Low-Dose Rivaroxaban as Extended Prophylaxis Reduces Postdischarge Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Malignancy and IBD.

BACKGROUND: Despite guidelines suggesting the use of extended prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer and perhaps IBD, routine use is low and scant data exist regarding oral forms of therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to compare the incidence of postdischarge venous thromboembolism in patients given extended prophylaxis with low-dose rivaroxaban. DESIGN: We used propensity matching to compare pre- and postintervention analyses from a 2-year period before instituting extended prophylaxis. SETTING: All colorectal patients at a single institution were prospectively considered for extended prophylaxis. PATIENTS: Patients with a diagnosis of IBD or colorectal cancer who underwent operative resection were included. INTERVENTIONS: Those considered for extended prophylaxis were prescribed 10 mg of rivaroxaban for 30 days postsurgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism incidence 30 days postdischarge. The secondary outcome was bleeding rates, major or minor. RESULTS: Of the 498 patients considered for extended prophylaxis, 363 were discharged with rivaroxaban, 81 on baseline anticoagulation, and 54 without anticoagulation. Propensity-matched cohorts based on stoma creation, operative approach, procedure type, and BMI were made to 174 historical controls. After excluding cases of inpatient venous thromboembolism, postoperative rates were lower in the prospective cohort (4.8% vs 0.6%, p = 0.019). In the prospective group, 36 episodes of bleeding occurred, 26 (7.2%) were discharged with rivaroxaban, 8 (9.9%) discharged on other anticoagulants, and 2 (3.7%) with no postoperative anticoagulation. Cases of major bleeding were 1.1% (4/363) in the rivaroxaban group, and each required intervention. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited to a single institution and did not include a placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with IBD and colorectal cancer, extended prophylaxis with low-dose rivaroxaban led to a significant decrease in postdischarge thromboembolic events with a low bleeding risk profile. See Video Abstract . RIVAROXABN EN DOSIS BAJAS COMO PROFILAXIS PROLONGADA REDUCE LA TROMBOEMBOLIA VENOSA POSTERIOR AL ALTA, EN PACIENTES CON NEOPLASIAS MALIGNAS Y ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL: ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de las normas que sugieren el uso de profilaxis extendida para la prevención del tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal y tal vez enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, el uso rutinario es bajo y existen escasos datos sobre las formas orales de terapia.OBJETIVO:Comparar la incidencia de tromboembolismo venoso posterior al alta, en pacientes que recibieron profilaxis prolongada con dosis bajas de rivaroxabán.DISEÑO:Utilizamos el emparejamiento de propensión para comparar un análisis previo y posterior a la intervención de un período de 2 años antes de instituir la profilaxis extendida.AJUSTE:Todos los pacientes colorrectales en una sola institución fueron considerados prospectivamente para profilaxis extendida.PACIENTES:Incluidos pacientes con diagnóstico de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal o cáncer colorrectal sometidos a resección quirúrgica.INTERVENCIONES:A los considerados para profilaxis extendida se les prescribió 10 mg de rivaroxabán durante 30 días postoperatorios.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la incidencia de tromboembolismo venoso 30 días después del alta. El resultado secundario fueron las tasas de hemorragia, mayor o menor.RESULTADOS:De los 498 pacientes considerados para profilaxis extendida, 363 fueron dados de alta con rivaroxabán, 81 con anticoagulación inicial y 54 sin anticoagulación. Se realizaron cohortes emparejadas por propensión basadas en la creación de la estoma, abordaje quirúrgico, tipo de procedimiento y el índice de masa corporal en 174 controles históricos. Después de excluir los casos de tromboembolismo venoso hospitalizado, las tasas posoperatorias fueron más bajas en la cohorte prospectiva (4,8% frente a 0,6%, p = 0,019). En el grupo prospectivo ocurrieron 36 episodios de hemorragia, 26 (7,2%) fueron dados de alta con rivaroxaban, 8 (9,9%) fueron dados de alta con otros anticoagulantes y 2 (3,7%) sin anticoagulación posoperatoria. Los casos de hemorragia mayor fueron del 1,1% (4/363) en el grupo de rivaroxabán y cada uno requirió intervención.LIMITACIONES:Limitado a una sola institución y no incluyó un grupo de placebo.CONCLUSIONES:Entre los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y cáncer colorrectal, la profilaxis extendida con dosis bajas de rivaroxabán condujo a una disminución significativa de los eventos tromboembólicos posteriores al alta, con un perfil de riesgo de hemorragia bajo. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Bleeding After Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients on Anticoagulation Medications.

BACKGROUND: Post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding is a serious complication after hemorrhoidectomy. In the setting of a new wave of anticoagulants, we aimed to investigate the relationship of post-operative anticoagulation timing and delayed bleeding. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy at a single institution over a 10-year period. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were utilized to test for association between delayed bleeding and anticoagulation use. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and October 2020, 1469 hemorrhoidectomies were performed. A total of 216 (14.7%) were taking platelet inhibitors and 56 (3.8%) other anticoagulants. Delayed bleeding occurred in 5.2% (n = 76) of which 47% (n = 36) required operative intervention. Mean time to bleeding was 8.7 days (SD ±5.9). Time to bleeding was longer in those taking antiplatelet inhibitors vs. non-platelet inhibitors vs. none (11 vs. 8 vs. 7 days, P = .05). Among anticoagulants (n = 56), novel oral anticoagulants were more common than warfarin (57% vs 43%) and had a nonsignificant increase in delayed bleeding (31% vs 16%, P = .21). Later restart (>3 days) of novel anticoagulants after surgery was associated with increased bleeding (10.5% vs 61.5%, P=.005). On multivariable analysis, only anticoagulation use (OR 4.5, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0), male sex (OR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9), and operative oversewing (OR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8-6.9) were associated with delayed bleeding. CONCLUSION: Post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding is more likely to occur with patients on anticoagulation. Later restart times within the first week after surgery was not associated with a decrease in bleeding.

Use of a standardized discharge checklist with daily post-operative C-reactive protein monitoring does not impact readmission rates after colon and rectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Elevated CRP has been associated with infectious complications after colorectal surgery but has not been evaluated in a prospective fashion as part of a discharge checklist. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component "discharge criteria checklist" that included daily use of CRP in decreasing hospital readmission rates after colorectal surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective before and after study design that included consecutive patients undergoing major colorectal operations at a single university-affiliated community hospital over a 2-year period. The primary outcome was inpatient or emergency department readmission after 30 days. Selected pre- and peri-operative factors associated with readmissions were then examined in a multivariate analysis model. RESULTS: The study included a total of 1546 patients. Surgical indications were inflammatory bowel disease (15%), colorectal cancer (24%), and benign disease (60%); 9.5% were emergencies. The readmission rates for each group were similar, 17.3% and 17.0%, for the control and discharge checklist groups, respectively (p=0.88). On multivariate analysis of the discharge checklist group dataset, only age, sex, surgical acuity and operating time were statistically significant risk factors. The difference of median CRP values on the day of discharge of those readmitted compared to those not readmitted (35 vs 32 mg/L) was not statistically significant (p=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The institution of a "discharge checklist" did not impact post-operative hospital readmissions. Not only were readmissions unchanged by the use of a CRP threshold at discharge, but CRP levels at the time of discharge were not associated with readmissions.

