Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Asian Pac J Trop Med ; 7(11): 918-21, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25441995

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of ulinastatin (UTI) continuous infusion combined Rivaroxaban on the deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into three groups:ulinastatin continuous infusion (Uc) group, ulinastatin single injection (Us) group and control (C) group. All patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after operation, and took Rivaroxaban 10 mg orally 12 hours after operation. Ulinastatin (5 000 U/kg) was given intravenously to both Uc and Us groups preoperatively. Group C was given isometric normal saline, group Uc was pumped UTI continuous intravenously at the end of surgery (10 000 U/kg) to 48 hours through PCIA pump. The values of hematocrit (HCT), thrombomodulin (TM), Interleukin (IL-6), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), D-Dimer (D-D) were normally tested before surgery (T1), at the end of the surgery (T2), 12 hours (T3), 24 hours (T4) and 48 hours (T5) after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with T1, there was an upward tendency in TM, IL-6, TAT, and D-D after operation in group C group (P<0.05). The values of them were significantly increased from nearly 24-hour after surgery in Us group (P<0.05). In group Uc, there were no significant changes in these indices after operation (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During the perioperative period, ulinastatin continuous infusion combined Rivaroxaban can correct blood hypercoagulability through different approaches in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(47): 17985-92, 2014 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25548498

ABSTRACT

AIM: To establish and validate a simple quantitative assessment method for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) based on a combination of the ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio and hepatic attenuation rate. METHODS: A total of 170 subjects were enrolled in this study. All subjects were examined by ultrasound and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) on the same day. The ultrasound hepatic/renal echo-intensity ratio and ultrasound hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate were obtained from ordinary ultrasound images using the MATLAB program. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed that the ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio and hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate were significantly correlated with (1)H-MRS liver fat content (ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio: r = 0.952, P = 0.000; hepatic echo-intensity attenuation r = 0.850, P = 0.000). The equation for predicting liver fat content by ultrasound (quantitative ultrasound model) is: liver fat content (%) = 61.519 × ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio + 167.701 × hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate -26.736. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the liver fat content ratio of the quantitative ultrasound model was positively correlated with serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and triglyceride, but negatively correlated with high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal point for diagnosing fatty liver was 9.15% in the quantitative ultrasound model. Furthermore, in the quantitative ultrasound model, fatty liver diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 100.0%, respectively, showing that the quantitative ultrasound model was better than conventional ultrasound methods or the combined ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio and hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate. If the (1)H-MRS liver fat content had a value < 15%, the sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound quantitative model would be 81.4% and 100%, which still shows that using the model is better than the other methods. CONCLUSION: The quantitative ultrasound model is a simple, low-cost, and sensitive tool that can accurately assess hepatic fat content in clinical practice. It provides an easy and effective parameter for the early diagnosis of mild hepatic steatosis and evaluation of the efficacy of NAFLD treatment.


Subject(s)
Adiposity , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Area Under Curve , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Liver/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...