HIV Infection in North African Patients.

North Africa is one of the rare regions where the HIV epidemic is growing. In France, 5% of the migrants discovering their HIV infection are from North Africa. The objective of this study was to compare the sociodemographic characteristics and outcomes of North African and French HIV-infected patients. This study was conducted in the HIV clinic of Bichat Hospital (Paris, France). The North African HIV-infected patients were born in Algeria, Tunisia, or Morocco or had lived there for more than 6 months. They were matched for age and gender (1:2) to patients born in France who had never lived outside France for more than 6 months. Sociodemographic, clinical, and immunovirological characteristics of North African and French patients were compared using conditional logistic regression. Among 4,738 eligible patients, 285 North Africans were identified. CD4 levels at HIV diagnosis were not significantly different between North African and French patients, but were more frequently <200/mm3 in the former than the latter at treatment initiation (p = .02). CDC stage 3 disease occurred more frequently in the first 3 years of care in our center in North African patients than in French patients (p = .01), and control of the HIV viral load over the 12 months preceding inclusion was better in French patients (p = .0001). There was no difference regarding loss to care. These results highlight possible issues in adherence to antiretroviral treatment in North African patients, which may be related to differences in the acceptability of the disease.

Budget impact of antiretroviral therapy in a French clinic cohort.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we first assessed costs associated with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in an infectious diseases University Hospital Clinic; second, we evaluated characteristics associated with these costs and finally simulated the impact on the overall ART budget of switching first-line and second-line regimens to less-costly regimens (as effective and well tolerated). DESIGN: Cohort analysis including persons living with HIV (PLHIV) aged at least 18 years on ART to estimate ART costs during 2014. METHODS: The current study was conducted in the Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital Clinic in Paris, France, where 4501 PLHIV consulted in 2014. We used the medical database Nadis to describe patients' ART, characteristics and estimated costs. When assessing the budgetary impact of potential switches, we considered patients' history of failure, CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, resistance mutations, hepatitis B surface antigen or HLAB5701 profile. RESULTS: A total of 4238 of 4501 patients were on ART (94%). The total annual cost of ART prescribed was estimated at &OV0556;48 280 200 in 2014; first/second (simplification)-line regimens represented 25% (1076/4238) of the treated PLHIV and 23% (&OV0556;11 209 000) of the annual cost. For these PLHIV, we considered switches from the most common ART regimens (protease inhibitor boosted by ritonavir or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor + two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) to less-expensive regimens. We found savings ranging from &OV0556;36 100 to 1472 600/year. Savings were the highest when we considered switching to generic-based regimens or from protease inhibitor-based triple therapy to protease inhibitor monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Costs associated with ART prescriptions are very high. Switches to generic-based regimens are associated with large savings. However, those targeting protease inhibitor regimens are also associated with substantial savings and should be considered.