Targeted dosing of anti-thymocyte globulin in adult unmanipulated haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: A single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is widely used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to prevent severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft failure. However, overexposure to ATG may increase cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, non-relapse mortality, and disease recurrence. To investigate the optimal dosing of ATG, we established a targeted dosing strategy based on ATG concentration monitoring for haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT). The aim of this phase 2 trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ATG-targeted dosing strategy in adult unmanipulated haplo-PBSCT. ATG was administered for 4 days (-5 days to -2 days) during conditioning. The ATG doses on -3 days and -2 days were adjusted by our dosing strategy to achieve the optimal ATG exposure. The primary endpoint was CMV reactivation on +180 days. Between December 2020 and January 2022, 66 haplo-PBSCT patients were enrolled and 63 of them were evaluable with a median follow-up of 632 days. The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation was 36.7% and that of EBV was 58.7%. The 1-year disease-free survival was 82.5%, overall survival was 92.1%, and CD4+ T-cell reconstruction on +100 days was 76.8%. The most common severe regimen-associated toxicities (> grade 3) were infections (51.5%) and gastrointestinal toxicity (25.5%). A total of 102 haplo-PBSCT patients who received the conventional fixed ATG dose (cumulative 10 mg/kg) comprised historical control. The outcomes in historical control were inferior to those of phase 2 trial cohort (CMV reactivation: 70.8%, p < .001; EBV reactivation: 76.0%, p = .024; CD4 + T-cell reconstruction: 54.1%, p = .040). In conclusion, ATG-targeted dosing strategy reduced CMV/EBV reactivation and improved survival without increasing GVHD after haplo-PBSCT. These advantages may be associated with accelerated immune reconstitution.

[The Prognostic Value of FOSB Gene in Acute Myeloid Leukemia].

AbstractObjective: To analyze the expression of FOSB in acute myeloid leukemia （AML） and its correlation with prognosis of the patient based on the large sample data. METHODS: The genome, transcriptome, gene chip and clinical information from multiple public databases were statistical analyzed. RESULTS: The expression of FOSB gene in AML patients was significantly higher than that in normal people. The prognostic analysis of the 163 patients showed that the patients with high FOSB expression showed longer OS and EFS than those with FOSB low expression. The patients were further divided into chemotherapy group and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) group according to the treatment method, and then each group was divided into two subgroups (FOSBhigh, FOSBlow) according to the median expression level of FOSB. In the allo-HSCT group, the patients with FOSB high expression was longer event-free survival (EFS: P=0.017) and overall survival (OS: P=0029). At the same time, allo-HSCT in patients with high FOSB expression could improve the prognosis of the patients (Chemotherapy vs Allo-HSCT, OS: P<0.001, EFS: P=0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that the high expression of FOSB was an independent favorable prognostic factor for EFS and OS (EFS: HR=0.501， P=0.019; OS: HR=0.461， P=0.009) of the patients. CONCLUSION: The high expression of FOSB indicated a good prognosis for acute myeloid leukemia.

Co-Administration with Voriconazole Doubles the Exposure of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

Background: Ruxolitinib is newly approved for glucocorticoid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allo-geneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and voriconazole is commonly used in allo-HSCT recipients for the prophylaxis or treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Drug-drug interaction (DDI) may occur between them because their metabolic pathways overlap and can be inhibited by voriconazole, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes 3A4 and 2C9. Objective: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the DDI between ruxolitinib and voriconazole in patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: A total of 12 patients with hematologic malignancies were enrolled in this single-arm, single-center, Phase I/II, fixed sequence self-control study. All subjects received 5 mg ruxolitinib alone, followed by the co-administration of ruxolitinib and voriconazole. The plasma concentrations of the two drugs were determined by two well-validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Phoenix WinNonlin software was used to compare the differences in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), terminal elimination half-life (T1/2), and apparent plasma clearance (CL/F), as well as area under the curve from time zero to last (AUClast) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUCinf) between the two periods. Results: After pre-treatment with voriconazole, no significant change existed in Tmax, while Cmax, T1/2, AUClast, and AUCinf of ruxolitinib were significantly increased by 50.4%, 81.3%, 110.1%, and 118.3%, respectively, and CL/F was significantly decreased to 43.6% compared with patients receiving ruxolitinib alone. Conclusion: Our findings confirmed a moderate inhibitory DDI between ruxolitinib and voriconazole as voriconazole decreased the elimination and increased the exposure of ruxolitinib in patients with hematologic malignancies. We recommended a dose reduction regimen when voriconazole and ruxolitinib were coadministered. Drug monitoring might help determine the ruxolitinib treatment concentration for aGVHD patients, improve efficacy, and reduce toxicity.

Optimal Active Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Exposure Associated with Minimum Risk of Virus Reactivation and Comparable Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Under Adult Myeloablative Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is often included in the conditioning regimen to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). However, the risk of virus reactivation increases significantly. We conducted a single-center prospective study to identify the optimal ATG exposure that ensures engraftment, effectively prevents acute GVHD, and reduces the risk of virus reactivation without increasing relapse of malignant diseases in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT). From September 2018 to June 2020, 106 patients (median age, 32 years) with malignant hematological diseases who received haplo-PBSCT for the first time were enrolled. All patients received 10 mg/kg rabbit ATG (thymoglobulin) divided for 4 days (days -5 to -2). Pre-transplant, post-transplant, and total areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs) of active ATG were calculated. Total AUC of active ATG was shown to be the best predictor for virus reactivation and acute GVHD of grades II to IV or grades III and IV. The optimal total AUC range of active ATG was 100 to 148.5 UE/mL/day. The median time was 14 versus 13 days (P = .184) for neutrophil engraftment and 13 versus 13 days (P = .263) for platelet engraftment in the optimal and non-optimal AUC groups, respectively. The optimal AUC group showed a lower cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and persistent CMV viremia than the non-optimal AUC group: 60.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.3%-73.1%) versus 77.1% (95% CI, 64.5%-87.7%; P = .016) and 31.5% (95% CI, 21.2%-45.3%) versus 56.3% (95% CI, 42.9%-70.4%; P = .007), respectively. The cumulative incidence of persistent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viremia in the optimal AUC group was significantly lower than the non-optimal total AUC group: 33.1% (95% CI, 22.5%-46.8%) versus 52.6% (95% CI, 39.3%-67.2%; P = .048). However, there was no difference in EBV reactivation (P = .752). Similar outcomes were observed for grade II to IV and grade III and IV acute GVHD between the two groups: 48.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-62.0%) versus 37.0% (95% CI, 24.8%-52.5%; P = .113) and 10.4% (95% CI, 4.8%-21.7%) versus 4.2% (95% CI, 1.0%-15.6%; P = .234, respectively. Relapse, non-relapse mortality, and disease-free survival demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups. But, overall survival at 2 years tended to increase in the optimal AUC group: 75.7% (95% CI, 62.4%-84.8%) versus 57.8% (95% CI, 42.4%-70.4%; P = .061). These data support an optimal active ATG exposure of 110 to 148.5 UE/mL/day in haplo-PBSCT. Individualized dosing of ATG in allo-HCT might reduce the risk of virus reactivation and effectively prevent acute GVHD simultaneously.