The Effect of Chronic Preoperative Opioid Use on Surgical Site Infections, Length of Stay, and Readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Chronic opioid use in the United States is a well-recognized public health concern with many negative downstream consequences. Few data exist regarding the use of preoperative opioids in relation to outcomes after elective colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if chronic opioid use before colorectal surgery is associated with a detriment in postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of administrative data supplemented by individual chart review. SETTING: This study was conducted in a single-institution, multisurgeon, community colorectal training practice. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery over a 3-year time frame (2011-2014) were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opioid use was stratified based on total dose of morphine milligram equivalents (naive, sporadic use (>0-15 mg/day), regular use (>15-45 mg/day), and frequent use (>45 mg/day)). Primary outcomes were surgical site infections, length of hospital stay, and readmissions. RESULTS: Of the 923 patients, 23% (n = 213) were using opioids preoperatively. The preoperative opioid group contained more women (p = 0.047), underwent more open surgery (p = 0.003), had more nonmalignant indications (p = 0.013), and had a higher ASA classification (p = 0.003). Although median hospital stay was longer (4.7 days vs 4.0, p < 0.001), there was no difference in any surgical site infections (10.3% vs 7.1%, p = 0.123) or readmissions (14.2% vs 14.1%, p=0.954). Multivariable analysis identified preoperative opioid use (17.0% longer length of stay; 95% CI, 6.8%-28.2%) and ASA 3 or 4 (27.2% longer length of stay; 95% CI, 17.1-38.3) to be associated with an increase in length of stay. LIMITATIONS: Retrospectively abstracted opioid use and small numbers limit the conclusions regarding any dose-related responses on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative opioid use was not associated with an increased rate of surgical site infections or readmissions, it was independently associated with an increased hospital length of stay. Innovative perioperative strategies will be necessary to eliminate these differences for patients on chronic opioids. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B280. EFECTOS DEL CONSUMO CRÓNICO DE OPIOIDES EN EL PREOPERATORIO CON RELACIÓN A LAS INFECCIONES DE LA HERIDA QUIRÚRGICA, LA DURACIÓN DE LA ESTADÍA Y LA READMISIÓN: El consumo crónico de opioides en los Estados Unidos es un problema de salud pública bien reconocido a causa de sus multiples consecuencias negativas ulteriores. Existen pocos datos sobre el consumo de opioides en el preoperatorio relacionado con los resultados consecuentes a una cirugía colorrectal electiva.El propósito es determinar si el consumo crónico de opioides antes de la cirugía colorrectal se asocia con un detrimento en los resultados postoperatorios.Revisión retrospectiva de datos administrativos complementada por la revisión de un gráfico individual.Ejercicio durante la formación de multiples residentes en cirugía colorrectal enTodos los pacientes de cirugía colorrectal electiva durante un período de 3 años (2011-2014).El uso de opioides se estratificó en función de la dosis total de equivalentes de miligramos de morfínicos (uso previo, uso esporádico [> 0-15 mg / día], uso regular (> 15-45 mg / día) y uso frecuente (> 45 mg / día)). Los resultados primarios fueron las infecciones de la herida quirúrgica, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria y la readmisión.De los 923 pacientes, el 23% (n = 213) consumían opioides antes de la operación. El grupo con opioides preoperatorios tenía más mujeres (p = 0.047), se sometió a una cirugía abierta (p = 0.003), tenía mas indicaciones no malignas (p = 0.013) y tenía una clasificación ASA más alta (p = 0.003). Aunque la mediana de la estadía hospitalaria fue más larga (4,7 días frente a 4,0; p <0,001), no hubo diferencia en ninguna infección de la herida quirúrgica (10,3% frente a 7,1%, p = 0,123) o las readmisiones (14,2% frente a 14,1%, p = 0,954). El análisis multivariable identificó que el uso de opioides preoperatorios (17.0% más larga LOS; IC 95%: 6.8%, 28.2%) y ASA 3 o 4 (27.2% más larga LOS; IC 95%: 17.1, 38.3) se asocia con un aumento en LOS.La evaluación retrospectiva poco precisa del consumo de opioides y el pequeño número de casos limitan las conclusiones sobre cualquier respuesta relacionada con la dosis - resultado.Si bien el consumo de opioides preoperatorios no se asoció con un aumento en la tasa de infecciones de la herida quirúrgica o las readmisiones, ella se asoció de forma independiente con un aumento de la LOS hospitalaria. Serán necesarias estrategias perioperatorias innovadoras para eliminar estas diferencias en los pacientes consumidores cronicos de opioides. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B280.

Sigmoidectomy for Diverticulitis-A Propensity-Matched Comparison of Minimally Invasive Approaches.

