Long-term outcome of persons with diabetic and non-diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy after foot correction using external fixation.

AIM: Diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy (Charcot foot) is a serious form of diabetic foot syndrome, often leading to severe deformity of the foot and subsequently to ulcers and osteomyelitis. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the success rate and long-term outcomes for a Charcot foot operation using external fixation in 115 individuals who underwent surgery between July 2008 and December 2012. METHODS: Some 115 consecutive persons, 78 (68%) men and 37 (32%) women, were enrolled in this study. The eligibility criterion for this retrospective study was reconstructive foot surgery using a Hoffmann II external fixator in diabetic and non-diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy. The main examination parameters in the follow-up were walking ability, amputation and mortality. Average follow-up was 5.7 (± 3.2) years. RESULTS: Ninety-seven per cent of people were able to walk after the operation with bespoke shoes or an orthosis. At follow-up, 77% were able to walk and 51% were fully mobile even outside the home. Subsequent amputations were performed in 29 individuals (26%), with 17 (15%) minor and 12 (11%) major amputations. Forty-seven individuals died before follow-up, the majority (53%) from cardiovascular events. Average survival time post surgery was 4.5 (± 2.9) years. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction surgery using external fixation is a very useful method for maintaining walking ability in the case of conservatively non-treatable diabetic and non-diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy. Individuals with severe Charcot foot disease had a low rate of major amputations. Osteomyelitis was the main reason for major amputations.

Changes in incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes from 2006 to 2016: analysis based on health insurance data in Germany considering the anti-hyperglycaemic medication.

AIM: To investigate the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia over the past 10 years, taking into account changes in anti-hyperglycaemic therapy. METHODS: This retrospective population-based study used German health insurance data. All adults diagnosed with documented type 2 diabetes (extrapolated to the German population: 6.6 million in 2006; 7.9 million in 2011; 8.86 million in 2016) were screened for severe hypoglycaemia. Anti-hyperglycaemic agents were identified by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code. RESULTS: The event rate for severe hypoglycaemia was 460 per 100 000 people in 2006, 490 per 100 000 in 2011 and 360 per 100 000 in 2016. The proportion of people with severe hypoglycaemia receiving sulfonylureas, as well as receiving combination therapy of metformin and sulfonylureas decreased from 2006 to 2016 (23.6% vs. 6.2%) Among those with severe hypoglycaemia in 2006, there were no prescriptions for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists or sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) agonists. The proportions of people with severe hypoglycaemia receiving DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 agonists in 2011 and 2016 were low. The proportion of people receiving human insulin also decreased (from 11.3% in 2006 to 10.3% in 2011 and 4.3% in 2016); the proportion of people receiving insulin analogues increased from 5.4% in 2006 to 11.5% in 2016. Therapy with mixed insulins was used by 19.7% of people with severe hypoglycaemia in 2006, by 14.0% in 2011 and by 7.3% in 2016. People undergoing therapy with insulin analogues have the highest risk of severe hypoglycaemia adjusted by age, gender, nephropathy diagnosis and year of survey [odds ratio (OR) 14.4, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 13.5-15.5]. CONCLUSION: The incidence of severe hypoglycaemic events in Germany increased between 2006 and 2011, and decreased in 2016.

Increase in the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in people with Type 2 diabetes in spite of new drugs: analysis based on health insurance data from Germany.

