[Decolonization of Health Care Workers In a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Carrying a Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolate]. / Dekolonisation bei Nachweis von Methicillin-sensiblen Staphylococcus aureus bei Mitarbeitern einer neonatologischen Intensivstation.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, an increased rate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus colonization was detected on a neonatal intensive care unit at the Leipzig University Hospital. Typing results showed a predominant spa-type t091. Considering nosocomial clustering, several infection prevention measures (e. g. intensified standard precautions, single-occupancy room, cohorted patients, continuing education of staff) were introduced, including staff screening followed by decolonization of colonized health care workers. METHODS: Staff members showing positive on screening carried out a 5-day decolonization program at home. Decolonization products containing octenidine as active ingredient were used first. At the earliest, 48 h after completing the procedure, the success of the intervention was tested (3 buccal and nasal swabs were taken on consecutive days). If 2 attempts at decolonization were not successful, staff members were provided with a mupirocin-containing nasal ointment instead of octenidine. RESULTS: Of 128 employees examined, 43 (33.6%) were identified as carriers of S. aureus. In 9 cases (20.9%; 9/43) the S. aureus matched with type t091. 2 carriers (4.7%; 2/43) of MRSA were detected as well. The first decolonization attempt against t091 and MRSA failed altogether. After a second decolonization, 3 cases became negative. Finally, 8 remaining staff members were decolonized successfully with mupirocin containing nasal ointment. CONCLUSIONS: Various reasons might explain the difficulties of decolonization such as the challenge of managing decolonization at home, inhibitory factors as well as inconsistent performance of decolonization measures. Additionally, differences between the preparations for the nasal decontamination may be considered.

Promoting Hand Hygiene Compliance: PSYGIENE­a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of Tailored Interventions

BACKGROUND: The German "Clean Hands Campaign" (an adaptation of the WHO "Clean Care is Safer Care" programme) to promote hand hygiene among hospital personnel at Hannover Medical School (MHH, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), known as Aktion Saubere Hände (ASH), met with initial success. By 2013, however, compliance rates with hygienic hand disinfection in the hospital's ten intensive care units (ICUs) and two hematopoietic stem cell transplantation units (HSCTUs) had relapsed to their initial levels (physicians: 48%; nurses: 56%). The cluster- randomized controlled trial PSYGIENE was conducted to investigate whether interventions tai - lored in ways suggested by research in behavioral psychology might bring about more sustainable improvements than the ASH. METHODS: The "Health Action Process Approach" (HAPA) compliance model specifies key psychological determinants of compliance. These determinants were assessed among health care workers in the ICUs and HSCTUs of the MHH by questionnaire (response rates: physicians: 71%; nurses: 63%) and by interviews of the responsible ward physicians and head nurses (100%). In 2013, 29 tailored behavior change techniques were implemented in educational training sessions and feedback discussions in the six wards that constituted the intervention arm of the trial, while ASH training sessions were provided in the control arm. The compliance rates for 2014 and 2015 (the primary outcomes of the trial) were determined by nonparticipating observation of hygienic hand disinfection, in accordance with the World Health Organization's gold standard. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ in their baseline compliance rates in 2013 (intervention: 54%, control: 55%, p = 0.581). The tailored interventions led to increased compliance in each of the two follow-up years (2014: 64%, p<0.001; 2015: 70%, p = 0.001), while the compliance in the control arm increased to 68% in 2014 (p<0.001) but fell back to 64% in 2015 (p = 0.007). The compliance increases from 2013-2015 and the compliance rate in 2015 were higher in the intervention arm (p<0.005). This was mainly attributable to the nurses' behavior, as the corresponding parameters for physicians did not differ significantly between the two study arms in stratified analysis. CONCLUSION: Tailored interventions based on behavioral psychology principles led to more sustainable increases in compliance with hand hygiene guidelines than ASH training sessions did. This was true among nurses, and thus also for hospital ward personnel as a whole (i.e., nurses and physicians combined). Further studies are needed to identify more target group-specific interventions that may improve compliance among physicians.

Intensive care physicians' and nurses' perception that hand hygiene prevents pathogen transmission: Belief strength and associations with other cognitive factors.

Besides habituation, conscious decision-making remains important for healthcare workers' hand hygiene compliance. This study compared 307 physicians and 348 nurses in intensive care at a German university medical centre regarding their belief that hand disinfection prevents pathogen transmission. Physicians perceived less risk reduction ( p < 0.001; variance explained: 4%), a comparison outscored only by lower self-rated guideline knowledge (8%). In both groups, the transmission-preventive belief was associated with high response efficacy, behavioural intention and self-efficacy, but not with self-rated knowledge. Consistent with the Health Action Process Approach, hand hygiene interventions targeting risk reduction beliefs may promote high motivation, but not action control.

Deep Surgical Site Infections after Open Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion Significantly Increase Hospitalisation Time and Total Treatment Costs.

INTRODUCTION: Deep surgical site infections (DSSI) usually require secondary treatments. The aim of this study was to compare the total length of hospitalisation (LOH), intensive care unit (ICU) duration, and total treatment costs in patients with DSSI versus without DSSI after open radical cystectomy (ORC) and urinary diversion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective case-control study in a tertiary care hospital in patients after ORC with urinary diversion during April 2008 to July 2012. DSSI was defined based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Matched-pair analysis for patients with versus without DSSI was done in 1:2 ratios. Patients with superficial surgical site infections (SSI) were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: In total, 189 operations were performed. Thirty-eight patients (20.1%) developed SSI of which 28 patients (14.8%) had DSSI. Out of 28 patients, 27 (96.4%) were with DSSI and required surgical re-intervention. Due to insufficient matching criteria, 11 patients with DSSI were excluded from analyses. Consequently, 17 patients with DSSI were matched with 34 patients without DSSI. Significant differences were seen for median overall LOH (30 vs. 18 days, p < 0.001), median ICU duration (p = 0.024), and median overall treatment costs (€17,030 vs. €11,402, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: DSSI significantly increases LOH (67%) and treatment costs (49%), adding up to a financial loss for the hospital of approximately €5,500 in patients with DSSI.