A Simulation-Free Replacement Solution for Radiation Therapy Immobilization Devices Using Computer Numerical Control (CNC) -Milled Polystyrene Molds.

Purpose: In radiation therapy (RT), if an immobilization device is lost or damaged, the patient may need to be brought back for resimulation, device fabrication, and treatment planning, causing additional imaging radiation exposure, inconvenience, cost, and delay. We describe a simulation-free method for replacing lost or damaged RT immobilization devices. Methods and Materials: Replacement immobilization devices were fabricated using existing simulation scans as design templates by computer numerical control (CNC) milling of molds made from extruded polystyrene (XPS). XPS material attenuation and bolusing properties were evaluated, a standard workflow was established, and 12 patients were treated. Setup reproducibility was analyzed postfacto using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) calculations comparing onboard treatment imaging with computed tomography (CT) simulations. Results: Results showed that XPS foam material had less dosimetric impact (attenuation and bolusing) than materials used for our standard immobilization devices. The average direct cost to produce each replacement mold was $242.17, compared with over $2000 for standard resimulation. Hands-on time to manufacture was 86.3 minutes, whereas molds were delivered in as little as 4 hours and mostly within 24 hours, compared with a week or more required for standard resimulation. Each mold was optically scanned after production and was measured to be within 2-mm tolerance (pointwise displacement) of design input. All patients were successfully treated using the CNC-milled foam mold replacements, and pretreatment imaging verified satisfactory clinical setup reproduction for each case. The external body contours from the setup cone beam CT and the original CT simulation with matching superior-inferior extent were compared by calculating the DSC and MDA. DSC average was 0.966 (SD, 0.011), and MDA average was 2.694 mm (SD, 0.986). Conclusions: CNC milling of XPS foam is a quicker and more convenient solution than traditional resimulation for replacing lost or damaged RT immobilization devices. Satisfactory patient immobilization, low dosimetric impact compared with standard immobilization devices, and strong correlation of onboard contours with CT simulations are shown. We share our clinical experience, workflow, and manufacturing guide to help other clinicians who may want to adopt this solution.

Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.

PURPOSE: An ideal commissioning and quality assurance (QA) program for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) delivery systems should assess the performance of each individual dynamic component as a function of gantry angle. Procedures within such a program should also be time-efficient, independent of the delivery system and be sensitive to all types of errors. The purpose of this work is to develop a system for automated time-resolved commissioning and QA of VMAT control systems which meets these criteria. METHODS: The procedures developed within this work rely solely on images obtained, using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) without the presence of a phantom. During the delivery of specially designed VMAT test plans, EPID frames were acquired at 9.5 Hz, using a frame grabber. The set of test plans was developed to individually assess the performance of the dose delivery and multileaf collimator (MLC) control systems under varying levels of delivery complexities. An in-house software tool was developed to automatically extract features from the EPID images and evaluate the following characteristics as a function of gantry angle: dose delivery accuracy, dose rate constancy, beam profile constancy, gantry speed constancy, dynamic MLC positioning accuracy, MLC speed and acceleration constancy, and synchronization between gantry angle, MLC positioning and dose rate. Machine log files were also acquired during each delivery and subsequently compared to information extracted from EPID image frames. RESULTS: The largest difference between measured and planned dose at any gantry angle was 0.8% which correlated with rapid changes in dose rate and gantry speed. For all other test plans, the dose delivered was within 0.25% of the planned dose for all gantry angles. Profile constancy was not found to vary with gantry angle for tests where gantry speed and dose rate were constant, however, for tests with varying dose rate and gantry speed, segments with lower dose rate and higher gantry speed exhibited less profile stability. MLC positional accuracy was not observed to be dependent on the degree of interdigitation. MLC speed was measured for each individual leaf and slower leaf speeds were shown to be compensated for by lower dose rates. The test procedures were found to be sensitive to 1 mm systematic MLC errors, 1 mm random MLC errors, 0.4 mm MLC gap errors and synchronization errors between the MLC, dose rate and gantry angle controls systems of 1°. In general, parameters measured by both EPID and log files agreed with the plan, however, a greater average departure from the plan was evidenced by the EPID measurements. CONCLUSION: QA test plans and analysis methods have been developed to assess the performance of each dynamic component of VMAT deliveries individually and as a function of gantry angle. This methodology relies solely on time-resolved EPID imaging without the presence of a phantom and has been shown to be sensitive to a range of delivery errors. The procedures developed in this work are both comprehensive and time-efficient and can be used for streamlined commissioning and QA of VMAT delivery systems.

No association between excessive wound complications and preoperative high-dose, hypofractionated, image-guided radiation therapy for spine metastasis.

OBJECT: Radiation therapy is known to impair wound healing. Higher dose per fraction is believed to increase this risk. This study sought to quantify rates of wound complication in patients receiving preoperative conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (XRT) or high-dose hypofractionated image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for spinal metastasis, and to identify predictors of wound complication. METHODS: The records of 165 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery for metastasis at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1999 and 2010, with a history of prior radiation therapy, were reviewed. Patients with primary spine tumors, 2 courses of prior radiation therapy to the surgical site, total dose < 9 Gy, or radiation therapy adjacent to or partially overlapping the surgical site, were excluded. One hundred thirty patients received XRT (≤ 3 Gy/fraction) and 35 received IGRT (> 3 Gy/fraction). The total dose prescribed to the 100% isodose line to treat the planning target volume was 18-30 Gy in 1-5 fractions. Clinical factors evaluated included age, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, body mass index, presence of diabetes, smoking, ambulatory status, prior surgery at same spinal site, preoperative laboratory results (hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, and albumin), perioperative chemotherapy or steroids, estimated blood loss, extent of stabilization hardware, time between radiation therapy and surgery, number of vertebral bodies irradiated, total radiation dose, and dose per fraction of radiation therapy. Wound complication was defined as poor healing, dehiscence, or infection. Potential predictors of wound complication were assessed by univariate analyses using competing-risk methods to adjust for risk of death. results: For XRT patients, median dose was 30 Gy (range 11.5-70 Gy) with 72% of them receiving 3 Gy × 10 fractions. For IGRT patients, 66% received 18-24 Gy × 1 fraction and 23% received 6 Gy × 5 fractions. Groups differed only by the mean number of vertebral bodies treated (4.6 XRT and 1.8 IGRT, p < 0.0001). Wound complications occurred at a median of 0.95 months (range 0.4-3.9 months). A total of 22 wound events occurred in the XRT group and 2 in the IGRT group. The 6-month cumulative incidence of wound complications for XRT was 17% and for IGRT was 6%. There was no significant difference in wound complications between groups (IGRT vs XRT: hazard ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.08-1.3; p = 0.11). Higher dose per fraction appeared to be associated with a lower risk of wound complication (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.06-1.15; p = 0.08), which trended toward significance. Univariate analyses did not reveal any significant predictors of wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent XRT or IGRT did not have significantly different rates of postoperative wound complications. This finding may be explained by the treatment of fewer vertebral bodies in IGRT patients, or by the low overall number of total events. With a wound complication rate of 6%, preoperative IGRT, a highly conformal treatment, resulted in a very low rate of surgical wound complication.

Local disease control after decompressive surgery and adjuvant high-dose single-fraction radiosurgery for spine metastases.

OBJECT Adjuvant radiation following epidural spinal cord decompression for tumor is a powerful tool used to achieve local disease control and preserve neurological function. To the authors' knowledge, only 1 published report addresses adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery after this procedure, but that study used significantly lower doses than are currently prescribed. The authors review their experience using high-dose single-fraction radiosurgery as a postoperative adjuvant following surgical decompression and instrumentation to assess long-term local tumor control, morbidity, and survival. METHODS A retrospective chart review identified 21 patients treated with surgical decompression and instrumentation for high-grade, epidural, spinal cord compression from tumor, followed by single-fraction high-dose spinal radiosurgery (dose range 18-24 Gy, median 24 Gy). Spinal cord dose was limited to a cord maximal dose of 14 Gy. Tumor histologies, time between surgery and radiosurgery, time to local recurrence after radiosurgery as assessed by serial MR imaging, and time to death were determined. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate these end points. RESULTS In this series, 20 tumors treated (95%) were considered highly radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation. The planning target volume received a high dose (24 Gy) in 16 patients (76.2%), and a low dose (18 or 21 Gy) in 5 patients (23.8%). During the study, 15 (72%) of 21 patients died, and in all cases death was due to systemic progression as opposed to local failure. The median overall survival after radiosurgery was 310 days (range 37 days to not reached). One patient (4.8%) underwent repeat surgery for local failure and 2 patients (9.5%) underwent spine surgery for other reasons. Local control was maintained after radiosurgery in 17 (81%) of 21 patients until death or most recent follow-up, with an estimated 1-year local failure risk of 9.5%. Of the failures, 3 of 4 were noted in patients receiving low-dose radiosurgery, equaling an overall failure rate of 60% (3 of 5 patients) and a 1-year local failure estimated risk of 20%. Those patients receiving adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery with a high dose had a 93.8% overall local control rate (15 of 16 patients), with a 1-year estimated failure risk of 6.3%. Competing risk analysis showed this to be a significant difference between radiosurgical doses. One patient experienced a significant radiation-related complication; there were no wound-related issues after radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS Spine radiosurgery after surgical decompression and instrumentation for tumor is a safe and effective technique that can achieve local tumor control until death in the vast majority of patients. In this series, those patients who received a higher radiosurgical dose had a significantly better local control rate.

Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance.

Our goal is to determine an optimized image-guided setup by comparing setup errors determined by two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients immobilized by customized thermoplastic masks. Nine patients received weekly imaging sessions, for a total of 54, throughout treatment. Patients were first set up by matching lasers to surface marks (initial) and then translationally corrected using manual registration of orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) radiographs with DRRs (2D-2D) on bony anatomy. A kV cone beam CT (kVCBCT) was acquired and manually registered to the simulation CT using only translations (3D-3D) on the same bony anatomy to determine further translational corrections. After treatment, a second set of kVCBCT was acquired to assess intrafractional motion. Averaged over all sessions, 2D-2D registration led to translational corrections from initial setup of 3.5 ± 2.2 (range 0-8) mm. The addition of 3D-3D registration resulted in only small incremental adjustment (0.8 ± 1.5 mm). We retrospectively calculated patient setup rotation errors using an automatic rigid-body algorithm with 6 degrees of freedom (DoF) on regions of interest (ROI) of in-field bony anatomy (mainly the C2 vertebral body). Small rotations were determined for most of the imaging sessions; however, occasionally rotations > 3° were observed. The calculated intrafractional motion with automatic registration was < 3.5 mm for eight patients, and < 2° for all patients. We conclude that daily manual 2D-2D registration on radiographs reduces positioning errors for mask-immobilized HNC patients in most cases, and is easily implemented. 3D-3D registration adds little improvement over 2D-2D registration without correcting rotational errors. We also conclude that thermoplastic masks are effective for patient immobilization.