AIM: To evaluate the use of new anti-hyperglycaemic agents that offer effective glycaemic control while reducing risk of hypoglycaemia, by analysing the incidence rates of severe hypoglycaemia in 2006 vs 2011 in relation to the medication. METHODS: This cross-sectional, population-based study used German health insurance data. All adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (extrapolated to the German population: 6.35 million in 2006 and 7.52 million in 2011) were screened for severe hypoglycaemia. Anti-hyperglycaemic agents were identified by their Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code, and defined daily doses of each medication were calculated. RESULTS: The severe hypoglycaemic event rate was 460 per 100,000 people/year in 2006 and 490 per 100,000 people/year in 2011. In 2006 and 2011, 10.9% and 7.3%, respectively, of all people with severe hypoglycaemia were on sulfonylureas, while 12.7% and 9.3%, respectively, were on a combination therapy of metformin and sulfonylureas. Among those with severe hypoglycaemia, there were no prescriptions of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in 2006, but in 2011, 1.55% and 0.17%, of those with severe hypoglycaemia were receiving the respective treatments. In 2006 vs 2011, human insulin was prescribed for 11.3% vs 10.3% of people with severe hypoglycaemia, while insulin analogues were prescribed for 5.4% vs 8.1%, and mixed human insulins for 19.7% vs 14.0% of patients with severe hypoglycaemia. People receiving insulin analogue therapy had a higher risk of severe hypoglycaemia than those receiving metformin, after adjusting for age, gender, nephropathy diagnosis and year of survey (odds ratio 14.6; CI 13.3-15.9). CONCLUSION: The incidence of severe hypoglycaemic events in Germany increased between 2006 and 2011, despite increased use of newer anti-hyperglycaemic agents and decreased use of insulins.

Diabetes-related burden and distress in people with diabetes mellitus at primary care level in Germany.

AIMS: The importance of diabetes-related distress for the treatment of diabetes is emphasised in national and international guidelines recommending routinely screening for psychosocial problems. Data of investigations regarding diabetes-related distress on primary care are rare in Germany though most people with diabetes are treated without insulin therapy at primary care level. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-five people with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2, n = 336, 229 without and 107 with insulin therapy) and type 1 (DM1, n = 9) were interviewed with the PAID questionnaire in the period from 1 October 2015 to 31 December 2015 in a general practice. A PAID score ≥40 (range 0-100) was considered as high diabetes-related distress. RESULTS: The mean PAID score of all participants was 3.9 ± 7.0 (DM2 without insulin 2.7 ± 6.3, DM2 with insulin therapy 6.0 ± 8.0, DM1 6.8 ± 4.9) and far below the threshold of 40 points. Only 1.2% of all responders showed high diabetes-related distress (score ≥40). People on insulin therapy with HbA1c >7.5% and with diagnosed depression prior to the study scored significantly higher. Furthermore, there are weak correlations between the PAID score and HbA1c (r = 0.253, p < 0.001), duration of diabetes (r = 0.169, p = 0.002), insulin dosage (r = 0.283, p < 0.001) and age (r = -0.129, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Only 1.2% of our outpatients with diabetes on primary care level showed high diabetes-related distress. Higher rates in the current literature are probably due to not investigating on primary care level. Guidelines should consider this.

Changes in Quality of Diabetes Care and Morbidity over 20 Years in People with Type 1 Diabetes and Long Diabetes Duration: The JEVIN Trial.

Background: The JEVIN trial started as a cross-sectional study in 1989/90 in Jena, a city of the former German Democratic Republic. At that time, the centralized diabetes care system was broken down and restarted 10 years later; structured treatment and teaching programs were implemented, blood glucose self-monitoring, insulin pump-systems and analogue insulin were introduced. We surveyed people with type-1-diabetes of the baseline JEVIN trial in a 20-year follow-up. Methods: 131 patients with type-1-diabetes were analyzed in 1989/90. Of the living population in 2009/10 (n=104), 83 persons were identified and 75 persons with a mean diabetes duration of 35 years were reexamined regarding HbA1c, self-monitoring, diabetes therapy, severe hypoglycemia, diabetic late complications and compared with the results of the same persons in 1989/90. Results: HbA1c decreased from 57.1 mmol/mol in 1989/90 to 52.7 mmol/mol in 2009/10 (7.4 -7.0%; p=0.049). Self-monitoring of blood glucose increased from 2 to 35 tests/week (p<0.001). 100%-use of animal insulin changed to human and analogue insulin therapy. The incidence of severe hypoglycemia increased from 0.1 to 0.16/patient-year. Retinopathy increased from 29 to 69% (p<0.001), nephropathy from 5 to 27% (p<0.001) and neuropathy from 13 to 43% (p<0.001). 17% had no diabetic late complications. Conclusions: The JEVIN trial shows a significant improve in HbA1c in the past 20 years. Severe hypoglycemia occurred rarely and 17% were still free of any diabetic late complication after 35 years of diabetes. This indicates a good quality of diabetes care in a German setting.

Principles of self-adjustment of insulin dose in people with diabetes type 2 and flexible insulin therapy.

AIMS: Structured treatment and education programmes for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and flexible insulin therapy provide rules for self-adjustment of insulin dose, that are extensively trained. The aim of this cohort study was to register current principles and the frequency of self-adjustment of insulin dose and their association with metabolic control in people with T2DM. METHODS: Details of insulin dose adjustment were assessed by a structured interview in 149 people with T2DM on flexible insulin therapy (mean HbA1c 7.1%/53.8mmol/mol, age 65y, diabetes duration 19.0y, BMI 33.8kg/m(2)) in a tertiary care centre. The frequency of insulin dose adjustments was obtained from the last 28days of the patients' diaries. RESULTS: Insulin dose adjustment by adjustment rules was used by 33 people (22.1%) and by personal experience/feeling in 111 participants (74.5%). People adjusting by rules were younger (60.9±9.8 vs. 65.7±9.2, p=0.011) and did more insulin dose adjustments per 28days (50.0±31.0 vs. 33.4±23.5, p=0.016). HbA1c and incidence of hypoglycaemia were comparable. There were no differences in satisfaction of treatment, quality of life as well as current well-being between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only a fifth of the participants used the rule trained within the education programme to adjust their insulin dose. The majority adjusted their insulin dose by personal experience/feeling. However, people in both groups were able to adjust their insulin dose. Although people using adjustment rules adjust their insulin dose more frequently, HbA1c and the incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar compared to those using personal experience/feeling.

HbA1c and Age in Non-Diabetic Subjects: An Ignored Association?

Objective: Target HbA1c values given in the most National Therapeutic Guidelines for patients with diabetes and cut-off HbA1c values for diabetes diagnosis are usually not taking the age of the respective patients into account; despite the fact that an increase in HbA1c in subjects without diabetes with age is known for some time. In order to further quantify the association between age and HbA1c in non-diabetic subjects an analysis of one German register was performed. Methods: In this cross-sectional study we analyzed data from 7 699 visits of 2 921 patients without diabetes (age 46.6 y [range 18-93 y]; 69.1% women; BMI 27.6±6.4 kg/m²) who had at least one HbA1c and blood glucose measurement. Data were drawn from an electronic patient record system (EMIL™) in which data were collected between 01/1992 and 01/2014. The patients were divided in 6 age groups (< 30 years [n=1 057];>30-40 years [n=1 160];>40-50 years [n=1 693];>50-60 years [n=1 523];>60-70 years [n=1 310];>70 years [n=956]) and the HbA1c values of these groups were compared. Patients with: gestational diabetes, use of systemic glucocorticoids, malignant neoplasm, age<18 y at time of first visit and IGT were excluded. HbA1c measurements were DCCT adjusted. Results: Patients with age>70 years have a 0.47% [5.14 mmol/mol] higher HbA1c compared to those<30 years. The mean HbA1c of the age groups was:<30 4.98% [30.96 mmol/mol],>30-40 5.07% [31.99 mmol/mol],>40-50 5.17% [33.10 mmol/mol],>50-60 5.33% [34.79 mmol/mol],>60-70 5.42% [35.79 mmol/mol] and>70 years 5.45% [36.10 mmol/mol]. In a multiple linear model the regression coefficient for each year of age increase was ß=0.0074 (p<0.001); thus age results in an increase of 0.074% in HbA1c per decade. Conclusion: HbA1c increases significantly with ageing in people without diabetes. The use of different cut-off values for every age range for diagnosis of diabetes should be discussed.

Diabetes-Related Burden and Distress is Low in People with Diabetes at Outpatient Tertiary Care Level.

OBJECTIVE: The importance of diabetes-related distress (DRD) for the treatment of diabetes is emphasized in national and international guidelines recommending routinely screening for psychosocial problems. To detect DRD, the PAID (Problem Area In Diabetes) questionnaire provides a valid and reliable instrument. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 783 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1, n=191, age 54.5 y, diabetes duration 22.5 y, HbA1c 7.2% (55 mmol/mol)) and type 2 (DM2, n=592, age 66.6 y, diabetes duration 15.6 y, HbA1c 7.0% (60.1 mmol/mol)) were interviewed with the PAID and WHO-5 questionnaire in a University outpatient department for endocrinology and metabolic diseases in 2012. A PAID score≥40 (range 0-100) was considered as high DRD. RESULTS: The mean PAID score was 17.1±15.1 in all participants. Only 8.9% of all responders showed high DRD (score≥40). The PAID score neither differed in people with DM1 and DM2, nor between participants with DM2 with or without insulin therapy. Females achieved significantly higher scores than men (19.0±16.6 vs. 15.6±13.7, p=0.003). A strong negative correlation existed between the PAID score and the WHO-5 Well-being Index (r=- 0.482, p<0.001). A 10 points higher WHO-5 Well-being Index was associated with 15.9 points lower PAID score in people with DM1 (p<0.001), and 9.2 points lower PAID score in DM2 (p<0.001), respectively. One percent higher HbA1c was associated with an increase of diabetes-related distress by 2.5 points in people with DM1 and by 2.0 points in people with DM2. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 10% of our outpatients with diabetes showed high diabetes-related distress.

Metabolic control and hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes on conventional or intensified insulin therapy: a 22 year retrospective single centre survey.

BACKGROUND: Multiple insulin injection therapy can easily be adapted to the patient's needs. Therefore, it is supposed that more intensive insulin therapy is associated with better metabolic control and less hypoglycaemia compared with a conventional insulin strategy in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: HbA1c and incidence of non-severe and severe hypoglycaemia were analysed with regard to the strategy of insulin therapy [multiple insulin injection therapy with preprandial insulin with or without basal insulin or conventional insulin therapy with twice-daily premix insulin] from 20 943 visits of 1417 people treated with insulin with type 2 diabetes in a university outpatient department for endocrinology and metabolic diseases over a period of 22 years. RESULTS: Multiple insulin injection therapy was used in 13 896 (66.4%) of all 20 942 visits. Compared with conventional insulin therapy, these patients were younger (62.0 vs 68.7 years; p < 0.001), had a slightly longer diabetes duration (16.5 vs 15.8 years; p < 0.001) and higher body mass index (32.8 vs 30.9 kg/m(2) ; p < 0.001), a higher insulin dose (76.4 vs 46.5 IU/day; p < 0.001), more frequent blood glucose monitorings/week (24.2 vs 14.8; p < 0.001), a slightly lower HbA1c [7.7 (61.2) vs 7.9% (62.9 mmol/mol); p < 0.001] but more non-severe hypoglycaemic incidences per week (0.3 vs 0.2; p = 0.01). Episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were rare and comparable (0.01/patient/year) with both insulin therapy strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple insulin injection therapy and conventional insulin therapy yielded comparable metabolic control with HbA1c below 8% (63.9 mmol/mol), but multiple insulin injection therapy is associated with higher body mass index and higher incidence of non-severe hypoglycaemia. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

High Quality of Diabetes Care Based Upon Individualised Treatment Goals - A Cross Sectional Study in 4784 Patients in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Recent guidelines recommend an individualized approach towards patients with diabetes mellitus. Data of a programme dealing with quality of diabetes care, "Diabetes TÜV" of the Deutsche BKK was reappraised in the light of recent evidence applying these recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data originates from a population-based study in primary diabetes care in Germany. Patients with diabetes mellitus insured by the Deutsche BKK were invited to participate. From 2000 to 2004 data of 4 784 patients participated. Double or multiple visits were not included. HbA1c was analysed in 0.5% categories and in age groups below and above 70 years. HbA1c was DCCT adjusted. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) (42% women, HbA1c 54 mmol/mol (7.1%), BP 136/79 mmHg) and 4 416 patients with diabetes type 2 (DM2) (44% women, HbA1c 48.6 mmol/mol (6.6%), BP 142/81 mmHg) were included.). An HbA1c of 53 mmol/mol (7%) or less was found in 70%, less than 64 mmol/mol (8%) in 87% of all patients, and higher than 86 mmol/mol (10%) in 2.8%. The detailed analysis shows that an HbA1c of <=47.6 mmol/mol (6.5%) is achieved of 38% of people with DM1 and 56% with DM2, an HbA1c <=66 mmol/mol (8.0%) of 79% and 88%, respectively.The mean systolic blood pressure (BP) was 142 mmHg, the diastolic BP was 81 mmHg. Systolic BP increased with age (systolic BP: < 50 years 131 mmHg; 50-70 years 142 mmHg; > 70 years 144 mmHg/diastolic BP: < 50 years 81 mmHg; 50-70 years 82 mmHg; > 70 years 80 mmHg). Using WHO grading, BP is mainly mildly elevated (grade 1: 41% (n=1942); grade 2, 17% (n=820) grade 3 6% (n=281). In 10 patients (0.2%) HbA1c above 86 mmol/mol (10.0%) coincides with a BP WHO grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years new evidence is available regarding treatment targets. The reappraisal of a cross sectional study of a quality assurance programme of a German health insurance in a differentiated way demonstrates that more than 2/3 of the people with diabetes mellitus meet their specific goals. Only very few patients are at imminent risk due to bad glycaemic control and high blood pressure. Old patients may be at risk of overtreatment. Strategies aiming at adapting pharmacological interventions in older patients must be conceived.

Trabecular bone score in type 1 diabetes--a cross-sectional study.

UNLABELLED: Trabecular bone score (TBS) seems to provide additive value on BMD to identify individuals with prevalent fractures in T1D. TBS did not significantly differ between T1D patients and healthy controls, but TBS and HbA1c were independently associated with prevalent fractures in T1D. A TBS cutoff <1.42 reflected prevalent fractures with 91.7 % sensitivity and 43.2 % specificity. INTRODUCTION: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) increases the risk of osteoporotic fractures. TBS was recently proposed as an indirect measure of bone microarchitecture. This study aimed at investigating the TBS in T1D patients and healthy controls. Associations with prevalent fractures were tested. METHODS: One hundred nineteen T1D patients (59 males, 60 premenopausal females; mean age 43.4 ± 8.9 years) and 68 healthy controls matched for gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed. The TBS was calculated in the lumbar region, based on two-dimensional (2D) projections of DXA assessments. RESULTS: TBS was 1.357 ± 0.129 in T1D patients and 1.389 ± 0.085 in controls (p = 0.075). T1D patients with prevalent fractures (n = 24) had a significantly lower TBS than T1D patients without fractures (1.309 ± 0.125 versus 1.370 ± 0.127, p = 0.04). The presence of fractures in T1D was associated with lower TBS (odds ratio = 0.024, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.001-0.875; p = 0.042) but not with age or BMI. TBS and HbA1c were independently associated with fractures. The area-under-the curve (AUC) of TBS was similar to that of total hip BMD in discriminating T1D patients with or without prevalent fractures. In this set-up, a TBS cutoff <1.42 discriminated the presence of fractures with a sensitivity of 91.7 % and a specificity of 43.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: TBS values are lower in T1D patients with prevalent fractures, suggesting an alteration of bone strength in this subgroup of patients. Reliable TBS cutoffs for the prediction of fracture risk in T1D need to be determined in larger prospective studies.

Osteocalcin, adipokines and their associations with glucose metabolism in type 1 diabetes.

To determine osteocalcin (OC) and adipokines in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and healthy controls, and to explore possible associations between glucose and bone metabolism, body composition and adipokines. Serum levels of total OC, undercarboxylated (UC-OC), leptin, adiponectin, and other parameters of glucose and bone metabolism were measured in 128 patients with T1D (mean duration 21.2years) and in 77 healthy controls, matched for gender, age, and body mass index (BMI). Partial correlations (adjusted for age and gender) with parameters of body composition (BMI, fat body mass [derived from bone mineral density scans]), glycaemic control (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), daily insulin dose in T1D), skeletal homeostasis (osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), all measured in serum), and serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were also examined. Independent predictors of total and UC-OC were then explored. Total OC was lower in males with T1D (16.3±6.4 vs. 22.2±9.9ng/ml; p=0.001), whereas UC-OC did not show group differences. Adiponectin was higher in T1D patients, both for males and females (8.9±6.6 vs. 5.7±2.5µg/ml; p=0.004 and 13.8±6.4 vs. 8.8±4.0µg/ml; p<0.001). IGF-1 was lower only in females with T1D (146.6±68.8 vs. 203.0±74.4ng/ml; p<0.001). BMI and fat body mass were similar in T1D and controls. In T1D patients, total OC was inversely correlated with BMI and HbA1c, and UC-OC inversely correlated with HbA1c. In T1D patients, leptin positively correlated with BMI, fat body mass and daily insulin dose, while adiponectin inversely correlated with BMI and daily insulin dose. Multivariate regression modelling showed that determinants of higher total OC levels were male gender (p=0.04, ß-coefficient=2.865) and lower HbA1c (p=0.04, ß-coefficient=-0.117), whereas determinants of UC-OC levels were T1D (p=0.016, ß-coefficient=2.015), higher IGF-1 (p=0.004, ß-coefficient=0.011) and lower HbA1c (p=0.011, ß-coefficient=- 0.061). Total OC and UC-OC are associated with good glycaemic control in T1D, with gender-specific differences for total-OC. The association of leptin and adiponectin with glycaemic control, as observed in controls, does not seem to be a feature in T1D, although both adipokines appear to be related to the insulin demand. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Bone and diabetes".

People with type 2 diabetes on premixed insulin therapy: how is the daily insulin dose partitioned and are there effects on the metabolic control?

AIM: To investigate the correctness of the recommendation for dose distribution in premixed insulin therapy, with two thirds of daily insulin dose before breakfast and one third of daily insulin dose before dinner. METHODS: The individual insulin dose distribution and metabolic control of people with Type 2 diabetes treated with premixed insulin therapy were studied in a cross sectional study involving 199 patients in a university outpatient department and 2 general practices in 2010. RESULTS: All 199 patients were treated with premixed human insulin. The mean pre-breakfast dose was 57% (min. 32%, max. 83%) and the mean pre-dinner dose 43% (17-67%) of the total daily insulin. A pre-breakfast dose of exactly two thirds of total daily insulin was used by 6.5% (n=13), about two thirds, i. e., 60-70%, was injected by 27.6% of the patients. The diurnal insulin distribution<60%, 60% up to 70% and > 70% pre-breakfast insulin did not make any difference in HbA1c, which was 7.3% (56 mmol/mol) each. CONCLUSION: The quite common recommendation in German and Austrian medical textbooks, that premixed insulin therapy should consists of a dose distribution with two thirds before breakfast and one third before dinner, is not observed in daily practice. Diurnal insulin dose distribution and HbA1c are not associated in this cohort. Novelty statement: The circadian insulin dose distribution of 2/3 before breakfast and 1/3 before dinner could not be confirmed for patients with diabetes type 2 and conventional insulin therapy. No correlation between metabolic control and insulin circadian insulin dose distribution was detected.

Complete evaluation of adrenal tumours in a tertiary care institution in Thuringia, Germany.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Adrenal tumours, mainly incidentalomas, are an increasingly common clinical and diagnostic challenge. The aim of the present study was the retrospective evaluation of all patients with adrenal tumours treated in our university department from 1.1.1999-31.12.2013 PATIENTS AND METHODS: 187 patients (108 females: 79 males, mean age 57.7 years) were found to have adrenal tumours in our institution during the study period. All patients underwent basic and, when indicated, advanced analytical testing for hormonal activity. Tumours were classified according to patients' gender, age at diagnosis, tumour localization and size, as well as benignity and malignancy when postinterventional histopathological examination was conducted. RESULTS: 134 (71.7%) patients had non-hormone secreting tumours, 17 (9.1%) pheochromocytoma, 13 (7.0%) Conn-syndrome, 13 (7.0%) adrenal Cushing's disease, 1 congenital adrenal hyperplasia and 2 sexual hormone-secreting tumours. 7 (3.7%) tumours could not be definitively classified due to unclear or marginal test-results. Cushing's disease was more prevalent in females (11 females: 2 males). 163 (87.2% of the total cohort) tumours were unilateral [95 (50.8%) left; 68 (36.4%) right] and 24 (12.8%) were bilateral. Tumour size was <3 cm in 109 (58.3%), 3-6 cm in 63 (33.7%) and >6 cm in 15 (8.0%) patients. 60 (32.1%) patients underwent adrenalectomy, thereof 88.9% of the patients with hormonally active tumours, while 8 (4.3%) were evaluated with ultrasound-guided biopsy. Malignancy was confirmed in 10 individuals (5.3%; 3 non-functioning tumours, 3 pheochromocytomas, 2 Cushing's patients and 2 sexual-hormone secreting tumours), while 2 surgical specimens with histopathological diagnosis of pheochromocytoma showed signs of malignant changes. Benignity was histopathologically confirmed in 55 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of detected adrenal tumours is rising due to widely available and applied abdominal imaging procedures. The vast majority of them are benign, of small size (<3 cm) and hormonally inactive. Adrenalectomy is the therapeutic method of choice in big and/or confirmed hormone-secreting tumours.

Healthcare utilization of people with type 2 diabetes in Germany: an analysis based on health insurance data.

AIMS: This population-based study assesses the healthcare utilization of people with Type 2 diabetes by analysing routine data from Allgemeine Orts-Krankenkasse (AOK), the largest statutory health insurance provider in Germany. METHODS: Anonymized billing data from all AOK-insured persons with at least one day of insurance during the evaluation year 2010 were analysed. Treatment and cost data from all areas of inpatient and outpatient care were available, as was information regarding patient age and sex. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification were used to identify 2.7 million insured persons with diabetes. RESULTS: The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of Type 2 diabetes was 9.8%. Of those patients identified, 33.9% had at least one diabetes-related complication and 83.0% had a diagnosis of hypertension. Almost two-thirds (63.1%) received antihyperglycaemic medication. Metformin and sulfonylurea were prescribed most often; medications without proof of benefit in endpoint studies were prescribed much less frequently. People without diabetes were admitted to hospital only half as often as those with Type 2 diabetes. The projected total expenditure in Germany for all people with Type 2 diabetes amounted to approximately €33.3 billion in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an increase in both the prevalence of diabetes and treatment costs. The majority of people with Type 2 diabetes were aged 70 years or older. One third of this group has diabetes-related complications. Antihyperglycaemic medications without proof of benefit in endpoint studies were prescribed much less frequently than drugs with proof of benefit.

Postprandial self-monitoring of urine glucose reflects glycaemic control in people with relatively well controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus not treated with insulin: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To analyse the association of self-monitoring of urine glucose with HbA1c concentration in people with Type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin. METHODS: We studied the association of postprandial self-monitored urine glucose with HbA1c concentrations in 264 people with Type 2 diabetes (mean age 62.4 years, time since diagnosis of diabetes 6.8 years and HbA1c 50 mmol/l). All patients took part in a diabetes treatment and teaching programme. HbA1c values were adjusted according to the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial. RESULTS: The mean ( ± sd) HbA1c concentration for the patients with constant negative urine glucose tests (56.1% of patients) was 46 ( ± 6) mmol/mol [6.4 ( ± 0.6)%]. This was significantly lower than in patients with < 50% positive urine glucose tests (33.3% of patients): mean ( ± sd) HbA1c was 53 ( ± 8) mmol/mol [7.0( ± 0.7)%] and also lower than in patients with ≥50% positive tests (10.6% of patients): mean ( ± sd) HbA1c of 57 ( ± 8) mmol/mol [7.4 ( ± 0.7)%]; P < 0.001. There was a significant correlation between the urine glucose test results and HbA1c (r = 0.416; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: HbA1c concentrations were observed to be in the near-normal range for people with Type 2 diabetes not receiving insulin treatment who were negative for postprandial glucosuria. Urine glucose self-monitoring is a cheap and effective method to determine the quality of glucose control.

Use of snacks in insulin-treated people with diabetes mellitus and association with HbA1c , weight and quality of life: a cross sectional study.

AIM: Insulin therapies with prandial injections offer the possibility to skip snacks or omit meals. It is unclear how many people with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus eat snacks and whether they snack for their own comfort or only on the recommendation of healthcare professionals. METHODS: In 2004, 163 consecutive people with insulin-treated diabetes seen in a university outpatient department were interviewed regarding their diet and degree of satisfaction with their meals. Fifty-five had Type 1 diabetes [age 47 years; diabetes duration 18 years; BMI 27 kg/m(2) ; HbA1c 62 mmol/mol (7.8%)], 53 had Type 2 diabetes with biphasic insulin therapy [age 68 years; diabetes duration 17 years; BMI 31 kg/m(2) ; HbA1c 60 mmol/mol (7.6%)] and 55 had Type 2 diabetes with prandial insulin therapy [age 60 years; diabetes duration 16 years; BMI 33 kg/m(2) ; HbA1c 59 mmol/mol (7.6%)]. RESULTS: Eighty per cent of those with Type 1 diabetes ate snacks, together with 77% of the Type 2 diabetes/biphasic group and 62% of the Type 2 diabetes/prandial group. Most participants (91% Type 1 diabetes, 88% Type 2 diabetes/biphasic group, 82% Type 2 diabetes/prandial group) liked to have snacks. The time at which they ate snacks was the same for both diabetes types. There were no differences between participants with Type 1 diabetes who snacked and those who did not in terms of age (P = 0.350), BMI (P = 0.368), HbA1c (P = 0.257) and time since diagnosis (P = 0.846). Participants with Type 2 diabetes who ate snacks were older than those who did not (biphasic: P = 0.006; prandial: P = 0.008). There were no differences in terms of BMI (biphasic: P = 0.731; prandial: P = 0.393), HbA1c (biphasic: P = 0.747; prandial: P = 0.616) and time since diagnosis (biphasic: P = 0.06; prandial: P = 0.620). CONCLUSIONS: Most people with insulin-treated diabetes eat snacks voluntarily and not because of physicians' instructions. There were no correlations between the use of snacks and HbA1c , BMI and time since diagnosis, except that the participants with Type 2 diabetes who ate snacks were older.

[Diabetic co-morbidities: prevalences in Germany]. / Folgeerkrankungen des Diabetes mellitus: Prävalenzen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.

In some patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) chronic hyperglycemia leads to microvascular complications in retina, kidney and nerves. Concerning missing data from Germany cited prevalence in German educational books and guidelines arise from other countries. This review demonstrates the prevalence of diabetic comorbidities in Germany. The largest investigation in Germany is the Disease-Management-Programm Nordrhein with more than 450.000 surveyed DM  patients. These researches show good comparability with most analyses respective to the prevalence of diabetic comorbidities in Germany. Patients with DM2 have a mean Hba1c of 7 % and patients with DM1 of 7.9 %. In patients with DM2 the prevalence of retinopathy is 11 %, nephropathy 10 % and neuropathy 20 %. Co-morbidities are more commonin patients with long diabetes duration and high HbA1c. In patients with DM1 the prevalence of retinopathy is 25 %, of nephropathy 15 % and neuropathy 27 %. The prevalence of diabetic co-morbidities in primary care in Germany is considerably lower as mentioned in educational books or guidelines. This positive development is reasonable through a better quality of care, nationwide early detection examinations and training programmes.