Voice Improvement After Essential Tremor Treatment via Focused Ultrasound and Deep Brain Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether two neurosurgical procedures, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and focused ultrasound (FUS), to treat essential tremor (ET) of the upper limb also reduce vocal tremor (VT) in patients with comorbid dysphonia. METHODS: Twelve patients with ET and concomitant VT scheduled for neurosurgical intervention (FUS or DBS) or returning for follow-up after DBS implantation were assessed. FUS patients were assessed pre- and post-intervention and DBS patients were assessed with the electrodes turned on and off post-implantation. Three voice recordings of a sustained /a/ were obtained for each participant condition. Percent fundamental frequency variability (FFV) was calculated for each recorded sustained vowel. Additionally, blinded expert perceptual VT rating (VTR) was performed to assess subjective changes in tremors. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients, seven underwent unilateral FUS, and five underwent bilateral DBS. Mean FFV without neurosurgical intervention was 18.3%, SD = 7.8 and with neurosurgical intervention was 6.3%, SD = 3.0 (t (70) =8.7, p < 0.001). Mean FFV decreased in the FUS cohort from 22.0%, SD = 7.1 pre-ablation to 6.7%, SD = 2.4 post-ablation (t (40) = 7.7, p < 0.001). Mean FFV also decreased in the DBS cohort from 15.7%, SD = 7.0 to 6.0%, SD = 3.3 when stimulation was turned on (t (28)=5.7 p < 0.001). In the FUS group, mean VTR decreased from 4.0 to 1.4 post-ablation (Z = 7.8, p < 0.001). In the DBS group, mean VTR decreased from 3.3 to 2.1 with stimulation (Z = 4.1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Neurosurgical interventions for ET (bilateral DBS and unilateral FUS) demonstrate acoustic and perceptual benefits for VT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:367-373, 2024.

Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to establish normative values for the smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) and its sensitivity and specificity as a measure of dysphonia. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Voice samples of running speech were obtained from 835 patients and 50 volunteers. Eight laryngologists and four speech-language pathologists performed perceptual ratings of the voice samples on the degree of dysphonia/normality using an analog scale. The mean of their perceptual ratings was used as the gold standard for the detection of the presence or absence of dysphonia. CPPS was measured using the CPPS algorithm of Hillenbrand, and the cut-off value for positivity that has the highest sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between normal and severely dysphonia voices was determined based on ROC-curve analysis. RESULTS: The cut-off value for normal for CPPS was set at 4.0 or higher, which gave a sensitivity of 92.4%, a specificity of 79%, a positive predictive value of 82.5%, and a negative predictive value of 90.8%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.937 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CPPS is a good measure of dysphonia, with the normal value of CPPS (Hillenbrand algorithm) of a running speech sample being defined as a value of 4.0 or higher.