Locoregional Versus General Anesthesia for Carotid Artery Stenting in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be performed by transfemoral or transcervical (TCAR) approaches and with a variety of anesthetic techniques. No current literature clearly supports one anesthetic method over another. We therefore sought to evaluate the outcomes of CAS procedures based on anesthetic approach. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals undergoing CAS during the study period. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthetic type (locoregional versus general [GA]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Locoregional anesthesia for CAS was used for 754 (65.5%) patients, with the remainder under GA. Demographic variables were comparable, as were the incidence of symptomatic presentation, high-risk anatomy or physiology, severity of the stenosis, and presence/severity of contralateral carotid disease. There was no difference in composite outcome (stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], and death) (7.0% v 6.1%, p = 0.53). The GA group had lower odds ratio of MI (0.12, p = 0.0362) but higher odds ratio of death (3.33, p = 0.008) and postoperative pneumonia (3.87, p = 0.0083), although on multivariable analysis the risk of death appeared confounded by respiratory variables. Multivariable and propensity score-weighted analyses did not identify a significant association of GA with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CAS in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, GA was not associated with the composite outcome but was associated with increased rates of postoperative pneumonia and decreased rates of MI. Further investigation should attempt to better clarify these relationships.

Ambulatory Status following Major Lower Extremity Amputation.

BACKGROUND: The ability to ambulate following major lower extremity amputation, either below (BKA) or above knee (AKA), is a major concern for all prospective patients. This study analyzed ambulatory rates and risk factors for nonambulation in patients undergoing a major lower extremity amputation. METHODS: A retrospective review of 811 patients who underwent BKA or AKA at our institution between January 2009 and December 2014 was conducted. Demographic information and co-morbid conditions, including the patients' functional status prior to surgery, at 6 months, and at latest follow up were recorded. Following exclusion criteria, 538 patients were included. Patients who were either independent or used an assistive device were considered ambulatory, while those who were completely wheelchair-dependent or bed-bound were considered nonambulatory. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, 83.1% of BKA patients were ambulatory, significantly more so than those undergoing AKA (44.9%, P < 0.0001). At 6-month follow-up these percentages dropped to 58.0% and 25.2%, respectively, for all patients. For patients who were ambulatory pre-operatively, 182/246 (73.9%) of BKA and 32/51 (62.7%) of AKA remained so post-amputation. Of those patients with both 6-month and greater than 1-year follow-up, there was no change in ambulatory status between the 2 time periods. On multivariable logistic regression, age greater than 70 years and female sex were associated with nonambulation post-operatively (P = 0.001, P = 0.015, respectively). None of the co-morbid conditions recorded (diabetes, renal insufficiency, end-stage renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, or body mass index > 35) was found to have a statistically significant correlation with post-operative ambulation using multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ambulatory patients undergoing a major amputation were able to remain ambulatory. Patients who failed to ambulate 6 months after their amputation, failed to resume ambulating. Age greater than 70 and female sex were found to have a statistically significant association with becoming nonambulatory following surgery.

Prolonged use of spinal precautions is associated with increased morbidity in the trauma patient.

BACKGROUND: Patients who experience traumatic spine injuries remain in spinal precautions (SP) to minimize the risk of devastating cord injury while awaiting definitive management. This study examines the incidence of pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infection (UTI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or pulmonary embolism (PE) in this population. STUDY DESIGN: From 2014 to 2016, 344 patients aged 18 and older with spinal column injuries were identified in a prospectively-collected registry at an urban, level 1 trauma center. After exclusion criteria, 330 patients were reviewed and the following were analyzed: demographics, duration of SP, time to intervention, and rates of PNA, UTI, and DVT or PE. Those patients kept in SP for ≤ 72 h ("prolonged") were compared to patients maintained in SP for > 72 h ("early"). RESULTS: Mean age was 54.6 years (SD, 21.7), median Injury Severity Score (ISS) 10 (IQR, 5-17). The median SP was 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-6.0) days. Fifty-eight (17.6%) patients underwent fixation and 170 (51.5%) received a brace. 102 (30.9%) patients initially awaiting a brace were cleared after MRI. 93 (28.2) patients suffered one of the tracked complications; 51 (15.5%) developed PNA, 35 (10.6%) UTI, 23 (7.0%) DVT, and 5 (1.5%) PE. Rate of overall complications between patients with SP ≤ 72 h versus patients with SP > 72 h was statistically significant (20.5% vs 34.6%, p = 0.005) as was the incidence of UTI (14.5 vs 6.0, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Prolonged SP (>72 h) is associated with increased rates of immobility-associated morbidities. Focus should be on prompt, definitive care and early mobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective review of prospectively-collected data.

Prospective Comparison of Blood Culture Bottles and Conventional Swabs for Microbial Identification of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Early, accurate detection of infection is vital to successful treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, no "gold standard" diagnostic testing exists. The goal of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of a blood culture bottle system (BCBS) to commonly used culture swabs in confirming PJI in patients with high clinical suspicion. METHODS: Patients were selected for enrollment based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines for PJI. erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were obtained before aspiration. Aspirated fluid was divided between BCBS, swab, and synovial fluid analysis. Forty-nine samples were analyzed. RESULTS: BCBS yielded 41 positive cultures vs 19 with swab (P < .0001), particularly with respect to Staphylococcus epidermidis. There were no false positive results in the BCBS group, using strict Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines. CONCLUSION: BCBS increased identification of pathogens in lower extremity PJI, providing clinicians with a low-cost, broadly-applicable test.

Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

This study compared tibial baseplate alignment (TBA) between robotic-arm-assisted (RAA) and conventional (CONV) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We hypothesized that RAA would increase the percentage of implants within a predetermined safe zone (SZ). We identified 177 CONV and 87 RAA UKAs through our center's patient registry. Two individuals reviewed postoperative knee radiographs and determined TBA. Coronal baseplate positioning was more accurate (i.e., within the SZ) for RAA (2.6° ± 1.5° vs. 3.9° ± 2.4°, p < 0. 0001). Conversely, sagittal alignment was more accurate for CONV (4.9° ± 2.8° vs. 2.4° ± 1.6°, p < 0.0001). RAA was more precise in both planes (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the percentage of implants within the SZ between the two groups (p = 1.0).