smoking [OR, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.06-1.83); P≤0.05], physical activity [OR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54-0.88); P≤0.01] and consumption of fish [OR, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.18-0.78); P≤0.01]. This is the first study that reports the prevalence of ACR >30 mg/g in the Spanish population. The association between clinical variables and other potentially modifiable environmental variables contribute jointly, and sometimes interactively, to the explanation of prevalence of ACR >30 mg/g. Many of these risk factors are susceptible to intervention.

Efectos de la extirpación del area piriforme sobre la ultraestructura de la corteza suprerrenal / Effects of resection of piriform area on suprarenal cortex ultrastructure

Hemos estudiado la ultraestructura de la corteza suprarrenal de 40 ratas macho Wistar, de pesos entre 200 y 259 gm. Los animales fueron divididos en 3 grupos: grupo control (animales intactos o animales de operación simulada); grupo experimental I (animales sacrificados al mes de la operación) y grupo experimental II (animales sacrificados a los dos meses de la operación). Los animales experimentales fueron sometidos a la extirpación bilateral del área piriforme. Hemos observado un progresivco decremento de las gotitas lipídicas ( y de la esteroidogénesis) y un incremento de las alteraciones mitocondriales en las células de la capa fasciculada y también en las células de la capa reticular; lo que indica la existencia de una disminución en la elaboración de las hormonas cortico-suprerrenales. Estos hallazgos nos sugieren que el área piriforme estimula la elaboración de hormonas por la corteza suprarrenal