Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 44(5): 1529-37, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22302733

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Peritonitis continues to be a major cause of dropout in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Changes in the prevalence of peritonitis etiologies and an increase in the frequency of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Gram-negative species resistant to commonly used antibiotics have been reported. As a consequence, the current clinical presentation and patient outcome may differ from classical descriptions. The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of PD-related peritonitis episodes that occurred over a period of 6 years at a single Brazilian dialysis center and to identify predictors of outcome. METHODS: A total of 170 peritonitis episodes that occurred in 92 PD patients between January 2004 and December 2009 were reviewed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify demographic, clinical, and microbiological factors predicting endpoints (resolution and peritonitis-related death). Patients' characteristics and peritonitis incidence, etiology and outcomes were compared with a series of 232 episodes that occurred in the first 6 years (1995-2000) of the PD program at the same center. RESULTS: The overall peritonitis rate was 0.65 episodes/patient-year. Gram-positive cocci were identified in 79 (46.5%) episodes, whereas Gram-negative bacilli were isolated from 48 (28.2%). CoNS were the main Gram-positive species identified in 48 episodes. Of these, 56.3% were resistant to methicillin. Among Gram-negative species, amikacin resistance was observed in 60% of non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) and in only 3.6% of Enterobacteriaceae. The overall resolution rate was 44.1%. Oxacillin resistance and NFGNB etiology were strong predictors of non-resolution, whereas older age was the only predictor of death. Antibiotic protocols did not influence outcome. Comparison with the results obtained for the 1990-1995 period showed a lower peritonitis rate, a strong decline in the proportion of Staphylococcus aureus episodes, a significant increase in the frequency of oxacillin-resistant CoNS and amikacin-resistant NFGNB, and a significantly lower resolution and higher death rate. CONCLUSIONS: The current clinical characteristics and outcome suggest a greater severity of peritonitis episodes and higher risk of death, possibly due to bacterial resistance. Older age is a risk factor for death.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects , Peritonitis/drug therapy , Peritonitis/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Amikacin/therapeutic use , Brazil , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/complications , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterococcus , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Oxacillin/therapeutic use , Recurrence , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcal Infections/microbiology , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
2.
ISRN Oncol ; 2011: 708343, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22084737

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To compare the frequency of another primary malignancy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) who received radioiodine therapy or not ((131)I). Material and Methods. 168 cases of DTC patients were retrospectively evaluated as to the frequency of another neoplasia by comparing patients with and without it, taking into account clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic parameters. Results. Another primary malignancy occurred in 8.9% of patients. Of these, 53.3% showed the malignancy before (131)I and 46.7% after it. By comparing both groups, the age at the moment of diagnosis of another neoplasia was 46.1 ± 20.2 years for the group before (131)I therapy and of 69.4 ± 11.4 years for the group after it (P = 0.02). Of the 148 patients treated with (131)I, 4.7% developed another malignancy. The latter were older (61 ± 17 years) than those who did not show another cancer type (44.1 ± 14.2 years) (P < 0.05). Conclusion. The frequency of another neoplasia found after (131)I was similar to that found before (131)I.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL