Dataset for: Autoantibody profiles in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurological immune-related adverse events.

The rise of cancer immunotherapy has been a milestone in clinical oncology. Above all, immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (ICI) with monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) has improved survival rates for an increasing number of malignancies. However, despite the clinical benefits, ICI-related autoimmunity has become a significant cause of non-relapse-related morbidity and mortality. Neurological immune-related adverse events (irAE-n) are particularly severe toxicities with a high risk for chronic illness, long-term steroid dependency, and early ICI treatment termination. While the clinical characteristics of irAE-n are well described, little is known about underlying immune mechanisms and potential biomarkers. Recently, high frequencies of neuronal autoantibodies in patients with irAE-n have been reported, however, their clinical relevance is unclear. Here, we present a dataset on neuronal autoantibody profiles in ICI-treated cancer patients with and without irAE-n, which was generated to investigate the potential role of neuronal autoantibodies in ICI-induced autoimmunity. Between September 2017 and January 2022 serum samples of 29 cancer patients with irAE-n post-ICI treatment) and 44 cancer control patients without high-grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs, n = 44 pre- and post-ICI treatment) were collected and tested for a large panel of brain-reactive and neuromuscular autoantibodies using indirect immunofluorescence and immunoblot assays. Prevalence of autoantibodies was compared between the groups and correlated with clinical characteristics such as outcome and irAE-n manifestation. These data represent the first systematic comparison of neuronal autoantibody profiles between ICI-treated cancer patients with and without irAE-n, providing valuable information for both researchers and clinicians. In the future, this dataset may be valuable for meta-analyses on the prevalence of neuronal autoantibodies in cancer patients.

Immune signatures of checkpoint inhibitor-induced autoimmunity-A focus on neurotoxicity.

BACKGROUND: Neurologic immune-related adverse events (irAE-n) are rare but severe toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. To overcome diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, a better mechanistic understanding of irAE-n is paramount. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, we collected serum and peripheral blood samples from 34 consecutive cancer patients with irAE-n (during acute illness) and 49 cancer control patients without irAE-n (pre- and on-ICI treatment, n = 44 without high-grade irAEs, n = 5 with high-grade nonneurologic irAEs). Patients received either anti-programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 or anti-PD ligand-1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1/anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 combination therapy. Most common cancers were melanoma, lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Peripheral blood immune profiling was performed using 48-marker single-cell mass cytometry and a multiplex cytokine assay. RESULTS: During acute illness, patients with irAE-n presented higher frequencies of cluster of differentiation (CD)8+ effector memory type (EM-)1 and central memory (CM) T cells compared to controls without irAEs. Multiorgan immunotoxicities (neurologic + nonneurologic) were associated with higher CD8+ EM1 T cell counts. While there were no B cell changes in the overall cohort, we detected a marked decrease of IgD- CD11c+ CD21low and IgD- CD24+ CD21high B cells in a subgroup of patients with autoantibody-positive irAE-n. We further identified signatures indicative of enhanced chemotaxis and inflammation in irAE-n patients and discovered C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)10 as a promising marker to diagnose high-grade immunotoxicities such as irAE-n. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate profound and partly subgroup-specific immune cell dysregulation in irAE-n patients, which may guide future biomarker development and targeted treatment approaches.

Autoantibody profiles in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurological immune related adverse events.

Background: Neurological immune-related adverse events (irAE-n) are severe and potentially fatal toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). To date, the clinical significance of neuronal autoantibodies in irAE-n is poorly understood. Here, we characterize neuronal autoantibody profiles in patients with irAE-n and compare these with ICI-treated cancer patients without irAE-n. Methods: In this cohort study (DRKS00012668), we consecutively collected clinical data and serum samples of 29 cancer patients with irAE-n (n = 2 pre-ICI, n = 29 post-ICI) and 44 cancer control patients without irAE-n (n = 44 pre- and post-ICI). Using indirect immunofluorescence and immunoblot assays, serum samples were tested for a large panel of neuromuscular and brain-reactive autoantibodies. Results: IrAE-n patients and controls received ICI treatment targeting programmed death protein (PD-)1 (61% and 62%), programmed death ligand (PD-L)1 (18% and 33%) or PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA-)4 (21% and 5%). Most common malignancies were melanoma (both 55%) and lung cancer (11% and 14%). IrAE-n affected the peripheral nervous system (59%), the central nervous system (21%), or both (21%). Prevalence of neuromuscular autoantibodies was 63% in irAE-n patients, which was higher compared to ICI-treated cancer patients without irAE-n (7%, p <.0001). Brain-reactive autoantibodies targeting surface (anti-GABABR, -NMDAR, -myelin), intracellular (anti-GFAP, -Zic4, -septin complex), or unknown antigens were detected in 13 irAE-n patients (45%). In contrast, only 9 of 44 controls (20%) presented brain-reactive autoantibodies before ICI administration. However, seven controls developed de novo brain-reactive autoantibodies after ICI initiation, therefore, prevalence of brain-reactive autoantibodies was comparable between ICI-treated patients with and without irAE-n (p = .36). While there was no clear association between specific brain-reactive autoantibodies and clinical presentation, presence of at least one of six selected neuromuscular autoantibodies (anti-titin, anti-skeletal muscle, anti-heart muscle, anti-LRP4, anti-RyR, anti-AchR) had a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 0.52-0.96) and a specificity of 88% (95% CI 0.76-0.95) for the diagnosis of myositis, myocarditis, or myasthenia gravis. Conclusion: Neuromuscular autoantibodies may serve as a feasible marker to diagnose and potentially predict life-threatening ICI-induced neuromuscular disease. However, brain-reactive autoantibodies are common in both ICI-treated patients with and without irAE-n, hence, their pathogenic significance remains unclear.

Dataset of a retrospective multicenter cohort study on characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced encephalitis and comparison with HSV-1 and anti-LGI1 encephalitis.

Over the past decade, cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved the outcome of many malignancies. However, with the broad use of ICIs, neurological immune related adverse events (irAE) are increasingly recognized. ICI-induced encephalitis (ICI-iE) is a particularly severe irAE, often leading to treatment termination, long-term sequalae or death. Despite its high morbidity and mortality, data on clinical features and diagnostic criteria are limited. We aimed to define clinical, radiologic and laboratory characteristics of ICI-iE and identify factors that discriminate it from anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated (anti-LGI)-1 encephalitis and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 encephalitis - two alternative causes of encephalitis - to increase the awareness of ICI-iE and improve its diagnosis and management. To that end, we retrospectively collected 30 cases of ICI-iE that were reported to the Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology (SERIO) and 46 cases of anti-LGI1 encephalitis or herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 encephalitis that presented to a large German neurological referral center (Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin) between January 2015 and September 2021. Signs and symptoms, imaging and electroencephalogram features, laboratory findings and outcome measures were assessed using standardized case report forms as well as patients' medical records and compared between the groups. The data reported here represents the largest primary cohort of patients with ICI-iE to date and the first comparison with other types of encephalitis. As all three disorders - ICI-iE, HSV-1 encephalitis and anti-LGI1 encephalitis - are rare neurological entities, this dataset can be used as a reference in future clinical studies on ICI-induced neurotoxicity, neurological autoimmune disorders, and central nervous system infections.

Characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced encephalitis and comparison with HSV-1 and anti-LGI1 encephalitis: A retrospective multicentre cohort study.

AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced encephalitis (ICI-iE) is a rare but life-threatening toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. We aim to identify the characteristics of ICI-iE and describe factors that discriminate it from herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 encephalitis and anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis, as two alternative entities of encephalitis. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre cohort study, we collected patients with ICI-iE reported to the Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology from January 2015 to September 2021 and compared their clinical features and outcome with 46 consecutive patients with HSV-1 or anti-LGI1 encephalitis who were treated at a German neurological referral centre. RESULTS: Thirty cases of ICI-iE, 25 cases of HSV-1 encephalitis and 21 cases of anti-LGI1 encephalitis were included. Clinical presentation of ICI-iE was highly variable and resembled that of HSV-1 encephalitis, while impairment of consciousness (66% vs. 5%, p = .007), confusion (83% vs. 43%; p = .02), disorientation (83% vs. 29%; p = .007) and aphasia (43% vs. 0%; p = .007) were more common in ICI-iE than in anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Antineuronal antibodies (17/18, 94%) and MRI (18/30, 60%) were mostly negative in ICI-iE, but cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed pleocytosis and/or elevated protein levels in almost all patients (28/29, 97%). Three patients (10%) died of ICI-iE. Early immunosuppressive treatment was associated with better outcome (r = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: ICI-iE is a heterogeneous entity without specific clinical features. CSF analysis has the highest diagnostic value, as it reveals inflammatory changes in most patients and enables the exclusion of infection. Early treatment of ICI-iE is essential to prevent sequelae and death.

Adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells improves immune cell engraftment and therapy-refractory chronic GvHD.

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is still the major non-relapse, life-limiting complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Modern pharmacologic immunosuppression is often insufficient and associated with significant side effects. Novel treatment strategies now include adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells (Tregs), but their efficacy in chronic GvHD is unknown. We treated three children suffering from severe, therapy-refractory GvHD with polyclonally expanded Tregs generated from the original stem cell donor. Third-line maintenance immunosuppression was tapered to cyclosporin A and low-dose steroids shortly before cell transfer. Regular follow-up included an assessment of the subjective and objective clinical development, safety parameters, and in-depth immune monitoring. All patients showed marked clinical improvement with substantially decreased GvHD activity. Laboratory follow-up showed a significant enhancement of the immunologic engraftment, including lymphocytes and dendritic cells. Monitoring the fate of Tregs by next-generation sequencing demonstrated clonal expansion. In summary, adoptive transfer of Tregs was well tolerated and able to modulate an established undesired T cell mediated allo-response. Although no signs of overimmunosuppression were detectable, the treatment of patients with invasive opportunistic infections should be undertaken with caution. Further controlled studies are necessary to confirm these encouraging effects and eventually pave the way for adoptive Treg therapy in chronic GvHD.

Clinical Presentation and Causes of Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Observational Study in Emergency Patients.

Introduction: Diagnosing non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) is often challenging. However, clear discrimination from non-spinal pathologies, e.g., "myelopathy-mimics" (MMs), is critical in preventing long-term disability and death. In this retrospective study we (1) investigated causes of NTSCI, (2) identified clinical markers associated with NTSCI and (3) discuss implications for NTSCI management. Methods: Our sample consisted of 5.913 consecutive neurological and neurosurgical patients who were treated in our emergency department during a one-year period. Patients with a new or worsened bilateral sensorimotor deficit were defined as possible NTSCI. We then compared clinical and imaging findings and allocated patients into NTSCIs and MMs. Results: Of ninety-three included cases, thirty-six (38.7%) were diagnosed with NTSCI. Fifty-two patients (55.9%) were classified as MMs. In five patients (5.4%) the underlying pathology remained unclear. Predominant causes of NTSCI were spinal metastases (33.3%), inflammatory disorders (22.2%) and degenerative pathologies (19.4%). 58.6% of NTSCI patients required emergency treatment. Presence of a sensory level (p = <0.001) and sphincter dysfunction (p = 0.02) were the only significant discriminators between NTSCI and MMs. Conclusion: In our study, one-third of patients presenting with a new bilateral sensorimotor deficit had NTSCI. Of these, the majority required emergency treatment. Since there is a significant clinical overlap with non-spinal disorders, a standardized diagnostic work-up including routine spinal MRI is recommended for NTSCI management, rather than an approach that is mainly based on clinical findings.