Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone Joint J ; 100-B(11): 1471-1476, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30418067

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The results of irrigation and debridement with component retention (IDCR) in the treatment of acutely infected total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have been variable. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome after IDCR when combined with chronic antibiotic suppression. We also evaluated survivorship free from subsequent infection, removal of the components, and death, as well as the risk factors for failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective review of 134 infected primary TKAs that were treated with IDCR. Infections within four weeks of the procedure were defined as acute postoperative infections, and those occurring more than four weeks after the procedure with symptoms for less than three weeks were defined as acute haematogenous infections. Patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics for four to six weeks, followed by chronic oral antibiotic suppression. Estimates of survival were made using a competing risk analysis. The mean follow-up was five years (2.1 to 13). RESULTS: The infection was an acute postoperative infection in 23 TKAs and an acute haematogenous infection in 111 TKAs. The incidence of subsequent infection was 36% in those with an acute postoperative infection and 33% in those with a haematogenous infection, five years postoperatively (p = 0.40). Age < 60 years increased the risk of subsequent infection (hazard ratio (HR) 2.4; p = 0.009) and removal of the components (HR 2.8; p = 0.007). Infection with a staphylococcal species increased the risk of subsequent infection (HR 3.6; p < 0.001), and removal of the components (HR 3.2; p = 0.002). Musculoskeletal Infection Society host type and local extremity grade, body mass index (BMI), the duration of symptoms, gender, and the presence of a monoblock tibial component had no significant effect on the outcome. CONCLUSION: In a rigorously defined group of acute periprosthetic infections after TKA treated with IDCR and chronic antibiotic suppression, the infection-free survival at five years was 66%. The greatest risk factor for failure was an infection with a staphylococcal species, followed by age of < 60 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1471-76.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Acute Disease , Administration, Oral , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Debridement/methods , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods
2.
Bone Joint J ; 100-B(9): 1157-1161, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168769

ABSTRACT

Aims: Recurrent infection following two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication. The purpose of this study was to report the survival of repeat two-stage revision hip arthroplasty, describe complications, and identify risk factors for failure. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified 19 hips (19 patients) that had undergone repeat two-stage revision THA for infection between 2000 to 2013. There were seven female patients (37%) and the mean age was 60 years (30 to 85). Survival free from revision was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis. The patients were classified according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) system, and risk factors for failure were identified. Mean follow-up was four years (2 to 11). Results: Gram-positive bacteria were responsible for 16/17 (94%) of the re-infections where microbes were identified. Following the repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty, survival free from any revision was 74% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56% to 96%, 14 at risk) at two years and 45% (95% CI 25% to 75%, five at risk) at five years. Failure to control infection resulted in re-operation or revision in 42%A of patients (8/19). Survival free from revision was not dependent on host grade. Conclusion: Re-infection after two-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for PJI presents a challenging scenario. Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty has a low survival free from revision at five years (45%) and a high rate of re-infection (42%). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1157-61.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Reoperation/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Reoperation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Bone Joint J ; 97-B(3): 312-7, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25737513

ABSTRACT

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is challenging when there is severe loss of bone in the proximal femur. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision THA in patients with severe proximal femoral bone loss treated with a fluted, tapered, modular femoral component. Between January 1998 and December 2004, 92 revision THAs were performed in 92 patients using a single fluted, tapered, modular femoral stem design. Pre-operative diagnoses included aseptic loosening, infection and peri-prosthetic fracture. Bone loss was categorised pre-operatively as Paprosky types III-IV, or Vancouver B3 in patients with a peri-prosthetic fracture. The mean clinical follow-up was 6.4 years (2 to 12). A total of 47 patients had peri-operative complications, 27 of whom required further surgery. However, most of these further operations involved retention of a well-fixed femoral stem, and 88/92 femoral components (97%) remained in situ. Of the four components requiring revision, three were revised for infection and were well fixed at the time of revision; only one (1%) was revised for aseptic loosening. The most common complications were post-operative instability (17 hips, 19%) and intra-operative femoral fracture during insertion of the stem (11 hips, 12%). Diaphyseal stress shielding was noted in 20 hips (22%). There were no fractures of the femoral component. At the final follow-up 78% of patients had minimal or no pain. Revision THA in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using the Link MP fluted, tapered, modular stem led to a high rate of osseointegration of the stem at mid-term follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:312-17.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Femur/pathology , Femur/surgery , Hip Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Aged , Bone Density , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Operative Time , Osseointegration , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Radiography , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Bone Joint J ; 95-B(11 Suppl A): 11-6, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24187344

ABSTRACT

Total hip replacement (THR) after acetabular fracture presents unique challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon. The majority of patients can be treated with a standard THR, resulting in a very reasonable outcome. Technical challenges however include infection, residual pelvic deformity, acetabular bone loss with ununited fractures, osteonecrosis of bone fragments, retained metalwork, heterotopic ossification, dealing with the sciatic nerve, and the difficulties of obtaining long-term acetabular component fixation. Indications for an acute THR include young patients with both femoral head and acetabular involvement with severe comminution that cannot be reconstructed, and the elderly, with severe bony comminution. The outcomes of THR for established post-traumatic arthritis include excellent pain relief and functional improvements. The use of modern implants and alternative bearing surfaces should improve outcomes further.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum/injuries , Acetabulum/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Hip Fractures/surgery , Hip Prosthesis , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Fluoroscopy , Foreign Bodies/complications , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Fractures, Comminuted/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Fractures, Ununited/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Ununited/surgery , Hip Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Ossification, Heterotopic/diagnostic imaging , Ossification, Heterotopic/etiology , Ossification, Heterotopic/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Hip/etiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteonecrosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Osteonecrosis/surgery , Pelvis/abnormalities , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis Design , Plastic Surgery Procedures/instrumentation , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL