Subject(s)
Macular Edema , Retinal Vein Occlusion , Humans , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Retinal Vein Occlusion/diagnosis , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Eye , BevacizumabABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The incidence of fungal keratitis demonstrates significant geographic and climatic variation. We report on the characteristics of the potassium hydroxide/calcofluor white (KOH-CFW) preparation observed at a tertiary center in Northern California, a region with a low incidence of fungal keratitis. METHODS: Culture-proven cases of microbial keratitis during a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and posttest probabilities were determined for the KOH-CFW assay. These results were compared with documented clinical impression and values reported in the literature. RESULTS: Three hundred three of 368 episodes of microbial keratitis during the study period documented the results of a fungal culture, KOH-CFW assay, and a clinical impression. Twenty-one (6.9%) of these cultures were positive for fungal organisms. The sensitivity and specificity of the KOH-CFW test were 29% and 93%, respectively. Clinicians' initial clinical impression based solely on patients' history and examination, without the aid of any histopathologic or biochemical test results, demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 33% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The observed sensitivity and specificity of the KOH-CFW preparation are significantly lower than many previously reported values. In regions with low incidence of fungal keratitis, the KOH-CFW preparation may have diagnostic performance similar to that of the clinical impression formed only on the basis of history and physical examination.
Subject(s)
Benzenesulfonates/pharmacology , Cornea/microbiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/diagnosis , Fungi/isolation & purification , Hydroxides/pharmacology , Keratitis/diagnosis , Potassium Compounds/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , California/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cornea/diagnostic imaging , Eye Infections, Fungal/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/microbiology , Female , Fluorescent Dyes/pharmacology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Indicators and Reagents/pharmacology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Keratitis/epidemiology , Keratitis/microbiology , Male , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify clinical and anatomic factor-associated vision loss in eyes with treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema and good initial visual acuity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study after long-term history of eyes with untreated center-involving diabetic macular edema and baseline visual acuity ≥ 20/25 seen at the University of California, Davis Eye Center between March 2007 and March 2018. We collected characteristics including diabetes type, hemoglobin A1c, presence of visual symptoms, visual acuity, and diabetic retinopathy severity; and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography biomarkers including central subfield thickness, intraretinal cyst size, intraretinal hyperreflective foci, disorganization of retinal inner layers, and outer layer disruptions to determine factors associated with vision loss as defined by DRCR Protocol V as threshold for initiating aflibercept therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-six eyes (48 patients) with untreated diabetic macular edema and mean baseline visual acuity of logMAR 0.05 ± 0.05 (Snellen 20/22) were followed for an average of 5.1 ± 3.3 years, with a median time to vision loss of 465 days (15 months). Older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04/year, P = 0.0195) and eyes with severe NPDR (HR 3.0, P = 0.0353) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR 7.7, P = 0.0008) had a higher risk of a vision loss event. None of the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography biomarkers were associated with vision loss except central subfield thickness (HR 0.98, P = 0.0470) and cyst diameter (HR 1.0, P = 0.0094). CONCLUSION: In eyes with diabetic macular edema and good initial vision, those with older age and worse diabetic retinopathy severity should be monitored closely for prompt treatment initiation when vision loss occurs.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Macular Edema/diagnostic imaging , Vision Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aged , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/physiopathology , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/therapeutic use , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Vision Disorders/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with successful treatment discontinuation in eyes with retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) and macular edema (ME) in real-world settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 214 eyes with RVO and ME with 24-month follow-up at five academic centers. Regression analyses identified factors associated with (1) successful treatment discontinuation for at least 6 months without fluid recurrence and (2) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months. RESULTS: Forty percent of eyes with branch RVO and 35% with central RVO (CRVO) / hemi-retinal RVO (HRVO) successfully discontinued therapy without fluid recurrence, with median time to discontinuation of 6 and 7 months, respectively. Lower 6-month central subfield thickness was associated with greater likelihood of treatment discontinuation within 24 months for eyes with CRVO/HRVO (P = .001), whereas better 6-month BCVA was associated with better 24-month BCVA for all RVO subtypes (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Early anatomic response at 6 months is associated with greater likelihood of stopping treatments. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:84-92.].
Subject(s)
Macular Edema , Retinal Vein Occlusion , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Retina , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Retinal Vein Occlusion/diagnosis , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the financial sustainability of teleophthalmology screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) using telehealth billing codes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors performed an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of medical records, billing data, and quality metrics at the University of California Davis Health System from patients screened for DR through an internal medicine-based telemedicine program using CPT codes 92227 or 92228. RESULTS: A total of 290 patients received teleophthalmology screening over a 12-month period, resulting in an increase in the DR screening rate from 49% to 63% (P < .0001). The average payment per patient was $19.86, with an estimated cost of $41.02 per patient. The projected per-patient incentive bonus was $43.06 with a downstream referral revenue of $39.38 per patient. One hundred seventy-eight clinic visits were eliminated, providing an estimated cost savings of $42.53 per patient. CONCLUSION: Sustainable teleophthalmology screening may be achieved by billing telehealth codes but only with health care incentive bonuses, patient referrals, and by accounting for the projected cost-savings of eliminating office visits. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:S26-S34.].
Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Ophthalmology/economics , Telemedicine/economics , Vision Screening/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetic Retinopathy/economics , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Vision Screening/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To present a perspective on the use of electrotherapeutics in the history of ophthalmology along with the development of novel contemporary ophthalmic instrumentation. DESIGN: Perspective study. METHODS: We reviewed historical journals, articles, and books discussing the use of electricity and electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology. RESULTS: Electrotherapeutic applications have been researched and used to treat ocular diseases as far back as the 18th century. By the 20th century, research in electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology had caught the eye of Edward Jackson, the first president of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology and first editor of the present (third) series American Journal of Ophthalmology. Edward Jackson published an extensive review on this topic and reported a variety of modalities used to treat ocular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: While many early therapeutic uses of electricity did not produce effective and replicable results, studies on electrical stimulation of the eye provided the foundation for the development of clinically significant vision enhancing and restoring instrumentation.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/history , Eye Diseases/history , Eye Diseases/therapy , Ophthalmology/history , History, 15th Century , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , History, Ancient , History, Medieval , Humans , Prospective Studies , Visual Prosthesis/historyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the management and long-term outcomes of patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and good initial visual acuity in real-world settings. METHODS: We reviewed 122 eyes of 100 patients with treatment-naive DMO and initial best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/25 or better. We assessed clinical characteristics, logMAR BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), cumulative intravitreal injections and laser treatments at yearly intervals, and characteristics at time of initial treatment. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify predictors of visual outcomes. RESULTS: At presentation, mean BCVA was 0.057 ± 0.048 logMAR (Snellen 20/23) and mean CST was 288 ± 57 µm. After a median follow-up of 3 years, 51% of eyes underwent treatment. More eyes underwent intravitreal injection as initial treatment (54%), but lasers were initiated at an earlier time and at better BCVA. Final BCVA was associated with better BCVA (P < 0.001) and earlier timing (P = 0.017) at initial treatment, but not CST at first treatment (P = 0.634) or cumulative number of injections or lasers (P = 0.441-0.606). CONCLUSION: DMO with good initial visual acuity should be monitored closely, as delay in treatment initiation is associated with worse visual outcomes. BCVA at time of initial treatment is the strongest determinant of final visual acuity.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term progression of idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERMs) with good baseline visual acuity, and to identify predictors of visual decline. DESIGN: Retrospective case series SUBJECTS METHODS: We reviewed records of 145 eyes with iERM and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or greater at presentation, including BCVA, lens status, and central macular thickness (CMT) at yearly visits; as well as anatomic biomarkers including vitreomacular adhesion, pseudohole, lamellar hole, intraretinal cysts, disorganization of the inner retinal layers (DRIL), and disruption of outer retinal layers. Linear mixed effects and mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify clinical and anatomic predictors of vision change and time to surgery. RESULTS: At presentation, mean BCVA was 0.17 ± 0.10 logMAR units (Snellen 20/30) and mean CMT was 353.3 ± 75.4 µm. After a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range 1-7 years), BCVA declined slowly at 0.012 ± 0.003 logMAR units/year, with phakic eyes declining more rapidly than pseudophakic eyes (0.019 ± 0.003 vs. 0.010 ± 0.004 logMAR units/year). Metamorphopsia, phakic lens status, lamellar hole, and inner nuclear layer cysts were associated with faster visual decline. Cumulative rates of progression to surgery were 2.9, 5.6, 12.2, and 21.1% at years 1-4. Visual symptoms, metamorphopsia, greater CMT, and disruption of outer retinal layers were associated with greater hazard for surgery. CONCLUSION: Eyes with iERM and visual acuity ≥ 20/40 experience slow visual decline, with 21% of eyes requiring surgery after 4 years. Clinical and anatomic predictors of vision loss may be distinct from factors associated with earlier surgical intervention.