ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pregnancy is a key setting for engagement in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) care, due to the implications for transmission to the infant and antenatal diagnosis representing an opportunity for ongoing follow-up. This study aimed to identify the coverage and predictors of clinical care for women with CHB during and after pregnancy in a population-level cohort. METHODS: Notified CHB cases in Victoria, Australia, were linked with hospitalizations, medical services, and prescribing data, covering the period 1991-2018. Women with an admission for a live birth were identified and services provided during pregnancy were assessed, including general practitioner (GP) or specialist visits, viral load and serology testing, and antiviral treatment. Viral load and serology testing coverage ware also assessed for the 2-year period following pregnancy. Demographic and clinical predictors of viral load testing during pregnancy were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 11 015 birth events occurred for 6090 women with CHB. During pregnancy most had a GP consultation (91.6%); however, only 39.5% had viral load testing and 41.4% had a gastroenterology or infectious diseases specialist consultation. Viral load testing and serology testing in the 2 years after pregnancy occurred in approximately half (47.9% and 52.2%, respectively) with increases over time. Viral load testing was more likely in those born overseas, those with more than one previous birth, and those living in Melbourne. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements over time, key gaps were identified in the provision of CHB clinical care during and after pregnancy, with implications for ongoing transmission and adverse outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundActive follow-up of chronic hepatitis C notifications to promote linkage to care is a promising strategy to support elimination.AimThis pilot study in Victoria, Australia, explored if the Department of Health could follow-up on hepatitis C cases through their diagnosing clinicians, to assess and support linkage to care and complete data missing from the notification.MethodsFor notifications received between 1 September 2021 and 31 March 2022 of unspecified hepatitis C cases (i.e. acquired > 24 months ago or of unknown duration), contact with diagnosing clinicians was attempted. Data were collected on risk exposures, clinical and demographic characteristics and follow-up care (i.e. HCV RNA test; referral or ascertainment of previous negative testing or treatment history). Reasons for unsuccessful doctor contact and gaps in care provision were investigated. Advice to clinicians on care and resources for clinical support were given on demand.ResultsOf 513 cases where information was sought, this was able to be obtained for 356 (69.4%). Reasons for unsuccessful contact included incomplete contact details or difficulties getting in touch across three attempts, particularly for hospital diagnoses. Among the 356 cases, 307 (86.2%) had received follow-up care. Patient-management resources were requested by 100 of 286 contacted diagnosing clinicians.ConclusionsMost doctors successfully contacted had provided follow-up care. Missing contact information and the time taken to reach clinicians significantly impeded the feasibility of the intervention. Enhancing system automation, such as integration of laboratory results, could improve completeness of notifications and support further linkage to care where needed.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , Humans , Pilot Projects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Victoria , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Disease Notification , Aged , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepacivirus/genetics , Population Surveillance/methods , Contact Tracing/methods , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosisABSTRACT
Background: The Northern Territory (NT) has the highest prevalence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Australia. The Hep B PAST program aims to improve health outcomes for people living with CHB. Methods: This mixed methods study involves First Nations peoples living in the NT. We used participatory action research principles across three steps: 1. Foundation step: establishing hepatitis B virus (HBV) status and linkage to care; 2. Capacity building: training the health workforce; 3. Supported transition to primary healthcare: implementation of the "Hub and Spoke" model and in-language resources. Analysis occurred at three time points: 1. Pre-Hep B PAST (2018); 2. Foundation step (2020); and 3. Completion of Hep B PAST (2023). Evaluation focuses on four key indicators, the number of people: 1) with documented HBV status; 2) diagnosed with CHB; 3) receiving care; and 4) receiving treatment. Findings: Hep B PAST (2018-23) reached 40,555 people. HBV status was documented in 11% (1192/10,853), 79.2% (26,075/32,915) and 90.8% (28,675/31,588) of people at pre-Hep B PAST, foundation step, and completion respectively. An estimated 99.9% (821/822) of people were diagnosed, 86.3% (709/822) engaged in care, and 24.1% (198/822) on antiviral treatment at completion. CHB prevalence in the study population is 2.6%, decreasing from 6.1% to 0.4% in the pre- and post-vaccination cohorts. Interpretation: Hep B PAST is an effective model of care. Partner health services are exceeding elimination targets. This model could enable other countries to enhance the cascade of care and work towards eliminating HBV. Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Highly effective hepatitis C therapies are available in Australia. However, people living with hepatitis C face various barriers to accessing care and treatment. AIMS: To identify gaps in the cascade of care for hepatitis C and generate estimates of the number living with untreated infection according to population group, using a representative longitudinal study population. METHODS: We linked hepatitis C notification data from Victoria to national pathology, prescribing and death registry data. We assessed receipt of key clinical services in a large cohort who tested positive for hepatitis C from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2016, with follow-up to 30 June 2018. We estimated the number still living with hepatitis C, adjusting for spontaneous clearance and mortality. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 45 391 people positive for hepatitis C. Of these, 13 346 (29%) received treatment and an estimated 28% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26-30%) were still living with chronic infection at 30 June 2018, with the remainder still living following spontaneous clearance (30%, 95% CI: 29-32%) or having died (12%, 95% CI: 12-12%). Half (50%) of those still living with hepatitis C were born from 1965 to 1980, and 74% first tested positive before 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an enabling policy environment and subsidised therapy, many people in this cohort were not treated. Increased measures may be needed to engage people in care, including those who acquired hepatitis C more than 10 years ago.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Victoria/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/therapy , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Longitudinal Studies , Registries , Young Adult , Information Storage and Retrieval , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Health Services AccessibilityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the associations between invasive group A streptococcal disease (iGAS) incidence and influenza, varicella, and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: We used individual-level linked data of iGAS cases from Victoria, Australia (2007-2017) to assess associations between these viral infections and iGAS. A self-controlled case series method was used to estimate the relative incidence of iGAS following an influenza or varicella infection, while the relative incidence of iGAS among HCV cases, and HCV cases who inject drugs, was estimated using population-level data and a negative binomial regression model. RESULTS: Of the 1949 individuals with at least one iGAS diagnosis, 82 were diagnosed with influenza at least once, 30 with varicella, and 118 with HCV during the study period. The relative incidence of iGAS increased substantially following infection with influenza (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 34.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.3-55.8) or varicella (IRR: 22.4, 95% CI: 10.3-48.8). iGAS incidence was higher among HCV cases (IRR: 5.7, 95% CI: 4.4-7.3) compared to individuals without HCV. iGAS incidence was also higher among HCV cases who inject drugs (IRR: 17.9, 95% CI: 13.0-24.4) compared to individuals without HCV who did not inject drugs. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significantly higher risk of iGAS following an influenza or varicella infection and for chronic HCV cases, particularly those who inject drugs. These findings are relevant to public health practice and support the timely identification of iGAS cases.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Influenza, Human , Streptococcal Infections , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Humans , Victoria/epidemiology , Hepacivirus , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Chickenpox/complications , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Streptococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcal Infections/epidemiology , Streptococcus pyogenes , Incidence , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis C virus treatment uptake varies by geographic area in Australia; however, analysis has not been conducted on variations in treatment completion. This study investigated treatment completion according to remoteness, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claim data from March 2016 to June 2019. Treatment was considered completed if all prescriptions required to complete the course were dispensed. Treatment completion was compared by remoteness of residence, sex, age, state or territory, treatment duration and prescriber type. RESULTS: Of 68,940 patients, 85.6% completed treatment, although the completion rate decreased over time. Residents living in very remote areas had the lowest treatment completion rate (74.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39, 0.7; P < 0.005), particularly those treated by general practitioners (GPs; 66.7%; OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.97; P = 0.042). DISCUSSION: This analysis suggests that people in very remote areas of Australia have the lowest hepatitis C treatment completion rate, particularly those accessing treatment through GPs. Further investigation into predictors of low treatment completion within these populations is required.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Australia/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , DemographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aimed to assess utilization of health-care services in people with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and a "late diagnosis" of hepatitis B or hepatitis C. METHODS: Hepatitis B and C cases during 1997-2016 in Victoria, Australia, were linked with hospitalizations, deaths, liver cancer diagnoses, and medical services. A late diagnosis was defined as hepatitis B or hepatitis C notification occurring after, at the same time, or within 2 years preceding an HCC/DC diagnosis. Services provided during the 10-year period before HCC/DC diagnosis were assessed, including general practitioner (GP) or specialist visits, emergency department presentations, hospital admissions, and blood tests. RESULTS: Of the 25 766 notified cases of hepatitis B, 751 (2.9%) were diagnosed with HCC/DC, and hepatitis B was diagnosed late in 385 (51.3%). Of 44 317 cases of hepatitis C, 2576 (5.8%) were diagnosed with HCC/DC, and hepatitis C was diagnosed late in 857 (33.3%). Although late diagnosis dropped over time, missed opportunities for timely diagnosis were observed. Most people diagnosed late had visited a GP (97.4% for hepatitis B, 98.9% for hepatitis C) or had a blood test (90.9% for hepatitis B, 88.6% for hepatitis C) during the 10 years before HCC/DC diagnosis. The median number of GP visits was 24 and 32, and blood tests 7 and 8, for hepatitis B and C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Late diagnosis of viral hepatitis remains a concern, with the majority having frequent health-care service provision in the preceding period, indicating missed opportunities for diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis B virus , Hepacivirus , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the cascade of care for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and estimate impacts of increasing treatment uptake on attributable burden, according to jurisdiction. METHODS: A mathematical model of CHB in Australia was utilised, combined with notifiable disease and Medicare data. We estimated the proportion with CHB who were diagnosed, engaged in care and receiving treatment in each state/territory, and projected future mortality. RESULTS: The highest uptake of all measures was in New South Wales, however, the largest increase over time occurred in Northern Territory. No jurisdiction is due to meet 2022 targets of treatment uptake or mortality reduction. Previously declining mortality is predicted to plateau or increase in all jurisdictions except Northern Territory. The largest gap in the cascade of care was most commonly diagnosed individuals not engaged in care; however, in Victoria and Tasmania it was lack of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of the cascade of care varied substantially between jurisdictions; while all require improvements to reduce mortality, the specific gaps vary, as do potential impacts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Improving the cascade of care for CHB will require jurisdictionally tailored approaches. If improvements are not made, more deaths will occur due to CHB in most states and territories.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis B, Chronic , Aged , Humans , Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/therapy , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , National Health Programs , New South Wales , Northern Territory , TasmaniaABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Australia is nearly 1%. In certain well defined groups the prevalence is far greater, yet an estimated 27% of people living with HBV infection remain undiagnosed. Appropriate screening improves detection, increases opportunity for treatment, and ultimately reduces the significant morbidity and mortality associated with the development of liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: This statement highlights important aspects of HBV infection management in Australia. There have been recent changes in nomenclature and understanding of natural history, as well as a newly defined upper limit of normal for liver tests that determine phase classification and threshold for antiviral treatment. As the main burden of hepatitis B in Australia is within migrant and Indigenous communities, early identification and management of people living with hepatitis B is essential to prevent adverse outcomes including liver cancer and cirrhosis. CHANGE IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS GUIDELINE: These recommendations aim to raise awareness of the current management of hepatitis B in Australia. Critically, the timely identification of individuals living with hepatitis B, and where appropriate, commencement of antiviral therapy, can prevent the development of cirrhosis, HCC and mother-to-child transmission as well as hepatitis B reactivation in immunocompromised individuals. Recognising patient and viral factors that predispose to the development of cirrhosis and HCC will enable clinicians to risk-stratify and appropriately implement surveillance strategies to prevent these complications of hepatitis B.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Hepatitis B , Liver Neoplasms , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Australia/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Consensus , Female , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/etiology , Liver Cirrhosis/prevention & control , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Viral hepatitis remains one of the most significant health issues globally, directly responsible for over 1 million deaths each year and affecting almost 300 million people around the world. Scientific research in recent decades has brought about improvements in the lives of people living with chronic viral hepatitis. On the 29 July 2021, the Australian Centre for Hepatitis Virology (ACHV) for the first time held a public educational forum for the general public. The main aim of this event was to inform the affected community about the importance of scientific research and give an overview of upcoming developments in the field. Here, we provide a detailed report of the panel discussion (including its organisation, execution, and lessons learned to incorporate into future events) and provide strategies that can be used by other scientific societies to hold similar events in their own communities.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Community-Institutional Relations , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C , Australia , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis B virus , HumansSubject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/economics , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Australia/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Fibrosis/economics , Fibrosis/epidemiology , Fibrosis/prevention & control , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/economics , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/prevention & control , Mass Screening/standards , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Worse outcomes from invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) have been reported among those coinfected with hepatitis C. We aimed to establish if IPD notification rates are higher among people notified with markers of hepatitis C virus infection than the general population. METHODS: IPD cases notified in Victoria, Australia, from July 2001-December 2017 were linked with hepatitis C cases (diagnosed by serology or PCR testing) notified from January 1991-December 2017. IPD incidence was calculated using population data and the estimated number of Victorians with hepatitis C. RESULTS: From July 2001-December 2017, 6407 IPD cases were notified. Hepatitis C infection was notified in 342 (5.3%) of IPD cases overall, and 24.4% among IPD cases aged 45-49 years. Among IPD cases also notified with hepatitis C, 55.3% were infected with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine serotypes and 82.8% with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine serotypes. Compared with IPD cases without hepatitis C, IPD cases also notified with hepatitis C were younger (mean age, 45.7 vs 49.4 years; P = .011) and more often male (65.5% vs 55.5%, P < .001). Annual IPD notification incidence was 6.8/100 000 among people without hepatitis C and 39.4/100 000 among people with hepatitis C (IRR, 5.8; 95% CI, 5.2-6.4; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: IPD notification incidence was 5 times higher among people notified with markers of hepatitis C than the general population. Pneumococcal vaccination should be offered to people with markers of hepatitis C virus infection. To facilitate appropriate treatment, young and middle-aged adults with IPD should be tested for hepatitis C.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , Pneumococcal Infections , Adult , Female , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Victoria/epidemiologySubject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Personnel, Hospital , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Hospital Departments , Hospitals, University , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Male , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease pandemic was declared in March 2020, as the southern hemisphere's winter approached. Australia expected co-circulation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses. However, influenza notifications were 7,029 (March-September) compared with an average 149,832 for the same period in 2015-2019 [corrected], despite substantial testing. Restrictions on movement within and into Australia may have temporarily eliminated influenza. Other respiratory pathogens also showed remarkably changed activity in 2020.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Population Surveillance , SARS-CoV-2 , Seasons , Sentinel SurveillanceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is effective and can substantially reduce the risk of progressive liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma but is often administered for an indefinite duration. Adherence has been shown in clinical trials to maximize the benefit of therapy and prevent the development of resistance, however the optimal threshold for predicting clinical outcomes has not been identified. The aim of this study was to analyse adherence using the medication possession ration (MPR) and its relation to virological outcomes in a large multi-centre hospital outpatient population, and guide development of an evidence-based threshold for optimal adherence. METHODS: Pharmacy and pathology records of patients dispensed CHB antiviral therapy from 4 major hospitals in Melbourne between 2010 and 2013 were extracted and analysed to determine their MPR and identify instances of unfavourable viral outcomes. Viral outcomes were classified categorically, with unfavourable outcomes including HBV DNA remaining detectable after 2 years treatment or experiencing viral breakthrough. The association between MPR and unfavourable outcomes was assessed according to various thresholds using ROC analysis and time-to-event regression. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-two individuals were included in the analysis. Median age was 46.6 years, 68% were male, 77% were born in Asia, and the median time on treatment was 27.5 months. The majority had favourable viral outcomes (91.06%), with most having undetectable HBV DNA at the end of the study period. The most common unfavourable outcome was a rise of < 1 log in HBV DNA (6.54% of the total), while 2.49% of participants experienced viral breakthrough. Adherence was linearly associated with favourable outcomes, with increasing risk of virological breakthrough as MPR fell. Decreasing the value of MPR, at which a cut-point was taken, was associated with a progressively larger reduction in the rate of unfavourable event; from a 60% reduction under a cut-point of 1.00 to a 79% reduction when the MPR cut-point was set at 0.8. CONCLUSION: Lower adherence as measured using the MPR was strongly associated with unfavourable therapeutic outcomes, including virological failure. Optimising adherence is therefore important for preventing viral rebound and potential complications such as antiviral resistance. The evidence of dose-response highlights the need for nuanced interventions.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B virus/drug effects , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hepatitis B, Chronic/blood , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sustained Virologic Response , Time Factors , Viral Load/drug effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an enhanced viral hepatitis surveillance program on data completeness and on epidemiological assessment of affected populations. METHODS: Notified cases of non-acute hepatitis B and C were analysed to determine demographic characteristics and risk factors during the period prior to July 2015-June 2016, and during enhanced surveillance of the period July 2016-June 2017, during which time doctors were contacted for information about new diagnoses. RESULTS: During the enhanced period, completeness for country of birth and Indigenous status doubled for both hepatitis B and hepatitis C, from 18-37% to 48-65%. The incidence ratio of hepatitis C among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people increased from eight-fold to 11.4-fold, and the proportion of hepatitis B cases reported as born in China and Vietnam relative to other countries increased. New data fields identified that 12% of hepatitis C diagnoses occurred in a correctional facility, and 2% of hepatitis B cases were healthcare workers. CONCLUSIONS: Improved data completeness highlighted the underlying epidemiology of chronic viral hepatitis, demonstrating the increased burden of infection among specific priority populations. Implications for public health: Enhanced surveillance provides greater insight into the epidemiology of chronic viral hepatitis, identifying groups at risk and opportunities for public health action.