Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 34(9): 900-5, 2013 Sep.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24331967

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of avian influenza surveillance program in Guangzhou from 2006 to 2012 and to evaluate the risk of infections with H5, H7 and H9 subtypes avian influenza viruses. METHODS: Avian influenza surveillance system in Guangzhou consisted five components:serum surveillance on occupational population, environmental specimen surveillance of avian influenza virus, avian flu emergency surveillance, influenza viruses surveillance on ILI patient and surveillance on pneumonia of unknown causes. Hemagglutination inhibition test was conducted to detect the antibodies against H5, H7 and H9 while RT-PCR was used to test the nucleic acid of H5, H7 and H9 viruses. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2012, 4103 serum specimens were collected from occupational populations and the overall positive rate of H5/H7/H9 antibodies was 3.82% . The antibody positive rates for H5, H7 and H9 were 0.22% ,0.00% and 3.70% respectively. 4 serum specimens for H5 and H9 simultaneously showed antibody positive. The positive rate of H9 among occupational populations(4.21%)appeared higher than that from the control population(2.16%). 2028 specimens were collected from poultry sites and 55 samples found positive for H5 nucleic acid (positive rate:2.71%), 14 samples positive for H9 nucleic acid (positive rate:0.69%), 5 specimens, simultaneously positive for H5 and H9 nucleic acids. However, none of the samples showing H7 nucleic acid positive. From 2006 to 2012, all the tested H5/H7/H9 virus were negative from the respiratory/serum specimens among those close contacts of patients or high risk groups through the avian flu emergency surveillance program,ILI patient influenza virus surveillance programs or pneumonia of unknown causes surveillance program. CONCLUSION: Contamination of H5/H9 avian influenza virus did exist in the poultry sites in Guangzhou, especially in the wet Markets. The H5/H9 avian influenza virus caused asymptomatic infection was proved to be existed within the population exposed to the poultry, suggesting that the poultry occupational population in Guangzhou was under the risk of avian influenza virus infection.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/virology , Population Surveillance , Adult , Animals , China/epidemiology , Environmental Monitoring , Female , Humans , Influenza A virus , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Poultry
3.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 30(11): 1111-3, 2009 Nov.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20193575

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct serological investigation on H5N1/H9N2/H7N7 infection among people occupied in poultry fields. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from people working in live poultry and none-poultry retailing food markets, poultry wholesaling, large-scale poultry breading factories and in small-scale farms, wide birds breeding, swine slaughtering houses and from normal population. Antibodies of H5, H9 and H7 with hemagglutination inhibition and neutralization tests were tested and analyzed. Logistic regression and chi(2) test were used. RESULTS: Among 2881 samples, 4 were positive to H5-Ab (0.14%), 146 were positive to H9-Ab (5.07%) and the prevalence of H9 among people from live poultry retailing (14.96%) was the highest. Prevalence rates of H9 were as follows: 8.90% in people working in the large-scale poultry breading factories, 6.69% in the live poultry wholesaling business, 3.75% in the wide birds breeding, 2.40% in the swine slaughtering, 2.21% in the non-poultry retailing, 1.77% in the rural poultry farmers and 2.30% in normal population. None was positive to H7-Ab among 1926 poultry workers. CONCLUSION: The H5 prevalence among people was much lower than expected, but the H9 prevalence was higher. None of the populations tested was found positive to H7-Ab. There was a higher risk of AIV infection in live poultry retailing, wholesaling and large-scale breading businesses, with the risk of live poultry retailing the highest. The longer the service length was, the higher the risk existed.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Occupational Exposure , Adult , Agriculture , Animals , Female , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza in Birds/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Poultry
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 12(11): 1773-5, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17283635

ABSTRACT

A patient may have been infected with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 in Guangzhou, People's Republic of China, at a food market that had live birds. Virus genes were detected in 1 of 79 wire cages for birds at 9 markets. One of 110 persons in the poultry business at markets had neutralizing antibody against H5N1.


Subject(s)
Birds/virology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/etiology , Animals , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/classification , Male , Phylogeny
5.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol ; 12(1): 135-40, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15642998

ABSTRACT

Accurate and timely diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection is a critical step in preventing another global outbreak. In this study, 829 serum specimens were collected from 643 patients initially reported to be infected with SARS-CoV. The sera were tested for the N protein of SARS-CoV by using an antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on monoclonal antibodies against the N protein of SARS-CoV and compared to 197 control serum samples from healthy donors and non-SARS febrile patients. The results of the N protein detection analysis were directly related to the serological analysis data. From 27 SARS patients who tested positive with the neutralization test, 100% of the 24 sera collected from 1 to 10 days after the onset of symptoms were positive for the N protein. N protein was not detected beyond day 11 in this group. The positive rates of N protein for sera collected at 1 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, and 16 to 20 days after the onset of symptoms for 414 samples from 298 serologically confirmed patients were 92.9, 69.8, 36.4, and 21.1%, respectively. For 294 sera from 248 serological test-negative patients, the rates were 25.6, 16.7, 9.3, and 0%, respectively. The N protein was not detected in 66 patients with cases of what was initially suspected to be SARS but serologically proven to be negative for SARS and in 197 serum samples from healthy donors and non-SARS febrile patients. The specificity of the assay was 100%. Furthermore, of 16 sera collected from four patients during the SARS recurrence in Guangzhou, 5 sera collected from 7 to 9 days after the onset of symptoms were positive for the N protein. N protein detection exhibited a high positive rate, 96 to 100%, between day 3 and day 5 after the onset of symptoms for 27 neutralization test-positive SARS patients and 298 serologically confirmed patients. The N protein detection rate continually decreased beginning with day 10, and N protein was not detected beyond day 19 after the onset of symptoms. In conclusion, an antigen capture ELISA reveals a high N protein detection rate in acute-phase sera of patients with SARS, which makes it useful for early diagnosis of SARS.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antigens, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Nucleocapsid Proteins/blood , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Humans , Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/blood , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/immunology , Time Factors
6.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 25(6): 503-5, 2004 Jun.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15231128

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible risk factors of severe acute respiratory syndromes coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection in workers from animal markets. METHODS: Self-designed questionnaires were used and serum samples were tested. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Results from simple factor logistic regression analysis showed that jobs which dealing with domestic livestock, wild livestock, wild animals, aquatics were related to risk factors of SARS-CoV infection. Results from multifactor logistic regression analysis showed that jobs that dealing with wild livestock and poultry were important risk factors with OR 12.28 and 0.41. CONCLUSION: Job that dealing with palm civets was the main risk factor of SARS-CoV infection in animal market workers.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Occupational Exposure , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/isolation & purification , Animals , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/virology , China/epidemiology , Disease Reservoirs , Humans , Logistic Models , Poultry , Risk Factors , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 38(2): 81-3, 2004 Mar.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15061910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate status of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronovirus (SARS-CoV) in traders of wild animals wholesale markets in Guangzhou. METHODS: Serum antibody against SARS-CoV IgG was determined cross-sectionally and symptoms of respiratory infection were investigated retrospectively for part of traders of three wholesale markets for wild animals in Guangzhou. RESULTS: Overall rate of infection with SARS-CoV in 635 traders was 16.69%, varying in three different markets. Infection rate in market A mainly engaging in wild animals ranked the highest of 25.61%, significantly higher than that in markets B and C engaging in domestic fowls and snakes. Infection rate in traders only engaging in civet cats was 58.54%, significantly higher than that in traders engaging in snakes only (9.46%). In market A, infection rate varied in different persons, 59.34%, 20.59%, 16.00%, 15.22%, 10.40% and 9.68% in traders engaging in wild animals, managers, children of the traders, traders engaging in domestic fowls, traders engaging in snakes, and traders engaging in frozen food, respectively, in a decreasing pattern as their contact opportunities. During the period of SARS epidemic, detection rate of SARS-CoV antibody in people with symptoms of acute respiratory infection was higher (30.70%) than that in those without such symptoms (20.08%). Prevalence of symptoms of acute upper respiratory infection in people with positive antibody against SARS-CoV was higher (49.28%) than that in those with negative antibody (30.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Infection with SARS-CoV in traders of animal markets possibly related to their direct exposure to wild animals, particularly to civet cats. During the period of SARS epidemic, some of the traders did infect with SARS-CoV, but they were neglected due to clinically inapparent manifestations.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulin G/blood , Occupational Exposure , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , China , Contact Tracing , Family , Humans , Occupations/classification , Retrospective Studies , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/transmission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...