Characterization of direct oral anticoagulants use in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment are of interest in oncology due to ease of administration and lack of need for therapeutic monitoring compared to other anticoagulants. Data supporting their use in patients with hematologic malignancies post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) are limited. The purpose of the study is to characterize DOAC use in HCT patients. This multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis included allogeneic and autologous HCT recipients. The primary outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB)/minor bleeding and VTE recurrence. Of 126 patients, 91 (72.2%) patients received an autologous HCT, and 35 (27.8%) patients received an allo-HCT. No major bleeding occurred in either transplant recipient groups. In autologous HCT recipients, CRNMB/minor bleeding occurred in four (4.4%) patients and VTE recurrence occurred in one (1.1%) patient. For allogeneic HCT recipients, CRNMB/minor bleeding occurred in five (14.3%) patients and VTE recurrence occurred in two (5.7%) patients. For patients that experienced a CRNMB, five (100%) of the allogeneic HCT and two (50%) of the autologous HCT recipients were thrombocytopenic at the time of bleeding. Only 38.5% of patients who experienced a drug-drug interaction requiring DOAC dose adjustment received the appropriate dose adjustment. DOACs were associated with low rates of recurrent VTE and no major bleeding events, similar to published data on DOAC use in the general cancer patient population. This suggests that DOACs may be safe therapeutic options with proactive management of drug interactions and careful monitoring for bleeding events, especially in the allogeneic HCT population where minor bleeding rates were slightly higher.

A pathogenic deletion in Forkhead Box L1 (FOXL1) identifies the first otosclerosis (OTSC) gene.

Otosclerosis is a bone disorder of the otic capsule and common form of late-onset hearing impairment. Considered a complex disease, little is known about its pathogenesis. Over the past 20 years, ten autosomal dominant loci (OTSC1-10) have been mapped but no genes identified. Herein, we map a new OTSC locus to a 9.96 Mb region within the FOX gene cluster on 16q24.1 and identify a 15 bp coding deletion in Forkhead Box L1 co-segregating with otosclerosis in a Caucasian family. Pre-operative phenotype ranges from moderate to severe hearing loss to profound sensorineural loss requiring a cochlear implant. Mutant FOXL1 is both transcribed and translated and correctly locates to the cell nucleus. However, the deletion of 5 residues in the C-terminus of mutant FOXL1 causes a complete loss of transcriptional activity due to loss of secondary (alpha helix) structure. FOXL1 (rs764026385) was identified in a second unrelated case on a shared background. We conclude that FOXL1 (rs764026385) is pathogenic and causes autosomal dominant otosclerosis and propose a key inhibitory role for wildtype Foxl1 in bone remodelling in the otic capsule. New insights into the molecular pathology of otosclerosis from this study provide molecular targets for non-invasive therapeutic interventions.

The value of clinical breast examination in a breast cancer surveillance program for women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of clinical breast examination for detecting breast cancer in asymptomatic women with predisposing germline mutations enrolled in a cancer risk management program that includes radiologic screening. DESIGN, SETTING: Retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of women with BRCA1/2 mutations who attended the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Management Clinic at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, a tertiary referral centre in Melbourne, during 1 September 2001 - 31 December 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive women with BRCA1/2 mutations who did not have personal histories of cancer and had not undergone bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy, and who had visited the clinic at least twice during the study period. Participants had generally undergone breast examination at 6- or 12-month intervals, and annual breast imaging (mammography; and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] for women aged 50 years or younger). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity (proportion of all biopsy-confirmed breast cancers detected by breast examination alone) and specificity of breast examination for detecting breast cancer. RESULTS: Of 414 eligible women (mean age, 35.5 years; SD, 11.2 years), 35 were diagnosed with breast cancer during 1761 woman-years of follow-up. Only two were diagnosed based on breast examination alone (ie, without radiologic evidence), neither of whom was undergoing MRI screening. The sensitivity of breast examination was 6% (95% CI, 1-19%), the specificity 97% (95% CI, 95-98%); the positive predictive value was 14% (95% CI, 2-43%), the negative predictive value 92% (95% CI, 89-94%). CONCLUSION: Clinical breast examination did not increase the number of breast cancers detected in MRI-screened women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Removing breast examination from surveillance programs that include MRI may be reasonable for these women.

Underutilisation of breast cancer prevention medication in Australia.

Increased implementation of proven prevention strategies is required to combat rising breast cancer incidence. We assessed use of risk reducing medication (RRMed) by Australian women at elevated breast cancer risk. Only 2.4% had ever used RRMed. Higher breast cancer risk was statistically significantly associated with use of RRMed (OR 1.82, 95%CI: 1.08-3.07, p = 0.02 for ≥30% lifetime risk compared with 16%-29% lifetime risk), but parity, education level and family history of breast cancer were not. Breast cancer prevention medications are underutilised. Efforts are needed to incorporate breast cancer risk assessment and risk management discussions into routine health assessments for women.

Motivators of Inappropriate Ovarian Cancer Screening: A Survey of Women and Their Clinicians.

Background: This study examined why women and doctors screen for ovarian cancer (OC) contrary to guidelines. Methods: Surveys, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, were sent to women in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer and family physicians and gynecologists who organized their screening. Results: Of 1264 Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer women, 832 (65.8%) responded. In the past 2 years, 126 (15.1%) had screened. Most of these (n = 101, 80.2%) would continue even if their doctor told them it is ineffective. For women, key OC screening motivators operated in the domains of social role and goals (staying healthy for family, 93.9%), emotion and reinforcement (peace of mind, 93.1%), and beliefs about capabilities (tests are easy to have, 91.9%). Of 531 clinicians 252 (47.5%) responded; a minority (family physicians 45.8%, gynecologists 16.7%) thought OC screening was useful. For gynecologists, the main motivators of OC screening operated in the domains of environmental context (lack of other screening options, 27.6%), and emotion (patient peace of mind, 17.2%; difficulty discontinuing screening, 13.8%). For family physicians,, the strongest motivators were in the domains of social influence (women ask for these tests, 20.7%), goals (a chance these tests will detect cancer early, 16.4%), emotion (patient peace of mind, 13.8%), and environmental context (no other OC screening options, 11.2%). Conclusion: Reasons for OC screening are mostly patient driven. Clinician knowledge and practice are discordant. Motivators of OC screening encompass several domains, which could be targeted in interventions to reduce inappropriate OC screening.

Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: Use and Views of Australian Women and Their Clinicians.

Guidelines endorse the use of chemoprevention for breast cancer risk reduction. This study examined the barriers and facilitators to chemoprevention use for Australian women at increased risk of breast cancer, and their clinicians. Surveys, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, were mailed to 1,113 women at ≥16% lifetime risk of breast cancer who were enrolled in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer cohort study (kConFab), and their 524 treating clinicians. Seven hundred twenty-five women (65%) and 221 (42%) clinicians responded. Only 10 (1.4%) kConFab women had ever taken chemoprevention. Three hundred seventy-eight (52%) kConFab women, two (3%) breast surgeons, and 51 (35%) family physicians were not aware of chemoprevention. For women, the strongest barriers to chemoprevention were side effects (31%) and inadequate information (23%), which operate in the Theoretical Domains Framework domains of "beliefs about consequences" and "knowledge," respectively. Strongest facilitators related to tamoxifen's long-term efficacy (35%, "knowledge," "beliefs about consequences," and "goals" domains), staying healthy for family (13%, "social role" and "goals" domains), and abnormal breast biopsy (13%, "environmental context" domain). The strongest barrier for family physicians was insufficient knowledge (45%, "knowledge" domain) and for breast surgeons was medication side effects (40%, "beliefs about consequences" domain). The strongest facilitators for both clinician groups related to clear guidelines, strong family history, and better tools to select patients ("environmental context and resources" domain). Clinician knowledge and resources, and beliefs about the side-effect consequences of chemoprevention, are key domains that could be targeted to potentially enhance uptake. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Despite its efficacy in reducing breast cancer incidence, chemoprevention is underutilised. This survey study of Australian women and their clinicians used behavioural change theory to identify modifiable barriers to chemoprevention uptake, and to suggest interventions such as policy change, educational resources and public campaigns, that may increase awareness and use.See related Spotlight by Vogel, p. 1.