ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in patient and graft survival for pediatric liver transplant recipients since 2002, and to determine if these outcomes vary by graft type (whole liver transplant, split liver transplant [SLT], and living donor liver transplant [LDLT]). STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated patient and graft survival among pediatric liver-only transplant recipients the PELD/MELD system was implemented using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. RESULTS: From 2002-2009 to 2010-2015, survival for SLT at 30 days improved (94% vs 98%; P < .001), and at 1 year improved for SLT (89% to 95%; P <.001) and LDLT (93% to 98%; P = .002). There was no change in survival for whole liver transplant at either 30 days (98% in both; P = .7) or 1 year (94% vs 95%; P = .2). The risk of early death with SLT was 2.14-fold higher in 2002-2009 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] vs whole liver transplant, 1.472.143.12), but this risk disappeared in 2010-2015 (aHR, 0.651.131.96), representing a significant improvement (P = .04). Risk of late death after SLT was similar in both time periods (aHR 2002-2009, 0.871.141.48; aHR 2010-2015, 0.560.881.37). LDLT had similar risk of early death (aHR 2002-2009, 0.491.032.14; aHR 2010-2015, 0.260.742.10) and late death (aHR 2002-2009, 0.520.831.32; aHR 2010-2015, 0.170.441.11). Graft loss was similar for SLT (aHR, 0.931.091.28) and was actually lower for LDLT (aHR, 0.530.710.95). CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, outcomes after the use of technical variant grafts are comparable with whole grafts, and may be superior for LDLT. Greater use of technical variant grafts might provide an opportunity to increase organ supply without compromising post-transplant outcomes.
Subject(s)
Liver Failure/surgery , Liver Transplantation/methods , Liver Transplantation/trends , Living Donors , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Liver/surgery , Male , Pediatrics , Tissue Donors , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Hyperkalemia is one of the reversible causes of cardiac arrest in children. The Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support guidelines have specific recommendations on the choice and sequence of medications for treatment of life-threatening hyperkalemia. However, the Pediatric Advanced Life Support guidelines have no specific treatment recommendations. The objective of this study was to measure the extent to which opinions diverge among pediatricians on the choice and sequence of medication administration in the management of hyperkalemia during cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Scenario-based survey. SETTING: A hypothetical hospital area covered by the pediatric rapid response team. PATIENTS: A hypothetical scenario of a 7-year old child receiving a blood transfusion who is suddenly unresponsive and found to be in pulseless ventricular tachycardia with stat labs revealing a potassium level of 8.3. INTERVENTIONS: A scenario-based survey of PICU fellows and attendings at a PICU Fellows Boot Camp. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-four fellows and 24 attendings responded to the survey. The response rate was 89%. Calcium was chosen most frequently as the first drug to be administered (calcium chloride, 40/115 [34.8%]; calcium gluconate, 62/115 [53.9%]) while 38 of 115 respondents (33%) chose a drug other than calcium. Only 17 of 115 respondents (15%) would use calcium, sodium bicarbonate, insulin, and dextrose in the advanced cardiovascular life support-recommended sequence. PICU attendings were significantly more likely to administer the advanced cardiovascular life support-recommended sequence than fellows (attendings, 8/24 [33%] vs fellows, 9/84 [11%]; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This survey revealed notable variability in the choice and sequence of medications for treatment of life-threatening hyperkalemia with surprisingly few participants in compliance with the advanced cardiovascular life support hyperkalemia guidelines. A standardized approach for pediatric life-threatening hyperkalemia is recommended to improve resuscitation quality.