Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban in clopidogrel-naïve patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The safety of administration of tirofiban, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, followed by a clopidogrel loading dose in clopidogrel-naïve patients undergoing ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not yet clear. METHODS: In a retrospective observational cohort analysis, clopidogrel-naïve patients undergoing ad-hoc PCI who received a high-dose bolus of tirofiban (25 µg/kg) followed by a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose (group 1) were compared with patients undergoing elective PCI who were pretreated with clopidogrel (group 2), between September 2014 and October 2021. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target-lesion revascularisation and bleeding at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were MACE at 7 days and individual components of the primary outcome at 7 and 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 1404 patients were included: 432 (31%) in group 1 and 972 (69%) in group 2. Median age was 69 years, and 28% were female. At 7­day follow-up, MACE occurred in 1.4% in group 1 versus 3.0% in group 2 (p = 0.08). 30-day MACE were observed in 1.9% in group 1 and 4.2% in group 2 (p = 0.03). Secondary outcomes were comparable between the groups. Cox regression analysis, corrected for baseline differences, revealed no significant difference in the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 1.8; 95% confidence interval: 0.8-3.9). CONCLUSION: Ad-hoc PCI in clopidogrel-naïve patients who were treated with high-dose bolus of tirofiban followed by a clopidogrel loading dose immediately after the procedure appeared to be safe.

Outcomes with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after PCI according to bleeding risk: A Bayesian meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a promising novel strategy to reduce bleeding complications compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In order to personalise treatment with DAPT based on patients' bleeding risk, we compared outcomes after PCI between P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and DAPT according to bleeding risk. METHODS: A search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short period of DAPT to standard DAPT after PCI was performed. Outcome differences between treatment groups regarding major bleedings, major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) were assessed with hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding credible intervals (CrI) according a Bayesian random effects model in patients with and without high bleeding risk (HBR). RESULTS: Five RCTs including 30,084 patients were selected. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared to DAPT reduced major bleedings in the total population (HR: 0.65, 95 % CrI: 0.44 to 0.92). The HRs of the HBR and non-HBR subgroups showed a similar reduction of bleedings for monotherapy (HBR: HR 0.66, 95 % CrI: 0.25 to 1.74; non-HBR: HR 0.63, 95 % CrI: 0.36 to 1.09). No notable differences between treatments on MACCE and NACE were observed in either sub-group or in the total population. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of bleeding risk, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is the favourable choice after PCI regarding major bleedings and does not increase ischemic events compared to DAPT. This suggests that bleeding risk is not decisive when considering P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

[The clinical value of bleeding risk stratification]. / Bloedingsrisicoscores: waarde voor de klinische praktijk.

Prediction of bleeding risk in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment has been repeatedly attempted and resulted in multiple risk models. Risk stratification can be used to personalize antithrombotic treatment to reduce bleeding complications. Although these risk models are validated and incorporated in the current guidelines, the feasibility and effectivity in daily practice remains questionable. Personalized antithrombotic treatment may be complex due to the number of risk factors that should be considered. Furthermore, most risk scores show moderate predictive value when they are validated externally or for a different treatment indication. However, personalized treatment seems key to minimalize bleeding events and is therefore indicated in all patients receiving antithrombotics. To increase the effectivity, it is important to use the appropriate model for each treatment indication. Online tools and the implementation of risk scores in the electronic medical record could facilitate the use of these scores.

Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in diabetic patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome treated with a new-generation drug-eluting stent.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and treated with a drug-eluting stent (DES) remains unclear. This is a prespecified sub-study from the Randomised Evaluation of short-term DUal antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute Coronary syndromE treated with a new generation DES (REDUCE) trial that was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of short-term versus standard 12 months DAPT in diabetic patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the COMBO stent. METHODS: In this study we included ACS diabetic patients enroled in the REDUCE trial treated with the COMBO stent and randomly assigned to either 3 or 12 months of DAPT. The primary study endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), stroke, target vessel revascularisation (TVR), and bleeding complications at 12 and 24 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 307 diabetic patients were included, of which 162 (52.8%) in the 3 months DAPT group and 145 (47.2%) in the 12 months DAPT group. Patient characteristics, PCI success, and number of stents used were similar in the 3 and 12 months DAPT groups. Occurrence of the primary study endpoint at 12 and 24 months follow-up was comparable between the two groups (3.1 vs. 3.5%, p = 0.865, and 15.8 vs. 14.9%, p = 0.824, respectively). Moreover, the prevalence of the specific clinical outcome parameters (all-cause mortality), MI, ST, stroke, TVR, and bleeding was similar in both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: This sub-analysis shows similar clinical outcomes following 3 months DAPT as compared to 12 months DAPT in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS using the COMBO stent. These results suggest that, even in this particular subset of patients, short duration of DAPT might be considered safe. Future larger studies are warranted to provide more precise estimations in terms of safety and efficacy of short term DAPT in these high-risk patients.

Clopidogrel or ticagrelor alongside dabigatran in acute coronary syndrome and indication for NOAC: a study rationale.

The combination of oral anticoagulants with platelet inhibitors has been widely investigated in patients with coronary stenting and concomitant atrial fibrillation. In these patients, default therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome is clopidogrel plus non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, omitting aspirin. However, in view of the high thromboembolic risk associated with acute coronary syndrome and the number of poor metabolizers for clopidogrel, investigation of alternative P2Y12-inhibitors is mandatory. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, registry-based, randomized, controlled trial aims to show the non-inferiority of dabigatran plus ticagrelor versus dabigatran plus clopidogrel in patients on chronic anticoagulants who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome. The primary end point is major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding definition. Trial registration number: NL75644.096.21.