Surgical Site Infection in Patients Managed with an Endoprosthesis for the Treatment of Cancer: Evaluation of Patient, Disease, and Index Surgical Factors.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after segmental endoprosthetic reconstruction in patients treated for oncologic conditions remains both a devastating and a common complication. The goal of the present study was to identify variables associated with the success or failure of treatment of early SSI following the treatment of a primary bone tumor with use of a segmental endoprosthesis. METHODS: The present study used the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) data set to identify patients who had been diagnosed with an SSI after undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction of a lower extremity primary bone tumor. The primary outcome of interest in the present study was a dichotomous variable: the success or failure of infection treatment. We defined failure as the inability to eradicate the infection, which we considered as an outcome of amputation or limb retention with chronic antibiotic suppression (>90 days or ongoing therapy at the conclusion of the study). Multivariable models were created with covariates of interest for each of the following: surgery characteristics, cancer treatment-related characteristics, and tumor characteristics. Multivariable testing included variables selected on the basis of known associations with infection or results of the univariable tests. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients who were diagnosed with an SSI, 27 (28%) had successful eradication of the infection and 69 had treatment failure. Baseline and index procedure variables showing significant association with SSI treatment outcome were moderate/large amounts of fascial excision ≥1 cm2) (OR, 10.21 [95% CI, 2.65 to 46.21]; p = 0.001), use of local muscle/skin graft (OR,11.88 [95% CI, 1.83 to 245.83]; p = 0.031), and use of a deep Hemovac (OR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.85]; p = 0.041). In the final multivariable model, excision of fascia during primary tumor resection was the only variable with a significant association with treatment outcome (OR, 10.21 [95% CI, 2.65 to 46.21]; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this secondary analysis of the PARITY trial data provide further insight into the patient-, disease-, and treatment-specific associations with SSI treatment outcomes, which may help to inform decision-making and management of SSI in patients who have undergone segmental bone reconstruction of the femur or tibia for oncologic indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prospective study for establishing minimal clinically important differences in patients with surgery for lower extremity metastases.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of patient-reported outcomes score changes is often unclear. Especially in patients undergoing surgery due to lower extremity metastases - where surgery is performed in the palliative setting and the goal is to optimize functional mobility, relieve pain and improve overall quality of life. This study assessed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference, Cancer-specific Physical Function, and Global (Physical and Mental Health) in patients treated surgically for impending or completed pathologic fractures. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for osseous metastasis of the lower extremity because of an impending or completed pathologic fracture were consecutively enrolled in this tertiary center study. Patients completed the three PROMIS questionnaires preoperatively (n = 56) and at postoperative follow-up (n = 33) assessment one to three months later. Of the 23 patients that did not complete the postoperative survey, 5 patients died within 1-3 months and 18 patients were alive at 3-months but did not respond or show up at their postoperative consult. Thirty-one patients (94%) of the 33 included patients reported at least minimal improvement and two patients (6.1%) no change 1-3 months after the surgery based on an anchor-based approach. RESULTS: The PROMIS MCIDs (95% confidence interval) for Pain Interference was 7.5 (3.4-12), Physical Function 4.1 (0.6-7.6), Global Physical Health 4.2 (2.0-6.6), and Global Mental Health 0.8 (-4.5-2.9). CONCLUSION: This prospective study successfully defined a MCID for PROMIS Pain Interference of 7.5 (3.4-12), PROMIS Physical Function of 4.1 (0.6-7.6), and Global Physical Health of 4.2 (2.0-6.6) in patients with (impending) pathological fractures due to osseous metastases in the lower extremity; no MCID could be established for PROMIS Global Mental Health. Defining a narrower MCID value for each subpopulation requires a large, prospective, multicenter study. Nevertheless, the provided MCID values allow guidance to clinicians to evaluate the impact of surgical treatment on a patient's QoL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II Diagnostic study.

Inter-rater Variability in the Interpretation of Pre and Post Contrast MRI for Pre-Surgical Evaluation of Osteosarcoma in Long Bones in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The value of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for extremity osteosarcoma resection planning is unverified. We evaluate the performance of intravenous gadolinium enhanced MRI for identification of neurovascular bundle involvement (NBI) and intraarticular extension (IAE) in patients with osteosarcoma. METHODS: Two pediatric radiologists independently analyzed MRI examinations of patients with pathology proven extremity osteosarcoma for NBI and IAE. Initial evaluation utilized only non-contrast MRI images (PRE) and, after 2 weeks, subsequent evaluation included both the pre and post contrast images (POST). Cohen's Kappa and McNemar's test were calculated to assess agreement between PRE and POST image interpretations of NBI and IAE. RESULTS: 56 patients with 90 preoperative MRI examinations were analyzed. PRE and POST interpretations were rarely discordant; 4/90 cases for NBI (Kappa 0.91) and 2/90 cases for IAE (Kappa 0.95). McNemar's test did not show a difference between PRE and POST imaging (NBI p=0.62; IAE p=0.48). CONCLUSION: No significant difference between PRE and POST image interpretation was found. A high level of agreement between PRE and POST image interpretation suggests that pre-contrast MRI may be sufficient for pre-surgical planning for pediatric patients with long bone osteosarcoma.

Long-term outcomes of corrective osteotomy for the treatment of distal radius malunion.

Corrective osteotomy is an established but challenging treatment for distal radius malunion. Short- and intermediate-term results have been previously published while long-term results have not. The long-term results of 22 patients treated with corrective osteotomy for symptomatic distal radius malunion are presented (range 6-24 years, mean 13 years). All patients completed the DASH questionnaire and the modified Gartland and Werley, and Green and O'Brien scores postoperatively. Wrist alignment was assessed through standard wrist radiographs. Average wrist flexion-extension was 72.5% of the contralateral limb. Grip strength averaged 71%. The DASH score averaged 16 points corresponding to mild perceived disability. Results were categorized as fair on both the Gartland and Werley score (average 9 points) and the modified Green and O'Brien score (average 67 points). Wrist alignment was maintained over time but 13 patients presented mild to moderate symptomatic wrist arthritis. The outcome presented may be a reflection of the use of stricter evaluation instruments or reflect the development of post-traumatic arthritis.

Arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous reduction and screw fixation of displaced scaphoid fractures.

Many scaphoid fractures can be treated with percutaneous screw insertion, but fracture displacement usually necessitates open reduction. Two surgeons treated 20 consecutive patients with displaced fractures of the scaphoid using arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous screw fixation. Thirteen patients had dorsal (antegrade) and seven had palmar (retrograde) percutaneous screw insertion. At an average follow-up of 18 (range 6-48) months, all of the fractures were healed and there were no implant problems. The early results of arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous screw fixation of displaced fractures of the scaphoid suggest that union can be obtained and good to excellent function achieved predictably without the need for open exposure. Avoidance of an open exposure limits wrist ligament injury and may preserve blood supply. Further evaluation of this procedure is merited.