Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Nurs Manag ; 26(1): 59-65, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28744987

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of modified brief assertiveness training (with cognitive techniques) for nurses. BACKGROUND: Most assertiveness training takes a long time to conduct; thus, briefer training is required for universal on-the-job training in the workplace. METHODS: In this single-group study, nurses received two 90-min training sessions with a 1-month interval between sessions. The degree of assertiveness was assessed by using the Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as the primary outcome, at four time points: pre- and post-training, 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 33 nurses received the training, and the mean Rathus Assertiveness Schedule score improved from -14.2 (SD = 16.5) pre-training to -10.5 (SD = 18.0) post-training (p < .05). These improvements were maintained until the 6-month follow-up. The pre-post effect size of 0.22 (indicating small effect) was larger than the effect sizes ranging from -0.56 to 0.17 (no effect) reported in previous studies that used brief training. CONCLUSIONS: Modified brief assertiveness training seems feasible and may achieve long-term favourable outcomes in improving assertiveness among nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The ease of implementation of assertiveness training is important because creating an open environment for communication leads to improved job satisfaction, improved nursing care and increased patient safety.


Subject(s)
Assertiveness , Nurses/psychology , Teaching/standards , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching/psychology , Workplace/psychology
2.
Ir J Psychol Med ; 32(2): 187-195, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30185244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Training in cognitive behavioural psychotherapy (CBT) is expensive both for the students and their funding bodies. OBJECTIVES: It is important to know how graduates of CBT courses are putting their skills to use, and whether they are continuously updating those skills to achieve best practice. We also wanted to discover the similarities and differences between CBT trainees in the United Kingdom and in the Republic of Ireland (courses in the United Kingdom being analogous to those in Ireland in content and participants). METHOD: An internet survey, derived from previous postal questionnaires, was used to enquire into the practice, experience, and continuing professional development of graduates from the CBT courses at Trinity College Dublin. RESULTS: Most MDT professions were represented in the graduates, preponderantly psychiatrists and mental health nurses, but also including social workers and occupational therapists. Most participants believed that the course had enhanced their careers, and almost half had changed job since graduating. Half said that CBT was now the main focus of their job, but others reported lack of resources, funding, time, and other duties impeded their ability to conduct CBT with clients. However, most participants engaged in continuous professional development regarding CBT, and received CBT clinical supervision. Discussion There was a difference in the proportion of the different professions undertaking this course compared with the United Kingdom and our response rate here was significantly lower. As in UK surveys, participants who may have been supported and funded to undertake the training may not afterwards be supported in implementing their skills in the workplace. The broader implications of this are discussed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...