Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Care ; 41(10): 2155-2161, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30089663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a new insulin delivery system designed to reduce insulin delivery when trends in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glucose concentrations predict future hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Individuals with type 1 diabetes (n = 103, age 6-72 years, mean HbA1c 7.3% [56 mmol/mol]) participated in a 6-week randomized crossover trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Tandem Diabetes Care t:slim X2 pump with Basal-IQ integrated with a Dexcom G5 sensor and a predictive low-glucose suspend algorithm (PLGS) compared with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. The primary outcome was CGM-measured time <70 mg/dL. RESULTS: Both study periods were completed by 99% of participants; median CGM usage exceeded 90% in both arms. Median time <70 mg/dL was reduced from 3.6% at baseline to 2.6% during the 3-week period in the PLGS arm compared with 3.2% in the SAP arm (difference [PLGS - SAP] = -0.8%, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.5, P < 0.001). The corresponding mean values were 4.4%, 3.1%, and 4.5%, respectively, represent-ing a 31% reduction in the time <70 mg/dL with PLGS. There was no increase in mean glucose concentration (159 vs. 159 mg/dL, P = 0.40) or percentage of time spent >180 mg/dL (32% vs. 33%, P = 0.12). One severe hypoglycemic event occurred in the SAP arm and none in the PLGS arm. Mean pump suspension time was 104 min/day. CONCLUSIONS: The Tandem Diabetes Care Basal-IQ PLGS system significantly reduced hypoglycemia without rebound hyperglycemia, indicating that the system can benefit adults and youth with type 1 diabetes in improving glycemic control.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Child , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Ambulatory , Young Adult
2.
Diabetes Care ; 39(7): 1175-9, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27330126

ABSTRACT

Research on and commercial development of the artificial pancreas (AP) continue to progress rapidly, and the AP promises to become a part of clinical care. In this report, members of the JDRF Artificial Pancreas Project Consortium in collaboration with the wider AP community 1) advocate for the use of continuous glucose monitoring glucose metrics as outcome measures in AP trials, in addition to HbA1c, and 2) identify a short set of basic, easily interpreted outcome measures to be reported in AP studies whenever feasible. Consensus on a broader range of measures remains challenging; therefore, reporting of additional metrics is encouraged as appropriate for individual AP studies or study groups. Greater consistency in reporting of basic outcome measures may facilitate the interpretation of study results by investigators, regulatory bodies, health care providers, payers, and patients themselves, thereby accelerating the widespread adoption of AP technology to improve the lives of people with type 1 diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Pancreas, Artificial , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Clinical Trials as Topic , Consensus , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL