Incorporating patient partner scores into high stakes assessment: an observational study into opinions and attitudes.

BACKGROUND: Volunteer patients (also known as patient partners (PPs)) play a vital role in undergraduate healthcare curricula. They frequently take part in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) and rate aspects of students' performance. However, the inclusion and weighting of PP marks varies, while attitudes and opinions regarding how (and if) they should contribute towards the pass/fail outcome are uncertain. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted to explore beliefs of PPs regarding inclusion of their scores in a high stakes undergraduate OSCE in a single UK medical school. All PPs delivering components of the local MBChB curriculum were asked to participate in the questionnaire study. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and framework analysis respectively. RESULTS: Fifty out of 160 (31% response rate) PPs completed the questionnaire; 70% had participated in a final year OSCE. Thirty (60%) felt their marks should be incorporated into a student's overall score, while 28% were uncertain. The main reasons for inclusion were recognition of the patient perspective (31%) and their ability to assess attitudes and professionalism (27%), while reasons against inclusion included lack of PP qualification/training (18%) and concerns relating to consistency (14%). The majority of PPs were uncertain what proportion of the total mark they should contribute, although many felt that 5-10% of the total score was reasonable. Most respondents (70%) felt that globally low PP scores should not result in an automatic fail and many (62%) acknowledged that prior to mark inclusion, further training was required. CONCLUSION: These data show that most respondents considered it reasonable to "formalise their expertise" by contributing marks in the overall assessment of students in a high stakes OSCE, although what proportion they believe this should represent was variable. Some expressed concerns that using marks towards progress decisions may alter PP response patterns. It would therefore seem reasonable to compare outcomes (i.e. pass/fail status) using historical data both incorporating and not incorporating PP marks to evaluate the effects of doing so. Further attention to existing PP training programmes is also required in order to provide clear instruction on how to globally rate students to ensure validity and consistency.

Patient, operative, and surgeon factors that influence the effect of superficial venous surgery on disease-specific quality of life.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Superficial venous surgery for CEAP 2 disease leads to an improvement in disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in the short term. However, which factors influence the magnitude of this improvement, how surgery affects QoL in patients with CEAP 4 to 6 disease, and whether this improvement is durable are not known. The objective of this study was to identify patient, operative, and surgeon factors that might influence the change in disease-specific QoL in the 2 years after superficial venous surgery. METHODS: This prospective study was comprised of 203 unselected, consecutive patients with CEAP 2 to 6 disease who underwent saphenous with or without subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery and who completed the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Symptoms Severity Score (AVVSSS) before surgery and at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: At baseline, recurrent and ulcer (CEAP 5 and 6) diseases were associated with a higher (worse) AVVSSS. Surgery was associated with a significant improvement in median (interquartile range [IQR]) AVVSSS: baseline, 17.8 (11.8 to 27.2); 4 weeks, 13.8 (7.9 to 21.3); 6 months, 9.6 (4.2 to 15.8); and 2 years, 8.1 (4.0 to 14.7). One hundred seventy-five patients (86%) at 6 months and 177 patients (87%) at 2 years reported an improvement in AVVSSS. Postoperative AVVSSS at both 6 months and 2 years was most significantly influenced by preoperative score (P <.0001). After adjustment for baseline AVVSSS, the following factors were identified in multivariate analysis as having a significant and independent positive (+) or negative (-) impact on AVVSSS: at 6 months, (-) recurrent disease (P =.009), (-) CEAP 4 disease (P =.026); and at 2 years, (+) long saphenous surgery (P =.02), (-) CEAP 5 disease (P =.030). CONCLUSION: In this unselected series, saphenous surgery with or without subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery led to an improvement in disease-specific QoL in 87% of patients out to 2 years. Although univariate analysis results suggested that many baseline factors might be associated with outcome, multivariate analysis results suggested that only surgery for recurrent disease and for CEAP 4/5 disease remained as significant negative, and only long saphenous surgery as significant positive, independent prognostic factors. These data provide evidence of the medium-term clinical effectiveness of venous surgery across the full spectrum of CEAP clinical grades, show the importance of multivariate analysis, and reemphasize the importance of minimization of recurrence.

The prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with chronic venous leg ulceration.

BACKGROUND: Thrombophilia is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), which in turn is a major risk factor for chronic venous ulceration (CVU). However, the relationship between thrombophilia and CVU remains unknown. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with CVU and to determine whether this is associated with a history or duplex scan evidence of DVT. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with CVU were prospectively studied. The patients underwent clinical assessment and duplex ultrasound scanning. Blood was drawn for antithrombin, proteins C and S, activated protein C resistance, factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210A, lupus anticoagulant, and anticardiolipin antibodies. RESULTS: The study included 35 men with a median age of 61 years (interquartile range, 45 to 72 years) and 53 women with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range, 69 to 82 years). Thirty-six percent of the patients had either a history or duplex scan evidence suggestive of previous DVT. The following abnormalities were detected: four, five, and six cases of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiencies, respectively; 14 cases of activated protein C resistance; 11 cases of factor V Leiden mutation; three cases of prothrombin 20210A mutation; eight cases of lupus anticoagulant; and 12 cases of anticardiolipin antibodies. Thrombophilia was not significantly related to previous DVT, deep reflux, or disease severity. CONCLUSION: Patients with CVU have a 41% prevalence rate of thrombophilia. This rate is two to 30 times higher than the rate of the general population but is similar to that reported for patients with previous DVT. However, in patients with CVU, thrombophilia does not appear to be related to a history of DVT, a pattern of reflux, or severity of disease. Many patients with CVU may have unsuspected postthrombotic disease.