BACKGROUND: As the availability and use of robotic surgery increases, current data suggest comparable outcomes to laparoscopic surgery but at an increased cost. Elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease is the most common colorectal application of robotic surgery and there is limited comparative data specifically for this indication. METHODS: We identified all elective cases of laparoscopic- and robot-assisted surgery for diverticular disease among a practice of 7 colorectal surgeons within an established enhanced recovery protocol. We performed propensity matching based on surgical indications (recurrent disease, ongoing symptoms, or fistula), stoma creation, and body mass index to create a matched cohort. Our primary outcomes were return of bowel function, length of stay, opioid use, and pain scores during the first 72 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were operative room and hospital charges. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2016, 69 robotic cases were propensity matched from a group of 222 laparoscopic cases to create a 1:1 case ratio that was equivalent in terms of patient demographics and operative indications. Time to first bowel movement was slightly quicker in the robotic group (1 [1] versus 2 [1.5], P = 0.09), while length of stay (3.5 [1.6] versus 3.6 [1.4] d, P = 0.64) was equivalent. Pain scores were lower in the robotic group on day 0 (4.6 versus 6.1, P = 0.0001), but similar on day 1 and day 2 (4.3 versus 4.1, P = 0.62 and 3.8 versus 3.3, P = 0.19). There was no difference in postoperative 72-h opioid use between groups (110.8 MME [144.5] versus 97.4 MME [101.5], P = 0.70). In the robotic arm operating room charges were slightly more ($2835 ± $394 versus $2196 ± $359, P < 0.0001), but total hospital charges were over significantly increased ($41,159 [$7840] versus $25,761 [$11,689], P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Via a carefully matched cohort of elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease at a single community institution, we have demonstrated that laparoscopic- and robotic-assisted surgery result in clinically equivalent return of bowel function, length of stay, postoperative pain, and opioid use.

Development of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Rectal Cancer Surgery Checklist.

BACKGROUND: There is excellent evidence that surgical safety checklists contribute to decreased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a surgical checklist composed of the key phases of care for patients with rectal cancer. DESIGN: A consensus-oriented decision-making model involving iterative input from subject matter experts under the auspices of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons was designed. SETTINGS: The study was conducted through meetings and discussion to consensus. PATIENTS: Patient data were extracted from an initial literature review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The checklist was measured by its ability to improve care in complex rectal surgery cases by reducing the possibility of omission through the division of treatment into 3 distinct phases. RESULTS: The process generated a 25-item checklist covering the spectrum of care for patients with rectal cancer who were undergoing surgery. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its lack of prospective validation. CONCLUSIONS: The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons rectal cancer surgery checklist is composed of the essential elements of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care that must be addressed during the surgical treatment of patients with rectal cancer.

"My bladder is hanging out of my anus": Successful Management of First Reported Case of Male Transanal Bladder Prolapse.

We present a case of an 81-year-old man who presented with a large recto-urethral fistula resulting in prolapsing bladder through the anus. A multi-disciplinary approach with urology, colorectal surgery and plastic surgery was utilized for management of the prolapse with excellent postoperative result. This unique scenario enabled a transanal cystoprostatectomy; the procedure was completed using a natural orifice without transabdominal surgery.

Risk factors for readmission after elective colectomy: postoperative complications are more important than patient and operative factors.

BACKGROUND: Colon resections are associated with substantial risk for morbidity and readmissions, and these have become markers for quality of care. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for readmissions after elective colectomies to improve patient care and better understand the complex issues associated with readmissions. DESIGN: This was an analysis of the prospective, statewide, multicenter Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database. SETTINGS: The analysis was conducted at academic and community medical centers in the state of Michigan. PATIENTS: Elective laparoscopic and open ileocolic and segmental colectomies from 2008 through 2010 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model were used to determine influence of patient characteristics, operative factors, and postoperative complications on the incidence of 30-day postoperative readmission. RESULTS: The readmission rate among 4013 cases was 7.3% (N = 293). On the basis of multivariate logistic regression, the top 3 significant risk factors associated with readmission were stroke (OR, 10.0 [95% CI, 2.70-37.0]; p = 0.001), venous thromboembolism (OR, 6.5 [95% CI, 3.7-11.3]; p < 0.0001), and organ-space surgical site infection (OR, 5.6 [95% CI, 3.4-9.4]; p < 0.0001). Important factors that contributed to readmission risk but were not found to be independent predictors of readmission included diabetes mellitus, preoperative steroids, smoking, cardiac comorbidities, age >80 years, anastomotic leaks, fascial dehiscence, sepsis, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, and length of stay. LIMITATIONS: The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative is a large database, and true causal relations are difficult to determine; reason for readmission is not recorded in the database. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications account for the majority of risk factors behind readmissions after elective colectomy, whereas preoperative risk factors have less direct influence. Current strategies addressing readmission rates should focus on reducing preventable complications.

Hidradenitis suppurativa and pruritus ani.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating disorder that can affect any areas bearing apocrine glands. Perineal HS is associated with high morbidity compared with other anatomic regions. Early-stage disease may mimic various other forms of cutaneous disorders, but as HS progresses pathognomonic skin changes occur. Clinical stage can guide the therapeutic approach, but the lowest recurrence rate is obtained by removing all involved skin and subcutaneous fat. Pruritus ani is a complex disease with a multitude of etiologies. Its management can be frustrating and disappointing for the patient and doctor alike. The key is to start with simple treatment options focusing on perianal hygiene and avoidance of the most common offending foods and beverages. If these measures fail, topical medications should be attempted before graduating to perianal injections of methylene blue as a last resort.

Colonoscopy in the office setting is safe, and financially sound ... for now.

PURPOSE: In 2000, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced a plan to allow for enhanced reimbursement for office endoscopy. This change in reimbursement was phased in during three years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fiscal outcomes and quality measures in the first two and a one-half years of performing endoscopy in an office setting under the new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidelines. METHODS: The following financial parameters were gathered: number of endoscopies, expenses (divided into salaries and operational), net revenue, and margin for endoscopies performed in the office compared with the hospital. All endoscopies were performed by endoscopists with advanced training (gastroenterology fellowship or colon and rectal surgery residency). Monitoring equipment included continuous SaO2 and automated blood pressure in all patients and continuous electrocardiographic monitors in selected patients. Quality/safety data have been tracked in a prospective manner and include number of transfers to the hospital, perforations, bleeding requiring transfusion or hospitalization, and cardiorespiratory arrest. RESULTS: The financial outcomes are as follows: 13,285 endoscopies performed from the opening of the unit through December 2003; net revenue per case $504 per case; expense per case has dropped from $205 per case to $145 per case; the overall financial benefit of performing endoscopy in the office compared with the hospital was an additional $28 to $143 per case depending on the insurance carrier. The quality outcomes since inception of the unit include the following: 13,285 endoscopies; 0 hospital transfers, 0 cardiorespiratory arrests; 0 perforations; and 1 bleeding episode that required hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy performed in the office setting is safe when done with appropriate monitoring and in the proper patient population. At the time of this study, office endoscopy also is financially rewarding but changes in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimbursement threaten the ability to retain any financial benefit.

The management of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a common clinical problem, which accounts for approximately 1 to 2 percent of acute hospital admissions. The colon is responsible for approximately 87 to 95 percent of all cases of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, with the remaining cases arising in the small bowel. The etiology, diagnostic evaluation, management, and treatment options available for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage were reviewed. METHODS: A review of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was performed, which discussed the most common etiologies with a few rare and unusual causes. The current literature about different diagnostic techniques, management problems, and therapeutic options was reviewed. Current management strategies and treatment options for the many causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding will be reviewed. RESULTS: A review of the different causes of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage and available diagnostic studies was performed. Management strategies based on the etiology of the bleeding and results of the diagnostic studies were discussed. An algorithm was provided to develop a diagnostic and therapeutic treatment strategy for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage can be a difficult and frustrating problem to both the clinician and the patient. Knowledge of the available diagnostic tests to help identify the source of bleeding is essential to the practicing clinician. Once the source is identified, management strategies and available treatment options need to be specific for each individual case. This review will aid the practicing physician in developing an algorithm for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage.