Indwelling Urinary Catheter and Dementia Are Associated with Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: The recent increase in enterococcal urinary tract infections (EUTI) and the potential morbidity and mortality associated with inappropriate antimicrobial treatment underscores the need for early risk assessment and institution of appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy. OBJECTIVES: To identify high-risk features associated with hospitalized patients with EUTI. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and bacteriological data of 285 patients hospitalized with UTI during 2016 were retrieved from the computerized database of Shamir Medical Center. Patients were divided into two groups: EUTI and non-EUTI (NEUTI), according to the presence or absence of enterococcus in the urine culture. The features of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: We obtained 300 urine cultures from 285 patients. Of the total, 80 patients (26.6%) had EUTI and 220 patients (73.3%) had NEUTI. A higher prevalence of urinary multi-bacterial cultures was found in EUTI compared to NEUTI patients (P < 0.01). Higher prevalence of permanent indwelling urinary catheter and dementia were found in hospitalized patients with community-acquired EUTI and nosocomial EUTI respectively (P = 0.02, P = 0.016) compared to patients with NEUTI. CONCLUSIONS: Indwelling urinary catheter and dementia are risk factors for EUTI in patients with community and hospital acquired infection, respectively.

ECG changes after non-cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study in intermediate-high risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to mitigate the risk for perioperative cardiac events focus on both patient's and operation's risk and often include a preprocedural electrocardiogram (ECG). The merits of postprocedural ECG for detection of occult cardiac events occurring during surgery are unknown. We aim to explore the incidence of pre, and new postprocedural ECG pathologies in an intermediate-high risk population undergoing non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational study, included patients older than 18 years with at least two cardiovascular risk factors who were scheduled for non-cardiac surgery. All patients had pre, and postprocedural ECG. The ECG was analyzed and coded according to the Minnesota criteria. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for indices associated with new postoperative ECG pathologies. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were enrolled. Preoperative pathologic ECG changes were recorded in 62.2% of the patients. Postoperatively, new ECG pathologies were documented in 49.8% of patients, most commonly T-wave changes (36.4% of changes). Pathologic ECG changes at baseline (OR 3.15, 95% CI [1.61-6.17]; P<0.01), diabetes (OR 1.93, 95% CI [1.02-3.64]; P=0.04), history of ischemic heart disease (OR 2.14, 95% CI [1.03-4.47]; P=0.04), higher volumes of fluid replacement (OR 1.70, 95% CI [1.10-2.61]; P=0.01) and higher levels of preoperative hemoglobin (OR 1.24, 95% CI [1.04-1.47]; P=0.01) were all independently associated with postoperative ECG changes. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-, but most importantly, postoperative ECG changes are common in intermediate-high risk surgical patients. Postoperative ECG may be valuable to disclose silent cardiovascular events that occurred during surgery.

Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.

The present study aimed to show that bidirectional reading and language exposure influence the position of egocentric reference (ER), the perceived direction of the body's sagittal axis proposed to act as an anchor for movements in extracorporeal space. Directional factors (e.g., visual scanning bias and reading habits) have been proposed to influence visuospatial performance, such as in line bisection and figure drawing. In past studies, bidirectional readers have been less consistent in demonstrating a bias compared to unidirectional readers. Using a straight-ahead pointing task to assess egocentric reference, we compared 14 unidirectional left-to-right readers (Uni-LR) to three bidirectional reading groups that differed in the reading direction of their native language and/or the level of their second language literacy: 16 low-English literate, native right-to-left, bidirectional readers (Lo-Bi-RL), 13 high-English literate, native right-to-left, bidirectional readers (Hi-Bi-RL), and 15 native left-to-right, bidirectional readers (Bi-LR). Participants were asked to point straight-ahead while blindfolded using either a left-to-right or a right-to-left scanning direction to approach the subjective sagittal midline. Uni-LRs showed left-side spatial bias when scanning left-to-right and right-side bias during right-to-left scanning, Bi-LRs and Lo-Bi-RLs (i.e., intermediate level or less in their second language) demonstrated the opposite pattern, and Hi-Bi-RLs showed left-side spatial bias regardless of scanning direction. Results are discussed in terms of accuracy and spatial bias regarding the interaction between reading direction and spatial cognition based on the level of bidirectional literacy and language exposure.